Whereas the clash between federalist and 'souverainiste' camps defined the French 1992 debate around the Maastricht Treaty referendum, this element has been largely absent in the 2005 debate on the Constitution, where a string of issues not strictly related to the content of the Constitution have taken centre stage.
The left-leaning part of the opposition to the Constitution does not claim to be against European co-operation as such but just wants to see another Europe than the one they claim to see in the Constitutional Treaty.
Social aspects
The malaise surrounding the loss of jobs due to businesses moving their operations to the new members states and strong pressure on French textile industry from China, that now benefits from full trade liberalisation in the sector as of January 2005, has led to calls for greater defence of the European 'social model'.
Both the 'no camp' within the Socialist Party and the right wing National Front have seized upon the issue. The accusations are, respectively, that the Constitution favours the more free market liberal model or that EU does not protect the French working man, 'La France d'en bas'. At one stage the debate went down to the level of a contest to count the number of times the words social and liberal were mentioned in the treaty. The word social won, but apparently to no avail.
Services directive
In the very same spirit, the social issue has also led to a heated debate around the much-demonised services directive (widely known as the Bolkestein directive), which exploded in February and March 2005. At the EU summit in March, heads of state and government lent a helping hand to France at President Chirac's insistence.
Thus the summit conclusions emphasised the need to strike the right balance between the interests of a liberalised market and the protection of social values. Chirac claimed that the directive was now back to square one, "remis à plat", however, the planned passage of the original proposal through the European Parliament is still fully on track. Amendments proposed by German socialist MEP Evelyn Gebhardt do, however, suggest that the French concerns have been taken on board.
French influence in the EU
The French thinkers and statesmen who have played a major role in the shaping of the European project over five decades have also managed to convey the image to the French population of an EU that is somehow constructed to serve the best interests of France.
Regardless of the extent to which this was ever the truth, the notion has indeed been challenged by the sheer mathematics of the EU-25, and the prospect of one day letting in a new large country, Turkey, that will surpass even Germany as the biggest member state.
Some analysts have suggested that the referendum on the Constitution is in reality a vote by proxy on enlargement, on which the population never had a chance to pronounce itself.
The huge benefits that the French agricultural sector have reaped from the CAP are also on the wane due to pressure from the WTO, and a growing realisation among the majority of member states that long overdue reform must now take place.



