EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU staff to keep high wages, but work more, says admin chief

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 04 October 2011, updated 18 November 2011

In an effort to increase budget efficiency, while maintaining salaries at the same level, the Commission is asking officials to work longer hours without giving additional compensation or other sweeteners. EurActiv has spoken with European Commission Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič, as intensive negotiations with the staff unions are underway.

“We cannot operate in a political and economic vacuum. We are the civil service of the European Union and we have to contribute to the service of the citizens in the same way as the national civil servants,” said Šefčovič, trying to explain the staff rules reform presented last June.

The Commission Vice-President has proposed new staff rules in a drive to save money and he hopes trade unions will back the plan so that a formal proposal can be presented to the Council and the European Parliament by the end of the year.

In 2004, the EU reformed its civil service, making the career structure more performance-oriented and career-based, adding new working methods, family-friendly working conditions and a new contractual status. The reform allowed the EU to save €3 billion to date and it expects to save another €5 billion between now and 2020 on that same reform package.

The new 2011 proposals, if adopted, will save another €1 billion by 2020.

“If you look at national administrations and whether they apply the same plethora of measures, I think you would need to look very hard to find a place where such a complex reform were introduced,” Šefčovič argued.

The Commissioner is trying to mobilise support for his reforms, which include a 5% staff reduction in all categories and in all institutions until 2017, an increase in the minimum working week for all staff from 37.5 to 40 hours, without compensatory wage adjustments, a surge in the retirement age from 63 to 65. Also, secretarial and clerical tasks will be carried out by contractual agents.

“I can tell you that we had to look very, very hard to find the potential measures for savings,” Šefčovič said, adding that union negotiations are intense as some of the proposals hit staff heavily.

“There is a strong feeling that they have already contributed a lot. But they see this proposal as a balanced one and I hope that they will support it as they realise that similar efforts are being performed at national level in most member states,” he insisted.

Many of the savings will be achieved in non-priority areas. The economic and monetary affairs directorate-general is on the frontline and will need more resources, according to Šefčovič, but he is eyeing reductions in IT staff, or at least consolidating IT services across institutions in an effort to boost efficiency.

“We have to really be very, very realistic and I would say very wise in how we allocate the resources and really align them better on priorities,” he argued.

Šefčovič mentioned that such move could also result in less management. “I can assure you that if my colleagues come to me with a new organisational structure to suggest more managers, then we are extremely reluctant and the success rate is very, very low,” he said, pointing out that both the Parliament and the Council have a higher ratio of management staff.

In order to allow officials to manage better the additional work-load, increase efficiency and maintain a work-life balance, the Commission has in recent years pushed for more teleworking, job-sharing and part-time work.

“We are trying to improve on efficiency and on the output of workforce, but at the same time creating better conditions for them so that they can work harder, but spend the necessary time with their families,” the Commissioner said, hinting at the fact that quality of life can offset the money compensation.

We need to attract the best

Asked on whether salaries were still too high in the EU institutions, compared with national civil servants, Šefčovič rebuffed by saying these should instead be compared to those in international institutions and the private sector.

“We have to take on the best lawyers—and there we are competing with the private sector, where salaries are totally incomparable with the Commission. We have to take the best IT specialists in the world,” he said, noting officials have to be experts in their field and at the same time speak three languages and be willing to leave their home country.

That comes at a price. “I can tell you that we have a big problem recruiting highly-qualified staff in a high-wage economy,” he said.

“Not to name countries, but we have had over the recent months quite a few turn-downs from potential European officials coming from high-wage economies who have turned down director posts because they get more in their national civil service,” he added.

To read the interview in full, please click here.

Šefčovič was speaking to EurActiv Managing Editor Daniela Vincenti and Founder Christophe Leclercq

COMMENTS

  • How can you assure that in EU admin your staff works more than in private companies!!! it is a shame!!! we work very hard and a lot of hours in private companies without any insurance for nothing.... it is a deep lack of respect for all the working hard european members who pay more taxes than EU workers and earn really less!!!! scandalous! outrageous!!! for all the europen members who do not have the quality of life of european EU workers and fight every day for their well being and family life!!!!!!!!

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • "officials have to be experts in their field and at the same time speak three languages"
    This is not true.Officials, apart from lawyers, economists and IT are NOT specialists. They are recruited on the basis of a competition that is general, suited for freshly graduated from Universities. The ones winning the competition later do CAP, home affairs or energy policy, regardless of their preparation. This is the major flaw of the institutions - that they do NOT employ specialists in all the fields.
    As to three languages - give me a break, the requirement is TWO languages plus a mother tongue, how hard is that?
    One thing is sure - they should not be employed for life, this is counterproductive. There are people who work really hard in the institutions, and ones who do nothing, merely coffees and lunches. The only way to verify the performance is to give long-term contracts, e.g. 10 years, but not a job for life.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • And what about the quality of the work?
    EU draft Constitution contains serious mistakes. Annex I to the Lisbon Treaty is constructed on the basis of non-existing (for more than 20 years) "Brussels nomenclature". Regarding language versions of legal documents - lot of chaos all around. Are they really "best lawyers" worth to get the highest salaries?

    By :
    Stranger
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • Good interview. in its full version, it reminds us that for every successful candidate to EU competitions there are 99 candidates who failed. Amongst the 99 who failed, there is always someone ready to make comments such as those which were posted here, earlier today. some of them are just insulting, I would even say that they stink envy, therefore I hope you will publish this comment too, in order to have a more balanced picture of your readers' reaction to the interview.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • Do they really work hard? I know the person who deals with foreign affairs and I am not sure that she overloaded by work as every time you talk to her, all she speaks about is numerous holidays she goes to. Starts at 10, finishes at 5-5.30. Is it really a hard work?

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • When things are not so good we have to blame someone, often the ones coming from other countries, strangers who come to still our money and our jobs, so lets blame now the European staff. I'd be curious to see who would be leaving home and family leaving their parents getting older and dying alone, often waving bye bye to sunny days, to come to work in Brussels, if the conditions offered weren't interesting, having experts speaking different "mother tongues" from all member states seems to be natural and essential in an European union.
    Competitions to become european functionary are opened to all citizens from the member states, and if it's so easy to achieve, go on and try it.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • Les Organisations Syndicales du Personnel (OSP) ou des fonctionnaires a titre individuel pourraient avoir des points de vue differents de ceux du VP Sefcovic et des commentaterus ci-dessus?
    Notamment dans les autres institutions, ou par les personnes directement affectees par ces nouvelles reformes. Leurs points de vue sont bienvenus, sous forme de reactions publiques ci-dessous, ou par email non public si vous preferez (En tout cas, bien entendu a titre personnel, qui n'engage pas la Commission ou tout autre institution).

    Merci par avance pour ces opinions, qui completent bien le debat dans les capitales, concernant les fonctionnaires nationaux.

    Christophe Leclercq
    publisher@euractiv.com

    By :
    Christophe Leclercq
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • Family-friendly environment? How? By working longer hours? What about single mums or family with one
    parent family, will the kids stay longer at school, crèches? All in the traffic together for longer hours? I thought quality above quantity? More hours will not save money but will cost mmore: more demotivation, more illness etc.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • "How can you assure that in EU admin your staff works more than in private companies!!! it is a shame!!! we work very hard and a lot of hours in private companies without any insurance for nothing"´

    Are you kidding? If you feel so exploited, why don´t you leave the private sector? You should strive to get job security and decent wages everywhere across the spectrum, in public institutions AND private companies and not attack public officials for trying to keep their privileges. Yes, they are privileges, but they should be generalized to the private sector. What is wrong with having a right work/private life balance, decent medical insurance and a good salary? Pick your fight better! It is not the fault of EU officials that you work for nothing in private companies.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • Quote: "I know the person who deals with foreign affairs and I am not sure that she overloaded by work as every time you talk to her, all she speaks about is numerous holidays she goes to". From this comment we learn that in the EU there is "the person who deals with foreign affairs" (only one, poor girl, and she has time for holidays while negotiating the EU position with the rest of the world?!?) Good illustration, it seems to me, of the lack of information (if not worse) that may be driving the discussion unless a good faith effort is made on all sides. Stereotypes do not help in addressing the real issue (the "perks" and duties of the EU civil servants, in a changing economic environment). The Commissioner has a point in saying: "it would be very easy to staff the Commission with a lower quality, lower price, but what would be the price that Europe would pay"? This is a good question. End of quotes, thanks to Euractiv for hosting this discussion.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • Some of these comments are obviously written by people who do not know the reality of what is offered to a new recruit starting at AST1 or AD5 in the EU institutions. I joined the EU in 2007 and because of the new staff reforms in 2004 could only start at AST1 level - starting salary 2790 euro per month - minus considerable pension, medical and other contributions. This would not at all have been attractive for me as I was earning more in the private sector - but for family and European schooling opportunities I accepted the position.
    New EU officials recruited after 2004 are NOT being offered attractive conditions at all compared to the private sector and other international organisations and it is outrageous to suggest that new EU officials are paid excessively.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • It is funny to see how people can get so passionate about their own pockets (who said EU policy making is boring?!)

    Seriously: EU civil servants still earn very well and have top working conditions, but then again they pass highly selective exams. In my view there is little to complain about (be it in favour or against the system or priviledges). As always, the problem lies with the few rotten apples who give all the others a bad name. It would suit the institutions to reform the contract system in order to sack underperformers more easily if needed - there is nothing wrong with a reality check once in a while. It would enhance the performance and reputation of the institutions and probably save a lot more money than what is currently being discussed!

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • The reality, like it or not, is that if you considerably lower EU civil service salaries you will end up with no recruitments from Sweden, Finland, Denmark, the UK, Austria, Luxembourg and a number of others. What people have to keep in mind is that usually when someone leaves their country to work in the EU ivil service their partner sacrifices their career and also... income. Usually therefore an EU civil servant salary accounts for the whole household income and this at the very best for a long number of years because many times it is difficult for a partner to find employment in a country whose languages (yes 2 not even 1) they do not master perfectly.

    So if we are ready to accept that the countries mentioned above will only have kids coming out of university who decide to join the EU institutions for a couple of years as an adventure, or citizens who have been unable to find employment anywhere else, then fine, we can reduce salaries. I doubt Cameron et compagnie would be happy to have these people as their representatives in the institutions though.

    And by the way, to all those saying EU civil servants leave work early, it is now 19:10, I am at work winding things up and no, it is not at all an exceptional day for me. Actually rather positive at that since I am for once going to be able to be home to put my kid to bed.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • When I hear Member States ask for salary reductions in the UN, IMF, Worl Bank, Council of Europe etc then I will treat them with a bit more seriousness. As things stand though the only idea here is to reduce morale in institutions which is less in their control than they would like. If we see the effectiveness of the UN or Council of Europe I think its a good thing the EU is not totally in the hands of egoistic and populist governments.

    If someone can tell me that I am inventing things here please step forward.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • @Anonymous: Can I be said to be qualified to comment as I passed a concours (in 2004) but decided NOT to work for the institutions (I refused several job offers)? Not everyone wants to work in the EU institutions : )

    In relation to the quality of work of EU officials, as others have commented, there are good and bad apples. The problem is that the bad apples do not get weeded out.

    A friend working in the Commission told me that a person who does their job badly gets a good appraisal so the unit can get rid of him/her to another unit. Apparently there is a way through the appraisal procedure by which disciplinary procedures can be triggered, but my friend has never seen anyone (no matter how bad) get such a low appraisal that they are subject to these procedures. Officials like my friend who work hard and do their job well would be very happy to get rid of the bad apples that give them a bad reputation!

    With the exception of very highly placed officials, most (not all) EU officials receive a higher salary and perks than they would do in a similar role in the civil service of their home country or in the private sector in many (not all) EU countries.

    Many people working in the private sector and even the public sector in many EU countries have lost their jobs and those who remain have often suffered pay cuts/freezes etc. As the EU officials salaries are rather good and funded ultimately from European taxpayer's money, it does not seem unreasonable that they are asked to help make economies like so many other people.

    By :
    Rebecca
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • At first, two obvious things.
    First, EU is an international organisation and therefore its employees should receive a remuneration which is comparable to that of other international organisations.
    Second, it is in everybody's best interests that salaries of EU employees are competitive in order to attract the best professionals.
    Then follow some things which are not so obivious.
    1) The reform of 2004 substantially decreased the salary and other benefits of EU employees, especially, for those coming from the new Member States.
    2) Institutions of EU, especially - the Commission, already recruit the persons at the lowest possible grade and with least advantageous conditions (auxilliary and temporary staff).

    Would somebody want to leave its home country with kids and spouse, who most likely will not find work in Brussels, for a one year contract and a salary of some 2500 €/month?
    Maybe, if you come from Bulgaria or Latvia. No, if you are german or swede.

    The problem is that all the selection procedures do not guarantee the recruitment of the best professionals. I know good experts who fail to pass the werbal and numerical reasoning test and, on the other end of spectrum, some mentally ill persons who passed the exams and are appointed as officials for life, making the life of their collegues miserable and failing to perform even the simplest tasks. But it is not a question of salary but that of ineffective recruitment and evaluation.

    At the end, EU civil service has become a scapegoat of politicians. Its part in the overall budget of the EU is at about 5%. Why should the Parliament become the travelling circus between Strasbourg and Brussels (at least 100 m €)? Blame France! Why is the Common Agricultural Policy so expensive and non-effective (70% of EU budget)? Blame all the Member States (especially France)! Why is the External Relations Service so horrible and expensive? Blame UK! Etc. Etc.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • >EU officials receive a higher salary and perks than they would do in a similar role in the civil service of their home country or in the private sector in many (not all) EU countries.

    Well, who would come to Brussels if the EU offered the same working conditions as the civil service in their homeland? The salary is also for living in a foreign country with another language, for leaving family and friends, for the trailing partner giving up his/her career etc. Once all civil servants /or private employees/ have to make the same sacrifices, along with demonstrating ability to work in two foreign languages and beating 99 other candidates for their post - then I will agree that the salaries should be comparable. BTW these conditions are already not nearly good enough to attract certain nations or professions. Recently the Selection Office resorted to accepting graduates - few experts with long experience are attracted by salary of 4KEUR gross for an official, i.e. per family as the spouse usually in vain looks for a job here (for contract workers the salary starts from 1850 EUR gross - and yes, we do pay taxes including special 'crisis tax).

    Finally, before joining the Commission I worked for a decade in private companies and the hours worked, pressure etc, are the same in both environments.

    By :
    Not Belgian
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • "Are they really "best lawyers" worth to get the highest salaries?"
    Possibly not. And you know why they are,indeed, NOT the best lawyers? Because the Commission does NOT offer the highest -or even high for excellent lawyers - salaries. Therefore they are not attracted to start working for the EU.

    In fact, a colleague of mine worked in the Commission as a seconded national expert. He is brilliant. He stated that he is not interested in even passing a competition, as he has better opportunities elsewhere. Indeed, he started to work for EFTA, also in Brussels. He earns circa 50% more (sic!), pays no taxes, but gets better benefits and more days off. 'Naff said?

    From what I hear, many present officials consider eloping to other internationals.

    By :
    Andreaa
    - Posted on :
    04/10/2011
  • With 35 000 applicants for 130 jobs and high investments in logic riddles outsourced to US intelligence company Prometric to sort out the "qualified" applicants, they still have problems to find qualified officials in their concours? I see, Commissioner Sefcovic.

    Worst of it: High salaries for EU officials alienate these persons from the populations. That is why citizens have no voice in the Commission, because Commission officials are not one of us Didn't they raise their salary when the financial crisis hit European citizens hard? European Commission does not need an aristocracy of super-qualified officers, it needs more cohesion within European societies, be a part of the game. More frontline heroes, less Etape waste, less consultants.

    By :
    Rebestein
    - Posted on :
    08/10/2011
  • I'm sorry, but moving to Brussels is not hardship. Leaving families behind is your choice. There are schools set up to educate children of EU officials and they get extra perks like language courses, social clubs, etc., that many others do not benefit from. There needs to be less whining and feeling of entitlement and more about what is reasonable given today's economic conditions.

    I support all the points above on good/bad, smart/below average officials because these are supported by what I hear even if they are hearsay. It seems there are flaws in the system, but no one is willing to overhaul the system. Well, no wonder! The very ones who need to fix the system have a high stake in it!

    By :
    Stop whining
    - Posted on :
    09/10/2011

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising