EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

La répression de la corruption en Roumanie est-elle insuffisante ?

Publié 06 juin 2008
Version imprimableSend by email

Malgré les rapports maintenant réguliers de Bucarest sur une série d'actes de répression de cas de corruption mineure, des responsables politiques de haut niveau dans l'UE semblent insensibles à ces enquêtes. Cette situation implique qu'un rapport de surveillance crucial de la Commission sur la corruption en Roumanie, prévu en juillet, pourrait être encore accablant.

Romania's action plan to eradicate rampant corruption in the country is displayed as a top priority by the government but the latest national anti-corruption report mainly relates minor criminal cases. It notably gives accounts of numerous examples of policemen subjected to bribery having refused large sums of money in exchange for "favourable solutions". 

Bucharest also reports intensive campaigning against corruption via posters and advertising. These, according to the Romanian authorities, have resulted in better transparency and an improvement in the quality of the services provided to the citizen. 

However such statistics on petty crime indictments and ad campaigns may not be sufficient to meet Brussels' expectations for the country to conform to European standards. Commission spokesman Mark Gray said recently that "what we don't see is prosecutions, particularly in the area of high-level corruption". 

The Romanian constitutional court recently ruled that all investigations of high-ranking politicians must first get approval from Parliament. This move has since led to legal action being dropped against five top level politicians, including former Prime Minister Adrian Nastase. 

Romanian President Traian Basescu reacted with anger, calling the constitutional court "a shield for corruption". This could have been an important test case for the country to show its commitment to the judicial reforms demanded by Brussels, but commentators believe that Romania's political class will never relinquish its immunity from prosecution. 

Réactions : 

Monica Macovei, formerly Romanian Justice Minister, said corruption is ongoing in the country, pointing out that all the major mayors running for office in the country's recent local elections have at one time been indicted for public corruption. 

At a discussion organised by the European Policy Centre, she underlined that even though Romanian government members and some high-ranking politicians were indicted for corruption and fraud, the judges keep postponing the hearings. 

Macovei also pointed out at regress since Romania joined the EU. In 2006, in the run-up to EU membership, the government passed anti-corruption measures under which bankrupt companies would not be eligible for state aid. However, immediately after EU accession, an emergency ordinance was passed which suspended aspects of this law for 28 named companies, she said. 

The new Justice Minister Catalin Marian Predoiu was quoted by the Times as stating recently in London: "It is fair to say that reforms lost speed". He added: "But we have a new attitude now: we really want to solve this problem." 

The minister believes he has good accounts of progress on three of the four benchmarks set by the Commission: on a new legal framework (writing the new civil and criminal codes); setting up a National Agency for Integrity; and reforming local bureaucracy to squeeze out small-scale corruption. 

Prochaines étapes : 
  • 16 Jul. 2008: Commission expected to publish its latest report on the post-accession monitoring of Bulgaria and Romania.
Contexte : 

Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU in January 2007 under precise conditions. There are three areas where the EU may invoke safeguard measures against them, according to their Accession Treaties: economic, internal market and judicial reforms. 

The safeguard clause can be invoked up to three years after accession and could result for example in food export bans or cuts in EU funds in areas such as agriculture and "structural" policies (EurActiv 05/02/08). 

More in this section

Publicité