EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Brussels plans sweeping rules to complete single EU telecoms market

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 18 July 2013

The European Commission is drafting ambitious plans to scrap mobile telephone roaming charges and to seize greater control over the radio frequency spectrum before the EU Parliament mandate ends next year, in a proposal that is likely to pitch Brussels against national interests and industry.

Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes wants the new regulation to establish the rules for “the elimination of surcharges for international and roaming traffic not justified by underlying costs,” according to the latest draft, which is being finalised for publication in September.

Kroes recently called for an end to roaming charges before the European elections in May 2014, and said mobile network operators should no longer be able to block telecommunications services such as Skype.

>> Read: Commissioner calls for end to roaming charges in EU

Another key objective cited in the draft is “the achievement of a European wireless space, through a coordinated European framework for the assignment of harmonised spectrum for wireless broadband communications services”.

Passport to open services to all member states

The draft new regulation aims to create a single market giving telecoms providers “the right, the ability and the incentive to develop, extend and operate their networks and to provide services irrespective of where that undertaking is established or its customers are situated in the Union.”

A new pan-European “passport” would enable telecoms operators regulated in one member state to trade in any other within the EU.

The plans are likely to irritate telecoms operators in EU member states where former national monopolies continue to dominate the market.

“As consumers we are ready to see roaming charges go, but from the point of view of operators there could be problems,” said Claire Harris, a senior director with FTI Consulting in Brussels.

Harris explained that current investment into fourth generation (4G) telecommunications networks is already “eating into margins”.

“This roaming issue could see margin squeeze at a competitive moment in a competitive market and could pull the rug out from under the carpet of these proposals” Harris added, saying operators could strongly resist them.

Another concern, according to the telecommunications executive, is that new operators will be able to use the new "passport" system to undercut domestic operators, by offering the cheapest prices across the EU.

The draft regulation’s proposals on spectrum are also far reaching and are likely to prove controversial. National regulators considering an auction of spectrum would need to take into account “the interests of European electronic communications providers seeking to serve the Union market”.

A new procedure would ensure that certain spectrum frequencies could be auctioned across the EU in a coordinated manner, with the timing and duration of the contracts subject to approval by the Commission.

Communications panel could gain powers

Member states resisting such attempts at spectrum harmonisation would be subject to final decisions made by the EU Communications Committee, a body made up of national representatives from all member states.The committee already has an advisory role, but would see its powers beefed up under the proposals.

France, Germany and Britain are amongst member states which have traditionally opposed ceding control of spectrum auctions that bring billions into public coffers. Spectrum is often also classed by member states as a matter of national security, and therefore off-limits to the EU executive.

The controversial elements of the regulation will make Kroes's task of guiding it through co-decision procedure with the Parliament and the Council all the more difficult.

Speaking to the European Parliament on 30 May, Kroes said she wanted Europeans to be able to see what the EU is doing for them ahead of elections to be held on 22-25 May 2014. She said the EU could deliver a “full, final” legislative package to end roaming charges “around Easter 2014”.

But that may be a tall order for a European Commission whose mandate expires in the autumn of 2014.

“The timing issue is a real concern. There are already a lot of proposals – such as the Payments Services Directive – due to arrive next week, before the summer. There is always a risk that if you start after the summer that people will be in election mode already,” said FTI Consulting’s Harris.

Next steps: 
  • Sept. 2013: European Commission expected to table a new regulation laying down measures to complete the European single market for electronic communications to be published by Commission
  • 22-25 May 2014: European elections
Jeremy Fleming

COMMENTS

  • "Kroes said she wanted Europeans to be able to see what the EU is doing for them ahead of elections to be held on 22-25 May 2014."

    Okay, its a desperate move to make the EU acceptable to the electorate in member states and Kroes swan song.

    Roaming charges? Maybe! The rest is dead in the water.

    By :
    George McGhie
    - Posted on :
    18/07/2013
  • Just to clarify that the Commission will NOT be seeking to seize powers from member states on spectrum. There would be much stronger coordinaton but we are not for example seeking auction income or pan-European spectrum licenses.

    Ryan Heath
    Spokesperson for Neelie Kroes

    By :
    Ryan Heath
    - Posted on :
    18/07/2013
  • Great idea (by Kroes) – does not go far enough. There is still far to much farting around with spectrum amongst MS. The military and others tend to get very “precious” when they have to give up unused stuff – MS could take a far tougher line.
    Moving to the operators (aka licensed robbers) – there is a significant failure in some member states to provide proper coverage. Let me give some concrete examples. London to Bristol/Cardiff mainline. The 2G GSM signal is crap – very very poor coverage& calls fail all the time (note this is just a voice call not GPRS or 3G – just plain old voice). By contrast coverage is total in France on TGV lines (including tunnels). Those that feel I am exaggerating are invited to take the train to Bristol from London and try holding a conversation for longer than 1 minute.
    Looking at tunnels. Mid-2000s most of the train tunnels in Swizerland – sorted using micro-base stations. Moving to the UK – none of the rail tunnels from London to the south coast have micro-base stations (widely used in mainland Europe – not deployed at all in the UK). Of course the UK is complicated becase of overhead wires – oh hang on they don’t have any …. Those living in the UK now give me a mooo – because you are being milked by tax-dodgers-r-us (aka Vodafone – please please sue me – the court case would be sooo funny), and other assorted 2G non-service providers.

    As for the special pleading by FTI, it would have more credibility if operators had properly built out their 2G networks. The examples show that they prefer to sweat easy assets (located in cities) as opposed to providing proper coverage. In a sensible world there would be no 4G build out until there was proper 2G coverage.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    18/07/2013
  • I'm angry to pay permanently again roaming fees for what ? What about people living in Luxembourg Andorra Lichtenstein ?! If you're calling from a border and your GSM swith automatically to a different provider you will be very sad if you get the bill and maybe more sadier if you have data activated !!

    As Mike Parr said (Licensed robbers) ! In thinking that americans doesn't have robbery fees ...!

    @ Mike

    Normaly low band frequencies mainly 900MHZ EU or 850MHZUS are optimized if you're using your mobile inside in a building or in a city with a lot of buildings around and the high band frequencies for 1800/1900 for outside a city as example but if you get low reception with high band then switch manually to low !! I ve set mine permanently to low 900 with Edge only and have no problems with net coverage at all!

    But i wish we europeans could have better telecomproviders than the U.S. has in political terms even with these damn (R) fees!
    We need to be uncomplicated and finish the single telecom large bandspektrum!

    Americans are top and we still flop (still)!

    National telecom providers should have the opportunity to install telecomshops on other member-states !
    As an example Luxembourg Telecomshops in Greece..
    or Movistar in Lichtenstein and so on ...

    T

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    18/07/2013
  • How complicated in an United Europe to have a "passport" needed for a telecom gunshops ..

    Still sounds very proteccionism if you have to use that word "passport"
    .....

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    18/07/2013
  • Personally I would be delighted if there were no signal at all on the London/Bristol train, nor in any restaurant, pub, or other place where I prefer to chill out. Mobiles are great - in the right place. TGV's used to have signs up telling people to refrain from irritating people with incessant phoning, have they gone now?

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    19/07/2013
  • @ Charles_M

    Great point Charles! Why is that people who use mobile phones in public places (trains, restaurants, pubs etc.) adopt a very superior and loud attitude to display how they are pissed with their own self importance? Trains should have one phone put in a cubicle for outgoing calls while all who refuse to turn off the offending instrument should have them confiscated. Offenders in restaurants should have their bill doubled and given as a tip to the staff.

    By :
    George McGhie
    - Posted on :
    19/07/2013
  • Great plan for the eventual colonization of the European citizen who are stupid enough to believe this will make them more important and better connected. Wonderful! Eventually one central database where when you order a pizza, they will know EVERYTHING about you. What will the corporate media shills decide to broadcast about this; how wonderful it will be? It certainly will, but only for those at the top. To all you mid-level people who believe this is a great idea; you will never become part of the ruling establishment.

    "All of us have the option of serving two sets of principles: privilege and power or justice and truth."
    -Julien Benda, 'The Treason of the Intellectuals'

    By :
    Carax
    - Posted on :
    22/07/2013
Neelie Kroes, the EU's Digital Agenda Commissioner. Photo: European Commission
Background: 

In June 2007, the European Commission introduced a regulation placing caps on prices of cross-border mobile calls in Europe, the so-called 'roaming regulation'.

The EU executive's intervention was limited to roaming because domestic calls remain a competence of national regulators. The first roaming regulation also excluded text messaging and data. A second regulation entered into force in 2009, introducing further steps to gradually lower caps for voice roaming, together with guarantees against "bill shocks" for data roaming.

In July 2011 the Commission proposed a third roaming regulation and announced plans to structurally reform the European market for roaming phone calls slashing wholesale prices and opening access to the market to new service providers.

The measures were supposed to eliminate differences for cross-border phone calls, saying that price caps will be no longer necessary as from 2016.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

InfoSociety News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

InfoSociety Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising