EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Cameron gives no ground before budget summit

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 22 November 2012, updated 23 November 2012

On the eve of an EU summit that could see further political isolation for the United Kingdom, officials made clear that Prime Minister David Cameron would not hesitate to use his veto to freeze the EU's 2014-2020 budget and to preserve the UK rebate.

 

Council President Herman Van Rompuy on 15 November tabled a €973-billion compromise proposal, €75 billion less than the Commission's initial recommendation for the 2014-2020 budget.

“While Van Rompuy's proposals are a step in the right direction, we believe there are still areas where further cuts can be made,” Cameron's spokesman said on the eve of the summit (21 November).

“The Van Rompuy proposal represents the talks starting to go in the right direction, we think that the level still needs to come down appreciably,” an EU diplomat added.

The diplomat said that the UK position is not about reducing actual expenditure, but about spending more efficiently. He added that EU administrative costs could still be reduced.

UK will offer newer member states a payment guarantee

Cameron will be working for an agreement at the summit, the source said, whilst reiterating that the UK will not accept the loss of its rebate.

“We think it [the rebate] is justified. It tries to rectify the low net receipts and that is what justifies those low receipts, and so it is a red line we have made that is clear to people,” said the diplomat.

Discussing concerns that proposals to freeze the budget will hurt newer member states through lost cohesion funds, the diplomat said that Britain was prepared to give a “payment guarantee” to those states.

Such a guarantee would ensure that spending levels under the next budget are preserved at the 2007-2013 rate, even if the overall budget is frozen.

Cameron has spoken to a number of EU leaders on the budget – including Angela Merkel, François Hollande, Mark Rutte, Fredrik Reinfeldt and Donald Tusk – by phone over the past week.

Summit represents another challenge for UK-EU relations

“There is a real prospect of agreement” at the summit, said another diplomatic source, but he added: “Cameron is prepared to say no, and I do not believe he is the only one prepared to say no. He has done it before.”

The sources acknowledged that the summit could represent another watershed moment in the UK’s worsening relationship with its EU partners.

The UK Parliament and press have both given a resounding signal that the British believe that any rise in the EU budget will be viewed as deeply inequitable, one said.

“Across the EU people are facing difficult choices. We are all facing stress and uncertainty and the EU is changing in reaction to the crisis,” said one diplomat.

Cameron does not have much room for manoeuvre in the negotiations, since the UK Parliament has already voted for a freeze in the EU budget.

The right wing of Cameron’s Conservative party is demanding a cut to the EU budget, whilst many believe that both Conservative and Labour parties might offer a referendum on Britain’s EU membership before the next general election, to be held in 2014.

With rumours that the other member states are feeling for ways to circumvent the UK veto, and Germany's Merkel increasing exasperated with British intransigence, the summit has the potential to worsen the UK’s already fraying relationship with the EU.

Germany, which has proposed a budget cut harsher than Van Rompuy’s, may represent Cameron’s only chance of a lifeline if EU leaders hope to agree the budget at this sitting, rather than delaying a budget deal until next year.

Positions: 

“Denmark has made it very clear that [it wants] a correction of the Danish contribution to the EU budget of €150 millions annually,” an EU diplomat told EurActiv.

“The reason for this is simple: It is not fair that Denmark is to finance other comparable countries’ rebates or corrections. The ideal solution would be to abolish rebates and corrections altogether which would also solve the Danish problem. But this has shown unrealistic. Therefore, we are demanding an end to the unequal treatment of Denmark,” said the diplomat.

“In a further blow to the Prime Minister's credibility and negotiating stance, a majority of MEPs steadfastly refused to listen to anything other than significant multi-billion rises for the MFF today (21 November), citing their desire for "more Europe",” said UKIP MEP Marta Andreasen.

"David Cameron's veto is worthless if nobody respects it. The UK has now been relegated to the sidelines on the EU Budget debate," said Andreasen.

Next steps: 
  • 22-23 Nov.: EU Heads of State and Government meet in Brussels to broker a deal on the EU's budget for 2014-2020.
Jeremy Fleming

COMMENTS

  • For the current budget negociations, how can Cameron call for less european taxpayor's contribution, but ask in the same sentence to go on financing the british rebate as well?

    By :
    UK-skeptic
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • @UK-sceptic: I'm not sure I understand your question.

    The rebate isn't financed by anyone, it's just a reduction in the amount the UK pays.

    By :
    Hoover
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • Hoover, in which world is a reduction of the amount paid by somebody, not financed by somebody else? Isn't there anyone's signature on the bottom of the cheque the UK receives back each year from the EU?
    Of course other european taxpayors are financing this discount contribution for the UK. It's just funny that Cameron claims to be speaking in the name of continental taxpayors while he's asking them to pay more cheques for the british rebate!

    By :
    UK-skeptic
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • Chillax

    By :
    Jenny
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • @Uk-Skeptic

    If you and I decide to put some money into a pot together, and you put less in than me, I'm not financing you. I'm just putting less in than you.

    By :
    Hoover
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • Oh, edit that last sentence. Should read "you're just putting less in than me", but you probably worked that out :-)

    By :
    Hoover
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • Hoover, Well if you and I put some money in a pot together and you put less than me, I will only not be financing you as long as you'll enjoy what we'll make out of it, in the same proportions as you've been contributing.

    Britain enjoys for 30 years just the same conditions of free access to develloping markets in Southern and Eastern Europe (net EU budget creditors), as say Belgium, Austria or Sweden. Why should the latter countries finance with their full national contribution to the EU Pot the developping of Spain, Poland or Romania, when the UKs discount-contributon allows though british buisnesses the same exclusivity as belgian, austrian or finnish companies, to profit from the cheap labour force and the expending export-demand in the most develloping economies of the single market, thanks to EU Regional and agriculture Funds? To be fair, British profits in the EU subsided countries of the Single Market should be taxed by Brussels as much as the UK isn't contributing to the EUs budget. The same way I would taxe your share of the rent we'd get from a house bought together with the pot you'd have contributed less money to than me.

    By :
    UK-skeptic
    - Posted on :
    23/11/2012
  • http://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,3312,vp,4188.pdf
    This is about how the money including EU funds were sent in Poland. The delay of the report concerning infrastructure was PR strategy on the request of the Polish administration that does not want to associate financial irregularities with organisation of EURO 2012.
    Who really needs this EU aid in Poland? They recently promised to bring us to EURO - do thy want to create Greece II of us? where we are going?

    By :
    Bozena Bieniasz
    - Posted on :
    06/01/2013
Cameron: Poker Face
Background: 

The European Commission presented on 29 June 2011 its proposals for the EU's 2014-2020 budget – the so-called Multi-Annual Financial Framework.

The Commission proposed raising the next budget to €1.025 trillion, up from the current €976 billion. This represents a 4.8% increase, which is beyond the average 2% inflation recorded in the last decade.

The European Parliament had said in a resolution on 23 October that even the original Commission proposal for a freezing of the budget at the level of 2013 ceilings would not be sufficient to finance existing policy priorities in the "Europe 2020" strategy, which comprises the new tasks laid down in the Lisbon Treaty, let alone any unforeseen events. 

The goal of the Cypriot presidency is to reach an agreement by the end of 2012, in line with the European Council conclusions of June 2012 [more].

On 30 October, Cyprus tabled a 46-page paper, called the ‘revised negotiating box’, which follows two previous versions issued by the Danish and the Cypriot presidencies. In advance of today's summit, Council President Herman Van Rompuy issued a further compromise proposal.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Communication Partners

Sponsors

Videos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising