EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

La CJE déclare illégales les restrictions des jeux d’argent en Autriche et en Allemagne

Publié 10 septembre 2010
Étiquettes
gambling
Version imprimableSend by email

La Cour de Justice Européenne (CJE) a statué cette semaine contre les monopoles étatiques autrichiens et allemands qui appliquent des restrictions sur les paris sportifs, loteries et autres jeux.

Ruling on three cases referred to it by the German courts on Wednesday (8 September), the European court found that while monopolies were sometimes justified, Germany's efforts to promote gambling were inconsistent with its goal of protecting consumers.

"German rules on sporting bets constitute a restriction on the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment," reads the ECJ's judgement.

While the Court acknowledged that such restrictions may be justified to protect the public interest, such as combating gambling addiction, it stressed that in the German case, the public monopoly does not pursue the objective of combating the dangers of gambling in a consistent and systematic manner.

Indeed, state monopolies drive intensive advertising campaigns to encourage gambling in casinos and on automated games to maximise profits, the Court noted.

"In such circumstances, the preventive objective of that monopoly can no longer be pursued, so that the monopoly ceases to be justifiable," the ECJ concluded.

Austrian law goes beyond what's necessary to fight crime and fraud

In a similar case, the ECJ yesterday (9 September) found Austria to be in breach of EU law.

The Court noted that Austrian legislation, which only allows companies with their seat in Austria to operate casinos, contravenes EU rules on the freedom of establishment and discriminates against companies with their headquarters in another member state.

It also found that excluding operators whose seat is in another member state is disproportionate, as the measure goes beyond what is necessary to fight crime and fraud.

In an earlier ruling, the Court stated that EU countries could ban online gambling if their aim was to combat fraud (EurActiv 07/06/10).

EU Green Paper being prepared

EU Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier announced in February that after years of ad-hoc rulings by the ECJ to regulate gambling in Europe, the EU executive would seek a more coherent way to address the issue (EurActiv 12/02/10).

A Green Paper on the matter is due to for publication in the coming months. Member states have not been consulted on gambling since they decided to leave the issue out of the Services Directive in 2006.

Réactions : 

The ruling was welcomed by proponents of a free gambling market.

The secretary-general of the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), Sigrid Ligné, referred to the German case as a landmark ruling which will have a decisive impact on much-needed reform in Germany.

"Other member states have opened or are opening their markets and moving away from monopoly regimes to multi-operator licensing systems. They show that consumers can be better protected in a market that is both regulated and open to competition," she added.

Regarding the Austrian case, Ligné stressed that it confirms clearly that member states cannot require EU licensed online operators to be physically present on their territory.

Clive Hawkswood, chief executive of the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), added that Austria is not alone in having gambling laws and arbitrary practices that seek to protect particular local operators. "We hope that this ruling will convince other member states to introduce changes in their legislation," he said.

European Lotteries (EL), an umbrella group representing licensed national lotteries in 40 countries, said that the German the ruling did not, however, pave the way for liberalising the market.

"Contrary to how proponents of liberalisation would like to interpret these rulings, the Court today by no means advocated a liberalisation of gambling," said EL president Friedrich Stickler.

"On the contrary, the Court reminded Germany that it has to control more strictly the offer of dangerous forms of gambling, such as casino games and gaming machines. The Court also pointed again to the higher risks associated with Internet gambling," Stickler added.

Contexte : 

While gambling activities have traditionally been strictly regulated at national level to protect consumers from addiction, fraud, money-laundering and fixed games, the exclusion of gambling activities from the EU's Services Directive has triggered numerous complaints from the gambling industry regarding access to national markets.

This has led to a number of European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings on the issue and several Commission infringement procedures against member states to verify whether national measures limiting the cross-border supply of gambling services are compatible with EU laws guaranteeing free movement of services.

A lire aussi

More in this section

Publicité