EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

La PAC et développement rural

Version imprimable
Send by email
Publié 22 juillet 2003, mis à jour 29 janvier 2010

L'élargissement confirme le soutien en faveur du développement rural dans l'UE.

Afficher sur une seule page

Résumé

The main aims of the new EU rural development policy are:

  • to improve agricultural holdings,
  • to guarantee the safety and quality of foodstuffs,
  • to ensure fair and stable incomes for farmers,
  • to ensure that environmental issues are taken into account,
  • to develop complementary and alternative activities that generate employment, with a view to slowing the depopulation of the countryside and strengthening the economic and social fabric of rural areas,
  • to improve living and working conditions and promote equal opportunities.

Between 4,300 and 4,370 million euro is allocated each year to rural development during the period 2000-06. These measures are financed by the EAGGF Guarantee Section or Guidance Section.

The following rural development measures are supported by the EAGGF:

  • early retirement,
  • less-favoured areas,
  • agri-environment measures,
  • afforestation of farmland,
  • renovation and development of villages,
  • protection and conservation of rural heritage,
  • diversification of farm activities,  
  • improvement of infrastructure.

Enjeux

A new policy for rural development was introduced as the second pillar of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in the framework of Agenda 2000 in March 1999. Agenda 2000 reformed the CAP in view of the expected enlargement to largely rural countries, such as Poland, Bulgaria or Romania.

The EU proposes reinforced rural development measures, as support for semi-subsistence farms, for the candidate countries, so that they can reap the benefit of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) even before they meet the EU production standards. Whilst Central and East European countries are only offered 25-35 per cent direct payments from the CAP budget from 2004 to 2006, reaching 100 per cent in 2013, the new members will receive higher rural development subsidies which will help them stabilise farm incomes.

Down

Réactions

The Commission argues that a better balance of support between market policy and rural development will increase both the social acceptability of the CAP and the possibility to address consumer, environmental and animal welfare concerns within the second pillar (rural development).

The European Parliament adopted two resolutions on in May 2002, calling for the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to be preserved, and for a major shift towards support for sustainable rural development. The two resolutions call for a new, third pillar for the CAP to ensure food quality and safety. They also demand full powers for the European Parliament over the CAP and the agriculture budget. Both resolutions call for more resources to be shifted from market support, which currently accounts for about 90 per cent of the CAP budget, to rural development. The Fiori Resolution also calls for an incomes policy to keep farmers on the land throughout the EU. It calls on the Commission to draft proposals for the post-2006 period aimed at making direct income support part of rural development policy.

The AgriCultural Convention has called on the European Convention to lay the foundations of a Common Agricultural and Rural Policy in the treaties. The AgriCultural Convention has "serious concerns about the negative side effects of the current CAP, and particularly its centrally controlled productivist focus". A new Common Agricultural and Rural Policy (CARP) should be based on the principles of sustainable development, democratic accountability, and should be clearly identified as a community policy. CARP should also enable developing countries fair access to Western markets and development of food security within their own. The AgriCultural Convention proposes that the current WTO round should advocate an integrated approach to rural development and sustainable farming practices across the world.

The biggest EU farmers associations COPA and COGECA say that the Commissions proposals for the CAP mid-term review "completely undermine the commitments made by the European Council when it decided Agenda 2000 at the Berlin Summit". COPA and COGECA consider that the current CAP reform model "is leading to a split between market concerns ("first pillar") on the one hand and ecological and rural development ("second pillar") on the other, with the risk of farms being segregated in a similar way".

Dates clés

A thorough reform of the CAP is not expected before 2006 when the EU should adopt its next multi-annual budgetary plan (2007-2013). The next reform will thus also involve the new Member States from Central and Eastern Europe.  

Liens externes

Publicité

Vidéos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 4

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Publicité

Publicité