EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Romania seeks EU leadership debate on surge of 'xenophobia'

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 16 March 2012

EU leaders need to have a high-level political debate on the surge of 'xenophobia' and anti-European attitudes that threaten integration, Romanian Prime Minister Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu said during his first political visit to Brussels yesterday (15 March).

"There is concern regarding the way EU policies can be questioned in the national executives and parliaments by the political expression of xenophobia, anti-democratic and anti-European attitudes," Ungureanu said at the end of talks with European Council President Herman Van Rompuy.

Before heading to Brussels, the Romanian premier said it was appropriate to have an extraordinary EU summit to talk "very frankly about what is happening" and to find ways to protect pro-European policies, "so that such cases that erode European politics will not keep integration captive".

Together with Poland and Bulgaria, Romania is one of the targets of the xenophobic website (see background) launched by the right-wing Dutch Freedom Party (PVV).

The European Commission and the European Parliament's major political parties have condemned the site [more]. However, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte has refused to take position, saying it has nothing to do with the government. Rutte leads a minority government backed by PVV.

Ungureanu said it was time "to openly discuss how Europe reacts to increasing political influence of the extreme right voters. We need  to recognise the problem and seek solutions."

The Romanian premier linked the trend to the accession of both Bulgaria and Romania to the border-free Schengen area.

The Netherlands is the only country opposing the entry of the two member states in Schengen, citing a lack of "substantial and irreversible" reform of their judiciary system and fight against corruption. But a more important reason appears to be that Rutte has committed to PVV to uphold the veto.

"I cannot shut up when it comes to such an important issue," Ungureanu said. "It is a sensitive problem, we are prepared to enter Schengen and we now need a political dialogue between the Romanian government and its EU counterparts".

Ungureanu called the Dutch attitude "unfair" and said that there should not be any inequalities in rights between the different citizens of the Union.

'Painfully low' absorption rate

Ungureanu took over as Romanian prime minister last month following more than 20 days of protests over austerity measures and the economic downturn.

In Brussels, he also talked about how his could start to access its untapped EU structural and cohesion funds. Romania is the worst performer EU-wide in absorbing EU funds, for reasons both of lack of administrative capacity and corruption.

"The current absorption rate of 7.4% is painfully low," said Commission President José Manuel Barroso, following his meeting with Ungureanu.

EU financing allocated to Romania will be lost at the end of 2013. In an effort to prevent this from happening, Barroso said the Commission was prepared to look favourably at Bucharest's request for a lower level of co-financing for projects promoting growth and job creation.

A source from the Romanian delegation told EurActiv that Romania will get help in tapping the estimated €6 billion in EU money from the European Investment Bank, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Barroso also referred to the next report under the Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification (CVM), put in place to help Romania remove existing deficiencies in law-enforcement. The next report, due this summer, will cover the entire five-year period since the country's EU accession in January 2007.

"I will not prejudge the outcome as it will depend on the progress made in Romania. What I can say is that the Commission will reject any attempts to link the mechanism to the Schengen accession process. This is a question of fairness," Barroso said.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • De EU moet onmiddellijk een eind maken aan de idiotie dat iedereen in EU zelf mag beslissen waar hij wil wonen en werken en dus gebruik kan maken van de sociale voorzieningen in dat andere land.
    Vrij verkeer is geen vrije vestiging!!!!!
    Ieder land maakt ZELF uit wie er mag komen wonen en werken.
    De EU is bezig europese landen kapot te maken.

    De EU gaat veel te ver in haar bemoeizucht.
    Dat moet stoppen anders is er maar een weg ER UIT.

    By :
    K.Bos
    - Posted on :
    16/03/2012
  • Already refusing to write in English commenting an article that was written in English is a proof of racism. If you think people are not free and that the state should decide on who can enjoy certain freedoms and who shouldn't, I strongly advise you to move to a communist country. You will find your freedom of speech there. In the meantime, as born privileged in a democratic and European country, just take advantage of your right to be informed and READ! Might open your perspectives.
    This "EU" you're talking about, I feel obliged to remind you that it is not a foreign entity that landed on European soil; it is made of the 27 countries! If you are so sure your country will do better isolated, feel free to opt out the EU, you can now do it. In the meantime, again, I suggest READING some more.
    Since Europe is so free, you also have the right to your own opinion. But for the sake of progress, just keep them to yourself, xenophobia didn't do Europe any good so far! (READ about it).

    By :
    ad
    - Posted on :
    16/03/2012
  • "There is concern regarding the way EU policies can be questioned in the national executives and parliaments by the political expression of xenophobia, anti-democratic and anti-European attitudes," Ungureanu said at the end of talks with European Council President Herman Van Rompuy.

    What a laugh!

    Ungureanu 's primal concern should be the reform of the Romanian judicial system, the corruption and the organized crime in his own country instead of letting himself be prompted by the van Rompuy rat about so called xenophobia, anti-democratic and anti-European attitudes in other EU member states.
    The EU is almost the equivalent of anti-democracy itself, with its 27 appointed commissioners, led by a so called 'president', none of them being chosen by the people of Europe.

    And @ad: on your part I suggest THINKING some more. Advising people to keep their opinions to themselves is not quite indicative of understanding the freedom of s-p-e-e-c-h.

    By :
    Edith Brands
    - Posted on :
    17/03/2012
  • @ Edith
    If you really think EU is anti-democratic, why don't you ask your government to declare it so officially and eventually ask for your country to leave the EU; maybe the rest of the EU countries will be better off in the EU without yours?!

    By :
    luke
    - Posted on :
    18/03/2012
  • Edith and Luke.

    Edith is correct about Rumanian's judicial system. Indeed it is that and others like it that bring the European arrest warrant into question. How on earth did the UK manage to get involved in that?

    Luke - you don't have to be too bright to work out that the EU is not democratic and therefore needs fixing. All of the commission have been appointed not elected. The UK's Baroness Ashton has never been elected to any political job in her life. If something is not right then fix it.

    You say that if the above is the case then the UK should leave the EU. Luke I think you will find that the majority of UK voters would quite happily accept your invitation. How many other EU electorates would also support leaving or at least demand major changes to the way the EU works? But then that question cannot be asked of the electorate because the EU is frightened of the answer they would get which therefore makes the whole thing anti-democratic.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    19/03/2012
  • K.Bos is apparently against freedom of movement and establishment in the EU. Well, when you chase out all the foreigners from the Netherlands who is going to work there? I am afraid not many, especially not those 'true Dutch' who live thanks to social allowances. Netherlands prefers Bulgarians and Romanians to work illegally in the country, because it is far cheaper than if they were legally residing.
    On the other hand, a country with such a high number of multinational companies needs highly skilled workers which the Netherlands as such cannot satisfy completely. So, there will be always international workers, highly educated, who contribute more to the Dutch economy than many lower skilled workers.

    Work migration existed in Europe since centuries, of course for some countries it was great when work was for free (forced migration by empires or colonialists - in other words slavery).

    Xenophobia is a sickness of panicked politicians, but it is a contagious one for electorates. Unfortunately it spreads from "more developed" to "less developed" countries in Europe despite of their better health care systems...

    What EU could do to counterbalance this horrible trend? the Romanian Prime Minister has the right to ask this question and the other EU Heads should not stay silent!

    By :
    Dance
    - Posted on :
    27/03/2012
Mihai-Răzvan Ungureanu
Background: 

The right-wing Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) launched a special website on 10 February, inviting Dutch citizens to denounce nuisance caused by Europeans citizens coming from Poland, Romania and Bulgaria [more]. Types of nuisance that can be reported include pollution, problems related to housing or simply competition on the job market.

More than 10,000 people responded in just a few days. The PVV website has caused a stir in the countries concerned.

Viviane Reding, European Commission vice president responsible for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, vigorously condemned the website for "openly calling for people to be intolerant".

PVV, led by Geert Wilders, is the third largest party in the Netherlands. Although it is not in the government coalition, PVV has been an active supporter of Prime Minister Mark Rutte's conservative cabinet, a cooperation which was laid down in a "support agreement".

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Justice & Home Affairs News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Justice & Home Affairs Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising