EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Brussels regrets it cannot afford 'wizards' anymore

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 11 May 2012

Despite attractive salaries and working conditions, the European Commission says it is unable to recruit the same kind of highly-talented personnel as giant multinationals.

Maroš Šefčovič, the European Commission Vice President in charge of administrative affairs, confessed yesterday (10 May) that the EU Executive had “problems” in recruiting talented people at middle-management level.

Speaking at at an event organised by the European Policy Centre (EPC), a Brussels think-tank, Šefčovič singled out the low level of interest from workers coming from “high-wages economies” like Britain, Luxembourg, the Netherlands or Denmark.

The Commission's administrative chief said he wanted the highest quality people to work at the EU Executive, but could hardly compete with the most successful private companies.

“We are looking for the best persons […] for the same quality of people who can become very successful bankers, economists, lawyers or consultants,” he said.

When defending the EU's interests in high profile competition cases against multinationals, the Union’s executive was faced with highly qualified and well-motivated opponents, he explained.

“If you defend the industry of a giant, they can clearly afford it. And they are usually represented by the partners of these firms, whose salary easily tops one million euro a year. And of course, on top of it, they get the bonus fee."

"EU civil servants don’t get anything like it, they just work for their salaries,” Šefčovič said.

In fact, Šefčovič wasn’t pleading for higher wages for EU civil servants – quite the contrary. He said that under the circumstance of the crisis, the Commission had the duty to show solidarity with Europe’s citizens and he had put forward a 5% cut in staff numbers for all institutions and agencies. At the same time, working time will be increased to 40 hours per week to make “significant savings”.

Šefčovič’s main message was that the EU civil servants did not cost much to the European taxpayer, and that in return their contribution was quite important.

56,000 civil servants work for the EU, with 30,000 employed at the European Commission. A further 18,000 are employed by other institutions and 8,000 for EU agencies all over Europe, he said.

He compared these numbers with the staff in the civil service of EU member countries. Regarding the UK, the country where the eurosceptic press often blasts the largesse of EU institutions, he said that there were 444,000 civil servants, with around 100,000 employed at the Department for Work and Pensions alone.

By comparison, the headcount at the entire EU Commission was comparable to the administration at the city of Paris, he said.

EU 'should not be arrogant'

The EU admin chief was pressed by EurActiv to comment on the high cost of some EU buildings, such as the so-called “Van Rompuy egg”, which outraged UK Prime Minister David Cameron.

The Commission Vice President said that he was not in charge for the “egg” building, but he would happily convey the message to those responsible. (The new European Council building was approved before Van Rompuy's appointment.)

“The EU should not be arrogant,” he said.

Šefčovič acknowledged it was “very improbable” that the Commission would push forward ambitious plans for new buildings, apparently dropping earlier plans for a "spectacular facelift" of the EU quarter.

Except for the refurbishing of the building hosting DG Agriculture, which is indeed decrepit, “you will se nothing else” in terms of architectural undertakings, he promised.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • "By comparison, the headcount at the entire EU Commission was comparable to the administration at the city of Paris, he said."

    That many? proof enough that the commission is a waste of money and should go the way of dodo

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    11/05/2012
  • Not sure that recruiting bankers, lawyers and other corporate wizards (dragons or vultures) would be my first choice for a public body. How about recruiting top-class staff who demonstrate a commitment to the public interest, understanding of responsibility for the governance of public money and above all leadership, courage and integrity?

    By :
    Monika_K
    - Posted on :
    11/05/2012
  • Having workers from high-wages countries does not necessarly mean they are better and it hardly makes them wizards. I understand his point but associating this with certain nationalities is wrong and discriminatory.

    EU civil servants "just work for their salaries"? hahaha - you almost pitty them...if you don't know the truth :)

    By :
    andreea
    - Posted on :
    11/05/2012
  • Yes, these comments show the sad truth... The Commission cannot attract intelligent people to fill up its highest posts... I mean the post of Commissioner responsible for Administration. Does that guy really know what he says? Could he find a €1000 a month job in the private sector? I very much doubt about.

    By :
    Santiago Herrero
    - Posted on :
    11/05/2012
  • Why doesn't the Commission regulate the private sector salaries and bonuses a bit more heavily - if the institutions need austerity meausures how can the private sector pay so much more?

    By :
    Anon
    - Posted on :
    11/05/2012
  • The most important is what is got by the citizens. And for me is to much burocracy and very small juice.
    Let EU citizens have the chance to vote freely on EU comission.

    By :
    antonio cristovao
    - Posted on :
    12/05/2012
  • At 25 years old, as a U.S. Citizen I was granted exception to work in the Commission and the Parliament.I specialize in analytics based communications.

    In my 2+ years in Brxl, I think the European Union is much more progressive than private industries across Europe, and have the better people. I got out of the institution because once in side it's hard to implement any thing. What I found looking at EU Private industry, to my amazement, is they were years behind and less than willing to accept new/more advanced ideas than the EC or EP.

    The issue isn't so much high quality people/salaries, it's the internal process that makes the Institutions a tough sell for dynamic individuals long term.

    By :
    Chandler Wilson
    - Posted on :
    14/05/2012

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising