EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Les eurodéputés allègent les règles de retard de paiement pour les hôpitaux

Publié 30 avril 2010 - Mis à jour 23 décembre 2011
Étiquettes
late payments SMEs
Version imprimableSend by email

Les hôpitaux se verront accorder 60 jours pour régler leurs factures après qu'une commission clé du Parlement européen a voté l'exemption des services de santé des nouvelles règles sévères qui obligent les autorités publiques à payer leurs factures dans un délai de 30 jours.

The Parliament's Internal Market Committee agreed government bodies should have just 30 days to pay invoices.

For business-to-business transactions, companies will be expected to pay within 30 days but can agree on a payment period of up to 60 days in certain cases.

This is a major departure from the original proposal by the EU executive, which had initially focused exclusively on payments by public institutions, leaving the private sector free to negotiate their own contractual terms.

Under the revised version drafted by German Socialist MEP Barbara Weiler, those failing to pay in time will pay penal interest rates "at least 9%" higher than the statutory rate. This would typically mean paying double-digit interest as well as fixed fee of €40 compensation for recovery costs. 

A number of MEPs wanted the health sector omitted from the recast of the Late Payments Directive – a revamped piece of legislation designed to ease cash flow problems for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

However, a late compromise means public hospitals will have twice as long to pay private contractors as other government bodies do.

Small health firms in the private sector, many of which rely on public hospitals as their major clients, have lobbied for changes to the Late Payments Directive, claiming they can wait for up to two years for payment (EurActiv 10/07/09).

Last-minute compromises effectively mean public and private hospitals will be able to keep contractors waiting for two months for payment. There was concern that if public and private hospitals were working under different payment rules it would distort competition in the health sector.

While health authorities in several member states are already paying quicker than 60 days after receiving invoices, southern European countries will struggle to tighten payment periods.

The worst offenders in late payments in the health sector have been Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal – none of which have the cash to pay contractors more quickly than is current practice.

There were also some on the Internal Market Committee pushing for exemptions for the childcare and elderly care sectors, but the majority decided this was not justified.

The directive will also apply to the EU institutions, which have come under fire in the past from the European Ombudsman for delays in settling bills (EurActiv 28/04/09). 

It now falls to the European Council to debate the revised directive put forward by the Internal Market Committee. Member states are hesitant to back strict rules that might jeopardise companies' freedom to contract.

MEPs believe the compromises agreed yesterday (28 April), which give considerable leeway to the private sector to negotiate terms that suit both parties, could be enough to win support from some governments.

Réactions : 

German Socialist MEP Barbara Weiler, rapporteur on the Late Payments Directive for the Internal Market Committee, said she hoped the revised draft would pass at first reading. She called on MEPs and European governments not to lose sight of the motivation behind revising the rules on late payments.

"SMEs are the reason for this directive. We should not forget that the whole point is to help SMEs improve their liquidity and give them more stability," she said.

Weiler said the European Commission's original plan to impose a 5% up-front penalty on late payers had been dropped in favour of a higher rate of interest on delayed payments. This, she said, was a compromise the Commission made because of the importance it attaches to getting a recast version of the directive through the legislature.

Eurochambres Secretary General Arnaldo Abruzzinisaid it is important that the directive focuses on guaranteeing prompt payments rather than "defining contractual payment terms in business-to-business relations".

"Late payments are a scourge for many businesses, particularly SMEs, and unfair commercial practices and market abuse must be tackled effectively. However, the notion that fixing a maximum payment period will help achieve this is absurd and, frankly, ill-informed," he said.

He said public authorities are at the hart of the late payment culture in many member states but businesses should continue to enjoy flexibility when negotiating their contracts and should not be limited to maximum payment periods.

"Eurochambres thus rejects the extension of payment limits to business-to-business relations as contained in the report on the recast Late Payments Directive adopted by the European Parliament's IMCO committee," Abruzzini said.

The European Builders Confederation, which represents crafts and SMEs in the construction sector, strongly welcomed the vote which it says reflects the parliament's commitment to protect SMEs from unfair late payments by public administrations and other businesses.

The EBC president, Andrea Marconi, said the support shown by MEPs for Barbara Weiler's report is a "strong warning" to the European Council.  "The Parliament’s committee decided to put into practice the principles and the commitments of the Small Business Act and of the Recovery Plan. It is now to the member states to live up to their engagement and adopt an improved late payments directive," he said.

Marconi added that late payments by public authorities discourages SMEs from accessing public procurement tenders and that large companies frequently impose "unfair payment conditions" on small contractors.

Eucomed, the medical technology industry group, says it is disappointed with the approach taken by the committee. The emphasis of the original proposal which focused on late payments in the public sector has been completely changed, it says.

The industry body is also critical of the IMCO's decision to delete a clause which would have forced public authorities to pay a lump sum compensation to contractors who are not paid on time.

The introduction of limits of payment time in the business-to-business transactions does not appear to help SMEs, according to Eucomed.

John Wilkinson, Chief Executive of the medical technology group, said the amount of unpaid invoices across Europe in the medical devices sector if €11 billion and this could continue to rise.

 "It seems to me that this compromise steers clear of addressing the real issue of many public authorities ignoring the terms of contracts that they have signed. If the Council of Ministers confirms these changes we fear that the €11 billion of overdue payments will continue to enlarge and this will starve the industry of the resources needed to bring innovative treatments to patients," he said

Prochaines étapes : 
  • 30 April and 7 May: Council working group meets to discuss late payments directive
Contexte : 

Amending the Late Payments Directive was one of four legislative proposals contained in the Small Business Act (SBA; see EurActiv LinksDossier) in June 2008. 

The original directive was adopted in 2000 and is regarded as the least disputed element of the legal changes set out in the SBA.

The amendment was one of the key demands of SMEs, which highlighted the fact that smaller businesses run a higher risk of insolvency during the start-up phase. 

A full sitting of the European Parliament will vote on the updated directive before the summer.

A lire aussi

More in this section

Publicité

Sponsors

Publicité

Publicité