EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Barroso prepares calendar for ‘more EU integration’

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 31 May 2012

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso has said he will propose a roadmap and "calendar" for more European integration at the next summit of EU leaders on 28-29 June, without discarding the possibility of a treaty change aimed at injecting more federalism into the Union.

Barroso said yesterday [30 May] that the Commission would look at further steps towards a federalist-style "full economic union" to complete the monetary union,  currently experiencing its most difficult time since the launch of the euro in 1999.

The comments were made as Barroso presented the Commission's recommendations to the member countries concerning their efforts to ensure fiscal discipline and boost growth.

The Commission President said that the pace and sequencing of these reforms would need to be decided by EU heads of state and governments but that the Commission would pursue an ambitious approach. He added that some of those decisions could not be taken immediately, as they required a new legal basis.

A banking union and single deposit guarantee scheme

Barroso also addressed plans for project bonds to boost investment in energy, transport and the digital economy, and augment the firepower of the European Investment bank (EIB), as well as better utilising the EU's regional funds.

To this, he added two other "building blocks" – a banking union with integrated financial supervision and a single deposit guarantee scheme, ensuring that banks retain a minimum of cash available to safeguard personal savings.

The idea of a eurozone banking union with a bail-out potential has been making headway in recent days, as Spain's banking crisis has deepened.

The Commission had already proposed a single deposit guarantee scheme years ago, Barroso explained, but it had been unanimously rejected by member states. This time around though, a number of countries were pressing for such a scheme.

There was no mention of Eurobonds, currently a divisive issue. The French President François Hollande wants Eurobonds to be introduced rapidly, while Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel sees this possibility only at the end of a long process in which EU countries would achieve fiscal convergence. A banking union is another step that Germany reportedly sees as a precondition for the introduction of Eurobonds.

Asked if his statement indicated the need for a new treaty change, similar to the colossal efforts which led to the Lisbon Treaty in December 2009, Barroso said that it was important to use “all possibilities” to move towards completing monetary union, including already available instruments.

“Regarding any legal issues for the future, we believe we should be ready to address them,” he said. “For full confidence in the future of the euro area, it is important that the member states agree to launch a process for more financial and economic integration”.

Launching such a process was also important for improving investors’ confidence, he added.

“What we are proposing is to establish a roadmap also with a calendar. The Commission will advocate an ambitious and structured response for a longer-term perspective on the future of the EU’s economic and monetary union."

The pace and sequencing of these developments, including a roadmap and a timetable, still needed to be worked out.

"An early confirmation of the steps to be taken will underscore the irreversibility and the solidity of the euro,” Barroso said, adding that this was precisely what he planned to propose to EU leaders at their June summit.

‘Euro is not the cause of the crisis’

Barroso indicated that he was concerned about public opinion on issues going beyond further EU integration. It was normal that support for further European integration should fall during austere economic times, he explained.

“This is why I am asking all the leaders - including at national level - to explain the reasons for the difficulties and the best way to address them. And I believe the difficulties we face today are not the result of the euro. That’s quite clear,” he said.

The use of the euro by 17 EU countries created specific challenges requiring new instruments, like the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), he said. New recommendations to enhance financial stability and boost growth could not be ruled out.

Reform ‘not by passion, but by necessity’

“If we leave it only to the governments, you will not have an objective, independent analysis of what’s going on in Europe today,” he said. 

On the other hand, “if you leave this only to the member states, I can tell you no significant changes will happen. This is why we need more integration”.  

Barroso ended with an appeal for unity in facing current challenges. "It requires leadership, sometimes courage, to explain what are the alternatives to the member states," he said.

"I think this will be done, if not by passion, by necessity”.

The federalist ideas advanced by Barroso will probably be more warmly received in Beriln than Paris. New French government officials visiting Brussels for the first time on 29 May appeared hesitant to take the big federalist leap that Germany and others in the European Union were asking for, in return for greater solidarity within the euro zone.

Positions: 

The Green group in the European Parliament expressed disappointment that, despite continuing deterioration in the economic fundamentals, the Commission had “failed to propose a proper change in the direction of the EU's crisis response”.

Commenting on the package, the Green's economic affairs spokesperson, Philippe Lamberts MEP, stated:

"Despite clear evidence of the need for a fundamental shift in the EU's crisis response, today's proposals show the Commission is still sitting on the fence. The Commission remains too cautious. The current policy mix is exacerbating the crisis; what is needed is an about-turn and not mere tinkering at the edges.”

"Ultimately, we will only draw a line under the crisis by mutualising sovereign debt and introducing a system of Eurobonds. However, in order to relieve the pressure from the sovereign and financial debt crises in the interim, other measures must be immediately introduced, notably a common redemption fund, accompanied by Eurobills and a banking license for the European Stability Mechanism”.

Next steps: 
  • 31 May: Ireland holds referendum on fiscal treaty
  • 17 June: Greece holds parliamentary elections
  • 17 June: France holds second round of parliamentary elections
  • 22 June (date not confirmed): the leaders of Germany, France, Spain and Italy to meet in Rome
  • 28-29 June: Regular EU summit in Brussels to agree growth strategy
  • 1 July: Target date for the European Stability Mechanism to enter into force
Georgi Gotev

COMMENTS

  • What joy! The prospect of being dictated to by a group of unelected, unwanted,complete megalomaniacs, aided and abetted by our treasonous British politicians.

    By :
    Sue
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • First of all, I would like to express my deepest condolescences to the families who lost their people in the recent earthquakes. Here in Hellas we have suffered from similar earthquakes and I can feel the pain of the people who lost their families. Furthermore, we would like to express my deepest sadness for the destruction of the old city. If someone can feel how painful is to lose your cultural heritage cannot be anyone else apart from the citizens of the Hellenic Republic.

    We believe that it is now the crucial momentum for Italy and other countries which are above the Εurafrican tectonic rift (like Hellas) to make an alliance in order to request for extra money from the Northern countries for natural disasters. It is of significant importance to ask for extra funding as Northern countries are not geographically situated above the Εurafrican tectonic rift and thus are privileged since earthquakes never occur in Northern Europe.

    By :
    Hellene Taxpayer
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • I can only hope that Barroso's recommendations become implemented as a United States of Europe (even if it only focuses on finance and economics then, whoever holds the purse strings holds the power and that would be the European Council).I would then like to see how many countries within the eurozone will sign up to giving away what woukd amount to total sovereignty. Even if the creation is not called the USofE, it will, in effect be the same beast.I don't think there is a country inthegroup of 27 or 17 that could do that without some recourse to their electorates, even if they arenot accustomed to holding them. I am fairlky certain that the UK would have to redefine its relationship with the new entity.`

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • these ideas from brussels are not the ideas of the citizens of the european countries . The man is clued out and has no idea what hes talking about. I dare them to be honest and hold referendums on these issues and for gods sake let the people speak for once. If they keep turning thier backs on the public thell been seen for what they are ! They forget that people have long memories and dont forget dictators. Its like the block bully , beat the euro countries up financially and create chaos and poverty until they have no choice but to submit.
    A sad day for democracy and a sad day for free people..
    In brussels propaganda rules!!!

    By :
    klassen
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • I wonder how many European citizens were aware of the long term "federal dictatorship" plans which have been in place for decades. We Britons were lied to and have never been given a say in the matter.

    By :
    Sue
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2012
  • Goodness, this sounds like a plan for one or two Europeans to take control of the entire European Union (which worringly includes the UK).

    This is a devastating reminder of how an innocent public can unwittingly be led into the clutches of immense power, cleverly divested to unelected, power driven megalomaniacs.

    The European Union was always a basket case waiting to happen. But now, from this long distance south of the equator, it appears to have been a deliberate roadmap to foisting upon the world it's next dictatorship.

    By :
    Elise
    - Posted on :
    02/06/2012
  • Oh my goodness. There I was thinking that the EU was run by politicians whose only failing was playing catch up with consequences of uscrupulous banking practices. Now, thanks to the conspiracy theorists commenting here, I am now enlightened. It is a bunch of 'megalomaniacs' don't you know, all hell bent on power grabbing and destroying (invariably) British sovereignty. What a load of NONSENSE. For goodness sake, people: 'basket case', 'take control', 'federal dictatorships'. Those pesky Germans and French, eh, can't trust them. Those faceless bureaucrats. Dear me. What laughable tripe. Insecurities laid bare.

    By :
    Ken
    - Posted on :
    06/06/2012
  • @Ken If you think that the EU is run by ordinary politicians, you are delusional. The Germans and French are in the same boat as us. Slowly but surely, their sovereignty will be handed over to the unelected, unqualifed maniacs like Rompuy, Barroso and the rest of the Frankfurt group (they haven't exactly done a great job so far). These are what make the current setup of the EU unacceptable. They are neither elected or can be deposed by us.

    You need to do some research into the history behind the EU. You're obviously happy that a "bunch of faceless bureaucrats" are running your life for you. Well, I am not!

    By :
    Sue
    - Posted on :
    06/06/2012
  • Sorry Sue, I think you vastly overstate the nature of the problem (and believe me, I am well versed in the EU). We are run more by the faceless bureaucrats in our own countries and our own unscrupulous politicians than we are by these so called 'maniacs' in Brussels. Any cursory look at what has happened in Europe over the last few years will yield but one conclusion: that it was (and remains) the mis-government of our democracies BY OUR OWN POLITICIANS that has led us into this mess. Had YOU done some research on the role of the Commission you would be (doubtless pleasantly surprised) at just how limited their authority is, and just how much Brussels has been sidelined by the Council. Your (I can only assume) natural British Euro-scepticism has led you into the error of viewing all Europe does as bad, consequently blinding you to the deep flaws in our own national politics. As for sovereignty: here's a news alert - sovereignty is a myth, Sue. It has been since the globalisation era began. Your 'unelected maniacs' are appointed by our governments, and they are not the ones who authorised national governments to over borrow and (in the case of some) cook the books in order to deceive the EU. The EU is not 'running your life', Sue. Certainly no more than any national government and our own bureaucracy.

    By :
    Ken
    - Posted on :
    07/06/2012
  • Look around, Ken and tell me one aspect of your life that hasn't been dictated by the European Union. Of course our own politicians are equally to blame. Ted Heath and his cohorts deceived the British public by announcing that no powers would be transferred to the Union. It was a blatant lie. They continue to spin and lie, ensuring that we know absolutely nothing about what their ultimate intentions are. Our system is just as corrupt and needs to change.

    The EU has become an uncontrollable monster and needs putting down. Paying the EU's "protection money" is like overseas aid. It never ends up helping the people who need it, it merely ends up in the pockets of despots and dictators.

    By :
    Sue
    - Posted on :
    07/06/2012
  • Goodness, Sue, maybe things are different in the UK, but I don't see the EU 'dictating' aspects of peoples lives to the extent that you think. In modern democracies, of course, we are restricted in much that we do, and some of it can be excessive or at least ridiculous. But I dare say Mr Blair has more to do with things in the UK that Van Rompuy. The enactment of regulations increased dramatically during New Labour's tenure, and while it might be useful for domestic politicians to point the finger at Brussels, in truth, nothing comes out of Brussels unless national governments agree to it first at Council level. A cursory look at EU decision-making should leave people in no doubt: national governments - elected by us - are the ultimate arbiters of European regulations. Contrary to Daily Mail hysterics, much of it is just common sense regulation to ensure standards and safety in food production (and a lot of the Mail's hyperbolics are just fabricated nonsense). I'd rather have some solid regulation than risk buying dangerous products. Sometimes they get it wrong, but no more so than any state. I accept that Heath was more than economical with the truth, but in fairness, no one in Europe beyond a small clutch of uninfluential Euro-federalists, had any sinister 'ultimate intentions'. It's not just the EU that's become an extensive political entity...the state (any state) has vastly increased its capacity to intrude in individual lives in the last few decades. In your (Britain's) case, however, I would say that has more to do with the record of New Labour than the European Commission. And, if I'm being honest, I don't see that improving under Cameron either (the recent Bible distribution by Gove was a joke of nanny state proportions). Still, notwithstanding the sharp difference of opinion...it's been nice to talk. Regards.

    By :
    Ken
    - Posted on :
    07/06/2012
  • !?Not that I am taking sides, though if we were in complete disarray now, in the EU, that is to a large extent to irresponsibility, cronyism, fraud, and a way too humongous public sector (increasing spending and regulatory power) that has substantially evolved in the last decades, still, apparently states being under siege from the invisible hand of neoliberalism. It's been more on the inappropriate policy build up and adhocratism in regulatory measures that lack of predictability and discontinuity have become the mores of both old and new MS in the EU.
    As I have a slightly different taken on the matter at issue, is there the case to redefining Westphalia ? I would say, yes.
    As the latest global developments have claimed new global order, the recourse to a concept of sovereignty as in 1648, is both obsolete and out of context.
    Nostalgia of an old order that equates the good and the new order that is by implication an exponent of the bad, is as much as, surprisingly (?!) not at all, a buried opposition in between democrats and socialists, currently renewing ties to build solid alliances, articulating common agenda (?!). I ain’t go any further, but it seems few of us are reading from fairytales and helpless unions.
    As far as we’ve got with the “four freedoms” enshrined in the EC Treaty, as on repercussions easily spotted by any citizen of the EU from Romania (hardly any economy left behind on its road to then forbidden fruit of liberal democracy and free markets) to UK and France claiming domestic disasters triggered by immigrants, it can not be that difficult to grasp with the need to further globally regulate thoroughly societal dynamics with a more coherent global public policy.
    The ball rolls as it was decades planned to though shortly failed in 1952 with the defense plan and with the constitutions in 2005 as rejected by Dutch and French! It is not a matter whether a United States of Europe is set forth and not even when, as it is an issue of what governance to shape for it, how to strike a balance in between the community method and inter-guvernamentalism, and how to boost lay people awareness, shared values, and eventually participation in the United States of Europe project!
    Think positive and indeed, progressive for the sake of generations to come!

    By :
    Florin Pasatoiu
    - Posted on :
    07/06/2012
  • Fact is, most Britons don't want to be part of this club. We are not natural socialists and the "community method" is not something we would choose if given the choice. We have been a major contributor to the EU since we joined and have not really got much back from it but red tape, regulations and mass immigration. So, thanks, but no thanks.. over 60% of Britons want out and I am one of them.

    By :
    Sue
    - Posted on :
    07/06/2012
  • megration

    By :
    makhlouf
    - Posted on :
    26/06/2012
  • @Don Latuske

    I agree with you
    The EU need a Governance with an adequated sovereignity!
    That's all!!

    When a nation lose partially the sovereignity for the EU governance and his economie growth /unemployement is going back! Is that not worth doing so? YES!

    By :
    slauer27
    - Posted on :
    28/06/2012
  • "United States of Europe" it sound very good .....

    Ha i ve seen on other posts that American fears this changement about an Superpowered EU :

    Here is a link for a bit laughing:

    http://money.msn.com/investing/the-united-states-of-europe-mirhaydari.aspx?page=2 click (BY OLDEST)

    By :
    slauer27
    - Posted on :
    28/06/2012
  • "United States of Europe" it sound very good .....

    Ha i ve seen on other posts that American fears this changement about an Superpowered EU :

    Here is a link for a bit laughing:

    http://money.msn.com/investing/the-united-states-of-europe-mirhaydari.aspx?page=2 click (BY OLDEST)

    By :
    slauer27
    - Posted on :
    28/06/2012
Background: 

European leaders have agreed to discuss plans for deeper economic integration as part of their longer term plans to solve the ongoing debt crisis in the euro area.

European Council President Herman Van Rompuy will present a report on 28 June exploring ways to deepen economic integration, including the subject of Eurobonds, which would pool part of European debt and reduce the borrowing costs of fragile economies like Spain or Italy.

France wants Eurobonds introduced quickly but Germany opposes this, saying it could consider them only after a new stage in the EU's fiscal and economic integration. The European Central Bank has argued along the same line.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising