EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Actualités en Bulgarie
Actualités en Turquie
Actualité en Allemagne
Actualités en Espagne
Actualités en France
Actualités au Royaume-Uni
Actualités en Pologne
Actualités en République tchèque
Actualités en Slovaquie
Actualités en Hongrie
Actualités en Roumanie
Actualités en Serbie
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Obama appelle ses alliés à se rallier à l’Afghanistan

Publié 02 décembre 2009
Version imprimableEnvoyer à un ami

L’équipe de sécurité nationale du président des Etats-Unis Barack Obama, lors du Congrès du 1er décembre, a fait part des inquiétudes des législateurs sceptiques à étendre la guerre en envoyant encore 30 000 soldats.

Rising combat deaths and military costs have sapped public support for the eight-year-old war and Obama's troop increase has prompted protests from left-leaning leaders of his Democratic Party ahead of next year's congressional elections. 

In his televised speech on Tuesday, Obama said the goal of raising US troop levels to nearly 100,000 was to step up the battle against the Taliban, secure key centres and train Afghan forces so they can take over, allowing for a US exit. 

Allies were also expected to send more soldiers, with Obama saying "the common security of the world" was at stake. 

Obama's pledge to start bringing US troops home after 18 months, provided conditions on the ground allow it, may help him to contain rebellion among Democrats. 

But the July 2011 drawdown date drew swift condemnation from Republicans who, while critical of Obama's three-month strategy review, were nonetheless behind his final decision to bolster the 68,000 US troops now in the war zone. 

"All Americans want to see our troops leave Afghanistan as soon as possible after successfully completing their mission," said Representative Howard McKeon, the senior Republican on the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee. 

"But we want that redeployment to be based on the events and conditions on the ground - not the Washington political clock." 

Republicans argue that setting withdrawal timelines only emboldens the Taliban and undermines support for US-backed governments in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

Key congressional committees scheduled back-to-back hearings on Wednesday and Thursday to review Obama's revised war strategy, estimated to cost $30 billion this fiscal year. 

As commander-in-chief, Obama has the authority to send the soldiers but Congress must approve the cost. 

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, will appear first before the Senate Armed Services Committee at 9 a.m. ET, followed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee at 1:30 p.m. ET. 

Army General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan who had recommended sending 40,000 more troops, will testify next week. 

Gates will describe "the symbiotic relationship between al Qaeda and the Taliban and the urgent need to reverse their momentum in both Afghanistan and Pakistan," said Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell. 

"He will candidly discuss the mistakes we have made in that region over the last few decades and the imperative that we not repeat them," Morrell said. 

Shorter timeline 

Major US troop movements are likely to begin in January and all 30,000 troops should be in place by the end of August, a far shorter timeline than war planners had expected. 

Other NATO members are expected to commit between 5,000 and 7,000 additional troops, although some of them are already deployed as part of the alliance's 42,000-strong contingent. 

(EurActiv with Reuters.

Réactions : 

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he expects allies to provide at least 5,000 troops for Afghanistan and possibly a few thousand more after President Barack Obama announced a big increase in US forces for the country. 

"There are 43 countries on the ground under NATO command and I am confident that other allies and partners will also make a substantial increase in their contributions," Rasmussen said in a statement after Obama's announcement. 

"I expect at least 5,000 more forces from other countries in our alliance and possibly a few thousand more," the NATO secretary-general said in the televised statement, released on Wednesday. 

France is considering boosting its presence in Afghanistan, possibly to train local security forces, in response to a request from US President Barack Obama, the newspaper Le Monde said on Tuesday. A senior French diplomat with NATO in Brussels later said France was still working out its precise contribution but could help with paramilitary police or supplies. 

"We are not saying no to Obama," Le Monde quoted a source close to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as saying. It said Obama would ask France for 1,500 more soldiers, although the senior diplomat later dismissed that figure as unrealistic. The diplomat said France was still looking at its options in view of a planned international conference on Afghanistan to be held in London on 28 January. 

Key Democrats welcomed Obama's decision to set a date to begin a drawdown but reserved judgment on the troop increase. 

"President Obama asked for time to make his decision on a new policy in Afghanistan. I am going to take some time to think through the proposal he presented," said Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, from Obama's home state of Illinois. 

"The cost of [the Afghanistan surge] is astronomical," said Republican Representative Walter Jones

Representative Dave Obey, who chairs the House committee in charge of approving government spending, said a long-term commitment to the Afghan war could cost $500 billion to $900 billion over the next decade, which could "devour our ability to pay for the actions necessary to rebuild our own economy". Obey, a Democrat, has proposed a war surtax to pay for the conflict. But a tax increase is unlikely, especially with midterm congressional elections next year, Reuters writes.

Prochaines étapes : 
  • 28 Jan. 2010: International conference on Afghanistan in London.
Contexte : 

Since US President Barack Obama took office, the European Union has decided to engage more in Afghanistan, especially in the field of nation-building (EurActiv 23/02/09). 

The EU launched EUPOL Afghanistan in June 2007. For the Afghan presidential election, the EU largely funded efforts estimated to cost over $200 million. 

More than 40 countries have sent troops to Afghanistan under NATO's banner, with the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Poland providing the most European soldiers. 

Last September, European defence ministers expressed reluctance to send more troops to the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan, anticipating their response to a possible US call for reinforcements (EurActiv 29/09/09). 

More in this section

Publicité