EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Germany's Schäuble calls for directly-elected EU president

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 18 May 2012

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble used his acceptance speech when awarded the Charlemagne Prize to detail his future vision of the European Union, arguing for a directly-elected Commission president.

At a time of sharp divisions within the EU, it might seem surprising that Schäuble was greeted on Thursday (17 May) as a ‘great European’ and received the Charlemagne Prize, the major international statesmanship award granted by the German city of Aachen.

Past prizewinners include Jean-Claude Trichet in 2011 and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in 2008 for her ‘cautious and integrative policies’ during the German presidency of the EU.

Schäuble is considered to be one of the most pro-European members of Merkel's cabinet. He used his acceptance speech to give new impetus to a debate on strengthening the EU and a swift review of the EU treaties. “We’ve got to create a political union now. We need strong European institutions,“ he said.

He argued that Europeans should be able to directly elect the president of the Commission. “The political unity in Europe needs a face,” Schäuble said. “At the next European parliamentary elections the parties could enter a top candidate that in the event of an electoral victory could then be accepted by the leaders of the national governments as the Commission president.”

It is not the first time Schäuble has suggested such an idea. In an interview with the German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in 2011, he also argued that Europe needed a directly-elected president. In October of last year, the Christian Democrats came forward with a ‘leading motion’ on the reform of the EU treaties which also included a directly-elected president of the Commission.

Schäuble used his speech in Aachen to argue in favour of the “further development” of the Commission into a “European government”. While he wants to reduce the power of the Council to a second chamber, he believes the European Parliament needs to be strengthened by the right to initiate legislation.

Treaty change still taboo

Since the Lisbon Treaty entered into force at the end of 2009, a new debate among the member states about a treaty change has largely been considered to be a taboo topic by European leaders.

The decade-long struggle over the ambitious EU Constitution, which failed in several referenda in 2005 and 2007, had thrown Europe into a deep crisis. But according to Schäuble, the debate about the direction Europe should take must start immediately.

He left no doubt on his position: political unity without developing into a European ‘super-state’. Schäuble sees deeper political and economic integration, as a consequence of the current eurozone crisis, but also listed the Common Foreign and Security Policy as a task for the EU.

Schaüble said a review of the treaties should start at the latest within five years. Merkel's intergovernmental fiscal pact needs to be incorporated into EU treaties within such a time frame.

Schäuble, who is tipped to be elected as the next head of the Eurogroup (the assembly of eurozone finance ministers), wants to take advantage of that time frame of five years to fundamentally change the Union's structure. Martin Schulz, president of the European Parliament, said that the review of the treaties might already start in 2015. He valued Schäuble's approach as a commitment to "European Unity".

Luxembourg's prime minister and head of the Eurogroup Jean-Claude Juncker praised Schäuble, saying the finance minister was a ‘German patriot’ and at the same time a ‘European patriot.’ 

Kathrin Haimerl for the Süddeutsche Zeitung, with EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Ah! The beginning of the end of the European Union then? Or, is it indeed the end of the beginning?

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    18/05/2012
  • What Minister Schaüble suggest is only what is needed for building a well functioning European Union. I support him strongly and wish him all success in his important endeavour!

    Hadar Cars
    Former MP, MEP and Swedish Minister of Trade

    By :
    Hadar Cars
    - Posted on :
    18/05/2012
  • We must give credit to this German Government for its recurrent and progessive proposals for an EU reform and a revision of EU Treaties.
    These proposals should now - at last - be relayed by progressive forces within the European Parliament. The "Spinelli Group" should skip its next academic conference and concentrate instead on concrete proposals on the timing, method and agenda for this reform.
    The pro-european associations should form a united front and plateform under the leadership of the Spinelli Group and engage in public debates on the reform.
    The 2014 european elections campaign should focus on the reform and a Convention convened before 2015.JG GIRAUD

    By :
    Jean-Guy Giraud
    - Posted on :
    18/05/2012
  • I perhaps would agree with you Hadar Cars if here in the UK we too had a "STRONG" LEADER.

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    18/05/2012
  • How deep in the sand can Schauble's head be burried !!!
    Can these people not see that there is something iretreavably wrong with the EU . Schauble is proposing himself for another good EU sinecure . The EU is up against the buffers , it isn't going anywhere . The commission is going to anounce political union ? Not before 27 referenda I hope !!! Do we want civil war in Europe or WWIII . Britain for one will not join a political union , without the people slaughter their politicians . The EU is headed by a bunch of blind dunderheads , who need to shut up and work to heal the incureable virus that is eating away the hearts of the European people .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • The 10 European nations: (1)Belgium (2)France (3)Germany (4)Greece (5)Italy (6)Luxembourg (7)the Netherlands (8)Portugal (9)Spain & (10)the United Kingdom (Revelation 17:12)the former W.E.U. permanent members. (Western European Union)

    By :
    Lujack Skylark
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Being the very practical person I am, and once in my life time lived under a really true LEADER of this Country and sadly now under the weakest Leader of all. I can report that if this Present Government does not remove this country from the European Union soon, the people will sadly, do it themselves. Without doubt the EU is trying to form itself into one State of European Union. The people of this Country cannot and will not accept that. They most certainly cannot possible contribute financially to it and they cannot continue in it for their loyal and true allegiance is to the British Crown and all that it stands for. It would surely be treason for this Government to even enter into any such proposal. The people of this Country have been betrayed by every Prime Minister that has been in Power with perhaps the exception of Margaret Thatcher and we know what happened to her by those closest to her. People are realising there is no point in having or paying for National Governments that can no longer Govern, for they too simply obey orders of foreigners. So, such is the dilemma they are in. All three major Political Parties here in the UK want to remain in the EU, and we know that they LibDemCons would never have got into power had the Cons not promised a referendum on the EU.

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Reply to Anne

    Your point of view is highly respectable. It remains in the hands of the British citizens - through elections or referendums - to decide if they desire further integration in Europe or withdrawal, with all the consequences this choice will entail . Would a majority decide to withdraw, the British Government will have to negociate a new agreement with the EU ; it is all described in article 50 of the Lisbon treaty . Sincerely Jean-Guy GIRAUD

    By :
    Jean-Guy Giraud
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Ah Jean-Guy Giraud, Clause 50 presents a terrible problem for the people of the United Kingdom of Great Britain. It should also cause a problem for the British Government too. The people of this Country have never once agreed to any EC/EEC/EU TREATY BEFORE IT WAS SIGNED OR RATIFIED. The people voted to agree to remain in the EC after the treaty had already been sign and ratified and after so many lies had been told to re the contents of that Treaty. Those lies were printed on the Official Paper distributed at that time. Nuff said, though sadly at that time people actually believed those high up Politicians and what they said at that time. No 'Tinternet to check up on words spoken at that time then.

    The British people are beginning to question whether we are indeed a member of the EU. You see our way of doing things of this nature here in the UK is some-what different to other Countries and sadly this may seem why we are always the "odd one out".

    When putting through the EC Bill through Parliament it went through an ordinary vote in the House of Commons which without doubt at all breached the Constitutional Convention that, on such a massive Constitutional Change should have been put to the people BEFORE any signature went on any paper and certainly before any ratification of any Treaty such as was signed.

    So, can we have our money back please? You see, if we were never in the EC to begin with, we couldn't vote to remain in it could we?

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Jean-Guy Giraud .
    I haven't read what is in article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty . I believe that Britain leaving the EU would be a major blow the EU morale . With regard to negociating a new agreement wirh the EU , Britain should tell the EU on a take it or leave it basis .
    Anne ,
    Your right the present British prime minister and his cabinet are the weakest I can remember , wet behind the ears , totally incompetent for the job , a total yes man to the US , EU or anyone else you like to name . I have written to him at 10 Downing St. to tell him what I thought of him .
    I lived in Italy for a number of years and people there think much the same as Brits. , but Italians are cowed still as they were under Mussolini , think government can do what they like and best to keep quiet .
    I think that the governments fear of a referendum on anything to do with the EU , that the British people will vote no , without considering the question .
    Perhaps we shall all have to vote UKIP , just to get Briain out of the EU .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • To Ann and David

    All I can say is : go to art. 50 and read it (you may also want to read the Preamble of that treaty), think hard about the consequences of your democratic choice, make up your mind independantly (not exclusively through the Murdoch media)and press your Parliament/Government one way or the other. Good luck JGG

    By :
    Jean-Guy Giraud
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Clause 50 is about withdrawal from the EU Treaties. 5 clauses, too many to repeat here. However, I have mentioned one point above, but there is also another very important point to remember, and that is the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and if my first point holds any weight because the people were told lies-easy enough to prove- and obviously the people were certainly not told the truth about the Treaty of Rome here in the UK, that also holds weight.

    Yes,David Barneby, I have read Lisbon more than once and there are other very important points which I will not go into here. As to your last point, the British people are generally placid, accepting what those they generally look up to, to be right, but they have seen a Prime Minister saying one thing and doing another. They no longer look up to him, and what is more, they are beginning to get angry at what HE is doing to their Country. Me! I have been angry for a long time.

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Thank you JGG. As an Island Nation and never being able to stand with one foot in one Country and the other foot in a different one, we have always been some-what different. I love languages, but sadly as school children we were never encouraged to learn and if they do at present it is probably only a half-hearted attempt. A great opportunity missed to find out other Countries way of life.

    Europanto was created in 1996 by Diego Mariani a journalist, author and translator for the European Council of Ministers in Brussels. This was my response to him.=
    EUROPANTO GOBBL-DE-GOOP.

    Esté nueva idioma, no es crazy,
    Pero it can make unas personas trés lazy,
    No necesitar to learn eleven idiomas,
    For al final cette course, no hay diplomas.

    C’est trés facile than “Old English Pigion”,
    Per favore-grazie, you learn just a smidgen,
    Straight up mate, vous ne regrettez pas,
    Just cheek, sommi Old Greek, you understand JA?

    Was darf es sein more than anything now?
    For c’est un morçeau de gateau, mein Frau,
    C’est wild, to learn impotante Europese,
    Just mix up todo este idiomas avec mucho ease.

    Beware though, personas in Brussels just might,
    Qué commencer as a joke, may be taken as right,
    Si Europanto catches on, c’est vraiment to relate,
    Mucho interpreters will meet a very sad fate.

    Goodbye, Arrivederci, Gia sas, Hasta Luego, Adjö, Näkemiin,
    Farvel, Dag, Au revior, Até logo, and Auf Wiedersehen,
    N’est pas vraiment, C’est un horreur,
    Arrividerci———————until tomorreur!!!!

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • The EU is doomed whether the euro survives or not. Why? Because, European leader s have ignored the crucial advice Robert Schuman and Konrad Adenauer offered them concerning the survival of the European Enterprise.

    And here is the unknown truth about the EU. A Briton wrote about European integration - how i would develop, its character and future prospects even before the French Founding Fathers of the EU - Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman - were born in 1888 and 1886. According to this great Briton, a confederation of European nations would develop through a great European crisis, and this confederation would become one of the major political features in history. He has been proved right. The EU was born with the Schuman Plan after the Second World War.

    He also warned that boundaries in Europe would change, and England and Ireland would become provinces of Europe if UK joined apolitical union of European nations. He warned they would not be saved. He has been proved right. European laws govern Brittan and Ireland. Most British people want Britain to leave the anti-democratic European Union which has become a burden on them. Everything the Briton wrote about the EU has come to pass. It is reasonable to suggest that what he recorded about Europe's future would also come to pass. The British people must heed his warning about EU's future and leave the European Union. No one can save the EU.

    Had the passengers who perished on the Titanic had known that the unsinkable ship would sink on it s maiden voyage, would they have joined the doomed vessel. EU leaders have no clue why the EU exists. They react to events. They have become victims of circumstances - not knowing where Jean Monnet's European Titanic is heading towards.

    By :
    Francis Codjoe
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Frances Codjoe, you write a lot of what I will call, "Common Sense". Long before I had a Computer (And I have gone through THREE now (worn them out!)) I sent for Monnet's speeches when he was President of the High Authority at the ordinary Session of the Common Assemble on May 10th 1955, at Strasbourg. Quote from page 11."It is plain that we shall only reap the full benefit of the Common Market when these limitations have been gradually removed by means of further integration extending the pooling of resources and enabling A COMMON ECONOMIC POLICY TO BE ADOPTED IN THE WIDER FIELD ETC AND HE GOES ON WITH FURTHER INTEGRATION. The Speech is here, but it is in French.http://aei.pitt.edu/14378/1/S35.pdf
    Monnet's Speech of 25th Feb 1964 came to me only in French which I had to translate, I notice now it is in ENGLISH here: http://aei.pitt.edu/14185/1/S13-S14.pdf
    Do take the time to read it. It is important. (Ah! I have just noticed that the French version is at the end. Hmph!-My translation was pretty well near accurate)

    You write, "The British people must heed his warning about EU's future and leave the European Union. No one can save the EU." Should the UK Government NOT remove this Country from the EU, when it knows without doubt the vast majority of people want FREEDOM from the EU, if the Government ignores them, the British people will indeed remove themselves from the EU.

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    19/05/2012
  • Anne , Jean-Guy ,Francis ,
    I have now read Lisbon Treaty article 50 , also article 218 . I cannot see any great complications , other than the terms that might be proposed by a British government . The EU and its parliament would discuss , agree or not agree the terms of withdrawal .
    failing agreement membership would end in 2 years .
    There is a need to repeal every law since 1972 and start again , rather than selectively deleting .
    Anne , I have been opposed to the EEC since Ted Heath "took us in". The decimal pound effectively halved in value . I had a small farm where I bred horses for eventing , point to point . The cost of feed skyrocketed , farmers couldn't afford to feed calves , I bought in 6 at a time to rear at £1 each .
    In 1975 I voted in the referendum for Britain to leave the EEC . I'm conservative farther Right than centre . Wedgewood-Benn became a hero for his magnificent speech agaist membership of the EEC at the Oxford Union , he was Spot On .
    I have lived a number of years in Italy and speak Italian fluently . My daughter is married to a German and lives in Berlin , speaks fluent German and teaches English at a bilingual school . We are not little Englanders , I have friends from nearly all the EU states , but I am strongly opposed to the present political/economic union . I cannot believe the ignorance and stupidity of heads of state and Brussels commission to have got the EU into this mess .
    Like you Anne , I have been Very Angry for a long time . Many friends who voted for Britain to stay in the EEC have since said to me , if only they'd known they'd have voted to come out .
    I believe the EU has determinately put its head in a noose that will eventually strange it .
    With a centred economy , if anything goes wrong , as now , the market slows to zero , you have no market at all . In a federal single state , those successful countries like Germany and Holland , will find that their hard work and world marketing will have to pay for all the failing economies . People of successful countries are going to be very angry and want to leave the EU .
    Cameron worries about the Banking and financial services industries in the city of London . One can only assume he has connections there . Is he aware of the sort of dealings done there , especially by American banks . British law does not seem to regulate banks at all , that fraud can be enacted with impunity ; a kind of trading with all the depositors money , again and again on the same sole basic sum , without limit . The US is limited to 140% , but the UK without limit . I wonder whether Cameron has any idea what is happening ; perhaps the British government reaps a huge reward ; perhaps he's affraid to devulge the truth . Nissan , Honda and other Japanese companies chose Britain , to build factories , because they were offered favourable terms and Britain has flexible employment , I do not think they would leave and their cars would not be blocked from EU import . Britain imports more to the EU than she exports , so any tarifs would be favourable to Britain . or we'd buy elsewhere . The common market , on your doorstep has been a trap that states like Britain have fallen into . We need to get out fast , like rats , from the " Sinking Titanic "

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • I would like to try and widen your outlook for I have to admit, I had not thought a great deal about the British Commonwealth other than a family of Commonwealth Nations getting together, meeting up and exchanging views, a voluntary association of independent states, promoting democracy and organising such as the Commonwealth Games until I realised that at the last ‘Commonwealth’ meeting in 2011 was “some-how different”. I knew this meeting was ‘different’ as soon as I realised that our Prime Minister, David Cameron and William Hague was there.

    Oh boy, Oh Boy. Without a word to the people of THIS Country he has proposed changes to the rules on succession to the British Crown, which has to have the agreement of some 15 other countries who have the Queen as their Monarch. He also wants to scrap the ban on spouses of Roman Catholics ascending to the throne and give girls the same right of succession as boys.

    He also pressed for progress on a range of human rights issues, and he advised the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (Chogm) that to stay relevant it must work harder to uphold basic values. Many people here in the UK might also welcome these proposed changes yet, none have been put to them. When did the prime Minbister of this Country explain to the people of this Country the proposes he put to strangers he perhaps had never met before?

    What is being proposed now, bears little resemblance from hesitant grouping that gathered together in 1931, yet is has plodded on since then quite happily until 2011. Now, I get the feeling that with all the proposed changes, it could all go awry.

    But the Commonwealth is not just about “games” is it? For I remember and regarded Members of the Commonwealth as “family”. Part of our family, for greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. Life is the most valuable matter we possess; and when a man is willing to lay that down for his friends or his country, it shows the utmost extent of love. Well over a million Commonwealth Forces died so that the people in these small British Isles remained free.

    Yes, I gently remind here, that our Commonwealth friends have fought along side of us when we have, as a country, have been near to losing our freedom to govern ourselves in two World Wars, the last war being one that people my age cowed in air-raid shelters while our Houses, Hospitals and Schools, factories, Bridges etc were bombed night after night here in the United Kingdom of Great Britain. All that FOR THE FREEDOM TO GOVERN OURSELVES AND WHAT HAVE PRIME MINISTERS OF THIS COUNTRY DONE TO THIS THEIR OWN COUNTRY SINCE 1972. YET ALL SWEAR FAITHFUL AND TRUE ALLEGIANCE TO THE BRITISH CROWN, THE CROWN THAT REPRESENTS ALL THE PEOPLE.

    So why the changes? Are we looking at World Government? Now I ask you are you content to pay and vote for a Government in the UK that has to obey EU laws in exactly the same way we are supposed to do? To abandon all that previous Generations gave their lives for? Or are you going to make a stand and say to our own Government, enough is enough, get us out of the European Union now.

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • Greece should be allowed to default and leave the Eurozone , or made to leave . Holding Greece within the Euro will only serve as a stop gap , to prevent an immediate domino collapse of the Eurozone . Banks and investors should realise that loans to Greece is money down the pan , lost forever .
    European Commission , Germany , France , heads of state should realise that the Greek bankruptcy is a festering sore that will never heal , will develop like an abcess that will poison everything the EU stands for . There is no way out , other than to accept the inevitable .
    Whilever this situation exists , there will be popular unrest in Europe . Hollande talks of creating economic growth ; how can you have growth in a trade area where half the countries are bankrupt . I do not believe the EU could create a single state without a referendum in each country , a NO vote wouldn't surprise me . A single federal state will have a transfer economy . Those prosperous northern states such as Germany and Holland will have to effectively pay off all the debt of the southern states and then support them in perpetuity . I cannot see the people of the northern states accepting that they work so hard and all their profits are wasted maintaining the southern states .
    The Euro needs to be abolished !!! It serves only to create unrest within the EU !!! All countries should return to original currencies and become once again independent sovereign states . The EU commission , parliament , lawcourts , ECHR and bureaucracy should be disbanded . European people have had 70yrs to mingle , get to know one another , make lasting friendships , there is no need for a central political control in Europe . To relentlessly pursue the present EU course will end in civil war , or an all out WWIII .

    .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • David, You wrote, "I do not believe the EU could create a single state without a referendum in each country , a NO vote wouldn't surprise me". When were YOU asked in a referendum before any EU Treaty was signed and/or ratified? Did I miss it? The people you/we elect ratified those treaties without your say so, except that they might turn round and say, "Well YOU elected me to speak on your behalf Chum".

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • Anne ,
    My outlook is very wide . The EU should have been a commonwealth ; personally I would have prefered to see a union of English speaking peoples , rather than the EU . When John Major signed Maastrict , he suggested expanding the number of states , to form a commonwealth or confederation of self governing sovereign nation states . The EU would not hear of it , but have expanded to a point which is unmanageable

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • Anne ,
    My outlook is very wide . The EU should have been a commonwealth ; personally I would have prefered to see a union of English speaking peoples , rather than the EU . When John Major signed Maastrict , he suggested expanding the number of states , to form a commonwealth or confederation of self governing sovereign nation states . The EU would not hear of it , but have expanded to a point which is unmanageable

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • Hi Anne
    The word of God must come to pass. However it takes a wise man to avert an ill-prophecy. Britain is being 'ruled' by selfish and ignorant politicians who hate their own country. The tragedy is that all the anti-EU groups have refused to join forces to defeat the 'common enemy' - the LIDLABCON. As I have already stated, we were warned about the evil EU 70 years even before the EU was born. British politicians have refused to learn what the British lawyer wrote about the dark future of the European Union.

    I pray the Lord intervenes miraculously to save His country. WE have dethroned the Holy Bible in Britain. WE have replaced the Manual of the Great Physician with Darwin's useless Evolution Manual. We are reaping what we have sown. Britain, once an Empire that ruled about a fifth of the world, has now become a province of the godless EU. What a pity . God cannot be mocked.

    The British lawyer wrote: “The dethronement of the Bible eliminates the most important factor in the formation of our national character and it is not easy to estimate the effects which this will have on the life of the people of this country.”

    By :
    Francis Codjoe
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • Mr Schauble
    1º People have to be informed (well) about EU proposition and in my country the politicians and tv say what they want :solve the language barrier with strong translation.
    2º The vote of a belgian or portuguese must have the same value as a polish or german(my first minister will fight against tokeep is power)
    3º Information of EU leaders have to arrive clear to me and not distorted by foreign interestes and interpretations undetected by normal citizens.
    Mr Schauble go on but pls be eficiente (german eficience not portuguese)

    By :
    antonio cristovao
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • here for you Francis Codjoe, We shall soon see: The year 2008 marked the last of God’s warnings to mankind and the beginning in a countdown of the final three and one-half years of man’s self-rule that will end by May 27, 2012.

    On December 14, 2008, the First Trumpet of the Seventh Seal of the Book of Revelation sounded, which announced the beginning collapse of the economy of the United States and great destruction that will follow. The next three trumpets will result in the total collapse of the United States, and once the Fifth Trumpet sounds the world will be thrust into WW III.

    The Seven Trumpets of the Seventh Seal, as well as the Seven Thunders of the Book of Revelation (which the apostle John saw but was restricted from recording) are revealed in this book.

    Many of the prophecies of the Seven Thunders are being fulfilled and will continue to increase in strength and frequency throughout this final three and one-half years of man's self-rule on earth.

    The prophecies revealed in this book explain the demise of the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, and much of western Europe, which will be followed by man's final world war. This last war will be the result of clashing religions and the governments they sway. Billions will die! The destruction of this time will far exceed the very worst times of all human history.

    As these events unfold, the world will increasingly become aware of the authenticity of the words in this book and realize that Ronald Weinland has been sent by God as His end-time prophet.

    This book is primarily directed to the people of the three major religions of the world (Islam, Judaism and Christianity), whose roots are in the God of Abraham. Ronald Weinland has been sent to all three.

    So, we shall see what happens on the 27th of this month. Or, more importantly what comes forth after 28th May.

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    20/05/2012
  • Antonio cristavo

    The problem is not of politicians letting the people know what it is all about . Politicians such a schauble have there mind focused on creating the Mighty Single State of Europe . People don't come into it at all , better if Europe had no people to mess things up . Worst of all is that politicians have no idea what they are doing , floundering around , because things are not going to plan . The EU is rule by occasional committee , by heads of state who have not " Got their eye on the ball ". Ordinary people who observe what is going on , between the EU and Globally think that all the politicians are fools and crooks only interested in what they can pocket for themselves . The point of keeping the people informed has passed , people don't belive a word their politicians say , think they are all bare faced liars .
    When there is no trust in Europe , the unity that might have made a union is gone .
    It is all very well for politicians to pontificate from Brussels , Berlin or the G8 , people don't care or believe a word of it , the game is over .
    It is time the politicians took their heads out of the sand faced reality .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2012
  • I agree with with you, expecially, "the game is over .
    It is time the politicians took their heads out of the sand faced reality" .

    By :
    Anne
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2012

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising