Sections
Mini Sections
Dans un article rédigé pour le think-tank Confrontations Europe, André Ferron, soutient que, contrairement à ce que l'on peut penser, le problème ne réside pas dans la recerche de fonds publics pour Galileo car de nombreux Etats membres sont disposés à investir massivement. Néanmoins, Galileo ne devrait pas être "nationalisé" : Le mieux serait en effet que le financement public soit approuvé par l'UE afin que l'intérêt communautaire prévale.
LinksDossier: GALILEO [FR]
Even though the European Commission acknowledged the failure of the Galileo project in May 2007 - with the private sector unable to reach an agreement that would have ensured the launch of the project in time, European public-private partnerships in general are not a failure. Rather, one specific public-private partnership failed, states the paper.
André Ferron compares the Galileo project to a tollbridge corresponding to 30 satellites at a cost of 3 billion euros, and generating up to 450 billion euros in annual revenue by 2025. The financial structure of the bridge would initially be composed of public participation - limited to one third - with the private sector providing the rest. The failure came from the private sector, due to uncertainties regarding the revenues, observes the author. Finally, it is better to finance the bridge entirely with public funds as proposed by the Commission, he argues.
Galileo is indeed a costly bridge, built next to a free American bridge and future Chinese and Russian bridges, all funded by the Army, the author continues. The Council of 8 June confirmed Member States' support for Galileo, but the future agreement must overcome this challenge and learn from the failures of the past, concludes the paper.
Bulgarie
France
Hongrie
Pologne
Rép. tchèque
Roumanie
Slovaquie
Turquie
Del.icio.us
Digg It
Technorati
Europeans challenge Europe