EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

La commission Transports du PE donne son feu vert à la proposition de directive sur la sécurité des

Publié 21 janvier 2005 - Mis à jour 28 mai 2012
Version imprimableSend by email

La commission des transports du parlement européen a voté, mercredi 19 janvier 2004, en faveur d'une proposition de directive visant à renforcer la sécurité des installations portuaires, adoptant dans le même temps des amendements du rapporteur Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert.

International Conventions

At international level safety at sea has, since the Titanic disaster of 1914, been safeguarded by the Convention on Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), regulated by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO). After the terrorist attacks of the early 2000s, a new chapter of SOLAS was agreed: the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. The code sets detailed security requirements for governments and port authorities on port security: staffing; equipment; assessment; monitoring cargoes; controlling access. It also sets similar rules for shipping companies regarding security and certification of vessels under SOLAS. 

European legislation

An EU  Regulation was formulated to incorporate the ISPS code into EU law. However, the code only covers the physical area between the ship and the port. The Commission therefore proposed a directive in Feb 2004, to cover areas beyond this space, in and around ports. 

Container Security Initiative (CSI)

In January 2002, the US launched the CSI, whereby maritime containers identified as a possible security risk through intelligence procedures, are intercepted at ports throughout the world. By a set of agreement between US and national governments, containers are screened at national ports by officials from the US Customs & Border Protection, working with national counterparts.

Réactions : 

EU Directive

The main dispute within the EU institutions is on the question of costs: who amongst governments, the EU and port authorities pays for what. Parliament has proposed that the Commission do a cost–benefit analysis to resolve this issue. The other main Parliamentary amendments to the Council position on the proposal are:

  • member states should decide on the exact physical scope of the directive
  • inspections to ensure implementation should be carried out by the Commission and not by member states
  • the proposal for a port security advisory committee should be dropped

The European Sea Ports Organisation (ESPO) takes the view that port security should be regulated within measures for the whole transport chain (i.e. security of transport connections to ports) and not targeted specifically. It fears duplication and wasted resources. It also argues, together with its US counterpart the American Association of Port Authorities, that costs should primarily be met from the public purse. It supports a full cost-benefit analysis of the Commission proposal.

CSI

Japan, some Asian ports and most major EU ports have joined the CSI scheme. The US plans to expand it further into Asia, Africa and South America.

Prochaines étapes : 
  • Parliament will vote in plenary in March 2005
  • Parliament's amendments to the Commission proposal will be referred back to Council
Contexte : 

In worldwide moves to combat terrorism after the twin towers and the Madrid attacks, transport systems were identified as areas of particular vulnerability. Within this, ports, vulnerable both as targets for attack and as points of illegal entry for people and for weapons, were a priority. Measures have therefore been taken to strengthen port security both at European and international level. The Commission has proposed a directive [COM (2004) 76], the international community has strengthened existing conventions and the US has instituted a security system for maritime containers (detailed below).

More in this section

Publicité