EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU’s ‘Nordic three’ beat US in competitiveness challenge

Published 27 September 2006 - Updated 16 November 2006
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

With six member states in the top-ten rankings of a study on global competitiveness, the EU gives notice that its policies are starting to pay off.

Switzerland, Finland, Sweden and Denmark top of the league:

This proves that focus on innovation and technology through investments in infrastructure, education, scientific research and the establishment of strong intellectual property protection are “a successful strategy for boosting competitiveness in an increasingly complex global economy”, said Augusto Lopez-Claros, chief economist and director of the WEF’s Global Competitiveness Network. 

  • EU ahead of US, China and India:

The EU now counts six member states (the Nordic three, UK, Netherlands and Germany) in the top ten and, although most have not made any significant upwards moves in the rankings, the economies most often described as Europe’s main rivals in its race for competitiveness have not fared too well either. 

The US has tumbled down the league, dropping from first to sixth place, overtaken by three EU member states, in a sign that the EU is making progress towards the Lisbon goal of becoming “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world” by 2010. 

The report also shows that the EU is still well ahead of China in the competitiveness race. Furthermore, China went down, and not up, in the rankings (to 54th position), its competitiveness limited by a largely state-controlled banking sector, low penetration rates for latest technologies (mobile telephones, internet, personal computers), and low school enrolment rates. 

India on the other hand, could turn out to be Europe’s main rival in the global economy, having improved its performance to rank 43rd overall - ahead of the EU’s worst-performing countries - thanks to excellent scores in capacity for innovation and sophistication of firm operations. 

  • Europe must still do more:

Despite the EU’s overall improvement in terms of competitiveness, much remains to be done. Indeed, Europe’s largest economies all showed signs of slowing - although Germany and the United Kingdom continue to rank in the top ten, the UK is still lagging on innovation, whereas Germany’s cumbersome labour regulations are holding the business community back. France has fallen from 12th to 18th position, due to the lack of efficiency and flexibility of its labour market and its badly targeted public expenditure. 

Italy has continued its downward slide to 42nd place in this year’s report. Having run budget deficits without interruption for the past 20 years, public debt levels are among the highest in the world. The study points to "deep-seated institutional problems" which have led to bad government spending, over-regulation and poor quality public services. 

As in previous years, Poland and Greece remain the worst performers in the EU – similar to the results of the World Bank study on "Doing Business in 2007", which showed the two countries to be among the worst places to do business in the world (see EurActiv 7 September 2006). 

Other new member states, however, including Estonia (25), the Czech Republic (29) and Slovenia (33), have performed quite well. And, among the candidate countries, Turkey and Croatia both seem to have benefited from the "EU bonus", moving up impressively in the rankings by 12 places each, to positions 59 and 51 respectively. 

Positions: 

Chief Economist and Director of the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Network Augusto Lopez-Claros said: "The top rankings of Switzerland and the Nordic countries show that good institutions and competent macroeconomic management, coupled with world-class educational attainment and a focus on technology and innovation, are a successful strategy for boosting competitiveness in an increasingly complex global economy...Countries that, like the Nordics, are investing heavily in education are likely to see rising levels of income per capita, growing success in reducing poverty and an increasing ability to establish a presence in the global economy." 

Peter Power, Spokesman for Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson, said this was of course "good news" but added: "The EU must seek to build on these improvements." This will be the aim of Mandelson’s paper on improving the external aspects of the EU’s competitiveness, which will be presented on 4 October 2006, with the aim to "significantly improve the position of European businesses in the world". 

France’s drop from 12th to 18th place is "not dramatical", said French Trade Minister Christine Lagarde. "Overall, we have lost only eight hundreths of a point on competitiveness, on a scale from one to seven", she declared, putting the downwards slide down to the fact that “the World Economic Forum carried out its study at the time of the CPE, the First Employment Contract”. (See EurActiv 4 April 2006). "I am not at all surprised that we did a little less well than last year because, to appreciate France’s competitiveness, having protests against the CPE in the backgound would naturally not lead to an optimistic view from businessmen that were interviewed," she said. She added that one must stick to the facts: "It is no coincidence that we are regularly the 4th country in the world for receiving foreign direct investments." 

Background: 

The World Economic Forum (WEF) releases its Global Competitiveness Report annually, which provides an overview of the key factors for driving productivity and competitiveness and ranks the 125 countries covered according to their performance in these areas. 

Contrary to last year’s report, which showed that the EU’s largest member states had been losing their competitive edge, the 2006-2007 edition, released on 26 September 2006, sees some of Europe’s 'big guns' making sharp progress and the 'Nordic three' knocking the US out of the top five.

More in this section

Advertising