EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU core countries to hold crisis mini-summit

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 29 May 2012

The leaders of France, Germany, Spain and Italy will meet in Rome after the June Greek election to discuss the eurozone crisis, the Italian press reports, as talk of Greece leaving the single currency gain momentum.

Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti had reportedly suggested a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President François Hollande and Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy.

Merkel had appeared lukewarm on the idea, which Monti said was needed to clarify the issues at stake before a full EU summit on 28-29 June.

"The four-way meeting on Europe should take place in Rome on 22 June, after elections in Greece and France," the French daily Le Figaro reported.

Votes and ratifications

Greeks are heading to the polls on 17 June in a repeat general election, which many fear could result in a government intent on ripping up the international bailout programme and lead to Greece's exit from the eurozone.

France is holding the second round of parliamentary elections on the same day, with the new Socialist president hoping to secure a left-wing majority to help him implement tax-and-spend plans.

The quadrilateral meeting is expected to seek a balance between the fiscal discipline, promoted by the ‘fiscal compact’ treaty (see background), and the measures to foster growth, advocated by Hollande.

Merkel’s government insists that the fiscal compact be ratified at the same time as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), the EU fund designed to bail out eurozone countries in difficulty. The ESM will become operational on 1 July.

But Merkel’s opposition – the SDP Social Democrats and the Greens – say the fiscal compact should be accompanied by new measures to promote growth and investment in Europe. Merkel needs the opposition support to secure the required two-third majority in the two houses of parliament to secure ratification of the fiscal pact.

The German opposition has also insisted that the fiscal treaty, coupled with measures for growth, be ratified on the same day in France, Germany and Italy

Ireland will hold a referendum to ratify the fiscal compact treaty on 31 May. The treaty needs the approval of only 12 of the 17 euro zone countries to enter into force. Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny warned yesterday (28 May) that the country’s sovereign debt could be downgraded by rating agencies if voters reject the treaty. Ireland is already under an EU/IMF bailout programme. 

Merkel on the offensive

In what can be seen as a counter-offensive from Merkel, Germany's Spiegel Online magazine disclosed on Saturday a six-point plan aimed at reconciling austerity and growth policies.

Under the plan, government-owned businesses are to be sold off, protections against wrongful dismissal relaxed and obstructive regulations for companies removed. There is also talk of special economic zones and privatisation agencies based on the model of Germany's Treuhand trust, created at the time of reunification to sell off most of former East Germany's state-owned enterprises.

Growth programmes versus structural reforms: This is the conflict Europe is about to face, and for which Merkel and Hollande are now seeking allies, Spiegel writes.

Next steps: 
  • 31 May: Ireland holds referendum on fiscal treaty;
  • 17 June: Greece holds parliamentary elections;
  • 17 June: France holds second round of parliamentary elections;
  • 22 June (date not confirmed): the leaders of Germany, France, Spain and Italy to meet in Rome;
  • 28-29 June: Regular EU summit in Brussels to discuss growth;
  • 1 July: Target date for the European Stability Mechanism to enter into force
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • The biggest reason why the EU is in the terrible constantly unfolding socio-economic disaster is not all to do with inept politicians and unscrupulous bankers with no empathy with society, but a total lack of having a driving economic policy based upon innovation and its exploitation. In this respect one can never get away from the fact that ALL real and ‘New’ wealth is technologically based. When we look at the history of the world, advanced technological concerns have always been at the leading-edge of the wealthiest and most powerful entities in the world. The reason, new technology makes old thinking and established technology redundant over time. The great companies of the world that we presently have are predominantly technologically driven. ‘Apple’ is a prime example of how technology can drive at times a corporate to the very pinnacle of the world’s richest companies. Not that long ago in relative terms, it may have gone bust. Therefore technology turns around the financial fortunes of corporations and creates vast numbers of jobs in the process.

    Therefore the EU’s problems are firmly based in not having an innovative structure that exploits this fundamental building block of economic dynamism. The ‘elites’ in the EU may think that they have but where they are simply deluding themselves and the 750 million Europeans within the EU. Indeed if the European Commission thinks that they have got it so right, why are we in constant stagnant waters when it comes to the global export markets where they decline more than advance year on year?

    What the EU has to do for its survival is to create the pan-European infrastructure that allows innovation and its exploitation to flourish. Presently we have not got this even though the ‘élites’ think that we have. Common sense dictates that we have to have new fundamental thinking first and not research and development first, which the EU leaders and mandarins think is the correct step-wise mechanism - they simply leave out the most important, the fundamental creative stage which is the most vital for our future.

    It is time to save the EU if it wants to be saved. There are differing views on this but exist or not, the successful or dire effects will be on the people of Europe, not the bureaucrats who decide our futures. Therefore not until we have a totally integrated system that is working throughout the whole of the EU when it comes to innovation, we shall continue in decline. Why cannot the powers that be see the reasoning in establishing a pan-EU system of creative incubators, for that is where the long-term prosperity of Europeans resides (the most creative people in the world through international studies)? But possibly this is because they do not understand. The reason, they never wish to think-out-of-the-box and to listen to those who just might have the solutions. Elitism I am afraid will be the death of us economically and socially over time !!!

    Dr David Hill
    Chief Executive
    World Innovation Foundation

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    30/05/2012
  • I can't see the Eurozone allowing Greece to leave Euro for some time, the ramifications could be disastrous, there are all the bank liabilities under the ECB's Target 2 system, which would turn into much lower value drachmas causing more pain for Euro banks.

    There's also the contagion problem - if Greece leaves the Euro the markets will swiftly speculate that Spain and maybe even Eire, Italy & Portugal are next and this crisis could spiral into something wildly out of control. And again you have Target 2 liabilities to think about, which be on a much bigger scale with Spain.

    The ECB needs to step up to the plate once again and buy time for Eurozone policy makers, IMF etc.. to figure out how to deal with the peripheral countries.

    By :
    Justin Pugsley, Principal, JJPAssociates
    - Posted on :
    01/06/2012
  • Dear Justin,

    The whole thing over time will fall down like a stack of dominoes. Therefore it will happen eventually so we cannot get out of this mess I am afraid. Do you know what PcW chief economist stated a few months back that the UK's total debt alone by 2015 is projected to be $16.4 Trillion equivalent? Too much debt in the Euro zone and no matter what we do we will not save it and that is based upon common sense, not hope.

    It is a catch 22 situation and whichever way we go, it will have dire effects for decades to come on the EU block countries. Indeed we may never get out of it with dwindling natural resources to sustain the human experience.

    Just remember who is paying for all this? It certainly is not the eurocrates who just wish the gravy train to continue infinitum.

    I am sorry but eventually it will go and if we persist, we shall all pay a price that bankrupts us all and our future generations in the process. We are certainly in economic hostile times where we are now the weak players on the world stage. I dread to say it but Eastern subservience is definitely on the way with the fixed mindsets of our EU leaders and Commissioners. I give it no more than 30 years for this to kick in and be our future reality.

    With a projected global pie of only 25% of the whole by 2075 (estimated by some economists), we shall not be able to support ourselves.

    Our only solution is the exploitation of innovation but where our leaders are just not listening. By doing this they are the people’s worst enemy !

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    01/06/2012
  • David Hill

    In your answer to Justin , you also answered your previous response to this article .
    The EU commission , heads of state might say to you ,
    " Inovation ! What's that ! "
    The EU is not an Integral unit and as such has No control over the functining of 27 vastly differing states . The EU is not a democratic entity ; despite the outward appearances of parliament and support of member governments . Out of 500ml supposed individual members , less than half may actually support the EU or their country's membership . What would be the result of an In or Out referendum in Britain be . My guess is about 65% voting Out and maybe even higher .
    Greeks rightly dont give a toss about the EU , only saving their own skins .
    When you have government by committee , with so many divergent policies , where are you going to get Inovation from ?
    The only sector that seems to employ innovation is the banking and financial services ," Hypothecating " , Fraud , and any other financial ruse that generates money by itself , rather than promoting manufacturing industries that employ people , who in turn earn money and pay taxes . Hypothecating in the US is limited to 140% in Britain no limit .
    The whole concept of the EU is outdated and economically selfcentred . Today we have a so called union of 27 states , half of whom are effectively bankrupt . So we are creating and trying to enforce an EUSSR , despite the fact that the USSR failed after little over 70 years .
    Globalism is a huge mistake , which as I see it is already beginning to implode , the EU is a part of the global concept . Globalism is supposed to be the means by which the US will control the world .

    The EU doesn't have a mindset , or a mind ; we are in the hands of mindless bureaucrats only concerned with getting more perks on the gravy train .
    Member states are caught in a sort of blackmail trap of not letting the others down . The EU is in a blind ally from which there is no exit , other than a complete about face or disolution . You give the EU no more than 30yrs , for the benefit of all Europeans I wish it would be much less .
    Europe needs to go back to manageable individual states , that operate along the lines of their culture and customs . Small closer knit units work better .
    The idea of being trading partners is mistaken ; each country should be looking to sell to the world outside . Hollande and other politicians are talking about growth , when the market is largely internal bankrupt and stagnant , no growth is going to come out of it .
    I wish the Greeks would vote No to austerity , default and leave the Eurozone . The hardship they suffer will be the same either way . A default might just tip the scales and start the domino collapse of the Euro .
    The Euro needs to go !!! While ever the EU teeters on the edge of a precipice trying to save the Euro and EU , there will be no peace or growth in Europe .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    02/06/2012
  • To EurActiv:
    I think your information about the four-way meeting must be wrong. I am sure that Barrose and perhaps even Van Rompuy will attend as well. Couldn't you check this? it is always the same story: even when the G8 meets, the European presidents are never mentioned.Is EurActiv the voice of the Intergovernemental approach?

    Tony Van der haegen
    former EU official

    By :
    Tony Van der haegen
    - Posted on :
    02/06/2012
  • Justin

    You may be right that the EU will not allow Greece to leave the Eurozone ; but conversely the Greeks may just slack off on austerity , in the knowledge that the EU is more afraid of them defaulting than their sticking to reforms .
    Contagion is the real problem , though as I see it could help the EU out of an impass . No matter what , I
    believe the Euro will eventually collapse and banks and investors will not get their money back .
    I believe that reallity should be faced up to now , rather than later .
    Heads of State , Presidents and commission cannot accept that the EU/Euro is in a deep hole from which it cannot escape . " If at first you don't succeed , try try and try again ", but it isn't going to work .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    02/06/2012
  • Hi David Hill & David Barneby,

    One can only assume that the Euro was deliberately launched as a faulty project designed to eventually create a crisis. Many prominent economists back in the 1990s warned what would happen if there was monetary union without fiscal union. It's possible that the likes of Kohl and Mitterrand were so ignorant of economics that didn't understand this, but I think not, it's hardly a complicated concept.

    But the Euro architects had a problem – they knew that they would not get fiscal union along with the massive transfers of powers away from sovereign states that this entails through the ballot box – the people's of Europe would never vote for it under 'normal' circumstances.

    European integration has often been jolted along by crises – 'ever closer union' is the rally cry and solution to all of Europe's problems apparently.

    Now the Eurozone faces its worse crisis yet, an existential one and one of potentially such epic proportions that it not only threatens the European economy, but that of the whole world. And the solution is yet again 'ever closer union.' You now have economists and the business community calling for fiscal union as a long-term solution to the crisis – because the alternative, the possible break-up of the Euro & EU is too dire to contemplate and if Greece leaves then the prospect of others leaving is greatly increased and the impact on Europe's fragile banking system could border on catastrophic. The Spanish banking system is already suffering big deposit withdrawals – imagine the impact a Greek exit will have on Spanish depositors? You could see bank runs that make the Northern Rock saga seem trivial.

    As for Greece and the completely unrealistic and unworkable austerity plans, which are steadily killing that country? I strongly suspect there will be some sort of fudge to give the Germans some face whilst giving enough leeway (and cash) for Greece to just about function. There's also a strong possibility that austerity measures will be phased out if the French get their way, which they usually do. I suspect the ECB will be unwillingly dragged deeper & deeper into printing more and more money to keep the whole thing afloat.

    So in essence, the architects of the Euro, either by chance or design, have created a situation whereby you either move towards full European integration or face an economic disaster and even the former is hardly a solution long-term as it will not have been achieved by popular consensus.

    By :
    Justin Pugsley, Principal, JJPAssociates
    - Posted on :
    02/06/2012
  • Justin

    The Euro was a political project , not an economic one . As you rightly say many prominent economists pointed out its faults and dangers . At the time Kohl and Mitterand , together with other EU leaders couldn't see any dangers . One must not forget that Germany was persuaded to join on the clear understanding that the 3% rule would be strictly maintained and that their would be no bailouts .
    Germany and France were the first to break the 3% rule , so today we have the bailouts too .

    I don't think fiscal union ever entered anyones heads at that stage . I believe that a single currency across the EU was intended to give confidence towards an eventual political union , the US of E . Fiscal union would arrive automatically with politcal union .

    I believe it is likely that EU leaders were so hell bent on the objective of The Single Federal State , that small details such as fault in the Euro were swept under the carpet . " Nothing is achieved with negative thinking "

    EU leaders knew that it would be difficult to get democratic support for political union . That was confirmed by the referendum on the EU Constitution that was voted out by France and Holland , leaving the Brits to smile , because otherwise they would have done it . From there on the EU commission has taken a tighter hold , as in NO Referendums on the Lisbon treaty . But IMO the Lisbon treaty has only served to deepen the hole and create resistence to EU control .
    I believe , that "Ever Closer Union" is the rallying cry of very few heads of state or citizenry of EU sovereign states .

    We have no leaders in the EU , 2nd and 3rd rate PMs and ministers ; apart from Merkel who finds herself in that position by default .

    I do not believe that Fiscal union will make any difference to the present disastrous situation .
    Could you have political union without EU wide referendums ? What might be the consequence of just anouncing political Union ? I do not believe a referendum on political union would produce the hoped for results .

    I lived for a number of years in Italy , where I have many friends . I can tell you that Italy is an almost ungovernable country , I suspect Greece , Spain and Portugal too . Laws are made that everybody breaks , you cannot put the whole population in prison , and think of the cost .

    I am very much aware of the consequences of a Greek default . If greece can do it why not Spain ,Italy ,Portugal or Ireland . Nations like Germany , France , Britain , have invested a lot of money in those countries , US banks are holding vast numbers of CDS , China has invested money . I believe that there is no way the Euro can survive in the long term ; but the longer it holds out the more devastating the financial and economic crash will be .

    Banks have lent money beyond reason , because taxpayers are expected to pay them back . Banks and investors are not investing in Industry as they should when they can earn more money for themselves in devious practices , If you don't know of Hypothecating , look it up .

    The whole political , economic , banking and financial world has gone rotten in recent years . This has to be stopped , before there is any way to go forward .
    Incompetence and negligence are the causes of the present crisis . Like the message being passed from person to person , by the end it is something completely different .

    neither Britain or any other country should have been allowed to join the EU , or EEC as we were lied to . If the original six had unified that may have worked . When John Major sign Maastrict , He believed that Britain could have a say in the direction taken forward . John major recommended the expansion to what we have today ; but he recommended a much looser confederation of Sovereign Nation States , more like a Commonwealth . The EU has taken up the expansion , but more along the lines of the failed USSR . Didn't the USSR fail because it was bankrupt ? The EU is failing for the same reason .

    As I see it the EU has NO WAY FORWARD . Germany would be wise to leave the Euro , before Eurobonds are forced upon it . I believe that the only course to take now is to organise a controlled end to the Euro and help each country to return to their original currencies . Anybody who is owed money in the EU has lost it now , borrowing money to lend to bankrupt countries is stupid , it will never be paid back , the money is lost for ever , it is no use going on pretending " Good Times Are Just Around The Corner " , dream on , they are not .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    03/06/2012
  • I fully agree Justin.

    The Chinese, central Asians and Russians have been getting together behind closed doors to develop a strategy to launch a global currency to topple the dollar for several years now. I know this as my institution unwittingly introduced economist Bob Mundell (father of the EURO) to them through the president of Kazakhstan. I don't know whether they will now continue but where if economic dominance is at the top of their agenda (sheer madness now through conventional warfare as no-one can win), they certainly will.

    All these politico-economic policies and creations are strewn with danger. But we Europeans will regret that we ever created this monster.

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    03/06/2012
  • First of all, we would like to express our deepest condolescences to the families who lost their people in the recent earthquakes. Here in Hellas we have suffered from similar earthquakes and we can feel the pain of the people who lost their families. Furthermore, we would like to express our deepest sadness for the destruction of the old city. If someone can feel how painful is to lose your cultural heritage cannot be anyone else apart from the citizens of the Hellenic Republic.

    We believe that it is now the crucial momentum for Italy and other countries which are above the Εurafrican tectonic rift (like Hellas) to make an alliance in order to request for extra money from the Northern countries for natural disasters. It is of significant importance to ask for extra funding as Northern countries are not geographically situated above the Εurafrican tectonic rift and thus are privileged since earthquakes never occur in Northern Europe.

    By :
    Hellene Taxpayer
    - Posted on :
    03/06/2012
  • I just can say that a pro-animals NGO gave an official report to the District Attorney of Athens, which was mentioning that cat and dogs have been disappeared from the streets of Athens. That means Hellenes and immigrants kill and eat stray animals because they do not have money to buy food.

    By :
    Hellene Taxpayer
    - Posted on :
    03/06/2012
  • David Hill ,

    " All these politico-economic policies and creations are strewn with danger. But we Europeans will regret that we ever created this monster."

    You are SO RIGHT !!!

    If I had had a say in the matter , there would have been No EEC or EU from Maastricht . I am an almost right wing conservative ; but I applauded the speeches by Peter Shaw and Wedgewood Benn at the Oxford Union debate on the EEC in 1975 . They have been proved right . I have no qualifications for expressing my views , but I have a very strong instict for what is right and what will work . I had very strong arguments with a few friends in Italy who thought the Euro would be so wonderful . Yes , Italians could travel abroad with money the same all over Europe . I said to them yes , but it will cost you very dear at home . Italy's cost of living rose 30% in the first year . most ordinary Italians hate the Euro , I'm sure would welcome the Lira back again and the freedom to adjust its value up or down as necessary .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    06/06/2012
Background: 

Since the election of François Hollande, the new socialist French president, Angela Merkel has come under pressure to relax the austerity measures which she has described as the remedy for the eurozone crisis.

For his part, Hollande took a different view, saying during his election campaign that he would seek a renegotiation of Merkel’s “fiscal compact” to secure inclusion of measures that should lead to growth and employment.

The Germany-inspired new fiscal treaty, signed by 25 EU countries on 2 March, faces difficulties with ratification as Ireland has said it will hold a referendum and France wants the treaty re-negotiated or at least associated with growth measures.

The fiscal compact treaty would notably commit signers to having national legislation to ensure deficits remain under 3% and so-called ' structural' medium-term deficits below 0.5%.

>> Read our LinksDossier: Europe's new treaty: Towards a multi-speed union

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising