EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Corruption creeping up in Bulgaria, Greece, Romania: TI

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 02 December 2011

The annual report of Transparency International revealed the poor performance of many EU member states in fighting corruption, with the poorest results recorded in Bulgaria and Romania, followed by crisis-hit countries Greece and Italy. Tellingly, some EU candidate countries appear to be doing better than current EU members.

Transparency International (TI) published its regular 'Corruption Perception Index'(CPI) for 2011, which includes some findings about Europe and its battle against corruption.

The anti-bribery watchdog ranked 183 countries based on how corrupt their public sector is perceived to be and graded them on a scale from zero to ten, with zero being the most corrupt.

​Bulgaria most corrupt EU country

Bulgaria scored the lowest among EU countries this year and was marked 3.3 out of ten, dropping to 86th place globally. Sofia now outranks Greece, which was perceived as the most corrupt EU country in 2010. According to TI's data, Bulgaria's results have been the worst over the last 12 years.

However, Italy and Greece are not in a much better position. Italy is ranked 69th, next to Ghana and Macedonia, and was given a score of 3.9, clearly below average. Greece's score is lower than last year, dropping from 3.5 to 3.4, and falling from 78th to 80th position in the ranking of most corrupt countries globally.

The report comes a few days after the head of Greece's new independent statistics agency faced an official criminal investigation for allegedly inflating the scale of the country’s fiscal crisis.

TI believes that one of the reasons that these two countries were so severely hit by the crisis was the high corruption rate that they have been battling with for years. “Eurozone countries suffering debt crises, partly because of public authorities’ failure to tackle the bribery and tax evasion that are key drivers of the debt crisis, are among the lowest scoring EU countries,” TI said.

Romania's scores are also lower than the previous year, down from 3.7 to 3.6, leading to a drop from 69th to 75th position,  ranking it next to China.

Higher scores for candidate countries

The results seem to be positive regarding some EU candidate countries, which managed to rank higher than many EU member states. Iceland scored 8.3 out of ten, affording it the 13th position in the world.

Turkey's performance is also relatively good, although slightly worse than last year (4.2, down from 4.4). However, it still did better than EU-member Slovakia and ranked higher than Croatia, which is set to join the EU soon.

Croatia, whose EU accession received backing from the European Parliament yesterday (1 December), was marked 4 out of 10 and ranked 66th on the global scale. Montenegro, another EU hopeful, had the exact same scores.

Germany and France fared well in the ranking, receiving a score of 8 and 7 respectively.

Denmark, which takes over the six-month rotating EU Presidency in January, had impressive results, ranking 2nd in the global index, just below New Zealand, with a mark of 9.4.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • I would like to know what the corruption score level was for Great Britain, which already has a poor Human Rights record. I have inside information that shows that the British legal system is riddled with corruption, only it is more refined and concealed than it is in Bulgaria. Great Britain needs to look at its own record before criticising countries like Romania and Bulgaria, which at least have a system set up for the public to aid fighting corruption, which is more than Great Britain has.

    By :
    Jan Foss
    - Posted on :
    02/12/2011
  • @Jan Foss, I fully support you. There might be corruption in Bulgaria and Romania but there is in all Europe and it is perhaps not so obvious. It is obvious that the author of the article corruption "perception" index; the data does not claim to reflect the actual, the real level of corruption. Does it mean if newspapers start writing good stuff about these countries (even if they don't solve their corruption problems), they will score better in the chart?

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    20/12/2011
Background: 

The EU has made the fight against corruption one of its highest political priorities, in both its internal affairs and its relations with third countries.

The EU systematically includes corruption-related issues on the agenda of candidate countries and insists that future member states set up and implement national anti-corruption policies.

The Commission has been monitoring corruption in the future EU member states since the beginning of the enlargement process in order to allay fears of European citizens about ethics of governance in different countries.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Justice & Home Affairs News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Justice & Home Affairs Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising