EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Barroso refuses to rule out third term bid

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 April 2013, updated 02 September 2013

Commission President José Manuel Barroso will decide next year whether to run for a record third term as head of the EU executive, according to reported comments yesterday (4 April) in Vienna, where he is on an official visit.

"My mandate runs until October 2014, then I will make a decision about myself," Barroso said in response to a journalist who asked him whether he intended to run for a third term.

Nothing in EU treaties prevents the Commission president from running for a third consecutive term, but it has never happened before.

The idea that Barroso should serve a third term was first uttered by Commission Vice President Viviane Reding in an exclusive interview for EurActiv Italy in August 2012.

>> Read: Reding: Barroso III would make Europe stronger

On that occasion, when EurActiv asked the Commission to comment, a spokesperson, Olivier Bailly replied: “We saw Vice President Reding's nice invitation in the interview that was made by EurActiv. I can assure you though that this is not on the President's mind, and that he is fully focused on his second term and the Commission's answers to the current economic crisis. And really, this is a non-issue for us.”

In March of this year, EurActiv asked Barroso about his legacy and the advice he would give to the next Commission President. He replied that he is still focused on the present, but that "one year and a half is a lot of time in politics - anything can happen".

 

Yesterday in Vienna, Barroso reiterated his call to major European political parties to put forward a candidate for Commission president in European elections in June 2014.

"This would give the elections a European dimension. The parties could then explain what they want for Europe," the Commission president said.

The proposal that each political family present a candidate for Commission president ahead of the next European elections in 2014 is gaining ground. No decisions have yet been made but the Party of European Socialists is widely expected to nominate Martin Schulz, the current President of the European Parliament. Chances are thought high that the liberal ALDE party could again nominate Guy Verhofstadt, the former Belgian prime minister, and a high profile federalist.

It is less clear who the EPP could nominate. The name of Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has been repeatedly mentioned, but his country is not member of the eurozone, and his English language skills may not allow him to deal with complex issues at the highest level.

EPP President Wilfried Martens has said that the next Commission president should speak “several languages”. France insists that high EU official be “bilingual”, meaning that they should have a good command of both English and French.

The post of Council President, occupied by Herman Van Rompuy, will also be up for grabs on 1 December 2014. Van Rompuy recently said he that he plans to retire from politics.

>> Read: Van Rompuy says he will quit politics in 2014

Hugo Brady, a senior research fellow at the Centre for European Reform, wrote in an op-ed published by EurActiv that Tusk is more likely to succeed van Rompuy than Barroso. Brady considered several potential Commission Presidents, but not the possibility of a Barroso third term.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • "running for third term" implies a democratic election process, which it certainly is not. Perhaps I am mistaken and will get my ballot paper in the post...

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    05/04/2013
  • hoping this is a joke...

    By :
    Ricard
    - Posted on :
    05/04/2013
  • To Echo "Charles_M" - where do I cast my vote?

    By :
    English
    - Posted on :
    05/04/2013
  • Fresh blood, fresh thinking, is desperately needed. 3 terms is like 3 generations, all is lost in the third. When will power crazy politicians learn?

    By :
    Daye Tucker
    - Posted on :
    05/04/2013
  • "... I will make a decision about myself."
    This over-promoted, self-important former Maoist and delusional megalomaniac is evidently completely oblivious that millions of ordinary folk have already made their own decision about him.

    By :
    Dujo
    - Posted on :
    05/04/2013
  • It depends if there is a genuine election process. The public would vote for a manequin if it was on a ballot paper that was shared only with Barroso. This man is responsible for the enslavement of the peoples of Europe & the removal of democracy within the Eurozone.

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    05/04/2013
  • @ Charles_M, @ English,
    Have you boys been on the sauce?

    @ Daye Tucker, absolutely spot on - Barroso has enjoyed his power trip and will not want to give it up.

    @ Dujo, @ Joe Thorpe, @Ricard,
    How depressingly right you are!

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    06/04/2013
  • May the Lord preserve us !!!
    But as the EU is in a downward spiral , what does it matter . Apart from the salary and perks , I cannot see why anyone else would want to take on this thankless task , that has little prospect of having a happy ending .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    06/04/2013
  • George - read my post again, carefully please

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    06/04/2013
  • @ Charles_M

    Sorry Charles, my sad attempt at humour!!

    George Mc

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    06/04/2013
  • What's so strange about it? I think he's done a pretty good job of steering as through the US-made crisis. Why fix something that ain't broken?

    Seriously though, why shouldn't BArroso have another term? This is the best kind of continuity we've had so far. To believe the European project is going to collapse is simply naive. What alternatives are there, and I mean seriously? Going back to national currencies and deleting the area of justice, security and freedom? Good luck convinving the current 20-30 generation to go back to getting visas and brining their passports around. Uncoupling the 27 economies and have everyone fend for themselves in bilateral arrangements? This part of the world is past the bilateral stage. We've move to the regionals, and regional groups of influence. The EU as such is not homogenous, but we all know that was never the point, but it's a marriage of convenience to all its members, that would otherwise be simply non-existant in the wider real-politik scheme of things.

    By :
    Karolina
    - Posted on :
    09/04/2013
  • I went to Greece, Rhodes, Tenerife, Spain, Italy, France, Portugal, Gran Canaria, France, Switzerland all before the free movement of peoples was ever introduced Oh & Yugoslavia & never once did I have to get a visa I have never needed one for Canada, America Australia or New Zealand just an electronic visa when I bought my airline ticket so I don't think being in or out of the Schengen area makes a difference which we aren't anyway. I dont want the EU to collapse unless it takes that for us to get out of it.

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    09/04/2013
  • "Why fix something that ain't broken?".....The perception of many is, that it IS already broken but that isn't the point. The third term is more normally the term that witnesses either stagnation or revolution and increased discontent from fresher thinking factions within or without. Times change so rapidly that politicians must be flexible, fleet of foot and prepared to make bold decisions and even u turns to change direction. Continuity must not mask the usual challenges of corruption and complacency that ultimate power from a third term seems to often to bring with it.

    By :
    Daye Tucker
    - Posted on :
    09/04/2013
  • Karolina
    So the Euro fiasco and tens of millions of people out of work is a U.S. made crisis? As the Eurocrats will eventually learn, one size does not fit all. But sadly the 'crats will not be the ones to pay the price for their grand illusions.

    By :
    Dujo
    - Posted on :
    09/04/2013
  • @Dujo: it really hasn't been that long, have you forgotten already? The crisis started in the US, with the failure of the loaning market, in 2010, and sudden pull outs by big amounts of money from the stock market. Investements froze, daughter companies in Europe were sacked, bank branches were sacked. Europe got pulled into the bottomoless loaning pit the US has been in for the past 30 years. Of course, it hit home hardest. What was unfortunate for the EU was that the pullouts affected European economies relying heaviest on overseas investements. When these investements started shutting down in places like Greece, a whole new can of worms was opened. But then again GReece was at fault itself, for spending unreasonably for the past 20 years as well, paying people a 16th salary every year, when they work an average of 6 hours a day (I know, I've gone to Greece to investigate) and they cannot possibly get their GDP up to speed to match their spending. So GReece collapsed first; EU swooped in to save it because that's what that whole "solidarity" principle is about. We all chip in to save the one drowning, even though the one drowning has been working for it steadily for a long time, and the rest of us pretended we don't see it. No Barroso, no EU institution, not anybody can come in and tell a government how to run it's national economy; but if we want to be in this club we have to keep it running at a certain level. Them's the terms. GReece has been cut a huge piece of slack, and has been given a golden chance. I do doubt however the EU can or would afford to do it again. It's not the Eurocrats you have a problem with, it's your national spending scheme. The Eurocrats can't do anything about it if you elect demagogues who tell you what you want to hear for 4 years, and are too scared of opinion polls to make reforms that matter. The Eurocrats can only say "hey, you agreed to play by these rules when you joined the club, so please be true to your word!" but that's about it, and I hope everyone here knows this. Otherwise, we're no better than our politicians shouting slogans.

    By :
    Karolina
    - Posted on :
    09/04/2013
  • Actually the rules have changed dramatically since we were dumped into the EEC and then given a referendum with the government employing scare tactics and outspending the no voters by a huge margin to ensure the yes vote they wanted. No one voted to be governed by a bunch of unelected political failures, the commission, in any country. No one voted for the euro, and no one has voted to bail out countries who would not have had such over inflated economies without being given our money via the eussr.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    09/04/2013
Background: 

Last November, the European Parliament easily approved a resolution pushing for a more political campaign ahead of the European elections and moving the date to either 15-18 May or 22-25 May 2014.

The change would allow MEPs to vote on the new head of the European Commission before the summer break and hold the approval hearings for the new commissioners in the autumn.

The next Commission is due to take office on 1 November 2014.

The Lisbon Treaty provides that the European Parliament shall elect the Commission president on the basis of a proposal made by the European Council taking into account the European elections (Article 17, Paragraph 7 of the TEU). This will apply for the first time for the 2014 elections.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising