EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Hollande: Treaty change ‘necessary’ to deepen eurozone

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 28 June 2013, updated 11 July 2013

A two-day European summit ended in Brussels on Friday (28 June) with calls for deeper economic integration among the 17 countries sharing the euro currency. French President François Hollande said a revision of the EU treaty “will be necessary” to harmonise economic policy and complete the euro area with its own budget and “social dimension”.

The final summit communiqué, adopted unanimously by the 27 EU heads of states and government, said the “the key priority” in the short run was to finalise the integration of the eurozone's patchwork banking supervision system.

The European Central Bank is scheduled to take over the supervision of eurozone banks from late next year, completing the first pillar of the banking union.

The European Commission is expected to initiate the second leg by tabling proposals as early as next week to establish a resolution authority responsible for shutting down or restructuring failed banks.

Strengthening the social dimension of the EMU

But in the longer term, eurozone countries will require closer coordination of economic policies, EU leaders said in the joint statement, adding that “the social dimension of the EMU should be strengthened”, an apparent breakthrough for France.

Discussions over the reinforcement of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) will conclude at the December EU summit, the statement read. The EU leaders vowed to take the first step in October by introducing statistical indicators to better monitor social and labour market conditions.

“We want coordination, we even want harmonisation,” Hollande said after the Brussels summit. “But there must also be a social dimension” he added. “France is very committed to harmonisation, including minimum wages.”

The French President underlined however that the integration process in the eurozone should start with a clearer definition of responsibilities between the European and national level. “This clarity is necessary,” Hollande said, adding that Europe could set the objectives but that countries should remain in charge of deciding how best to achieve them.

The European Commission and France have become embroiled in a war of words over recent weeks after the EU Executive issued Paris with prescriptive recommendations on economic reforms, a move that fell foul with the French President, who said the EU should not “dictate” reforms to member states.

>> Read: France placed under EU reform scrutiny

The Commission appeared to cross a red line and hurt French sovereignty by suggesting Paris should raise the retirement age, triggering a barrage of criticism from national ministers who accused the EU Executive of by-passing democratically elected parliamentarians and fuelling the far-right vote.

The EU summit statement seemed to acknowledge the problem of defining the EU’s role, saying the coordination of employment and social policies should “fully respect” national competencies.

“The role of the social partners and social dialogue, including at national level, is also key,” the statement read, announcing that the Commission “will present a communication on the social dimension of the EMU shortly.”

A 'fund' for the euro zone

The summit breakthrough on the EMU’s social dimension may have unblocked French reluctance to open discussions on the revision of the EU treaties, a long-standing demand from German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Berlin has insisted repeatedly on the need to centralise oversight of national budgets as a necessary step to complete the monetary union and tackle the fundamental flaws of the EMU that fuelled the eurozone sovereign debt crisis, a move that requires amendments to the EU treaty.

>> Read: Merkel calls for 'political union' to save the euro

“There will necessarily be a revision of the treaty,” Hollande said in a concession to Germany, indicating that the eurozone should have its own budget and a new “fund” to promote economic integration and “solidarity” among the 17 countries sharing the single currency.

"With Ms Merkel we agreed … on a fund dedicated to the euro area with revenues that are assigned to this fund. The euro area would then decide how to use this fund,” Hollande said, citing competitiveness, employment and youth as possible areas for spending.

“The euro area with additional resources, different decision-making processes – this is the future of European integration,” the French President said.

Speaking after the summit, Merkel confirmed the idea but gave few details, saying the new fund should be used to improve the competitiveness of euro area economies. “We need to come to a common understanding of what is important to strengthen growth and competitiveness,” she told a press conference.

“In December, we will take decisions on contractual agreements between member states and the Commission and the solidarity mechanisms that go hand in hand with that.”

Next steps: 
  • 22 September: German elections
  • October: EU summit to look at indicators for the social dimension of the EMU
  • December: EU summit to decide on way forward to deepen EMU
  • May 2014: European elections
Frédéric Simon

COMMENTS

  • too early to say the actual results but "competitiveness" is no god of mine. Youth unemployment is just a syndrom of major disfunctioning: 6 billion euros will not solve anything... the ideological rift is still there, let us be clear, even if nobody dares contradict the mainstream line

    By :
    catherine
    - Posted on :
    28/06/2013
  • @ catherine Posted on : 28/06/2013
    Hi !
    I thought it was 8 billions?
    But you're right!

    But now we can not always trying with a "fund " to tackle the results of our decayed economy BUT should straight the rod to the MAIN problem !And this are the LACKs of some federal policies of the economy and monetary Union which the need of Solidarity and i mean not the "Fund" solidarity but the one for the global EU-economy to drop the jobless of some states !

    Maybe this will make a little upper-state but finally we will fight effectiveness against that problem!

    How many times do economic experts have to explain this to heads of states !?

    We have now 5 years selfish interests with bad economy which caused high unemployment due to austerity and incomprehensible national governance trying to bring depth under control !

    If don't I see a REAL European solidarity !

    What theirs interests are ,is now integrating more member-states INSTEAD of unifying and tackling FIRST the problems of the 17th's !!!!!

    The U.S.A. is really not to blame !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    30/06/2013
  • Over the years the troika and thier masters destroyed the economies of southern europe, now brussels is feeling the heat so they extend their hands with a bag of cash and a few empty promises.
    Unbelievable , and this idiot hollande who says there is no more crises and all is wel in hotel california,and he wants to unite all of europe.
    Where did they find this guy , hes strait out of the film dumb/dumber.

    By :
    klassen
    - Posted on :
    30/06/2013
  • @ Klassen

    It's so simple
    Germany only should apply the Eurobonds !
    and finally

    Head's of the 17 States inj Europe should do as the
    11 Confederated-states in America did it during Philadelphia in 1787 !

    Simply Signing for an United Countries European Constitution !!

    Then our problem will be the past !

    Where the hell is the problem when it comes to tackle that moron economy with a bunch of jobless here in Europe! Not how the Political way is the Problem but that everybody has a Job with an adequate salary !

    That selfish Situation by austeriry is beginning to be insupportable for merely a lot of youth !
    So Germany shoud agree for a depth pool and Holland shouldn't say no more NO as well a real European "fund" called trasury!

    OR we Reamain at this level !!!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    01/07/2013
  • Sadly, I cannot tell whether Klassen is being ironic or serious when he/she says, "Simply signing for an united countries european consitution....then our problems will be past." If that is meant to be a serious startement, I would dearly like to know and understand how this will solve the problem. Later in the post, it would seem to suggest Germany should provide the purse to resolve these 9economic0 problems. If I were german (sadly, not), I would be incensed to think that I would be expoected to work my arse off for these failed Southern European politicians who have badly let down their nations and should, accordingly, stand trial for their maladministration.

    For God's sake, leave Germany and the Germans alone (I speak as a citizen of the UK).

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    01/07/2013
  • No DON!

    WHAT ACTUALLY Southern-states haven is an high depth interests to pay with Austerity imposed by MERKEL!
    In Which unlikely said :Germany profits !

    So Now ! If you pool the depth and equalize the interests rates without to much austerity then this willresults have an great oxygens effect and apease southern states economy/Jobless which will have even a positive imact on global EU-economy!
    What more longer southern member-states takes to recover their economy what weaker for the economies even more difficult to recover later !

    Either they do it right and take an example of the U.S on their Solidarity or it's time to close the door everyone as well ending the free trade for everyone getting old devaluated currency back !
    So everybody don't need to blame each others again despite coming wars again as it was during Nationalsim in which we are !!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    01/07/2013
  • As to one of the fellow writers don, i think hollande is a moron. He is inept and fully incapable of running a country or anything else for that matter.
    If he thinks a fed will work , hes making a grave mistake. Im not french and have in fact no right to say anything about this guy , and if he were to keep his kindergarden comments for his euroextremist buddies the majority would just ignore him. And if he wants to rivise the treaty he should hold a referendum in his own country and see what his citizens want , and respect that outcome. Until then he should shut it.
    Crisis (what crisis) right?

    By :
    klassen
    - Posted on :
    01/07/2013
  • Sorry Klassen, my country isn't a populist playground where everybody needs to vote everytime a politician fancies revising treaties (like switzerland), on the contrary, everybodybody elects one guy (unlike anywhere else in Europe by the way) for 5 years to represent them and work for the general good (not for each little desire of anyone anytime and on any subject), therefore, as Holland just got elected, I wouldn't see any reason he should now start asking the french people what to do, and especially shutting up abroad about what France wishes.

    I also wonder how you yourself know whether Holland is or not capable of "running a country". It is rather your entire post that is inept. You may disagree with him but should french as a result reshape their own democratic system. And regarding your personal judgement about him, it surely is about the same level as the quality of your cinema references.

    By :
    Augustin Chamarbois
    - Posted on :
    02/07/2013
  • @ klassen - Posted on : 01/07/2013

    See my post I explained it already !

    See the United States as example !
    Why shouldn't a Fed not work ?!!?
    One of the modern political system !
    Yes it will work much better than that lazy system we less democratic we have now!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    02/07/2013
  • You all may have different opinions but back to the article. Hollande says we need treaty change. I don't know what he wants but I hope he succeeds as it will probably the best chance for UK citizens to get a referendum!

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    02/07/2013
  • Nope im not a populist/nationalist or anything that even comes close , im just a concerned citizen whom sees through the vail of crap these guys throw at us. Anyone who says the euro zone has no crises is looking through blinders and should stop with his own promotional bs.
    The guy is either a loony or is looking forward to running with merkel for eu president ,who knows , but his views are as useless as a chocolate teapot.
    I say have the guts and the decency to give the people of europe thier say before you make treaty changes or screw with constitutions which have been zealously guarded and fought for over the centuries.
    Have some respect thats all.
    If people cant have thier say then everything that our democracy our way of life and our freedom is based on has been a waste of time .
    This is not populism or nationalism , its the way we were taught to think, to act ,honesty and respect. People need to participate in these kinds of decisions that affect all of us, its just that simple.
    Treaty changes and integration are way to big for a merkel or hollande or whomever to make on their own, they need the support of the people, so ask them ,its that simple.
    Referendums were held in some countries to change constitutions , they lost but changed them anyway.
    Thats where we are headed with these people.
    Do we want it this way, or are we to be led down a path which we havent chosen?

    By :
    klassen
    - Posted on :
    02/07/2013
  • @ Klassen

    I am getting really tired with pro EU posters and politicians redefining the English language.
    There is nothing wrong with Populism. The dictionary definition is:

    A political philosophy supporting the rights and power of the people in their struggle against the privileged elite. What the hell is wrong with that!

    “Do we want it this way, or are we to be led down a path which we haven't chosen? “

    You are totally correct in your post. I until recently believed that we were losing the argument to the beurocrats and two faced politicians who compromise the privileged elite. I am now starting to believe that the people are starting to see through the lack of accountability and democracy which can only be a good thing.

    Onwards and upwards!

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    02/07/2013
  • Klassen, Populism isn't necessarily nationalistic. Both right and left wing politicians can be promising all sorts of miracles will be springing out of sensational measures, which happen to be as a matter of fact completly ineffective.

    Demagoguery (is this greek word also not yet translated in the english language, George?) may succeed in entertaining masses of crowds looking for a cheap thrill and happy to dive in nonesense (whether they believe all their problems will be solved out of eliminating foreigners or redistributing everyone's wealth), that won't make these measures more effective, nor more democratic as a result, since no democracy functions without a minimum respect for rational principles (were it proved everybody in France wanted burning publicly Holland's guts in Notre Dame's nave, because they believed it would provide France with salvation! Even if a few politicians (even though everyone knows it's a pissing laugh) are always happy to claim they also share such opinions, I still have my doubts concerning the results and especially the democratic level of undertaking such processes, at least for the French Republic's standards).

    I really think your whole little competition game for world leadership with Merckel only exists in your own imagination (as well as in the fantacies of quite a few daydreamer french people, I must admit) but Holland presumebly has other concerns to keep himself buisy with. I totally agree with your analysis of his strategy to present himself as a "chocolate-teapot moron-idiot" (you can even say bingo sucker from the apple tart shop just round the corner) but apparently this has always happened (strangly) to serve him in his carrier, despite everyone laughing at it as you still do and despite everyone knows he is everything but the "flower of morning dew" he appears like (i.e. a cold upper-class boring manipulative apparachik with no blood or humor, nevermind his pathetic attempts in the matter).

    The french constitution can be changed wihout necessarily requiring a referundum (2/3 of both chambers actually) and international treaties (Europe so far has no constitution) are changed everyday by diplomates and ambassadors all around the world, the french wouldn't know each time wether this or that modification should, acoording to their expertise, change or not. France isn't switzerland or Ireland: I think if they had to wonder every sundays whether they'd better buy more gaz off the russians, change the french laws to allow more chinese products in this or that sector, start a new relationship with Algeria, lend more money to the IMF or impove french involvment in Nato's front, that would completly bore the french people and poison the political debate in the whole country. They wouldn't either know what to say (how could they anyway, I mean without the ressources and intelligence a whole administration has for dealing with necessary international treaty term modifications?).

    Unfortunatly democracy isn't such a simple thing as you seem to have fount out. Since the Ancient Greece the struggling debates between direct/representative democracy, delegated or imperative mandates, both developments of administrative powers and their necessary public control will remain unresolved for quite a bit of time, I should think, in France, in Europe, as anywhere else in a so-called democratic system (unless you now come up with a better idea than Aristotle, Platon, Locke or Rousseau). After all you also know how "a country" needs to be run... Maybe Holland needs you, Klassen, quite simply!

    By :
    Augustin Chamarbois
    - Posted on :
    03/07/2013
  • We need one President as Tony blair said for more democracy!

    We need to change the Treaty to make the Eu governable with federal policies for the EMU!
    Hollande is proponent to take the first step to the right path and not to the backward path!
    And we need an European Bondmarket and not nationalistics one..for more solidarity !

    Leader's have to take common path seriously !

    And let european people beginn to elect democracially a real European President with a real European Senate!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    04/07/2013
  • @ Augustin Chamarbois

    I have read your post a couple of times and If I have understood it correctly I would probably agree with most of it.

    Many of of our citizens (UK) are only interested in earning a living, looking after and educating their children while enjoying their free time and holidays. They do not tend to follow politics and are not sad people like you and me. They will have opinions on single issues and broadly support Labour, Lib-Dem or Conservative Politics. This can be quite tribal and they tend to vote as their parents and grandparents did.

    The main issues in General Elections tend to be the Economy, Jobs, Health Service and Education and it can be quite difficult to bring forward other issues which are not seen as relevant to peoples day to day concerns.

    Indeed I believe that the following quotes by Churchill sum up the problem:

    “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

    “No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”

    Demagogue in English:

    A leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power.

    We have had a few of those and in my humble opinion Tony Blair (who many on the continent see as a future President of Europe) is probably our most recent and best example of the black art.

    Because of what happened in 1973 and 1975 there have been huge changes in the governance of the UK and bearing in mind the aforesaid many of us believe that we need to have a grown up debate about where our future lies in the world. Much has happened over the years with changes happening as you have described in your post. It is time for Brits to lance the boil one way or another.

    By the way I think our Mr Cameron is a closet Europhile and could be guilty of a bit of demagoguery himself

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    04/07/2013
French President François Hollande (Photo: © Présidence de la République - P. Segrette)
Background: 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has insisted on achieving a fiscal union in the eurozone – and centralised EU oversight over national budgets – as a necessary step to end the eurozone sovereign debt crisis.

Seen from Berlin, a fiscal union is a prerequisite for considering any moves towards greater debt sharing – or eurobonds – being advocated by French President François Hollande.

Hollande for his part, believes political union should only be considered after the 2014 European elections and could not happen before there is agreement on creating banking and "social" unions.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising