EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Barnier urges Europeans to build their own drones

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 24 July 2013

In proposals aimed at relaunching cooperation on defence production, to be unveiled today (24 July), the EU’s commissioner for the internal market, Michel Barnier, urges Europe to shake off its dependency on Israel and the United States for pilotless military aircraft known as drones.

The European Commission will publish a policy document setting out proposals to foster cooperation among EU countries on defence matters.

Barnier said the lesson that Europe could draw from the recent US espionage scandal, Prism, was “to become sovereign, independent, in strategic matters.”

“In this paper, we make an original proposal concerning European defence capabilities,” said Michel Barnier, EU commissioner for the internal market.

“Why would Europe not have a programme on drones?” Barnier told a small group of French Brussels-based journalists last week.

The commissioner said such a programme would help Europe to “earn its sovereignty and not be forced to go buy equipment outside of Europe,” citing Israel and the United States as the only two countries in the world from which Europeans could buy drones.

Cuts in defence spending have encouraged European industrialists to support a joint drone programme. In June, France's Dassault Aviation, European aerospace giant EADS and Italy's Finmeccanica said a joint programme would "support the capability needs of European armed forces while optimising the difficult budgetary situation through pooling of research and development funding.”

In a joint statement the three companies said they were prepared to work together on the creation of a European MALE (medium-altitude, long-endurance) drone, which allows surveillance of vast areas over 24 hours.

Dassault held a first successful test flight of its Neuron prototype in December 2012. Together with BAE Systems, the company signed a deal with the British and French governments in mid-2012 to propose a joint plan to demonstrate technology and operational aspects of a future unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV).

Standards

Although defence matters remain chiefly the competence of individual EU countries, Barnier said the Commission could help coordinate a European drone programme by promoting research and harmonising legislation on airspace, which are different in every member state.

Europe's defence industry have been hit by austerity-driven cuts in government spending and Barnier believes there could be renewed political momentum to re-launch cooperation in this area by pooling resources.

He cited hospital ships, aircraft carriers, maritime surveillance drones, cybersecurity facilities and laboratories related to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defence (CBRN) as equipment “that could be jointly acquired and used if necessary”.

France's former defence minister, Hervé Morin, warned in 2010 that, with declining investment in defence, Europe risked becoming a “protectorate” of the United States within 50 years.

While Europe has no real competence on military matters, there are areas where EU regulations could help foster cooperation.  The Commission communication aims at fostering innovation and growth by supporting small defence firms and encouraging synergies between military and civilian research.

Barnier said there were “seven areas” where the European Commission could offer assistance and expertise, “within the limits of the treaties”, citing certification, standardisation, public procurement, space, research, commerce and energy.

More generally, the Commission wants to make it easier for defence firms to export by creating standard procedures across Europe for certifying that products meet requirements rather than requiring each product to undergo costly testing in every country, an EU source said.

The communication will be discussed by the EU’s 28 heads of states and governments for possible endorsement at a European summit in December.

Next steps: 
  • 24 July: European Commission presents Communication on a comprehensive strategy to strengthen Europe's defence sector
  • 26 Sept.: EU defence ministers meeting to debate Commission communication on defence industries
  • 19 Nov. Defence ministers meeting
  • 19-20 Dec.: EU summit to discuss and possibly endorse Commission communication
Frédéric Simon

COMMENTS

  • European countries have been working on drone projects for several years, especially the UK and France.

    The UK has a number of advanced prototypes and is sensibly looking at developing the next generation of drones such as the supersonic stealth Taranis. In the meantime it is using off the shelf models from the US and adapting Israeli drones such as the Watchkeeper based on Elbit Hermes 450.

    The next generation of drones will rely more on artificial intelligence and again the UK is doing a lot of work on this via firms such as QinetiQ.

    A UAV centre has been set up in Wales designed to create an industry hub around UAVs and to drive innovation.

    It's hard to see what the European Commission has to offer. All the various industry players and governments already know each other and collaborate as do governments who are setting aside funds to promote these technologies.

    Give it 4-5 years and Europe will probably have a vibrant UAV industry -- but it takes time to develop new technologies especially if you want to step ahead by a generation rather than just making 'me to' products.

    By :
    Justin Pugsley, Principal, JJPAssociates
    - Posted on :
    24/07/2013
  • As you say BAE is heavily involved but has a very low profile; Barnier probably didn't bother researching the subject before commenting. The European Commission will feel compelled to meddle in this as with every other field where it has no competence, likely ensuring US and Israeli dominance for good.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    24/07/2013
  • Each member-states have it's own build part productions as the building for the Eurofighter !

    We have to think Forward !!
    Building our drones in ONE Flag to be the best!

    So the parts can be manufactured by several states of europe !

    It's time to create a strong United European Defense and Army!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    24/07/2013
  • At present the US Reaper is the best drone by far and it makes no sense, based on performance and cost, for any of the EU States or cooperation of states to start here.
    I believe that the UK and France are working on the next generation which no doubt will not be available for at least 10 years.
    As Justin Pugsley points out It's hard to see what the European Commission has to offer. Unless of course we are talking about another power grab on the way to a federal state.
    In the UK we already know that the next generation replacement for the Euro Fighter Typhoon will be the American F35 Stealth fighter which we need for our new Aircraft Carrier(s) and for the RAF.
    It would be extremely worrying if we had to rely on sharing key equipment with other EU States. With the UK having more extensive interests around the world than most other EU states, we would not want to find ourselves trying to help or support friends and allies and failing because some of our EU partners disapproved and refused to release shared assets. I seem to remember something about Belgium not being helpful when the Falklands conflict started.
    Working under the NATO umbrella is fine and I have no problems with sharing Naval designs to reduce costs etc. Let's just leave the Commission out of it.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    25/07/2013
  • More fortress Europe. Just what the world does not need.

    By :
    John
    - Posted on :
    25/07/2013
  • More fortress Europe. Just what the world does not need.

    By :
    John
    - Posted on :
    25/07/2013
  • This is another simple power grab by the EU designed to make member countries reliant on the EU to survive in the outside world. This is how the USSR tied everyone onto its umbilical chord but when the chord snapped the party ended & what we witnessed was a civilisation that was 30 years behind the rest of the world.

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    26/07/2013
  • Further to my previous post, I have had the opportunity to check and confirm that Belgium refused to supply us with artillery shells and small arms ammunition which we required for the Falklands conflict. Although some are still angry to this day about this, I am personally not surprised.

    I do hope however that our government does not ever again put us in a situation where we and our services are reliant on the whim of another country (so called ally or not).

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • an European,

    you're totally right, we need a strong United European Defense and Army.

    Firstly, without deep military cooperation between members we can't protect EU from ANY military threat. Single members are too weak for it ("big" members like Germany are no exception).

    Secondly, we can save A LOT of taxpayers money. Military expenses make 20-40% of total members expenses. Why should we pay this huge amount of money _28_ times for a single military function?

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • Dead right George, we need to keep our own sticks & clubs to wield at whom we need without reference back to our "Friends" in Europe. We have 3 Real Friends when it comes to unconditional support at a time of need, Canada, Australia & New Zealand with one more reluctant at times friend in the United States & of the group of "Five Eyes" group of nations they under Obama are the least reliable partner even though we are always fighting their corner inside the EU (often against our own interests) like their personal lobbyist

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • @ Otto
    Where do you get your figures from? Can you explain what 20-40% of total members' expenses means?

    If you look at EU member states as a whole they spend 1.61% of GDP (2010).

    Of EU spend in 2010 the UK and France account for 40% of Europe's defence budget, 50% of its military capacity and 70% of all spending in military research and development.

    What I don't understand is how you are going to take the disparate parts of the EU where language and culture differs so much and hone that into a military force (if that is what you mean). For European defence the NATO model is by far the best option.

    By all means get together and agree the best way forward for equipment in the hope that you can reduce costs. By that what I really mean is that the larger nations call the shots.

    The community method for defence is a joke. If anyone seriously thinks you can have an effective EU defence force acceptable to all please google 'Fred Karno's Army' for a description of what you will get.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • You forget to mention we also want to have the very best technology & equipment which doesn't mean collaborating with EU member states to produce rubbish. We want Type 45 Destroyers etc not some rubbish that would be sunk by a pea shooter

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • George Mc,

    >> Can you explain what 20-40% of total members' expenses means?

    I mean military expenditures as % of the budget of the member state.

    >> how you are going to take the disparate parts of the EU where language and culture differs so much and hone that into a military force

    We can use the Switzerland model:

    - a federation of 26 semi-independent states (cantons)
    - 4 official languages with a lot of monolinguals
    - a united army with a single commander

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • @ Joe Thorpe

    Absolutely correct. It also raises questions about security and who could be trusted to maintain and work on some of the systems installed on ships and aircraft.
    It is also possible in the case of the UK that our American cousins may say No where we share technology!

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • @George Mc

    Can you blame them? If I was America I wouldn't want any technology of substance getting into the hands of any country outside of the "Five Eyes" group. Its no coincidence the Americans only share their secrets with countries with Queen Elizabeth as head of state.

    By :
    Joe Thorpe
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • @ Otto

    Not sure I understand what you mean as 20-40% does seem high. Mostly these things are expressed as a percentage of GDP which on a good day would be North of 2%, but never mind.

    I think I see where you are going with the Swiss model with 26 cantons and 4 languages. According to my research 65.6 of the Swiss are German speakers, 22.8 speak French, 8.4% speak Italian and 0.6% Romansh.

    I would not have thought the last one worthy of making a fuss about but if we look at the most populous countries in mainland Europe then I suppose it would make sense to make the main military working languages, German, French, Italian and Spanish.

    Picking one leader would hard but I would think that the French are probably the most experienced. You could put a French General in charge of the Army.
    I am not sure if you would want just one defence force covering everything or if you would want to have Air Force and Naval structures. Once again the French would probably be the most experienced so the same could follow on.

    Just a thought as you say a united army under one single command. Do you mean by that, all nationalities lumped together in the services or would you find it easier for communication purposes to have a German division, French Division etc. Answering into one commander?

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • George Mc,

    For example, total public spending in the United Kingdom in 2012 - £694 billion
    Total spending on defense - £44.4 billion
    So, in this example you have 6% for defense.

    According to Wikipedia, Swiss recruits are instructed in their native language. I suppose they indeed have German divisions, French Divisions etc.

    Anyway, 51% of EU citizens speak English (most of them better then I). So, one can easily pick out enough good English-speaking recruits from every member-state.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
  • Otto
    Ok 6% sounds more manageable than 20-40% which sounds more like the Peoples Republic of North Korea.

    I'm not sure where your Swiss model is going here. If your Defence Force is recruiting from everywhere then one language (whatever you decide on) is about it. It is my understanding that some of the worst examples of language being a problem are in the United States Army where they have a lot of Latin recruit where their English is a bit shaky. That is why I had thought you would seek to recruit Divisions/Battalions from each country (a bit like NATO).

    If it is the former and the UK is still in the EU you might get some who are prepared to join if English is the language. If you are looking for good Senior NCO's you might be able to persuade some Brits who have reached the end of their UK service life to join, although I think that can be good hunting ground for Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
    Interesting one though.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), also known as Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). (Picture: iStockphoto)
Background: 

More than 10 years have passed since France and the UK launched the European Security and Defence Policy through the St Malo Declaration.

The European Commission attempted to relaunch cooperation in 2007 with a communication which aimed at fostering a more competitive European defence industry.

The EU executive set up a task force on defence industries and markets, outlining that more than 1,350 SMEs are present on the European defence sector.

In 2010, France urged its European partners to fight austerity by boosting defence cooperation. Paris warned that Europe risked becoming a pawn of the United States and China if it failed to do so.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Innovation & Enterprise Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising