EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU pushes through Unified Patent Court

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 30 July 2013

Brussels has paved the way for a specialised European patent court to solve disputes in one instance and avoid multiple litigation cases in up to 28 different national courts.

The European Commission yesterday (29 July) announced the legal framework for Europe-wide patent protection by updating EU rules on the jurisdiction of courts and recognition of judgments, the so-called Brussels I Regulation.

The changes are intended to make it easier for companies and inventors to protect their patents. The Unified Patent Court will have specialised jurisdiction in patent disputes, with an aim to cut legal costs and speed up decisions in patent infringement cases.

“In the event of a dispute, companies will no longer have to launch actions before a number of courts in different countries,” said Vice-President Viviane Reding, the EU’s Justice Commissioner.

“Removing bureaucratic obstacles, extra costs and the legal uncertainty of having 28 different and often contradictory systems makes the single market more attractive. This is a very good example of how justice policies can stimulate growth.”

In February, after negotiations that lasted 40 years, the European leaders formally signed on a new unitary patent for 24 participating member states.

The current system made patent registration up to 60 times more expensive in Europe than in China. In the United States, in 2011, 224,000 patents were granted, in China 172,000 while in Europe only 62,000 European patents were delivered.

One reason cited is the prohibitive cost and complexity of obtaining patent protection throughout the EU’s single market.

At present, someone seeking to get Europe-wide protection for an invention has to validate the patents in all 28 EU member states. The patent holder may become involved in multiple litigation cases in different countries on the same dispute.

But this will change in the near future under the February agreement on the unitary patent package, which only Spain and Italy refused to join because of language concerns.

The proposal must be agreed by member states and by the European Parliament before becoming law.

The Commission urged EU countries to ratify the Unitary Patent Court Agreement as quickly as possible, and to complete accordingly the preparatory work required for the court to become operational, so that the first unitary patents can be granted.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • This is good bit it overlooks one worry about the European Patent story: there may be a risk that the way the cpourt is set up will stimulate more 'patent troll' cases in Europe.

    By :
    stephen.pattison
    - Posted on :
    30/07/2013
  • The concern about patent trolls shows how cart-before-the-horse we've allowed certain rhetoric to get.

    Patents are protection of property rights. A smooth, common, easy-to-work-with system for protecting rights is an obvious step forward.

    Trolls are asserting their rights under the various nations' laws. As yet, we do not have a good framework for identifying why certain people should be denied rights to their property.

    Many of the world's most useful inventors are non-practicing entities, and the world is the better for their efforts. Take Fraunhofer, the inventors of the MP3 format (and newer, even better and more specialized conversions of sound into data). If they were forced to stop collecting license fees because somebody called them a troll, they would simply have to close up shop. There would be no incentive to put in their R&D.

    There are other, more contentious efforts, but eventually they go back to an inventor, one who maybe put in hard work or a company that came up with something tangential to their business, who want to get a fair payback on successful, useful R&D. That's essential if we want R&D of the sort that any ordinary engineer could easily reverse-engineer and undercut the value of.

    I'm all ears about how to separate the wheat from the chaff. But right now, I see general claims about the chaff, by people utterly unskilled in winnowing.

    By :
    Walt French
    - Posted on :
    30/07/2013
  • Excellent news! As a CEO of a tech company I can clearly see the importance of the change.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    03/08/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Innovation & Enterprise Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising