Sections
Mini Sections
Head of Section, responsible for high-performance computing and data handling
Senior Manager, European Electricity Policy
Senior Manager, European Regulation
EU Affairs - Online Media Sales Manager
Senior Media Officer / Head of Press relations Team
Consultant (Scientist) - EU FP7 Project 'SafeWind'
Psychiatrist, Public Health Expert or Clinical Psychologist
Energy Engineers and Economists (fixed-term contract)
Mettre une annonceD’après une nouvelle enquête, chaque banque européenne devrait dépenser entre 10 et 100 millions d’euros pour appliquer les nouvelles dispositions de la directive relative aux services de paiements. Cette initiative européenne vise à augmenter la compétitivité dans le secteur des paiements et à passer progressivement à une économie plus efficace et moins basée sur les paiements en espèces.
The poll, carried out in June across 30 major EU banking institutions by the payment system consulting organisation PSE Consulting
, reveals that banks expect relatively limited costs but minimal competitive benefits of the new directive. On the basis of the answers collected, PSE Consulting estimates that the total cost for banks will be €6 billion by November 2009, when the directive
is supposed to enter into force. In addition, almost 60% of the sample are sceptical about the actual advantages that the new rules will bring (see our Links Dossier on the PSD).
The survey comes as the banking sector voluntary agreed to establish the Single Euro(pean) Payment Area (SEPA), an initiative to harmonise bank procedures with the aim of creating a genuine EU market for payment services. According to the consultancy TowerGroup
, SEPA costs the EU banking sector around €10 billion in investments, much more than the implementation of the PSD (see our Links Dossier on SEPA).
The two initiatives are expected to bring benefits for consumers, who will be able to enjoy cheaper and more competitive payment services throughout the EU, as the Commission keeps pointing out. But banks themselves are set to profit from SEPA and the PSD by gaining easier access to other EU national markets. Indeed, the relative majority of the financial institutions interviewed by PSE Consulting (37%) consider the increased cross-border competition as the most positive effect of the PSD on their revenues.
The following table explains the differences between SEPA and the PSD:
| SEPA | PSD | |
| Currency |
Euro |
Euro + Currencies of Member States |
| Geographical coverage |
EU + EEA + Switzerland + potentially other partners |
EU + EEA |
| Impact |
Interbank relationships |
Bank-consumer relationship |
| Legal status |
Self regulation |
Law |
| Services regulated |
Direct debt, credit transfer, payment cards |
Payment services including mobile money, low-value payments, e-money |
| Providers affected |
Banks |
Banks, credit institutions, e-money providers, postal services, supermarkets, money remittance services, etc. |
| Involved changes for financial institutions |
IT, back-office activities |
Contracts, contractual relationships with customers |
| Estimated costs for the banking sector |
€10 billion |
€6 billion |