EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Global clean-energy 'revolution' falters ahead of Rio

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 18 June 2012, updated 14 December 2012

SPECIAL REPORT / A UN push to provide electricity to more than 1 billion people who live off the grid is threatened by indecision at an important global development conference this week, despite robust support from EU leaders.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, has called for a “global clean energy revolution” to provide electricity to the developing world by 2030 and he won commitments to the plan from the European Commission earlier this year.

But negotiators meeting in New York ahead of the 20th anniversary Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro appeared to fall short of agreeing commitments to provide sustainable energy in some of the world’s most impoverished regions, though the final conclusions are likely to support the concept.

“A New York agreement about that was not reached,” Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said in Brussels before heading to the Brazil meetings.

“It’s logical and should be supported by everybody, but we hope we will find an agreement,” he said. “It’s absolutely something which is a must for human development.”

Potočnik has pressed for an assertive EU role in winning binding ecological commitments at Rio from wary partners in developing and rich nations alike.

He told EurActiv he did not know why energy access has not had stronger support in behind-the-scenes manoeuvring to set the agenda for this week’s UN Conference on Sustainable Development.

Money problems

But one UN Development Programme official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said donor fatigue in times of economic troubles is part of the problem.

The official, who is familiar with the Rio negotiations, also said some of the Group of 77 developing countries enthusiastically support the goal but don’t want rich nations prescribing how it is to be achieved by placing environmental conditions on aid.

Olivier Consolo, who heads the CONCORD charity confederation in Brussels, says the promises being made by the EU and donors to expand energy access are hollow.

“It’s quite easy for Western countries to come and say, OK, we would like developing countries to move to more sustainable commitments,” said Consolo. “But there are no new resources, and it seems that this is the pretext the [G77] are using to block negotiations – no more resources and no more engagement.”

Ban has pressed donor nations to expand electricity access to spur economic growth while tackling health and environmental risks associated with burning wood, kerosene and charcoal for energy.

In impassioned appeals citing his own childhood in post-war South Korea without electricity, Ban has urged governments to work with the private sector to support sustainable energy investments in needy countries.

Business support

He has won important backing. The head of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, which includes 68 leading EU corporations, serves on a board advising Ban on his universal energy initiative.

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso and Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs in April vowed to unleash EU money to support public and private investment in sustainable energy for needy countries, through a €50-million Energising Development initiative plus additional funding.

Before the initiative was launched, the Commission was already providing millions of euros for energy access and renewables projects in developing countries. These include the ACP-EU Energy Facility that finances cross-border energy projects in Africa, the Caribbean and Pacific nations; a two-year-old cooperation project designed to boost renewable energy in African nations; and a trust fund that has provided more than €200 million in infrastructure grants to sub-Saharan Africa.

Yet such figures pale in comparison to need. The International Energy Agency says annual investments of $48 billion are needed over the next 20 years to provide power access to those off the grid – a fraction of the $409 billion the IEA estimates was spent by world governments to subsidise fossil fuels.

CONCORD’s Consolo urged developed countries meeting in Rio to do much more – “a kind of Marshall Plan where Western countries would accept to finance renewable energy” in needy nations. But a forthcoming CONCORD study on aid shows some EU countries – including Germany and Spain – retreating on their overseas development commitments, he said.

The number of people without electricity in the world, which the UN puts at 1.5 billion, or nearly one-in-five humans, could grow as the population lurches toward 9 billion by 2050 from 7 billion today.

Off-grid parts of South Asia and Latin America contribute to pockets of grinding poverty, says the UNDP’s latest Human Development Report. But the electricity deficit is most glaring in sub-Saharan Africa, where 62% of the poorest people have no power.

Positions: 

Simon Upton, environment director at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, told EurActiv in an interview:

“If developed countries imposed a carbon price across the board, and auctioned the permits using an emissions trading scheme, the sums of money involved are very, very large and would enable climate finance to be available on much bigger scale than the case now," he said by telephone from Paris.

“In a world where there are real fiscal pressures, the case for doing has got that much stronger. How can one afford to spend money damaging the environment when you can’t even balance your budget? It’s that sort of logic."

Next steps: 
  • 20-22 June: UN Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro
Timothy Spence

COMMENTS

  • Rio+20 will fail the world's people in a catastrophic way in the long-term

    Over the last 300 years we have built a false and unsustainable world for humanity. Indeed we now live in an artificial world order that can never survive and eventually humankind will cease to live as an intelligent species. Since the term MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) was expressed, our world has been living on borrowed time. Indeed the world is now more than ever dividing itself on the altar of nationalism and self-interest. I give no more than five years for the EC to break up and nations in the West to go their own way. But I also see on the other side of the coin, as Europe and the West disintegrate, that the East and nations like Russia will come ever closer together. This will create a formidable economic block and where a weakened western civilization will be more prone in the future to lead to conflict. History shows that global wars are economic and this will not change in the future. This is not based upon unsound expectations, but the sheer fact that the world’s economic power is transferring eastward and that we shall have around 10 billion humans by 2050, all struggling for natural resources to preserve their way of life. Increasingly what is deteriorating constantly between western nations is communication, cooperation and collaboration but where due to these facts, we should be coming closer together to preserve our planet. Indeed the latest Rio+ 20 Conference decisions by the world’s nations (decisions predominantly made by the richest nations as they own the UN to all intents and purposes) will simply be another nail in the coffin of human sustainability and existence, as nations dilute what was already agreed in 1992.

    Pointers to why Rio+20 will fail is because big business will not want to deviate from a global strategy that puts great wealth into the hands of the few (shareholders and main board directors) and poverty into the hands of over 60% of the world’s population. For global concerns consistently act covertly, only think of the bottom-line and at times act totally against humanity's very existence.

    http://foolscrow.wordpress.com/2010/07/27/return-to-nuremberg-big-pharma-must-answer-for-crimes-against-humanity/

    http://abna.ir/data.asp?lang=3&Id=121037

    http://avian-influenza.cirad.fr/content/download/1931/11789/file/Kennedy-F-Shortridge.pdf

    http://www.slideshare.net/patriciakh/can-we-save-our-troubled-world

    http://www.stwr.org/poverty-inequality/fighting-poverty-a-global-challenge.html

    For no longer can we sustain ourselves with the prophesy of wealth for all through globalization and capitalist economics. How this has now been shown to be a sham for over 90% of the seven billion human inhabitants living on planet Earth. Therefore considering where we are heading and the dire consequences for humanity we simply have to start working as one planet as Einstein and others determined, but where our political masters took no heed before. It is also becoming very clear that the price of our present economic systems will eventually be the extinction of the human experience. Are we therefore really as intelligent as we think?

    Dr David Hill
    Chief Executive
    World Innovation Foundation

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    18/06/2012
  • A major reason that the AGW hypothesis has been discredited, not only by reputable scientists but by commensense educated persons, is the attempt to substitute polemical rants for data-bases science--as illustrated admirably here by the huffing and puffing of the likes of David Hill

    By :
    hinckley buzzard
    - Posted on :
    19/06/2012
  • Hinckley Buzzard

    Not rants but using pure common sense and something apparently that you have not got. I hope that you live long enough to see what dire ramifications appear for humankind and which complacency will clearly provide. Although others have said it in the past including myself, even Janez Potočnik the EU environment commissioner, stated at the Rio+20 conference that on our present economic development path we would need the natural resources of two Earths by 2050 to provide for us at the present growth rates. Do a bit of homework and get into the 'real' world of tomorrow. Or alternatively give the reasons why you think that we shall all be living in a plentiful rose garden for ALL come 2050 and beyond. Me thinks that a great deal of naivety comes in here with regard to what the world can ultimately provide.

    Dr David Hill
    Chief Executive
    World Innovation Foundation

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    19/06/2012
Ban Ki-moon addresses a sustainable energy conference in Brussels in April. UN photo
Background: 

Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs has proposed sweeping changes to how the EU parcels out overseas aid – the so-called Agenda for Change. It would focus more attention on the neediest countries while gradually reducing aid to middle-income nations.

The EU is collectively the largest aid donor, providing €54 billion, or 56% of the total in 2010, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

EU leaders have traditionally seen overseas aid as an extension of their “soft power,” agreeing to provide annual development aid equivalent to 0.7% of gross national income 2015, and though it is on track to fall well short of that goal, it is well ahead of the United States’ $30.2 billion (€22.4 billion) in 2010, or 0.21% of GNI.

In April, European Commission President José Manuel Barroso and Piebalgs vowed to support public and private investment in sustainable energy for needy countries, through a €50-million energy development initiative.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising