EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Macedonia warms to Greek name solution initiative

Version imprimable
Send by email
Publié 08 novembre 2012

Skopje has made a promising opening to Greece by reacting favourably to a proposal aimed at resolving the long-standing name dispute between the countries.

A letter from Macedonian Foreign Minister Nikola Poposki to his Greek counterpart Dimitris Avramopoulos was given to Greek authorities on 6 November in Athens, one month after Greece tabled a proposal aimed at a solution.

In an unusual move, the letter was made public and welcomes the Greek intention to move the issue “decisively forward”, reflecting a potentially positive course.

The letter was given to Greek Deputy Foreign Minister Dimitris Kourkoulas, who recently joined his country’s foreign service. Kourkoulas is an experienced diplomat who had previously worked for the European Commission.

Poposki insists that the Greek proposal for the two countries to sign a memorandum as a basis to unblock the name issue has come as a response to initiatives from Macedonia, an EU candidate. Greece has long objected to the unqualified use of "Macedonia" because of its own province of the same name.

Enlargement Commissioner Štefan Füle has lately pressured both sides to solve their differences. From the European Commission’s perspective, there is a need to lift the Greek veto for Macedonia to begin EU accession talks, and put the country on a more stable track in light of growing ethnic tensions in the former Yugoslav republic.

The Commission issued a recommendation to start accession negotiations with Macedonia in December 2005. Without the Greek veto Macedonia - at least in theory - could have wrapped up the negotiations. Croatia, another former Yugoslav republic, started accession negotiations in 2005, completed them in 2011 and is due to join the EU on 1 July 2013.

Greece plans ambitious EU presidency

The Greek political thinking has apparently evolved lately. The country has ambitious plans for the Western Balkans during its EU presidency in the first half of 2014. On 5 October, Avramopoulos sent a letter to Poposki with a proposal for a bilateral memorandum as a basis for finding a solution to the name dispute.

On this basis, the Commission has a plan according to which Skopje could start accession negotiations even before a resolution of the name dispute with Greece is found. In its recently published 2012 enlargement strategy paper, it calls for finding a solution to the name dispute at “an early stage of the accession negotiations”.

In his letter to Avramopoulos, Poposki repeats many formulations used previously by his Greek colleague regarding improving mutual confidence, promoting neighborliness and strengthening bilateral cooperation.

“I hope you will also agree with the recent assessment of the European Commission that a decision of the European Council to open accession negotiations would contribute to creating the conditions conductive to finding a solution to the name issue, under the auspices of the United Nations," the letter says.

"It is our firm desire to overcome the difference over the name. This will benefit both countries and the region as a whole. Starting from this shared vision, I welcome the intention, expressed in your letter, to move the talks on the difference over name decisively forward,” Poposki wrote.

United Nations special mediator Matthew Nimetz, a US diplomat, is mediationg between Skopje and Athens over the name dispute.

According to various reports, a compromise to the name would contain a “geographical qualifier” given that Macedonia is a geographical region that overlaps the territories of Greece, Bulgaria and the former Yugoslav republic.

Diplomats have been speculating whether “Northern Macedonia” or “Upper Macedonia” could be acceptable to both sides.

Bulgaria spoils the party?

The auspicious diplomatic exchange may be dimmed by statements from Bulgarian President Rossen Plevneliev, who told Füle last week that Macedonia is “not ready” to start accession negotiations. Plevneliev’s positions were repeated during Füle's meetings at government level.

As the Commission wants to table the proposal for starting negotiations with Macedonia at the 13 December EU summit, Füle visited Bulgaria in a bid to clarify the government's position with respect to Macedonia, and learned that Skopje could count with a Bulgarian veto.

Bulgarian officials at various levels have accused Skopje of stealing from Bulgaria's history, manipulating historical facts, discriminating against Macedonian citizens with Bulgarian citizenship and badmouthing the neighbouring country.

Commission officials are trying to figure out how serious the Bulgarian veto threat is, EurActiv was told. Bulgaria is holding parliamentary elections next summer and a “firm position” vis-à-vis Skopje appears to have the support of the majority of the Bulgarians.

The Commission said it welcomed the exchange of correspondence between “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and Greece. 

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Who writes these articles for EurActive? It seems that the author is quite biased. The author writes "In an unusual move, the letter was made public" and then has links later on in the article to the Greek proposal. There is nothing unusual about making the letter or memorandum public - the Greek foreign ministry made theirs public the day they sent it to the Macedonian foreign ministry.

    EurActive needs objective reporting.

    By :
    Meto Koloski
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • The Macedonian Prime Minister asked for direct meetings with modern Greece years ago and they've now responded. So its Macedonian initiative NOT modern Greece's.

    Oddly no mention of modern Greece's denial of basic Human Rights to its indigenous minorities such as Macedonians mentioned in this article. I'd expect a more through piece about the name issue with some context as to why modern Greece's nationalism has caused problems with all of its neighbors

    By :
    trajko Papuckoski
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • The extreme nationalism coming from the the "modern" nation of the former Yugoslavia Republic (officially known as Vardar prior to Tito's renaming in 1944) needs to be addressed not just the name.

    The issue isn't just the name. The name is just a signifier for the deeper issue is FYROM ultra nationalist using a name to usurp Greek history (see giant Alexander states, stadiums, airports, etc.. etc.. and sudden identity quick change into "descendents of ancient Macedonians" while their apologists dishonestly pretend not to notice to hide their shame for supporting them) They abuse the name to insinuate Macedonia Greece and other regional states are "occupied". (what they frame as "united Macedonia")
    r
    While it is easy for FYROM's apologists in non-neighbouing nations to "generously" support them (because they don't have to constantly deal with their bizarre attempts to usurp their own identity, history or deal with maps showing large portions of their own nation's annexed to another - see Chamberlain) this behavior by FYROM is clearly not "good neighbourly" relations.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpFQUH_9VPA

    The fact of the matter is there is not a single "ethnic Macedonian" in the former Yugoslavia. The "ethnic Macedonian" identity has been created 100% by assimilation and state propaganda. Prior to 1944 the majority of its inhabitants freely self-identified as ethnic Bulgarians (and to lessor degree Serbs) Prior to Yugoslav communists references to "Macedonians" were primarily in a regional sense. For instance all of FYROM's alleged "Macedonian' heroes (Misirkov Delchev, Gruev, Tatarchev and even IMRO were from an a self-admitted ethnic Bulgarian background)

    This is why FYROM has poor relations with all its neighbours. Not just the name of the "modern" nation of the former Yugoslavia Republic needs to be addressed but the new "ancient macedonian" identity that has been fabricated with state propaganda has to be addressed.

    'The idea that Alexander the Great belongs to us was at the mind of some outsider groups only. These groups were insignificant in the first years of our independence. But the big problem is that the old Balkan nations have been learned to legitimize themselves through their history. In the Balkans to be recognized as a nation you need to have history of 2,000 to 3,000 years old. Since you (Greece ) forced us to invent a history, we did invent it.' - FYROM Foreign Minister Denko Maleski - 1991 to 1993
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlDLmufGHqQ&feature=related

    "We are Slavs who came to this area in the sixth century ... We are not descendants of the ancient Macedonians" - Kiro Gligorov, FYROM's first President
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBB8UjOHG_8

    By :
    Demetri
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • 20 years to find a name/identity for the former Yugoslav republic is plenty of time. Instead of trying to find a name, IMRO fanaticism has exploited bad feeling towards Greece over its botched government fiances to become far worse (which is only provoking a similar response in other neighbouring states and threatening to destabilize the Balkans).

    Given the former Yugoslavians sudden identity quick change into "descendents ancient Macedonians" (i.e. self-identifying hellenes) right before their apologists eyes (and FYROM's own prior governments claimed the exact opposite to them)... any that continue to collude with the former Yugoslavians are effectively morally complicit in IMRO's subtle attempt to ethnically erase the Greek people (to hide their shame)

    Their are no excuses left but racism towards Greeks (and even Bulgarians who also are having their history usurped) for any of FYROM's apologists to continue to pretend not to notice their erratic behavior.

    "Slav people and our language is closely related to Bulgarian." - FYROM´s Ambassador to Canada Gyordan Veselinov, Ottawa Citizen Newspaper, February 24 1999

    'We do not claim to be descendants of Alexander the Great.' - FYROM'S Ambassador Ljubica Acevshka, speech to US representatives in Washington on January 22 1999

    By :
    Demetri
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • On the left hand side of the background description, the word "slavic" should be removed. There is no such thing as a Slavic Macedonian. Slavic is not an ethnic group but a linguistic group. Macedonians are an ethnic group.

    By :
    Meto Koloski
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • "It is our firm desire to overcome the difference over the name."
    Really?: Severmakedonija ( = North Macedonia) or Anymacedonia.

    But, no, it is not. Your desire is to monopolize the name of Macedonia.
    Yet Greeks (Germans, Turks, Albanians )cannot allow any non Greek (German, Turkish, Albanian) people to monopolize the name of Macedonia (Bavaria, Ottoman, Tosk ).

    By :
    Istor Macedonian
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • Denko Maleski, FYROMian politician:

    "The lack of capability by Macedonists in condition of democracy, also contributes to the vision of their opponents. The creation of the Macedonian nation, for almost half of a century, was done in a condition of single-party dictatorship. In those times, there was no difference between science and ideology, so the Macedonian historiography, unopposed by anybody, comfortably performed a selection of the historic material from which the Macedonian identity was created. There is nothing atypical here for the process of the creation of any modern nation, except when falsification from the type of substitution of the word “Bulgarian” with the word “Macedonian” were made. In a case which that was not possible, the persons from history were proclaimed for Bulgarian agents who crossed into some imaginary pure Macedonian space.

    But when we had to encourage the moderate Greek political variant and move into a direction of reconciliation among peoples, our nationalism was modelled according to the Greek one. The direct descendants of Alexander the Great raised the fallen flag on which the constitutional name of the Republic of Macedonia was written and led the people in the final confrontation with the Greeks, the direct descendants of Greek gods. This warlike attitude of the "winners" which was a consequence of the fear of politician from heavy and unpopular compromises had its price. In those years, we lost our capability for strategic dialogue. With Greeks? No, with ourselves. Since then, namely, we reach towards some fictional ethnic purity which we seek in the depths of the history and we are angry at those which dare to call us Slavs and our language and culture Slavic!? We are angry when they name us what we -if we have to define ourselves in such categories- are, showing that we are people full with complexes which are ashamed for ourselves. We lost our capability for reasonable judgement, someone shall say, because the past of the Balkans teaches us that to be wise among fools is foolish. Maybe. Maybe the British historians are right when they say that in history one can find confirmation for every modern thesis, so, we could say, also for the one that we are descendants of the Ancient Macedonians…

    (Utrinski Vesnik newspaper, October 16, 2006)

    For more have a look at:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_nationalism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Macedonia

    And for good laughs have a look at:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_Prayer_%28video%29

    especially at the translation on the bottom of the article...

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • @ Meto Koloski:

    From Eugene N. Borza, American historian who has written multiple works on Macedonia and is regarded an expert on the overall subject:

    Modern Slavs, both Bulgarians and Macedonians, cannot establish a link with antiquity, as the Slavs entered the Balkans centuries after the demise of the ancient Macedonian kingdom. Only the most radical Slavic factions—mostly émigrés in the United States, Canada, and Australia—even attempt to establish a connection to antiquity [...]
    The twentieth-century development of a Macedonian ethnicity, and its recent evolution into independent statehood following the collapse of the Yugoslav state in 1991, has followed a rocky road. In order to survive the vicissitudes of Balkan history and politics, the Macedonians, who have had no history, need one. They reside in a territory once part of a famous ancient kingdom, which has borne the Macedonian name as a region ever since and was called ”Macedonia” for nearly half a century as part of Yugoslavia. And they speak a language now recognized by most linguists outside Bulgaria, Serbia, and Greece as a south Slavic language separate from Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, and Bulgarian.
    Their own so-called Macedonian ethnicity had evolved for more than a century, and thus it seemed natural and appropriate for them to call the new nation “Macedonia” and to attempt to provide some cultural references to bolster ethnic survival.

    ("Macedonia Redux", in "The Eye Expanded: life and the arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity", ed. Frances B Tichener & Richard F. Moorton, University of California Press, 1999)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
  • Some real and impartial investigative journalism would look behind the superficial veils cast by all interested parties in this most pathetic “Macedonian name/identity/historical game” and when they weigh up all the hard facts could only come to one conclusion. That is, the now 20 year old tactic of road blocks being imposed on the Macedonian peoples’ future in terms of international legitimacy (keep them voiceless no UN), prosperity (keep them poor no EU) and delicate interethnic stability (stir up nationalism no NATO) has only one goal and that is to destabilise Macedonia enough that she implodes and ceases as a viable independent state.

    Problem solved for Macedonia’s good neighbours, namely Greece and Bulgaria! The reason being, If there is no Macedonia then there are no Macedonians therefore Greece, Bulgaria and to a lesser extent Albania technically don’t have Macedonian minority population issues! At present we have Greek, Bulgarian and Albanian citizens who after nearly 100 years or repression, coercion and in some case brutalization still possess a “Macedonian identity”, but are denied their basic minority/human rights to identify as such. Repeat, there are Greek, Bulgarian and Albanian citizens (not Macedonian citizens) today that are denied the basic human rights for simply identifying as something other than what their governments wants

    The abuse and deprivation of human rights in these nations are not the ravings, nor the invention of Tito or Gruevski, these are real, legitimate citizens living in these EU or soon to be EU member states who have been brave enough to stand for what they believe. Admittedly, yes the international recognition and viability of Macedonia and Macedonians as such may precipitate other likeminded citizens to be counted in these states, but surely this is their own internal problem, something of their making and something they need to come to terms with and not hold the lives of over 2 million people to ransom. Macedonians in general are easy going peace loving people, they have gone through hardships as have the Greeks and Bulgarians, but Macedonians don’t need 19th century Greek and Bulgarian politics imposed on them in the 21st century.

    These are just a few legitimate and impartial statements on this issue;

    1.Gay McDougall, UN- Greece should withdraw from the dispute over whether there is a Macedonian minority on its territory and focus on protecting the rights to self-identification, freedom of expression and freedom of association of those communities.

    2.Human Rights Watch- Recommends to the international community that it acknowledge and take steps to end human rights abuses by the Greek government. In particular, it urges the CSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities to investigate the situation of the ethnic Macedonians and to take steps to end discrimination against them.

    3.Panayote Dimitras, Greek Helsinki Monitor - Greece and Bulgaria are isolated in their fantasy that there is no Macedonian minority. Every Greek politician is obsessed by the fantasy that there is no Macedonian minority living in Greece.

    By :
    Kiril
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • I can't wait for modern Greece to receive another bailout, maybe their trolls can go back to work and hire some Bulgars and leave us Macedonians alone.

    Since you're copy & pasting the same tired quotes how about a quote from Arrian, Plutarch, or Demosthenes????? Oh you don't like their quotes supporting a separate and unique Macedonian identity??? Maybe a Yogi Berra quote instead like "It was impossible to get a conversation going, everybody was talking too much"

    Seeing that @istor, @alexander, and @demetri don't have much to do other than troll Macedonians on the web maybe they can explain how the concept of nationality and nation building started with their little capitals that were full of Ottoman Mosques.

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • @ trajko

    Another yet another speech oh hate and no real arguments... FYI:

    Arrian:

    "Your ancestors came to Macedonia and the rest of Greece and did us great harm, though we had done them no prior injury. I have been appointed leader of the Greeks, and wanting to punish the Persians I have come to Asia, which I took from you."

    (Alexander's letter to Persian king Darius in response to a truce plea, Arrian, "Anabasis Alexandri", II, 14, 4)

    "There are Greek troops, to be sure, in Persian service - but how different is their cause from ours! They will be fighting for pay - and not much of at that; we, on the contrary, shall fight for Greece, and our hearts will be in it."

    (Alexander the Great addressing his troops prior to the battle of Issus, Arrian, "Anabasis Alexandri", II, 7)

    Plutarch:

    "Yet through Alexander Bactria and the Caucasus learned to revere the gods of the Greeks ... Alexander established more than seventy cities among savage tribes, and sowed all Asia with Greek magistracies ... Egypt would not have its Alexandria, nor Mesopotamia its Seleucia, nor Sogdiana its Prophthasia, nor India its Bucephalia, nor the Caucasus a Greek city, for by the founding of cities in these places savagery was extinguished and the worse element, gaining familiarity with the better, changed under its influence."

    (Plutarch, "Moralia: On the Fortune of Alexander", I, 328d, 329a)

    "If it were not my purpose to combine foreign things with Greek things, to traverse and civilize every continent, to search out the uttermost parts of land and sea, to push the bounds of Macedonia to the farthest Ocean, and to disseminate and shower the blessings of Greek justice and peace over every nation, I should not be content to sit quietly in the luxury of idle power, but I should emulate the frugality of Diogenes. But as things are, forgive me, Diogenes, that I imitate Heracles, and emulate Perseus, band follow in the footsteps of Dionysus, the divine author and progenitor of my family, and desire that victorious Greeks should dance again in India and revive the memory of the Bacchic revels among the savage mountain tribes beyond the Caucasus."

    (Plutarch, "Moralia: On the Fortune of Alexander", I, 332a-b, Loeb)

    About Demosthenes calling Philip a barbarian; Demosthenes harboured a personal grudge against Philip because of the humiliation he suffered when he lost his power of speech at the Macedonian court, as stated by Aischines (On the Embassy 35). Demosthenes called anyone he did not like a barbarian, including fellow Athenians (e.g. 21.150). The word, at least in some uses by Demosthenes and others, should be understood as a generic insult. Thus, for example, in some parts of the USA people are dubious that people from other parts are "real Americans".

    Modern historians experts on Macedon clearly revealed the Demosthenean corpus as simply a form of political rhetoric designed to formulate public policy (Eugene Borza, "In The Shadow of Olympus", Princeton University Press, 1992, ISBN 0691008809, pp. 5-6) or as just an insulting speech (Nicholas Hammond, "The Miracle that was Macedonia", St. Martin's Press, 1991, ISBN 0283999101).

    So, maybe you could read some books non published in FYROM?

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • @ Kiril:

    T.J. Winnifrith, British academic:

    "FYROM was also an attempt at a multicultural society. Here the fragments are just about holding together, although the cement that binds them is an unreliable mixture of propaganda and myth. The "Macedonian" language has been created, some rather misty history involving Tsar Samuel, probably a Bulgarian, and Alexander the Great, almost certainly a Greek, has been invented, and the name Macedonia has been adopted. Do we destroy these myths or live with them? Apparently these radical Slavic factions decided to live with their myths and lies for the constant amusement of the rest of the world!"

    ("Shattered Eagles, Balkan Fragments", Duckworth, 1995)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • FYROM? really?? why is it that the 'Arab Republic of Egypt' is refereed to as Egypt for short and not AROE but the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is constantly refereed to as FYROM by bloggers? its MACEDONIA not FYROM ok! FYROM is a made-up word.
    other examples include the 'Hellinic Republic of Greece' or should that be HROG??
    Also why is it that modern Egyptians who speak Arabic can claim to be descendants of ancient Egypt yet Macedonians who currently speak a Slavic language don't have the right to claim they have any links to ancient Macedonia?

    By :
    AROE
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • I don't see what the issue is... why can't both Greece and the Republic of Macedonia use the name Macedonia??
    what’s the difference between Macedonia and Luxembourg? both nations have countries that border them that have provinces with the same name.... YES!! there is a Province called Luxembourg in Belgium, but i don't recall reading anywhere about Belgium blocking Luxembourg's EU membership and asking them to change there name and identity... and just a foot note the official name of Luxembourg is Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, but i have never seen anyone refer to Luxembourg as (G.D.O.L) so why do Greeks who have officially recognized there neighbour as the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia use (F.Y.R.O.M)?

    By :
    whats in a name
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • there is also a state called Georgia in the United States and there is a former soviet republic called Georgia, I don't see the Americans carrying on about that :)
    it seems Greeks are just being overly sensitive about the name issue.

    there are also two provinces in Iran called East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan which border the Republic of Azerbaijan. I can't find any reference to Iran blocking there use of the word Azerbaijan.
    it would seem that the concept of having an independent state using the same name as a province in a neighboring country is not unique to Macedonia and Greece.
    it seems Greece is just blowing this issue out of proportion.

    oh there is also a Republic of Karelia in the Russian Federation as well as regions in Finland called North and South Karelia which border the Russian Republic, and then there is the Province of Niger in the Federal Republic of Nigeria which has the same name as the Republic of Niger in Africa, no name disputes there ether, and lets not forget the Republic of Ireland which borders the British administered Northern Ireland. So based on these precedence, Macedonia should continue using the term Republic of Macedonia and Greece can continue using West Macedonia, Central Macedonia and East Macedonia and Trace as it has done since 1988, and if Bulgaria wants to weigh in they can rename there province of Blagoevgrad to North Macedonia.

    By :
    whats in a name
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • there is also a state called Georgia in the United States and there is a former soviet republic called Georgia, I don't see the Americans carrying on about that :)
    it seems Greeks are just being overly sensitive about the name issue.

    there are also two provinces in Iran called East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan which border the Republic of Azerbaijan. I can't find any reference to Iran blocking there use of the word Azerbaijan.
    it would seem that the concept of having an independent state using the same name as a province in a neighboring country is not unique to Macedonia and Greece.
    it seems Greece is just blowing this issue out of proportion.

    oh there is also a Republic of Karelia in the Russian Federation as well as regions in Finland called North and South Karelia which border the Russian Republic, and then there is the Province of Niger in the Federal Republic of Nigeria which has the same name as the Republic of Niger in Africa, no name disputes there ether, and lets not forget the Republic of Ireland which borders the British administered Northern Ireland. So based on these precedence, Macedonia should continue using the term Republic of Macedonia and Greece can continue using West Macedonia, Central Macedonia and East Macedonia and Trace as it has done since 1988, and if Bulgaria wants to weigh in they can rename there province of Blagoevgrad to North Macedonia.

    By :
    whats in a name
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • @whats in a name

    Not at all the same; FYROM has territorial claims on Greece and Bulgaria, claiming that "their Macedonia" is under occupation and "ethnic Macedonians" literally suffer there!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Macedonia

    At the same time FYROM tries to de-hellenize ancient Macedonians and de-bulgarize its Slavic citizens:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_nationalism

    while wants to monopolize the name "Macedonia" and everything around it! As millions of Greeks identify themselves as Macedonians, unrelated to the Slavic people who are associated with the FYROM, Greece opposes the use of the name "Macedonia" by it's northern neighbour without a geographical qualifier, supporting a compound name such as "Northern Macedonia" for use by all and for all purposes (erga omnes). Of course FYROM rejects it, and that's the policy of the current nationalistic government, VMRO-DPMNE, which supports the hilarious claims of the so-called "Macedonists". Please do have a look at:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_Prayer_%28video%29

    especially at the English translation on the bottom of the article, and have the laughs of your life...

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • United States again returns to Iraq. Arayik Sargsyan, Academician, President of the Geoplitical Academy.
    Performing a "request" Erdogan, kurds began a policy of pressure on Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on all sides. In case even the President's daughter has joined Iraq, Kurd Jalal Talabani's, Ms Ala al-Talabani. During a NATO seminar in Yerevan, NATO's Special Representative for the South Caucasus and Central Asia, Mr. James Appathurai officially stated that: "NATO does not intervene in the Affairs of Syria, and will not interfere in the Syrian case, as it has with Libya." Our experts from Iraq have reported new plans to increase its United States FORCES in Iraq, and to the thousands of special forces intend to 4.3 thousands another 12 thousand United States Army soldiers.
    United States again returns to Iraq, although it from there by and large and not leave.

    http://www.yerkramas.org/2012/11/09/ssha-opyat-vozvrashhaetsya-v-irak/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • Turkish factor is key factor approximating Armenia and Macedonia

    PanARMENIAN.Net - Armenia and Macedonia have several common goals, Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia said.
    As Arayik Sargsyan told a press conference, the monopoly of a unipolar world headed by the U.S. is gradually receding into the past, with Russia, China, the EU and the Arab League coming to the fore.
    “Armenia and Macedonia geographically are divided by Turkey, while the problem of the Turkish factor strategically unites them. Neo-Ottomanism and Pan-Turkism spark concerns of Turkey’s two neighbors, of the Balkan Countries, Serbia and Greece,” he said, adding that the common threat may lay the foundation of consolidating ties and joining efforts to form a counterforce.http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/103143/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • Consul of Macedonia: good partner in Balkans beneficial to Armenia

    PanARMENIAN.Net - The newly-appointed Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia pledged to do the utmost to contribute to development and strengthening of bilateral relations.

    As Arayik Sargsyan told a press conference, Armenia will benefit from a good partner in the Balkans and Macedonia, in turn, from a partner in the South Caucasus. The consul noted that the Macedonian side has officially requested the Armenian authorities to appoint him as Honorary Consul to Armenia.

    “With establishment of ties between Armenia and Macedonia dating back to the times of Alexander the Great, the historical experience should be used in developing current relations,” the official concluded.
    http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/103141/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia Arayik Sargsyan told a press conference, the monopoly of a unipolar world headed by the U.S. is gradually receding into the past, with Russia, China, the EU and the Arab League coming to the fore.
    “Armenia and Macedonia geographically are divided by Turkey, while the problem of the Turkish factor strategically unites them. Neo-Ottomanism and Pan-Turkism spark concerns of Turkey’s two neighbors, of the Balkan Countries, Serbia and Greece,” he said, adding that the common threat may lay the foundation of consolidating ties and joining efforts to form a counterforce.
    Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia Arayik Sargsyan: "as Greece, on the edge of bankruptcy, sells everything possible, including its islands and cultural heritage”.
    http://www.panarm enian.net/eng/news/103143/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • @Alexander go on there's other quotes your omitting. Why don't you quote the Human Rights Watch or the UN's Ms McDougall since you've got nothing but time to copy and paste other people instead of forming a thought and expressing yourself.

    So why do you troll us?

    Is it because modern Grecians and Bulgars are the poorest EU members and there's not enough bailout money to give you a sense of worth?

    Maybe its shame because you covet your neighbors property and you feel like idiots for the Sultan Mustapha's divide and conquer strategy? Grecians & Bulgars still fight over Macedonian to this day.....even after 245 years the Sultan's strategy is still playing itself out.

    Its sad to see 2 poor and insignificant countries like Bulgaria and modern Greece act imbeciles. I think there's better use of EU funds.

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • One needs no proof that Greeks are liars; all you have to do is read the long cut-and-paste collected "documents" above. These people have lied to Europe, have lied to the world, and have lied to their own children who grow up to become supporters of fascist oriented groups.
    Ask yourself a question: Can anyone with an ounce of nerve tissue believe what these proven falsifiers of history are saying? Is there anyone in this world that still finds a shred of credibility in their actions?
    Europe should remove its breast from these blood suckers. Let them work for their money.

    By :
    Angela Discouri
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • @trajko:
    http://www.topix.com/forum/world/macedonia/TOM51PLFA8KUGF6V9

    By :
    Istor Macedonian
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/227817

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    09/11/2012
  • @trajko and Angela Discouri:

    My opinion will just be my opinion, and, as like any average reader's opinion, perhaps not significant on the issue... even you can express your opinion, although as everyone here can see, you choose to do what you know best, and that is to swear.

    What I choose to do here is to provide not my humble opinion on the issue but instead the opinion of international scholarship. Now why don't you try to learn something by them? It will only do you good...

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • Why Greeks won't rename their province?

    The solution is really simple:

    The region of Greece called "Macedonia" --------> The region of Greece called "North Greece" (or something)

    DONE.
    No more idiotic "name disputes".
    JUST RENAME THE DAMNED PROVINCE

    By :
    Good Man
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • It is not just a province. It is a crucial part of out identity and history.

    The point is that Slavofyromians MUST forget and cut any imaginary link they have with this region in Greece.

    This means that Slavofyromians and the entire World must translate the word "Macedonia" of all ancient and medieval books by this very new name.

    Then it will be "Alexander the Greek" and not "Alexander the Macedonian" any more.

    But Slavofyromians wont separate themselves from Macedonian name, glory and past.

    have a look here:
    http://www.topix.com/forum/world/macedonia/TOM51PLFA8KUGF6V9

    By :
    Istor Macedonian
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • Almost all of the wars were about "out holy identity and holy history".

    Can't you just forget your f*kin "holy" Past and start a new life?

    Think about your future, not about some dead people from the 300 BC.

    By :
    Good Man
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • Since the word Greece and Grease are too close it confuses alot of people so let's decide Grease's new name. Here are the choices:

    1) Republic of we've been invaded and raped by the Persians, Macedonians, Romans, Goths, Huns, Slavs, Avars, various Crusaders, Bulgars, Venetians, Ottomans, and Lord Byron.

    2) Republic of German Prince Otto took the East Indian Company and used Bavarian blue to make it "Greek"

    3) Republic of we've fought Balkan wars with Bulgars to control and forcibly assimilate Macedonia

    4) Republic of our Census takers report 99.99% modern Greeks live in Republic of Name to be Determined Soon (NDS). That's better purity than the drugs we're on to make believe Albanians, Macedonians, Bulgars, Turks, Vlachs and other minorities don't exist in NDS

    5) Republic of Anatolian Christian refugees who couldn't learn ancient Katharevousa so we taught them Dimotikí and resettled them in southern Macedonian and called the whole thing "Greek"

    6) Republic of we used to call it Northern Greece from 1913 until the late 1980s and changed it to prefectures of Western Macedonia, Central Macedonia, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace because we knew the Socialist Republic of Macedonia established in 1945 would break free from Yugoslavia

    7) Republic of we can't afford to learn Anthropology so we still believe in nationalistic Megali idea.

    8) Republic of we troll every news article about Macedonia and copy/paste our interpretation of history to make our selfs feel better about being a mongrol mix of Albanian, Bulgarians, Macedonian, Roma, Turkish, and Vlach people

    9) Republic of please take pity on us as we file for EU patents on Feta Cheese and Yogurt because we don't know who we are

    Whatever name we decide for you has to be used in all references, so choose wisely!!

    Now to the average reader, there's more to modern Greece than you know. Don't trust modern Greeks bearing presents or telling history stories. Do your own research and I'm sure you'll find some dirty secrets of this undercover 3rd world county.

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • Since the word Greece and Grease are too close it confuses alot of people so let's decide Grease's new name. Here are the choices:

    1) Republic of we've been invaded and raped by the Persians, Macedonians, Romans, Goths, Huns, Slavs, Avars, various Crusaders, Bulgars, Venetians, Ottomans, and Lord Byron.

    2) Republic of German Prince Otto took the East Indian Company and used Bavarian blue to make it "Greek"

    3) Republic of we've fought Balkan wars with Bulgars to control and forcibly assimilate Macedonia

    4) Republic of our Census takers report 99.99% modern Greeks live in Republic of Name to be Determined Soon (NDS). That's better purity than the drugs we're on to make believe Albanians, Macedonians, Bulgars, Turks, Vlachs and other minorities don't exist in NDS

    5) Republic of Anatolian Christian refugees who couldn't learn ancient Katharevousa so we taught them Dimotikí and resettled them in southern Macedonian and called the whole thing "Greek"

    6) Republic of we used to call it Northern Greece from 1913 until the late 1980s and changed it to prefectures of Western Macedonia, Central Macedonia, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace because we knew the Socialist Republic of Macedonia established in 1945 would break free from Yugoslavia

    7) Republic of we can't afford to learn Anthropology so we still believe in nationalistic Megali idea.

    8) Republic of we troll every news article about Macedonia and copy/paste our interpretation of history to make our selfs feel better about being a mongrol mix of Albanian, Bulgarians, Macedonian, Roma, Turkish, and Vlach people

    9) Republic of please take pity on us as we file for EU patents on Feta Cheese and Yogurt because we don't know who we are

    Whatever name we decide for you has to be used in all references, so choose wisely!!

    Now to the average reader, there's more to modern Greece than you know. Don't trust modern Greeks bearing presents or telling history stories. Do your own research and I'm sure you'll find some dirty secrets of this undercover 3rd world county.

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • Sorry #2 should read:

    Republic of German Prince Otto took the *FLAG of the East Indian Company and used Bavarian blue to make it "Greek"

    I could add a few more about massive ethnic cleansing Athens has conducted, passing off the Phoenician alphabet as their own, coercing landlocked Macedonia into the Interim agreement by an illegal embargo the EC fought Athens about, but I think we've got a good list above.

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • @Good Man

    This is a joke, right? I mean that, ancient Macedonians –who were a Greek people and spoke Greek and had Greek culture- would have laughed if they were told that 2500 years after them, a Slavic people unrelated to them would try to usurp their name, history, culture and heritage!

    And they would laugh even more if they were told that these Slavic people –who entered the Balkans centuries after the demise of the ancient Macedonian kingdom- settled in a land which was ancient Paeonia and not ancient Macedonia but was called such by a foreign people: the Romans for administrative reasons at the beginning and later the Ottomans, who attributed the term to a wider geographic region! I mean, imagine how funny would be if the Serbs, another Slavic people, who settled on Illyrian lands, claim that they are Illyrians since they settle on Illyrian lands, or Europeans claiming they are Indigenous Australians or Native Americans since they settle in Australia and America, usurping the history and culture of the indigenous people! Just think, what if Serbs start calling themselves "Illyrians", Europeans in Australia "Aborigines" and in the USA "Native Americans"? Now that would be hilarious!! Yet, nowadays, Slavic citizens of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia fly the Vergina sun (an ancient Greek symbol found in the whole of ancient Greek world) and call the original, Greek Macedonia "Aegean", while they have territorial claims on it!...

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • Edward O'Hara, British politician:

    Attention may have been deflected from the danger in that area by the nature of the dispute between FYROM and Greece, which is seen as being ostensibly over a name, although it amounts to more than that. A name is important as it gives an area an identity. I shall not indulge in a lecture on the ancient identity of the Macedonians and on Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great, but the Greeks were historically correct in the campaign that they launched in the early days of the dispute. Understandably, detached outsiders say, "But that is ancient history, isn't it?" Nor shall I engage in a lecture on the falsification of the history of Slavo-Macedonia since 1944, although that, too, has much hard factual content. I simply remind the House that Tito's renaming of Vardar Banovina as the Republic of Macedonia in 1944 was a political statement. More than that, it was a territorial claim. It laid claim to territory in Greece and in Bulgaria. Notably, the objective was the warm water port of Salonika on the Aegean. The Greeks fought a bloody civil war on that issue between 1945 and 1949, when we were celebrating the peace that was commemorated as recently as yesterday. Clause 49 of the constitution of the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia enshrines that claim and subsequent propaganda, especially by a political faction, the VMRO, has kept the claim alive ever since.

    (House of Commons Hansard Debates for 9 May 1995, Column 601)

    President Kiro Gligorov may argue that he cannot control the publications of political parties, but I believe that the adoption of the sunburst emblem of Vergina, recently discovered in Greek Macedonia on the coffin of Philip II of Macedon, the father of Alexander the Great, is a wilful act of authorisation of that claim. If hon. Members wish to empathise with the strength of feeling about that emblem, it is as though the thistle were stolen from the Scots and adopted by another country. It is an emblem, but it stirs up passions. President Gligorov has mounted an impressive propaganda campaign about that, which has deflected attention from some of the more substantial issues in that earlier dispute and, in great measure, has succeeded in casting the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the guise of the little victim of the big bully, Greece...

    Greece has no territorial dispute with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. It is almost unique in the Balkans in having no such territorial claims on any of its neighbours. Greece has demonstrated its desire to have policies of support and co-operation with its neighbours in that part of the world by its breakthrough in its relationship with Albania, on which both Governments deserve congratulations because thereby another potential flashpoint to the south of the Balkans was damped down. Greece is physically located in the Balkans. It wants nothing more than to achieve a similar relationship with the former Yugoslav republic, but it needs support to do so.

    It is no wonder that, in matters of politics in the Balkans, Greece feels misunderstood. It cannot understand why, after it stood alone with the United Kingdom against the forces of fascism between 28 October 1940--Ohi day, as it is still called--and 27 April 1941, when Athens finally fell, its former allies now appear to be taking the part of forces against which it stood, especially when, after the second world war, it endured those further four years of civil war to hold the line against the communist advance to the Aegean. That was done for the United States and for the United Kingdom especially--the world powers of the time--and those Governments objected, in 1944, to Tito's change of the name of Vardar Banovina.

    (House of Commons Hansard Debates for 9 May 1995, Column 602)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • @Alexander

    "This is a joke, right? I mean that, ancient Macedonians would have laughed if they were told..."

    Alexander, they don't care. They are dead.

    And almost no one care about your little piece of territory and your little piece of the world history. Except some pure Macedonians and Greeks who can't forget some dead people from 300 BC.

    For the rest of the World your conflict looks simply stupid.

    It' like two kids with the name "Alexander" discuss:
    - hey, this is MY name!
    - no, its mine!
    -...and this is my sandbox! A was first here!
    - no! My grandfather was here first! its mine
    ...

    You all just infantile.

    By :
    Good Man
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • @Good Man

    The "pure Macedonians and Greeks" is a fraud, since pure Macedonians are Greeks and FYROMians are Slavs. Except if you are so ignorant that you don't even know the difference.

    Anyway, as for your example with the kids, if it only was that simple!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_nationalism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Macedonia

    And for good laughs have a look at:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_Prayer_%28video%29

    especially at the English translation on the bottom of the article...

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • "since pure Macedonians are Greeks and FYROMians are Slavs. Except if you are so ignorant that you don't even know the difference."

    No, I just don't care. It's not important for me. And for the rest of the world (except your two little countries).

    You know, your two countries are only 3 mm on my world map on the wall. And your two countries have almost no economy, no science, and no influence in the world.
    Can you say me why your country is not so rich and powerful and important as Japan? Why your country is Nothing in the middle of Nowhere?

    I can say you why. Because you folks live in the past. You live in past, you think only about past.
    Japan think about future. They have future.

    You folks think only about past. Heroes of the past, boundaries of the past, victories of the past and names of the past.

    You have no future.

    By :
    Good Man
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • @Good Man.
    Yes we Greeks are ready to forget Macedonian history, but we cannot allow SlavoSkopians to monopolize it.

    Thanks to SlavoSkopians we Greeks do remember our famous and glorious Macedonian history and identity.

    By :
    Istor Macedonian
    - Posted on :
    10/11/2012
  • @Good Man

    "No, I just don't care. It's not important for me."

    You have the right to express your opinion, but you cannot speak on behalf of others. As for the rest of your comment on Greece and its influence on the world, there are hundreds of books out there which one can read on the issue, I suggest three easy ones, especially for you... :

    Bruce Thornton, "Greek Ways: How the Greeks Created Western Civilization", Encounter Books, 2002

    Victor Davis Hanson, John Heath, "Who Killed Homer: The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom", Encounter Books, 2001

    Simon Goldhill, "Who Needs Greek?: Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism", Cambridge University Press, 2002

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    11/11/2012
  • I wish to understand how a inept article about macedonia caused such vitrial.my pet rat refused to poop on this story.......i wish i did.

    By :
    vwp
    - Posted on :
    11/11/2012
  • @ Alexander:
    I'm about the CURRENT power and influence (a lack of), not about some ancient dead civilization.

    By :
    Good Man
    - Posted on :
    11/11/2012
  • Consul of Macedonia lists possible cooperation areas with Armenia

    April 14, 2012 - 17:36 AMT
    PanARMENIAN.Net - Presence of Macedonian businesses in Armenia may contribute to deepening of cooperation between Armenia and Macedonia, Consul of Macedonia to Armenia said.
    Arayik Sargsyan stressed the need to consider the possibility of realization of Armenian products in the Macedonian market, with special importance to be attached to development of cultural ties.
    The Armenian community in the country totals about 1000 people, with a Sunday school operating. The Consul noted that following his meeting with the Macedonian archimandrite, Armenians were allowed to hold a service in Orthodox Church in Macedonia's capital city of Skopje. Mr. Sargsyan also stressed the importance of organizing cultural events in both countries.
    `Consultations on the Association Agreement may become another cooperation area. Armenia may benefit from Macedonia's experience in conducting negotiations with the EU in the direction,' the official said.

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    11/11/2012
  • @Good Man

    Yes, that's a very sad situation... Nevertheless,

    "For all of us who love history, and know history, Macedonia is as Greek as the Acropolis."

    (Mike Rann)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    11/11/2012
  • Every time I see an article concerning this ridiculous name dispute that had grown in a major issue, justifying the greeks of vetoing a innocent nation membership in EU/NATO makes me sick.
    First of all makes me sick of my government and all others major governments in EU that are allowing such a fascism to be introduced by EU Member state in the 21st century.
    I am also tired of EU tolerance to such an deceiving greek nation that has abused every EU citizens funds on such a financial scale.
    Its about time someone with iron fist to show the barbaric balkan tribes that if they want to identify themselves as first world countries they will HAVE TO admire themselves, their neighbors and others, but above all they will HAVE TO recognize the minorities living on their territory. We all know that there is huge turkish minority in germany, germany also knows that and admires the facts. Those people there cannot be told to be germans cause they feel otherwise, they identify themselves otherwise, they are born otherwise. We all know that there is turkish minority in greece. There is also macedonian minority in greece, bulgaria and albania also no exception here. It appears that only greece is not aware for the minorities living there. It looks like only greece (bulgaria to certain extent also) is not admiring the facts and is denying basic human right, and my oh my all of that in the 21st century in Europe. That is unthinkable, that is unacceptable, that is barbaric and that must CHANGE! Those political strategies are long left for the 3rd world countries to cope with and fight with. If thats the path greece chooses, than it should be left behind EU, and eventually incorporated to some future african union. We all pray for greek soberness, if not we all should agree with greek punishment.

    By :
    Roberto Benini
    - Posted on :
    12/11/2012
  • @ Roberto Benini

    (Yawning...)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    12/11/2012
  • Poor yawning Alexander,

    His got his Hellenic head so far up the bums of writers like Bruce Thornton and Simon Goldhill that he can’t see the light of day. The realities are that any opposing view to your idyllic, homogeneous, ethnically pure Greece of the 21st century is bludgeoned to death and hidden from the worlds prying eyes. One small example as reported by Fred Barbash below, it seems that even in England one of the pillars of western democracy its institutions are not free from your Greece’s inhuman charade against her own citizens.

    Washington Post Foreign Service LONDON, Feb. 2 -- One of the world's most prestigious book publishers confronted a rebellion today among some of its academic advisers for cancelling publication of a study about Greece because of fear of reprisals from nationalist extremists there. The manuscript -- Fields of Wheat, Rivers of Blood by Anastasia Karakasidou -- is a scholarly study of ethnicity in the Greek province of Macedonia and had been enthusiastically endorsed for publication by the panel of experts to which Cambridge University Press had submitted it. But a spokesman for Cambridge Press said that after consulting, among others, British diplomats in Greece, the publisher decided that the author and the subject were too controversial and could put at risk "life and limb" of Cambridge Press employees in Greece.

    "Fields of Wheat, Rivers of Blood", a good read, highly enlightening and recommend for all those interested in the truth behind your homogeneous fantasy.

    By :
    Kiril
    - Posted on :
    12/11/2012
  • @ Kiril

    You dare mention Karakasidou?! The author of this book has been vilified by Greek chauvinists and praised by western journalists for having allegedly championed the cause of 'ethnic Macedonians' in Greece. She has done no such thing! She simply explores how people in a village formerly known as Guvezna ‘twenty some kilometres from Thessaloniki’ as she specifies, now named Assiros came to see themselves as belonging to this group rather than the other. She soon realises that in Macedonia ethnic identity, is ‘a fluid, historically rooted construct … subject to change’. People are shown to choose (sometimes under pressure) who they want to be. In trying to grasp how these processes work she concludes: ‘Nationalism and national ideology "Otherizes" those who do not meet their definitional criteria of group membership; the formation of a self-conscious nation then minoritises such Others; and the attainment of territorial nation-statehood effectively ethnicises those minorities’. She insists that ‘ethno-cultural creation…does not create something out of nothing’ seemingly, unaware that only God is supposed to have achieved this. All this is theory. In practice she deals with Slavic speakers, a term–she specifies–that ‘denotes a population cohort rather than a self-conscious group’. So these users of a Slavic idiom do not seem, after all, to constitute a minority in Greece, let alone an ethnic one. The name she has given them does not even distinguish them from the Russian speaking Pontic Greeks! The book is valuable not because it deals with a minority in Greece but for describing in all its picturesque detail the process of Hellenisation of the villagers in Assiros. There is the case of a Greek teacher-cum-national activist who barely escaped death during the Macedonian Struggle (1898-1906) through the intercession of a cousin he had… in the Bulgarian army. There is the case of Paskalina who entered school as a monolingual Slavic speaker and graduated as a Greek. Her colourful CV contained stories of persecution that were attributed to Bulgarians or Greeks as circumstances dictated. Interestingly, when during the Second World War, the Assiriotes were offered an abundance of food by the Bulgarian authorities of occupation if they registered with them as Bulgarians, none did so. She also presents plenty of gossipy evidence on mixed marriages with Greek husbands forbidding their wives to use their Slavic idiom at home. This interesting book of anthropological fieldwork showing how and why people in Assiros chose Greekness, is unfortunately marred by serious historical mistakes. The Greco-Turkish war in Asia minor took place in 1919-1922 and not in 1922-23 as she mentions four times (p141,142,144,200); Venizelos did not preside over the Lausanne Conference (p145), he merely represented Greece there; the evzoni were not Greek Independence fighters (p198) but a military unit so named long after Greece became a nation-state; it is simply not true that the British moved to support Kemal’s Government at ‘a critical moment in Greece’s Asia Minor campaign’ (p 287); Metaxas did not die in 1940 (p 295) but in 1941; the Italian government did not seek in October 1940 ‘right of passage for its troops through Greece in order to invade Ethiopia’ (p 302) because the Ethiopian campaign–that had started in 1936–had long finished by then; the civil war in Greece did not end in 1947 but in 1949(p 303).

    Now let's take a look on what Denko Maleski, a politician of the FYROM (one of you) said:

    "The lack of capability by Macedonists in condition of democracy, also contributes to the vision of their opponents. The creation of the Macedonian nation, for almost half of a century, was done in a condition of single-party dictatorship. In those times, there was no difference between science and ideology, so the Macedonian historiography, unopposed by anybody, comfortably performed a selection of the historic material from which the Macedonian identity was created. There is nothing atypical here for the process of the creation of any modern nation, except when falsification from the type of substitution of the word “Bulgarian” with the word “Macedonian” were made. In a case which that was not possible, the persons from history were proclaimed for Bulgarian agents who crossed into some imaginary pure Macedonian space.

    But when we had to encourage the moderate Greek political variant and move into a direction of reconciliation among peoples, our nationalism was modelled according to the Greek one. The direct descendants of Alexander the Great raised the fallen flag on which the constitutional name of the Republic of Macedonia was written and led the people in the final confrontation with the Greeks, the direct descendants of Greek gods. This warlike attitude of the "winners" which was a consequence of the fear of politician from heavy and unpopular compromises had its price. In those years, we lost our capability for strategic dialogue. With Greeks? No, with ourselves. Since then, namely, we reach towards some fictional ethnic purity which we seek in the depths of the history and we are angry at those which dare to call us Slavs and our language and culture Slavic!? We are angry when they name us what we -if we have to define ourselves in such categories- are, showing that we are people full with complexes which are ashamed for ourselves. We lost our capability for reasonable judgement, someone shall say, because the past of the Balkans teaches us that to be wise among fools is foolish. Maybe. Maybe the British historians are right when they say that in history one can find confirmation for every modern thesis, so, we could say, also for the one that we are descendants of the Ancient Macedonians…

    (Utrinski Vesnik newspaper, October 16, 2006)

    Cheers Kiril!

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    13/11/2012
  • Poor Alex,

    Yes I dare mention Karakasidou (one of you).

    And yes, Denko is a very wise man with his own views and what a delight it is for people like him to express their own views without fear of violence and retribution. Your Hellenic Republic could do with people like him and one must wonder how many volumes he would write on the nationalistic foundations that still underpin your society even today.

    But I won’t digress, my point is that we in Macedonia have nothing to hide, all our citizens are free to express themselves, form associations, speak and write as they wish. But in your so called homogeneous Greece anything outside your supposed homogeneity is punished, why, what are you afraid of?

    To illustrate this point, Macedonia has at least a few dozen ethnic minorities, with many even forming political parties. Now contrast that with Greece, no minorities at all, the only country in Europe without and I would hazard to guess, the only country in the world without a single minority population. WOW, good effort, Hitler would be proud!

    The real facts are that you have Greek citizens that have NOT been exposed to many decades of Titoistic one party politics as Denko wrongly suggests and they feel the same as us, MACEDONIAN! And the only reason we are discussing this silly name game is because of that one reason. For as long as there is no Republic of Macedonia, there are technically no Macedonians and therefore Greece and others have no obligation to recognise any minority population as such.

    To end, an excerpt from an article in the Eurasia Review about the views of the 2nd in charge of the Greek Orthodox Church on the subject of Greek citizens wanting to start a radio station in Meliti. The only catch is they want to broadcast in their mother tongue, what they call Macedonian;

    On Sunday, August 14, 2011, Metropolitan Anthimos stated the following, which was captured on video: “We have some of those who were left here since the Civil War period, as we call it, that difficult period, who did not leave to the other side and stayed here with us… [They] are now revolting, and are instigated from abroad by the Skopian [sic] propaganda … That is why we address to the Ministry of Interior and deputy ministers relevant to the media to tell us: is it true, such a radio station will become in Meliti . . . yes or no? If it is yes, then I, and the youth, and anyone else who wants to . . . [with] at least 40 or 50 buses must go there, and together with our brothers in Florina and Meliti, we will destroy everything into broken glass and nails . . . It is not possible to do the job differently.”

    The video is even better, cheers!

    By :
    Kiril
    - Posted on :
    13/11/2012
  • you'd think in 2012 that bankrupt and improvised modern-day athenians and sofians would be working to create new jobs and improve living conditions BUT instead they spend their time trying to attack macedonians to make themselves feel better about themselves.

    someone earlier was right....the balkans are poor and don't produce anything but a million interpretations of history to argue about.

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    13/11/2012
  • @ both FYROMians above (or perhaps Kiril aka trajko)

    The usual FYROMian trick, attacking Greece and Greeks to distract public opinion from the countless FYROMians problems... Could you perhaps tell us something about your problems? No? Well, I didn't think so. But let me mention you just a few on them...

    FYROM has a very high (32%) unemployment rate,

    http://www.indexmundi.com/macedonia/unemployment_rate.html

    and one of the highest shares of people struggling financially, with 72% of its citizens stating that they could only manage on their household’s income ‘with difficulty’ or ‘with great difficulty', though Macedonia, along with Croatia, was the only country in the Western Balkans to not report an increase in this statistic. Corruption and a relatively ineffective legal system also act as significant restraints on successful economic development. Macedonia still has one of the lowest per capita GDPs in Europe. Furthermore, the country's grey market is estimated at close to 20% of GDP.

    http://www.balkan-monitor.eu/files/BalkanMonitor-2010_Summary_of_Findings.pdf

    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mk.html

    The FYROM suffers from an ongoing ultra-nationalism promoted by the ruling nationalist party "Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity" (VMRO–DPMNE) and the Macedonian Diaspora, which results in a reduced international sympathy for the country.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_nationalism
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VMRO-DPMNE

    FYROM has launched the "Skopje 2014" project which aims to give a more monumental appearance to Skopje, the capital, and made plans to erect several statues (mainly of ancient Greeks such as Alexander the Great and his father Philip), fountains, bridges, and museums at a cost of about €500 million! The project has generated controversy: critics have described the new landmark buildings as signs of a reactionary historicist aesthetics, it has been criticised for its cost and for the lack of representation of national minorities in the coverage of its set of statues and memorials, it is accused for turning Skopje to a theme park, it is viewed as nationalistic kitsch, and has made Skopje an example to see how national identities are constructed and how this construction is mirrored in the urban space.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skopje#Skopje_2014_project

    FYROM's nationalism attacks press freedom, with a TV station and three dailies closed since the beginning of 2011. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is ranked 94th in the world according to the 2011/2012 index of press freedom, conducted traditionally by the organization "Reporters Without Borders".

    http://en.rsf.org/macedonia-disastrous-summer-for-macedonian-17-08-2011,40797.html

    http://macedoniapressfreedom.org/

    At the same time, FYROM allows an ultra-nationalistic and racist public service video praising the "Macedonoids" - progenitors of the white race, to be aired on MRT, the public broadcasting organization of the FYROM,

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_Prayer_%28video%29

    and FYROM have territorial claims on Greece!!!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Macedonia

    So, dear FYROMians: nice try, yet another failure. Instead of attacking Greece and Greeks you could do something for your countless problems, starting on teaching THE TRUTH at your schools: tell to your kids that you are heavy propaganda victims, history rappers. Learn to be proud of your Slavic origin and stop claiming that you are Macedonians! You had enough brainwashing, now get smart and face the truth: You are Slavs so you speak a Slavic language -a Serbianized Bulgarian dialect- so you can't be Macedonians, since TRUE MACEDONIANS WERE AND ARE GREEK PEOPLE, speaking GREEK since ancient times!

    Let us remember the words of two Greeks, two FYROMians and two international scholars:

    Alexander I of Macedon, king of Macedon from 498 BCE to 454 BCE:

    "Men of Athens.. In truth I would not tell it to you if I did not care so much for all Greece; I myself am by ancient descent a Greek, and I would not willingly see Greece change her freedom for slavery."

    (From the speech of Alexander I of Macedon when he was admitted to the Olympic games, Herodotus, "Histories", 9.45)

    Alexander the Great, king of Macedon, 356 BCE - 323 BCE:

    "Your ancestors came to Macedonia and the rest of Greece and did us great harm, though we had done them no prior injury. I have been appointed leader of the Greeks, and wanting to punish the Persians I have come to Asia, which I took from you."

    (Alexander's letter to Persian king Darius in response to a truce plea, as quoted in "Anabasis Alexandri" by Roman historian Arrian, Book II, 14, 4)

    Krste Misirkov, philologist and publicist, one of the founders of the modern FYROMian nation, considered a national hero in FYROM:

    "We are more Bulgarian than those in Bulgaria."

    "We speak a Bulgarian language".

    "And, anyway, what sort of new Macedonian nation can this be when we and our fathers and grandfathers and great-grandfathers have always been called Bulgarians?"

    ("За Македонцките Работи" - "On the Macedonian Matters", Sofia 1903)

    Kiro Gligorov, first president of the FYROM:

    "We are Slavs who came to this area in the sixth century AD. We are not descendants of the ancient Macedonians!"

    (Foreign Information Service Daily Report, Eastern Europe, February 26, 1992, p. 35)

    T.J. Winnifrith, British academic

    FYROM was also an attempt at a multicultural society. Here the fragments are just about holding together, although the cement that binds them is an unreliable mixture of propaganda and myth. The "Macedonian" language has been created, some rather misty history involving Tsar Samuel, probably a Bulgarian, and Alexander the Great, almost certainly a Greek, has been invented, and the name Macedonia has been adopted.Do we destroy these myths or live with them? Apparently these radical Slavic factions decided to live with their myths and lies for the constant amusement for the rest of the world!

    ("Shattered Eagles, Balkan Fragments", Duckworth, 1995)

    Eugene N. Borza, American historian, expert on Macedon:

    Modern "Macedonians" cannot establish a link with antiquity, as the Slavs entered the Balkans centuries after the demise of the ancient Macedonian kingdom.

    The twentieth-century development of a "Macedonian" ethnicity, and its recent evolution into independent statehood following the collapse of the Yugoslav state in 1991, has followed a rocky road. In order to survive the vicissitudes of Balkan history and politics, the "Macedonians", who have had no history, need one.

    They reside in a territory once part of a famous ancient kingdom, which has borne the Macedonian name as a region ever since and was called "Macedonia" for nearly half a century as part of Yugoslavia. And they speak a language now recognized by most linguists outside Bulgaria, Serbia, and Greece as a south Slavic language separate from Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, and Bulgarian.

    Their own so-called "Macedonian" ethnicity had evolved for more than a century, and thus it seemed natural and appropriate for them to call the new nation "Macedonia" and to attempt to provide some cultural references to bolster ethnic survival.

    ("Macedonia Redux", in "The Eye Expanded: life and the arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity", ed. Frances B Tichener & Richard F. Moorton, University of California Press, 1999)

    Have a nice day!

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    13/11/2012
  • Arayik Sargsyan, academician: Organisers of 9/11 in New York, ordered the killing of United States Ambassador in Libya. Natanyahu attacks by Arabs against Obama. Arayik Sargsyan, academician, president of the Geopolitical Academy.
    http://www.vedomosti.ru/newsline/opinions/2012/04/04/1599772#discussion#ixzz26QkxPHpf

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • CONSUL OF MACEDONIA IN ARMENIA

    Chairman of Academy of Geopolitics Arayik Sargsyan has been appointed Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia. In this regard, Arayik Sargsyan told Lragir.am that as an academician and expert, he was invited to Serbia, Albania and Macedonia last year to scrutinize the Kosovo issue. The aim of the visit was to prevent possible Muslim-Christian clashes. As an independent expert with an international reputation and a scientist, the Macedonian party submitted an official request to the Foreign Ministry of Armenia informing about Arayik Sargsyan's appointment as Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia. According to Arayik Sargsyan, in this office he will strengthen the Armenian-Macedonian friendship, raising awareness of the history, culture, demography and economy of Macedonia. He says he will work towards possible involvement of Macedonian investments in the economy of Armenia. "I will do everything to ensure that Armenia acquires a partner and a friend in the Balkans in the face of Macedonia," said Arayik Sargsyan.http://www.armtown.com/news/en/lra/20120413/25807/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • Consul of Macedonia lists possible cooperation areas with Armenia

    PanARMENIAN.Net - Presence of Macedonian businesses in Armenia may contribute to deepening of cooperation between Armenia and Macedonia, Consul of Macedonia to Armenia said.
    Arayik Sargsyan stressed the need to consider the possibility of realization of Armenian products in the Macedonian market, with special importance to be attached to development of cultural ties.
    The Armenian community in the country totals about 1000 people, with a Sunday school operating. The Consul noted that following his meeting with the Macedonian archimandrite, Armenians were allowed to hold a service in Orthodox Church in Macedonia’s capital city of Skopje. Mr. Sargsyan also stressed the importance of organizing cultural events in both countries.
    “Consultations on the Association Agreement may become another cooperation area. Armenia may benefit from Macedonia’s experience in conducting negotiations with the EU in the direction,” the official said.http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/103148/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • Solve the Karabakh issue is only a new Treaty of Gulistan between Russia and Iran. Arayik Sargsyan, academician, President of the Geopolitical Academy.
    NATO freeze the process of integration of the South Caucasus Republic: as was stated quite officially, "sooner or later, Georgia will become a member of NATO ... In the United States and NATO are actually viewed the South Caucasian countries as members of the same team, which sooner or later will provide the "green road" on joining the Alliance. The growth of NATO. .. can lead to the military alliance. Only new Gulustan Treaty between Russia and Iran could open the way to solve the Karabakh issue on the merits.
    http://bs-kavkaz.org/2012/11/reshit-karabahskij-vopros-sposoben-tolko-novyj-gulistanskij-dogovor/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • Putin wants to get away from Barzani guarantees for Russian business.

    Arayik Sargsyan,academician, President of the Geopolitical Academy.

    For several months the President of Kurdish autonomy in northern Iraq, Massoud Barzani wants to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The leadership of Russia has argued that the agreement signed with the authorities of Iraq, would be impracticable due to sabotage and secessionist action guide of Kurdistan, headed by Massoud Barzani, and his "protege," Iraq's Kurdish President Djalyal Talabani. Anyway, we can firmly say that Iraqi Kurds hate Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki 's, because they simply are afraid as fear of Saddam Hussein. The war between the forces of the Iraqi army and the Kurdish Peshmerga militia ("marching to die") we have yet to see.
    http://www.yerkramas.org/2012/10/27/putin-xochet-poluchit-ot-barzani-garantii-dlya-rossijskogo-biznesa/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • Masoud Barzani as a real threat to Nouri al-Maliki and Iraq: Arayik Sargsyan, President of the Geopolitical Academy. For several months the President of Kurdish autonomy in northern Iraq, Massoud Barzani wants to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The leadership of Russia has argued that the agreement signed with the authorities of Iraq, would be impracticable due to sabotage and secessionist action guide of Kurdistan, headed by Massoud Barzani, and his "protege," Iraq's Kurdish President Djalyal Talabani. Anyway, we can firmly say that Iraqi Kurds hate Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki 's, because they simply are afraid as fear of Saddam Hussein. The war between the forces of the Iraqi army and the Kurdish Peshmerga militia ("marching to die") we have yet to see.
    http://warfiles.ru/show-16479-masud-barzani-kak-realnaya-ugroza-dlya-nuri-al-maliki-i-iraka.html

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • Province of Kirkuk as "Apple of discord" between Baghdad and the Kurds.
    Arayik Sargsyan,academician, President of the Geopolitical Academy. I wonder how will behave the son Mustafi Barzani-Masoud, after meeting with Putin? And whether it will seek support from the (outgoing, however, from the post of Secretary of State) Hillary Clinton is a colleague and successor policies of Henry Kissinger? We have not forgotten, as Mustafa Barzani trusted words of then Assistant United States President Nixon. The main problem between the Central Government and the Kurds is the status of Kirkuk province. Baghdad remains opposed to its inclusion in the Kurdish autonomy. For their part, Kurdish leaders never agree to independence of Kurdistan with Kirkuk. Thus, the land of the province of Kirkuk could become a cause for war between the Arabs and the Kurds. aware of the importance of the Kirkuk region issue, Ambassador of the United States October 28, 2012 urgently nailed in the Kurdistan capital Arbil. Massoud Barzani met with the Ambassador of the United States in Iraq, Robert Steven Bikroftom. During the meeting the parties discussed the current situation in Kirkuk. Ambassador of the United States called on both sides to Erbil and Baghdad is to find a solution to the Kirkuk region. And in the meantime Note: the status and identity of Kirkuk is a geopolitical asset in the hands of those who control this region in northern Iraq. It is the State that will be in Kirkuk, and will be a real geopolitical leader of Mesopotamia. http://bs-kavkaz.org/2012/11/kirkuk-kak-yabloko-razdora-meghdu-arabami-i-kurdami/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • United States again returns to Iraq. Arayik Sargsyan, Academician, President of the Geoplitical Academy.
    Performing a "request" Erdogan, kurds began a policy of pressure on Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki on all sides. In case even the President's daughter has joined Iraq, Kurd Jalal Talabani's, Ms Ala al-Talabani. During a NATO seminar in Yerevan, NATO's Special Representative for the South Caucasus and Central Asia, Mr. James Appathurai officially stated that: "NATO does not intervene in the Affairs of Syria, and will not interfere in the Syrian case, as it has with Libya." Our experts from Iraq have reported new plans to increase its United States FORCES in Iraq, and to the thousands of special forces intend to 4.3 thousands another 12 thousand United States Army soldiers.
    United States again returns to Iraq, although it from there by and large and not leave.

    http://www.yerkramas.org/2012/11/09/ssha-opyat-vozvrashhaetsya-v-irak/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • The war between the army of Irag and"Peshmerga" Kurds will turn around of Kirkuk. Arayik Sargsyan,academician, President of the Geopolitical Academy.
    I wonder how will behave the son Mustafi Barzani-Masoud, after meeting with Putin? And whether it will seek support from the (outgoing, however, from the post of Secretary of State) Hillary Clinton is a colleague and successor policies of Henry Kissinger? We have not forgotten, as Mustafa Barzani trusted words of then Assistant United States President Nixon. The main problem between the Central Government and the Kurds is the status of Kirkuk province. Baghdad remains opposed to its inclusion in the Kurdish autonomy. For their part, Kurdish leaders never agree to independence of Kurdistan with Kirkuk. Thus, the land of the province of Kirkuk could become a cause for war between the Arabs and the Kurds. aware of the importance of the Kirkuk region issue, Ambassador of the United States October 28, 2012 urgently nailed in the Kurdistan capital Arbil. Massoud Barzani met with the Ambassador of the United States in Iraq, Robert Steven Bikroftom. During the meeting the parties discussed the current situation in Kirkuk. Ambassador of the United States called on both sides to Erbil and Baghdad is to find a solution to the Kirkuk region. And in the meantime Note: the status and identity of Kirkuk is a geopolitical asset in the hands of those who control this region in northern Iraq. It is the State that will be in Kirkuk, and will be a real geopolitical leader of Mesopotamia.
    http://www.yerkramas.org/2012/11/03/vojna-mezhdu-armiej-iraka-i-peshmerga-kurdov-obernetsya-vokrug-statusa-g-kirkuk/

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2012
  • The FYROM language used today was first developed after World War Two in Australia by linguists.

    "The first document written in the literary standard Macedonian language is the first issue of the Nova Makedonija newspaper in 1944. Makedonska Iskra (Macedonian Spark) was the first Macedonian newspaper to be published in Australia, from 1946 to 1957. A monthly with national distribution, it commenced in Perth and later moved to Melbourne and Sydney."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonian_language

    By :
    Chris
    - Posted on :
    21/11/2012
  • nice trolling chris.....getting in the last word! modern grecians would be proud of your excellent trolling and pasting obscure references to make yourself feel better your own background.

    don't stop now, the internet is full of stories about macedonia waiting for you to post!!!

    By :
    trajko
    - Posted on :
    23/11/2012
  • Arayik Sargsyan, Consul of Macedonia to Armenia:It's time to create an alliance of Christian's around Turkey:.http://bs-kavkaz.org/2012/11/reshit-karabahskij-vopros-sposoben-tolko-novyj-gulistanskij-dogovor/ …

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    24/11/2012
  • "It is historically proven that the Yugoslav Democracy of Macedonia was created by Stalin, Tito and Dimitrov, aiming at the stealthy removal of a large part of Northern Greece. This Democracy was used during the period 1944-1949 in order to destabilise Greece."

    Thomas Niles, US Ambassador, statement on the 23rd June 1992 to the SubCommittee of US Congress, Eleutherotypia newspaper, June 24, 1992

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • It is the national identity of these Slav Macedonians that has been the most violently contested aspect of the whole Macedonian dispute, and is still being contested today. There is no doubt that they are southern Slavs; they have a language, or a group of varying dialects, that is grammatically akin to Bulgarian but phonetically in some respects akin to Serbian, and which has certain quite distinctive features of its own. In regard to their own national feelings, all that can safely be said is that during the last eighty years many more Slav Macedonians seem to have considered themselves Bulgarian, or closely linked to Bulgaria, than have considered themselves Serbian, or closely linked to Serbia (or Yugoslavia). Only the people of the Skopje region, in the north west, have ever shown much tendency to regard themselves as Serbs. The feeling of being Macedonians, and nothing but Macedonians, seems to be a sentiment of fairly recent growth, and even today is not very deep-rooted.

    (Elisabeth Barker, "Macedonia, Its Place in Balkan Power Politics". Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. 1980. pp. p. 10. ISBN 0313225877.)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • The FYROMian nationalists quite simply stole all of Bulgarian historical argument concerning Macedonia, substituting Macedonian for Bulgarian ethnic tags in the story. Thus Kuber formed a Macedonian tribal alliance in the late seventh century; Kliment and Naum were Macedonians and not Bulgarians; the medieval archbishop-patriarchate of Ohrid, which Kliment led, was a Macedonian, not a Bulgarian independent church, as shown by the persistence of Glagolitic letters in the region in the face of the Cyrillic that were spawned in Bulgaria; and the renowned Samuil led a great Macedonian, rather than a western Bulgarian, state against Byzantium (giving Slav Macedonia its apex in the historical sun).

    (Dennis P. Hupchick, "Conflict and Chaos in Eastern Europe", Palgrave Macmillan, 1995.)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • (The obviously plagiarized historical argument of the Macedonian nationalists for a separate Macedonian ethnicity could be supported only by linguistic reality, and that worked against them until the 1940s. Until a modern Macedonian literary language was mandated by the socialist-led partisan movement from Macedonia in 1944, most outside observers and linguists agreed with the Bulgarians in considering the vernacular spoken by the Macedonian Slavs as a western dialect of Bulgarian.)

    Dennis P. Hupchick, "Conflict and Chaos in Eastern Europe", Palgrave Macmillan, 1995.

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • I have even met people who believe there is a special race which they call 'Macedonian', whose cause they wish to aid. The truth is, that in a district which has no official frontiers, and never has had any stable ones, there are people of six races, who, as we have seen, all have causes to be considered [...] I shall speak only of the part I have stayed in- the districts of Lakes Ochrida and Prespa. Here there are Greeks, Slavs, Albanians, and Vlahs. Of Turks, except officials and such of the army as may be quartered on the spot, there are few. The Albanians, I believe, are all Moslem. Should there be any Christians they would be officially classed as Greeks.

    (Edith Durham, "The Burden of the Balkans", 1905, p. 76)

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • Saudi Arabia and Qatar reformat the Middle East for their interests. Arayik Sargsyan, academician, Honorary Consul of Macedonia to Armenia.

    In my view, we are dealing with a logical continuation of actions of Tel Aviv, have recently been launched, on October 24 Israeli air raid on the warehouse of military products in the suburb of Yarmouk near the capital Khartoum, Sudan. for mediation in resolving the crisis over Gaza Mohammed Mursi was promised several (about six) billion. Hillary Clinton urged Israel not to begin land-based military operations against Gaza. U.S. will now have to put the 2 divisions Patriot systems in order to strengthen Israel's "Iron Dome." what is happening in Lebanon, including the high-profile attacks, one way or another connected with the assassination of Rafik Hariri, closely associated with Saudi Arabia and is Saudi project in Lebanon. 1976 formal agreement remains in effect. The loss of the Christian communities would end in the presence of the Holy Sepulchre, which will be deeply symbolic, spiritual - idiologicheskoe value.

    http://warfiles.ru/show-18536-saudovskaya-araviya-i-katar-pereformatiruyut-blizhniy-vostok-pod-svoi-i-zapada-interesy.html

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    26/11/2012
  • how can a race with a Slavic language and Slavic names claim to be descendants of ancient Macedonians?

    By :
    Billy
    - Posted on :
    27/11/2012
  • "Arab spring" had led to the exodus of Christians from the Middle East.
    Interview of academician, the Honorary Consul of Macedonia in Armenia Arayik Sargsyan, devoted to actual problems of the Middle East.

    In my view, we are dealing with a logical continuation of actions of Tel Aviv, have recently been launched, on October 24 Israeli air raid on the warehouse of military products in the suburb of Yarmouk near the capital Khartoum, Sudan. for mediation in resolving the crisis over Gaza Mohammed Mursi was promised several (about six) billion. Hillary Clinton urged Israel not to begin land-based military operations against Gaza. U.S. will now have to put the 2 divisions Patriot systems in order to strengthen Israel's "Iron Dome." what is happening in Lebanon, including the high-profile attacks, one way or another connected with the assassination of Rafik Hariri, closely associated with Saudi Arabia and is Saudi project in Lebanon. 1976 formal agreement remains in effect. The loss of the Christian communities would end in the presence of the Holy Sepulchre, which will be deeply symbolic, spiritual – ideological value.

    http://warfiles.ru/show-18536-saudovskaya-araviya-i-katar-pereformatiruyut-blizhniy-vostok-pod-svoi-i-zapada-interesy.html

    By :
    ARAYIK SARGSYAN, academician, President of the Academy of ge
    - Posted on :
    27/11/2012
Foreign Minister Nikola Poposki of Macedonia
Contexte : 

Macedonia declared independence from the dissolving Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1991.

The country is an ethnic mosaic. Slavic Macedonians represent the largest group (64% of the population). Ethnic Albanians are the biggest minority (25%), with Turks (3%) and Roma (1.9%) also present.

Of all the hurdles standing in the way of Macedonia's EU accession, the so-called 'name dispute' with Greece appears to be the biggest.

Seen from Athens, the official name used by Skopje – the Republic of Macedonia – is an open challenge to the Greek region of Macedonia. In reprisal, Greece vowed to veto Macedonia's participation in international organisations, including the EU, until the issue is resolved.

Although Macedonia is recognised as the country's constitutional name most EU countries, the name dispute with Greece has led to an impasse for the country's membership of both the EU and NATO.

Greece also considers that Skopje is misappropriating large chunks of its ancient history. The airport in Skopje was named after Alexander the Great, who is seen by Greece as a hero of its ancient history. Recently, Skopje angered Athens by erecting a giant statue of a ‘warrior on horseback’ resembling Alexander the Great.

More in this section

Publicité

Vidéos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 4

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Publicité

Publicité