EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Northern Cypriot activists seek visibility in Brussels

Version imprimable
Send by email
Publié 27 juin 2012, mis à jour 28 juin 2012

Hundreds of people from Northern Cyprus are expected today (27 June) to dress as ghosts to protest what they say is the indifference of the European Union to the division of their island and the hardships in the Turkish region.

An organiser of the demonstration told EurActiv nearly 500 people are expected to show up dressed as “likeable, not scary ghosts.”

“The message is that we, from Northern Cyprus, are like ghosts because nobody sees us,” another organiser said.

Freshly arrived from the northern part of the divided island, the said they preferred to remain anonymous.

When the ghosts go marching in

The rally is expected to begin at mid-day in the Luxembourg Square outside the European Parliament with a parade of white-clad demonstrators marching towards the Schuman Circle where the Council and the Commission are located. 

The organisers didn’t make it a secret that they wanted to ride on the wave of interest around the forthcoming Cyprus EU presidency, and if possible, “steal the show”.

The demonstration leaders noted that the Northern Cypriots have no representation to the EU institutions, as all six Cypriot MEP seats are taken by politicians from the island’s south. They seek trade and tourism ties between Northern Cyprus and the EU, plus participation in international sporting competitions.

There are some 280,000 people in Northern Cyprus.

The rally, authorised by the Brussels authorities, is organised and financed by various Northern Cypriot NGOs, EurActiv was told. Many Northern Cypriots hold Republic of Cyprus or British passports, so the visa didn’t appear to be a problem. The charter flights took off from the Turkish city of Antalya, which is close to Cyprus.

Politically isolated

The northern part of Cyprus, occupied by Turkey since 1974, is politically isolated and is banned from direct trade with the EU. In a tit-for-tat response, Turkey bans ships and airplanes from the Republic of Cyprus, an EU member state which it does not recognise.

Ankara says it would allow opening the Northern Cyprus ports and airports only on the condition that the European Council decision of April 2004 is implemented.

Both Turkey and Northern Cyprus blame Nicosia for blocking the implementation of the 2004 decision to “economically integrate” the Turkish Cypriot community.

Asked if Turkey was behind the protest stunt, activists insisted that the interests of the Northern Cypriots and of Turkey often did not coincide. A majority of Northern Cypriots didn’t like the statements by Ankara that Turkey would consider annexing northern Cyprus, which is technically EU territory, if talks between Greek and Turkish Cypriots fail to reach a deal on reunification of the island, the protest representatives said.

Another message of the protestors appears to be that it would be unfair both on behalf of Nicosia and of the European Union to pretend that the Cyprus EU presidency is just “business as usual”.

Demonstrators also say that people in Northern Cyprus were worried that their southern counterparts were less and less interested in the reunification talks. They also said that in the long run, this development was pushing Northern Cyprus into the arms of Turkey.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • I would suggest the following revision to the news item, framing history slightly more accurateL

    "The northern part of Cyprus, occupied by Turkey since 1974, FOLLOWING A GREEK CYPRIOT COUP D'ETAT, is politically isolated and is banned from direct trade with the EU."

    By :
    kristian
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • @Kristian, the northern part of the island is "occupied" by Turkish Cypriots like my parents, grandparents and wider family who were forced out of their homes in South Cyprus during the conflict, which started in December 1963.

    Of course many others have come to live in the North too - just as in the South.

    Please do your research before you offer up suggested revisions of how we reference Cyprus history. We need balance not propaganda!

    By :
    Ipek
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • This is a turning point for the EU and its attitude towards Turkish Cypriots. They have been blanked out for too long. Thye EU effectively has been condoning and enforcing apartheid in Cyprus - one set of human rights for thr Greek Cypriots and a sub-standard set for Turkish Cypriots. North Cyprus ran its own democratically elected government since 1964 - why is the EU treating them like leppers? The have no right to trade, take part in cultural and sporting events, and are prevented from their right to representation. Any this treatment from the EU which always like to pretend that they stand for human rights?? Minorities like Turkish Cypriots should not be treated like this. see www. embargoed. org

    By :
    Freddie Zylestra
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • The only apartheid condoned and enforced in Cyprus is that of the fasist state of Turkey. What about my rights in the north? what about my property? what about my freedom of use of my religious sites? what about my right to trade and enterprise in the north? what about the ethnic cleancing that took place in the north by the mighty superpower Turkey? All these are forbiden by the occupier of the north. The audacity you have to speak of apartheid and human rights....

    By :
    Nicolas Margaritis
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • The legal and Internationally regognized Cyprus
    Government has not the power to isolate the Turkish
    Cypriots.
    Their isolation is due to the International Law,
    The rule of law with which Turkey was never in good
    terms is the one which does not recognize as
    independant entity the ilegally occupied North part
    of Cyprus by Turkey.
    This demonstration is carried out in a wrong place.

    By :
    Christos Eleftheriou
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • @ Nicolas, freedom to worship on both sides is restricted (e.g. go ask the Imam of the Larnaca Sultan Hale mosque). Greek Cypriots can get property back easier than Turkish Cypriot refugees - there is a property commission in the North, yet TCs who want property in South told to "wait for a solution". And ethnic cleansing starting in December 63 when GCs forced out many TCs including my family. Please ensure you reflect on ALL facts when posting and not simply go on some anti-Turk bashing mission!

    By :
    Ipek
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • @ Christos, it is true the Republic of Cyprus is the only internationally recognised entity on the island, but that was meant to be a power-sharing state, which collapsed in Dec 63. Since that time the GC-run RoC Govt has used its international status to block all types of rights & opportunities for TCs, from friendly football matches to direct trade with the EU.

    But not legal or morally acceptable for TCs to be left hostage to Cyprus politics. TCs have rights too and by going along with GC Govt veto, EU is violating TC rights & discriminating against own citizens. Alternative the EU says the EU border stops at Green Line and TCs are not their citizens. Which is best Christos?

    By :
    Ipek
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • The EU prides itself as a bastion of freedom,equality and human rights. The EU tells the Turkish Cypriots that they too are EU citizens and yet it denies the Turkish Cypriots freedom of direct travel and direct trade among other things. The ironic thing is that the same rights are not denied to the Greek Cypriots. The EU is no longer the bastion of freedom,equality or human rights. It is a shinning example of double standards.

    By :
    Kenan
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • to the fellows who used greek-sounding aliases:
    I don't blame an average person for repeating the propaganda that they hear on media. but facts are there.
    it is the greek-cypriot administration who broke the agreement they made with the turkish-cypriots and with turkey and started the ethnic cleansing against turkish-cypriots.
    even greek-cypriot membership in eu is violation of agreements that were signed among mentioned parties.
    turkey's intervention was its right as guarantor because the military regime in greece had started to take steps to annex the island to greece in cooperatin with greek-cypriot administration. the earlier agreements were to guarantee presence of an independent state on island with two equal parties.
    today greek-cypriots enjoy the power game in the region by playing one big power against another. their current status has nothing to do with legitimacy nor with justice.

    By :
    erc an
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • the dilemma out there which nobody wants to speak of is:
    the entity that broke its international agreements, ran ethnic cleansing against turkish-cypriots and terror against anybody who were against the enosis, is now considered legal representative of the whole island including turkish side.
    can anybody explain this by any thing else than the politically biased preference of permanent members of un security council. four of the permanent members have military presence on and around the island.
    and the ridiculous dilemma greek-cypriots accept to live with: you ask for compensation for your property that is left in the north. however, when you are told that you are allowed to go north and reclaim it, you avoid it on the basis that the entity in the north is an illegal entity. and worst of all, you people by majority rejected the annan plan in 2004 which was accepted by the turkish side. and you still point finger to the other side. don't you see the ridicule of your position? isn't it time to change yourselves?

    By :
    erc an
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • Ercan, you are right. Turkey invaded as a guarantor power, within the agreed constitution. What you fail to realise is that once peace and stability was restored, Turkey should leave. They haven't. Still till today, they illegally occupy Cyprus. And how can they refuse to recognise a state, which they guaranteed, which gave them the right to invade? And if Turkey is so vigorously defending the Turkish speaking Cypriots, then why don't they practise this in their own country and protect, not kill, the Kurds? In fact, the Kurds make up a much larger percentage of population than the TC's do in Cyprus. And no we can't get our properties back. That so called 'land commission' only pays compensation. And the Annan Plan was racist and pro -Turkish (fact, read the plan). Why would the GC's agree to a plan that will allow them in 15 years time to invest in the proposed 'TC State' in the plan? Don't you realise that Turkey is not your mother land? Can you put your hand on heart and tell me you even look like a Turk fro Turkey, or have the same mentality as them? You can't. Your mother land is 'Cyprus' and your president is 'Christofias'. Grow some balls as a minority and bring down the wall, and join your brothers in running your motherland, getting rid of the invader and illegal settlers.

    By :
    George Thomas
    - Posted on :
    27/06/2012
  • George, I totally agree with your views on the presence of Turkish troops in the island. You have to understand the the huge gap economic and infrastructural gap with the south and the north and proposed Annan plan sought to minimise this difference by establishing positive discrimination on proposed TCs state. This was vital for the survival of TCs within new state establishment. On the other hand, the number of TCs feel short of Turkish immigrants thanks to the open ports to the turkish immigrants and favourable work conditions in the north part which forced many TC people migrate to other parts of the world, mainly to the UK which harbors close to half million TC people. But TC people are not minority in any political terms. Any future solution will be constituted between equal political rights of the TCs and GCs in the island, so that GCs would rather stop seeing TCs as minority and get use to the idea of equal political representation which is the single most important factor to ensure long term solution.

    By :
    izzet
    - Posted on :
    28/06/2012
  • What are "Northern Cypriots"?

    80% of the native population of the north part of Cyprus are Greek Cypriots who have been ethnically cleansed by the Turkish army in 1974 and are not allowed to return to their homes.

    Today the majority of the population of the north part of Cyprus are Turkish Settlers which Turkey brought to our island after 1974 and gave to them the homes and properties of the Greek Cypriot refugees.

    Therefore the real "Northern Cypriots" are Greek Cypriot refugees, and indeed they seem to be invisible to those who want to assist the Turkish expansionism against Cyprus.

    In 1974 Turkish army ethnically cleansed the majority of Cypriots from north Cyprus, replaced them with Turkish settlers, and declared the "trnc" on our land.

    By :
    Andreas Nikolaides
    - Posted on :
    29/06/2012
  • Andreas, I am neither GC nor TC, but I just cannot accept your bull... (being economical with truth). Please consult a reliable vocabulary on the meaning of "ethnic cleansing" and be more careful when calling "our land" what is or should be the land of all Cypriots regardless of their ethnicity.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    29/06/2012
A 'likeable', not scary ghost
Contexte : 

The division of Cyprus represents one of the most difficult issues of modern times. Despite repeated efforts under the auspices of the UN to bring the leaders of the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities to the negotiating table, the island has remained divided since 1974. 

Hopes for reunification were raised in 2002 when then-UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan suggested a two-part federation with a rotating presidency. 

In an April 2004 referendum, the Greek Cypriots rejected - and the Turkish Cypriots approved - a UN-sponsored unity plan. The plan's failure disappointed EU officials, who had agreed to allow Cyprus to join the EU that year partly in the hope that doing so would encourage a solution. In May 2004, the Greek Cypriot-controlled 'Republic of Cyprus' became a full member of the EU.

At their December 2004 summit, EU leaders agreed to open accession talks with Turkey on 3 October 2005. One of the conditions specified was for Ankara to extend a 1963 association agreement with the EU's predecessor, the European Economic Community, to the Union's 10 new member states. This group includes the Greek Cypriot state, which is not recognised by Turkey.

In July 2005, Turkey signed a protocol extending its customs union to the EU-10 states, but at the same time Ankara issued a declaration saying that its signature did not mean it had recognised the Republic of Cyprus. Turkey also refused to open its ports and airports to Cyprus, as it claims the EU has fallen short of having direct trade with the unrecognised northern part of the island.

More in this section

Publicité

Vidéos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Publicité

Publicité