EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

L'UE approuve le budget 2011, mais la bataille n'est pas encore terminée

Version imprimable
Send by email
Publié 16 décembre 2010, mis à jour 20 décembre 2010

Les décideurs politiques de l'Union européenne ont approuvé le budget 2011 de l'UE hier (15 décembre), mettant ainsi fin à des discussions houleuses sur le montant de l'augmentation des dépenses. Toutefois, la bataille devrait reprendre de plus belle l'année prochaine suite aux demandes de certains pour une réduction du budget à long terme.

The European Parliament passed a budget worth 126.5 billion euros, 2.9% more than this year, after a long tussle with the EU's 27 member states.

"It took us longer than expected but finally we got there," said Budget Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski, adding that the vote paves the way for Europe to address next year's burning issues with more strength. 

With issues such as energy, the environment, climate, trade, growth and financial stability best tackled at European than national levels, Lewandowski said, "this budget was essential to start the year with the required tools" to boost employment and growth.

Legislators had initially demanded a 6.2% rise, but backed down under pressure from governments, which said EU spending must not grow by so much when many countries are making deep cuts at home to ward off a sovereign debt crisis.

Negotiations between legislators and governments also stalled for weeks over demands for the parliament to have more power in determining future EU budget-making. Those demands were met only partially and in a non-binding way.

"Thanks to today's decision we will avoid a provisional budget, which would slow down the execution of EU policies, mainly agriculture and regional aid," European People's Party MEP Sidonia Jedrzejewska of Poland, the Parliament's lead negotiator, said in a statement.

Without a budget deal, next year's spending would have been the same as in 2010 and disbursed in 12 equal instalments. Some programmes would have been denied funding, such as the EU's fledgling diplomatic service, new bodies to supervise financial markets, and a nuclear fusion project.

The worst is yet to come

The Parliament's vote settled a dispute over EU spending for now, but battle will be joined next year when governments open negotiations on the bloc's next long-term budget, which will run from 2014 and may last seven or 10 years.

"It is quite obvious that the minority of net-paying EU countries with Eurosceptic governments want the EU budget to be cut at all costs," said Goran Farm, a Swedish socialist member of the European Parliament.

"This is only the first shot in a bigger battle to come. If the Council wants to slash the EU budget, we will face permanent trench warfare. We are not going to accept that."

Britain and the Netherlands have been the strongest advocates of EU budget cuts.

An EU diplomat said Britain would like the see long-term spending frozen at the current level in real terms, which would mean cuts when taking into account economic growth and inflation.

"Clearly our objective will be to push for the same restraint on the budget for the next financial perspective that we've been pushing for the budget next year," said UK Prime Minister David Cameron's budget spokesman.

Britain's stance worries poorer EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe - the main beneficiaries of the bloc's regional aid funds, which finance road construction, environmental clean-up, job training and other projects.

The EU's costly farm subsidies will be another contentious issue in the debate. They will be defended by France, their major recipient. Britain is also set to defend its rebate from EU coffers won by former prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1984.

(EurActiv with Reuters.)

Réactions : 

Given the present context and the exceptional situation this year, the agreement on the draft 2011 budget is the best compromise possible: but underlying problems remain, said French centre-right MEP and budget committee chair Alain Lamassoure (European People's Party).

"Unlike some national budgets, the Union's budget is not in danger of financial collapse - it is balanced - but it is on the brink of political bankruptcy," he argued, saying that the Union cannot afford to fund the new initiatives stated in the Treaty of Lisbon.

"Parliament attaches much importance to the agreement reached with the Commission and future presidencies to find a way to secure funding for future policies," he added.

"This is not the budget of our dreams but at least we managed to secure extra financing for youth, support for SMEs, research and aid to Palestine. This is a good compromise at a time when the only thing we see across Europe is austerity," said the leader of the Socialists & Democrats Group in the European Parliament, German MEP Martin Schulz.

An egocentric vision of Europe prevailed, said leftist Portuguese MEP Miguel Portas (GUE/NGL) after the positive vote in Parliament. 

"This is a Europe that today refused to tax financial transactions, to reduce the burden on already impoverished national budgets and to start a debate on new resources for the EU - a Europe that refused the flexibilisation of the budget to maintain education, environmental and social programmes. This is the Europe which complies with companies that conduct research for the Israeli military while Israel fails to act in accordance with international human rights standards," Portas said.

"After all the brouhaha they made during the negotiations, the European Parliament president and the presidents of the three main political groups have sold the Parliament short," said the Greens after the vote.

"The Greens will continue to push to ensure that the European Parliament has a full and substantial role in the negotiations on the next financial framework, and to ensure that this includes a proper consideration of own resources for financing the EU budget," said Green budgetary spokesperson and German MEP Helga Trüpel.

"A proper own resources system would reduce costs for national exchequers and end the annual budgetary squabbling. We will also continue to fight against further wasting public money on the white elephant that is ITER [nuclear fusion project]. That the European taxpayer should be expected to foot the bill for the ballooning ITER budget is simply wrong. The least costly option would be to abandon the project now before the main construction has started at all," she added.

S&D budget spokesman and Swedish MEP Göran Färm said: "I have concerns for the future. EU member states have agreed to increase the tasks of the EU but they disagree about financing them.

"This is going to be a major problem in 2012 and 2013 where we still need to secure the financing of important projects such as the EU2020 strategy for jobs and growth, innovation, climate change and ITER. We need more not less flexibility to allow the EU to fulfil its new tasks. The European Parliament, like any other Parliament, will never accept having less influence over the budget," Färm added.

EU Budget Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski said the adopted budget gave a ''strong signal to citizens and an even stronger signal to the markets and to the world''.

''Europe is far more about addressing concrete issues then inter-institutional wrangling! Despite the difficult financial and economic situation, despite our national disparities, when faced with crises Europe acts as one!'' he stated.

"It took us longer than expected but finally we got there. [The budget] will enable the whole of Europe to address next year's burning issues with more strength. The agreement […] shows that our national governments and the European Parliament can resolve their differences for the greater good of half-a-billion Europeans,'' he stated.

Polish MEP Sidonia Jędrzejewska, rapporteur on the EU budget for the European People's Party, described the adopted budget as ''good news for all beneficiaries''.

''The Parliament's ultimate aim was to provide the EU with a sustainable budget that can be fully and predictably implemented from the beginning of the financial year,'' she said.

"The adopted package not only provides us with a sound budget for 2011, but also guarantees the involvement of the Parliament in the negotiations of the next Multiannual Financial Framework by the Council. Additionally, it contains a commitment from the European Commission to present an official proposal on the own resources-issue by June 2011," she noted.

UKIP MEP Marta Andreasen, a member of the Parliament's budget committee member, blamed UK Prime Minister David Cameron for not negotiating harder after voting against an increase in the EU budget.

"While we should be pleased that the European Parliament has surrendered its demands for a 6% increase in the budget and settled for 2.9%, what has become clear is that PM David Cameron seriously underestimated the bargaining power that the UK brings to the table and he could have held out for, and earned, a total budget freeze.''

"Instead, he fell for the Parliament's bluff and gave them half of what they wanted, when he could have actually given them nothing."

Jacques Huillard, vice-president of the European Construction Industry Federation, expressed ''relief'' at the final budget compromise, describing the Parliament's new role in budget negotiations as ''largely positive".

''Nevertheless,'' he said, ''we deeply regret that the political compromise has been made at the expense of investment programmes, notably of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) programme, cut by nearly 5% in payment credits.''

''The TEN-T budget had already been cut by two thirds during the 2005 budget negotiations, from €20 billion to €8 billion […] this questions the feasibility of achieving the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth,'' he said, calling on the EU to live up to its promises for the next financial framework period.

Prochaines étapes : 
  • 2011: Negotiations start on long-term financial perspectives.
Contexte : 

The size, structure and priorities of the EU's annual spending, which amounted to roughly €130 billion in 2010, are governed by the 'Financial Perspectives', which cover the period 2007-2013 (see EurActiv LinksDossier).

Negotiations on the next multi-annual budget planning are due to start in earnest in 2011, and will cover the period 2014-2020.

The most controversial issue of the review is the current 44% (€55 billion) share of the budget that is set aside for agricultural subsidies.

On 19 October, the European Commission listed a number of options to fuel the EU's future budget, proposing a decrease in the share of spending coming directly from the member states.

To compensate for the shortfall, it proposed introducing an EU tax which could take several forms: a tax on air transport or a share of new financial, corporate or energy taxes, or an EU-wide VAT.

More recently, European Commission President José Manuel Barroso offered to put on the table in June 2011 concrete proposals for "own resources" in the long-term EU budget.

A lire aussi

More in this section

Publicité

Vidéos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Publicité

Publicité