The EU has gone back to the drawing board to reconcile gaps between EU and US laws on data protection after the European Parliament refused to back previous transatlantic agreements on sharing citizens' financial data and their passenger flight records in anti-terror investigations.
The European Commission yesterday (26 May) announced it had drafted a mandate – a text for negotiation –outlining the kinds of right it will be seeking for EU citizens whose data is accessed by US authorities.
"Fundamental rights must be protected and respected at all times. I want an EU-US agreement that protects personal data rights while fighting crime and terrorism, said European Commission Vice President for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Viviane Reding.
The agreement would give EU citizens the right to access, rectify or delete data where appropriate, according to a statement from the Commission.
New draft to delay agreement
Observers say the change in the Commission's attitude comes after the European Parliament in February overwhelmingly voted against the terms of a previous agreement on sharing financial data – the SWIFT agreement, named after the company that stores the data on its servers (EurActiv 11/02/10).
Commissioner Reding will present the draft mandate both to the EU's current Spanish Presidency and the European Parliament next week.
Under pressure from American authorities over a widening security gap in terror investigations, the Commission had initially intended to have a new agreement signed by the summer.
A spokesperson said the new draft mandate would likely push an agreement back to 2011 because getting a deal with the US would take "a great deal of negotiation".
Dutch MEP takes on Homeland Security
MEPs' concerns over how data is used in the US intensified after a Dutch MEP went head to head with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) last year.
Sophie In 't Veld, a liberal MEP, petitioned the US authorities to let her look into her passenger name records and asked the DHS and the FBI to explain the meaning of a swathe of inexplicable codes attached to her records.
When none of that worked, she took the agencies to court, where a judge ruled that the DHS had done enough to satisfy In 't Veld's request.