EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Commission to use telecoms single market for battle over spectrum

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 30 April 2013, updated 06 May 2013

Brussels' ambitious plan to usher in a single market for telecoms is likely to harmonise spectrum policy, a move member states are likely to resist.

A single market proposal will be put before EU leaders in October, but the European Commission is now racing to get drafts out before the end of June so that it can complete an inter-service consultation before the ideas are discussed by government leaders.

Roberto Viola, deputy director-general in DG Connect, was scathing on current spectrum policy and indicated how far the Commission intended to attempt harmonisation in its single market plans.

A 'valid passport'

“We want a valid passport for telecommunications companies to offer services and this links to having a more harmonised regulatory environment,” he told a conference on regulation in the telecoms sector on 25 April, organised by the European Telecommunications Network Operators association (ETNO).

Viola, a former secretary-general of Italy's regulator for the communication industries (Agcom), also said the EU executive would roll “concrete measures” affecting spectrum policy into the body of the single market proposals.

Originally it was foreseen that spectrum would be dealt with in a separate paper from the Commission.

“Member states are greedy on spectrum, displaying a short-term vision for the benefits of their finance ministries,” Viola explained.

“If Americans told us that there is a different spectrum frequency plan for the city of Tucson from other cities, we would find it bizarre, yet that is what is happening in the EU,” said Viola.

New rules will seek to harmonise the EU spectrum, Viola said, explaining that the proposals would seek to address the speed at which member states roll out spectrum and the duration of contracts.

In a speech to Barcelona’s Global Mobile Congress on 26 February, Neelie Kroes, commissioner for the digital agenda, said the 27 EU states needed to align their approach on mobile spectrum and fibre broadband, creating a genuine single market.

Kroes described Europe’s poor efforts to release broadband spectrum as resembling “a bowl of spaghetti”.

The proposals on spectrum harmonisation will be controversial, since France, Germany and Britain are amongst those which oppose ceding control of spectrum auctions that bring billions into public coffers. Spectrum is often classed by member states as a matter of national security, and therefore off-limits to the EU executive.

Consolidation, but not at any price

Meanwhile Cecilio Madero, the Commission’s deputy director general for antitrust who is responsible for competition policy, told delegates at the conference: “A genuine single market would require less competition-oriented regulatory intervention.”

This is in line with the EU executive’s broad plan to free up the path to more consolidation in the telecoms sector, to encourage bigger, heavier-hitting European players.

Europe has about 100 mobile operators, set against six in the United States and three in China, making for a much more fragmented market. European companies have also been struggling to pay off debts and build 4G and fibre broadband.

Madero made clear that such consolidation would not be allowed at any cost, and that the EU executive would not permit consolidation to result in price rises unless they can be justified.

Positions: 

“We think that Europe’s regulatory regime has been very successful in one way: at bringing down consumer prices, and Europe has amongst the world’s lowest prices for telecoms,” Daniel Pataki, the director of the European telecommunications Network Operators (ETNO), told EurActiv in an interview.

“But at a time when investment is needed much more than before, and because of the technological changes and also when global competition is increasing from internet players, we see Commissioner Kroes’ announcement of a single market as a symbol that some things need to be changed against this backdrop,” Pataki added.

“The truly European single market would certainly facilitate the economies of scale that a healthy market more and more requires. As an example, the European 800MHz band support on terminal side is encountering issues which did not exists for the 700MHz band in the USA: this is related to the fact that the USA citizens can actually rely on a stronger single market,” according to Alessandro Casagni, the head of European wireless regulatory policy with tech company Huawei.

“The recent 800MHz auctions in Europe have drained financial resources out of the telecommunications sector in a moment in which public funds at European and national levels are being reduced,” Casagni said.

Next steps: 
  • June 2013: Draft rules on single market for telecommunications including provisions on spectrum expected to circulate
Jeremy Fleming

COMMENTS

  • We have excellent Broadband, Telecom & Mobile services with lots of competition ensuring good pricing already why do we need the EU interfering in yet another National competence?

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    30/04/2013
  • We need a spectrum of harmonisation in Europe concerning the telecommunications if we want to be strong !

    Why should i as EU citizen pay still for the fu..in' expensive roamin' if it travel to another member-states?!!
    Americans doesn't have such expensive prizes as even roaming !
    But we are still little dumpest Europeans which pays a lot to our operators ...
    @Joe
    The EU should fight for free roaming for it's europeans citizens ;-)

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Buy a local sim card, I have a house in Spain & one in Ireland I use wifi hotspots & a local sim for texting & use Skype, Whatsupp & Viber which are all synced to my UK number. We have our spectrum set so as not to interfere with spectrum set aside for defence use etc. The Telecoms in most of Europe is appalling once you move from the cities they should concentrate on these issues but not with our money subsidising them which is what will happen. The EU will want to sneak in an equalisation cost so we end up paying more to subsidise the usual subsidy junkies. I was recently in Poland for a few weeks there are plenty of hotspots, all the hotels & hostels have wifi & if not why stay there? wind one that has it. Most airports have wifi even the buses & trains have wifi in Ireland in all the carriages not just for the hob nobs in the posh carriage. We should not open up our networks for free roaming our providers have spent billions on infrastructure they should be entitled to charge visitors to use it. Three Network allows same as home use of their own networks in other countries I use Three in Australia & can use as much data as I like just as I do at home. Most of the cost issue with roaming in Europe is language so you should check online & disable data before you leave your home airport.

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • We need a single information space in EU if we want to be a strong country. It means unified rules for all Internet providers and mobile operators. Because a single information space is a pan-European issue, it should be controlled by EU, not by individual states.

    A citizen of the EU should not pay for roaming in the EU. Were are no borders, so why should he?

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Roaming charges are a different issue altogether to EU ownership, regulation and dictatorship of the electomagnetic spectrum and the telecoms and IT markets.
    This is yet another instance of the EC vision of a fourth reich. This is a political gesture, because the EC have absolutely no technical competence in this or any other matter.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Otto,

    We do have borders, we also have 27 different languages we are a totally different environment to the United States of America. I am not European I am British which is a part of Europe just as a Brazilian is not South American in his passport I am not European. I don't know where you are from but I can assure you I have no desire to watch or listen to anything that comes from any other European countries that requires me to have a translator or subtitles & I cant imagine why anyone would want to have free access to British media which isn't dubbed or subtitled in your own language & if you do why shouldn't you pay for it the same as we do?

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Joe Thorpe,

    we do have external borders, but no internal ones. You can, for example, freely travel from Spain to France and no one will check your passport. There are some restrictions, of course, but they are temporary.

    Actually, we have de facto the common language of the EU. English. Almost every EU-citizen can understand it, and many can speak (with different levels of correctness, as you can see in the comments section of this site).

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Well perhaps if English is so well spoken in Europe a few of them might make some original content for TV instead of obtaining content illegally from UK producers. We actually do have border controls & you can't just wander in & out of the UK without a passport & suitable ID. When we leave the EU there will not be a single official English Speaking country in the EU which is why hundreds of millions are spent each year on translators even Ireland has everything translated into gaelic so it makes much more sense to have German or French as the official language of the EU, do you agree?

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Charles_M,

    what have you done since our last discussion against the rule of the unelected leader in your country? Please tell me the dictatorship in UK was abolished and you have a truly democratic country with an elected head of state by now.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Otto,

    How does our electoral system affect you? Unlike the EU we don't impose our government system on Europeans. At it happens We had a referendum (Not allowed in Europe) & chose to keep our electoral system & this was carried by a country mile. We want less Europe we don't want them interfering in things that aren't broken, everything they propose doesnt save money it costs money & quite often it's our money they are ladling out. I would be more concerned about security & foreign policy than digital media & worrying about our system of government

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Joe Thorpe,

    Ireland, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania are only EU-states outside the EU with internal borders. For the Bulgaria, Cyprus and Romania it is a temporary. If you live in EU, you can just wander in & out of the any other EU-country without a passport or any ID.
    See
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Area

    English is DE FACTO the main language of EU. So, we need only some legislative changes to make it de jure the single language of EU with other languages as a minority languages or something.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • sorry, should be "...INSIDE the EU with internal borders".

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • making English the "De Facto" Language is bonkers when its not the first language of even the 1st 2nd or 3rd most populous country. We only have the 3rd biggest population if the populations of England & Scotland are added to Wales anyway thats not what this thread is about. Its about the EU trying to gain influence in our digital market so it can interfere with media rights for items like the English Premier League, Wimbledon etc & UK made Television, Film & Games media. Instead of trying to grab access rights the other countries should purchase it from our providers or create their own content

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Joe Thorpe,

    Some decisions of your benevolent dictator can affect the whole EU. Yes, the UK still have a vote in the EU.

    You say "we don't want them interfering in things that aren't broken". But your country IS broken, literally. You have strong separatist movements in every part of your small Kingdom, and after the year 2014 you'll live in other country, not in "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" anymore.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Joe Thorpe,

    the other way round, it is much more simple to adapt a "neutral" language for a multi-language community. Especially in the case of Brexit.

    No one outside the UK care about your English Premier League or your Television series. Most popular media are American and local media.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • We welcome any country having a referendum Gibraltar had one recently as Did the Falklands So did Northern Ireland & Now Scotland thats democracy if you think the majority will opt to leave the UK I'm sure Alex Salmond will enjoy your support.

    I am delighted you don't think anyone is interested in the Football Premier League you might offer your support in keeping the EU from interfering in how they allocate rights.

    We have no voice in Europe we are out voted on nearly every level apart from the Military thanks to QMV & that will change too. We will have some unelected official in Brussels wanting to deploy our Military soon enough if we dont get out soon.

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Otto - unelected leader?? what comics do you read? Only yesterday we had local elections, next year the Scots have a referendum, the year after there is a general election, I think our democratic history goes back a long way, certainly more so than much of Europe.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Charles, don't play the fool. The head of state, your hereditary and unelected Leader with not_so_limited powers.

    You can't vote for a head of the state.
    You can't vote for a head of the government.
    You can't vote for a member of the upper house of the Parliament.
    The rulers of your country are some nobility and their friends.
    Why on the Earth уou call your land "democratic"? There is no δημοκρατία (dēmokratía) "rule of the people" in your country.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Otto,

    We had a referendum, we chose to keep what we have & when we have a referendum about the EU we will get rid of what we have & you can play happy families with your masters at the Bundestag

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Britons are somewhat slow with social progress, and their political life is still in XVI century, but I hope some day they will discover more advanced forms of government.
    The medieval British Monarchy can't be a good partner for EU. But the modern British Republic can and will be.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Even Australia, Canada & New Zealand 3 countries that share our head of state have had referenda & chosen to retain the monarchy so there must be something in it? none of those countries are shackled to the EU & all 3 are doing ok without it & all 3 will not be signing up to free trade agreements because the EU throws up its protectionist barriers just as it has with us & services for 40 years

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • The United States of America made a decision to send the British Monarchy to hell.
    Today it is the only superpower. The UK is almost the 51th state or colony of it. And the USA are very interested in the free trade agreement with EU.
    So, looks like Australia, Canada & New Zealand made a wrong decision.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Otto must be Greek - enough said

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • There is as much chance of a full Free Trade Agreement with the EU & the US as there is of the Euro being a crowning success. French farmers won't budge on leaching on Farm Subsidies & our American friends will want access to services (Which we haven't managed to achieve in 40 years) not to mention the rights to sell GM foodstuffs into the EU & the EU will want to block American made cars by saying they don't meet their standards on economy standards & various other specifications such as exhaust emissions & coolants for their aircon systems. The EU will want its standards to take primacy & there are two hopes of that happening * one's Bob. Then we have labeling issues, the Americans are not going to start using metric units not now not ever & to confuse issues further their Gallon is not the same quantity as a UK Gallon :-)

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Charles,

    Wasn't Bismark called Otto? German fella before the first world war maybe earlier? Maybe he's a German stamping his feet :-)

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    03/05/2013
  • Joe Thorpe,

    There are a lot of obstacles, but Americans and we have the most important thing for the deal: the political will.
    Also, no one care about metric units:)

    Charles_M,

    I was born in Scotland but the most of my life I lived in Germany. My wife is Dutch. My kid study in Austria.
    I'm European. This is my national identity.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    04/05/2013
  • Otto you have a confused identity which accounts for much of your prejudices. There is no "European" national identity, Europe is a continent, a geographic region. European nationalism is just as nasty as the various versions we saw in the 30's & 40's. Reminds one a bit of Austria in 1938, where the national vision was to be part of a greater evil.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    04/05/2013
  • I'm not a nationalist, I love EU.
    Actually, almost all of EU-skeptics are Nazis, hidden or open. They think their national micro-states should be isolated for the sake of national interest. They don't understand their isolated national micro-states have no future in the globalised world.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    04/05/2013
  • @ Joe Thorpe
    @ Charles_M Charles_M - Posted on : 04/05/2013
    Wrong!!

    Geographical seen during the Roman Imperialism Europe was a COUNTRY with territories in it so much you don't like we had together united 300 Year without waring each other as the United States today!
    The wars comes all after the fall of the roman empire!

    1.WW 2.WW all due to national prejudices ..!NSDAP and so on !

    History has to be learn and to understand !

    Maybe you don't agree with Otto but i do agree with him since i'am European too an an know very well what is happening here!

    Mr Thorpe & Charles
    Europe is going to the way of a "light" Confederation if believing or not !
    What about the United States there were 11 un-elected states which ratified without peoples consensus an full centralized U.S Governement in philadelphia 1787!
    So "democracy" it was but no-one speak about !

    Believe me ! back to nazionlism you are right ! The vision will be beginning the same as the 30's & 40's ! Proudness demons are sleeping !

    I'm feeling as Europeans as well feeling free to travel to work where i want !

    Charles & Otto !
    We don't nowadays a splitted Europe but a strong United one !
    Americans knows the sense of an Unification !
    They have say to "dismantle" the bank-secrecy in Europe(Austria Luxembourg) they still can do/dictate even as our allies what they want with us !
    So should Europe doing it !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    04/05/2013
  • Correction :
    Charles & Joe !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    04/05/2013
Harmonised frequency?
Background: 

Radio frequency spectrum is a limited part of the electromagnetic spectrum as a whole, but it is extremely important due to its capacity to carry codified messages. This makes it an essential resource for telecommunication services such as mobile telephones, TV and radio broadcasting, satellite and broadband communications.

The EU has authorised 1,200 megahertz of spectrum for wireless broadband, but on average European member states have only granted 65% of it.

The allocation of spectrum has been marked by intense debate between member states on which services should be prioritised and how countries can conduct spectrum auctions around the same time to make sure the roll out does not create an uneven playing field.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

InfoSociety News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

InfoSociety Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising