The Commission believes that total liberalisation of the postal sector would lead to a better, faster and cheaper service for consumers and businesses, but trade unions are concerned that it would cause job losses. Furthermore, some member states remain protective of their public services and are reluctant to open them up to private-sector and foreign competition.
In the UK, where full competition came into effect at the beginning of 2006, postal deliveries are found to be cheaper and faster. Nevertheless, a number of member states, including France, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Greece and Poland remain opposed to full liberalisation. They would prefer to put certain safeguards into place to establish financing mechanisms to guarantee the universal service obligation and to have a long transition period.
Companies seeking access to Europe’s closed postal markets hope that Commissioner McCreevey will stand up to these countries, but they are doubtful as to whether the new Directive will be sufficient to break the domination of national champions.
It appears that the Commission’s new proposal will not go much further than to abolish remaining “reserved areas” (where member states could restrict access for economic operators, as is currently the case for the delivery of letters that weigh less than 50 grammes).
However, market entry for new players could be difficult so long as former incumbents maintain their unique access to public postal networks which include assets and infrastructure such as post offices, letter boxes and postmen.




