EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Barroso: 'We will need to move towards a federation of nation states'

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 12 September 2012, updated 13 September 2012

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso delivered today (12 September) his State of the Union speech, passionately pleading for launching a wide-ranging public debate for a major transformation of the European Union into a "federation of nation states".

Barroso largely benefited from the positive fallout of the long-awaited ruling of the German Constitutional Court, which today rejected efforts to block the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) - the eurozone's €500-billion bailout fund.

His speech to the European Parliament in Strasbourg began at 9 a.m., while news of the court decision came an hour later (read full speech here). Parliament President Martin Schulz briefly interrupted the debate to announce the news, prompting a round of applause from MEPs in the assembly.

It is not known whether Barroso had a second version of his speech in case of a negative decision. What is certain, however, is that whenever he departed from the written text, he appeared more convincing than usual, an impression confirmed by a series of comments form journalists on Twitter.

Barroso started by acknowledging that the euro area's institutional architecture had not been “up to the job” to face the sovereign debt crisis.

“This is now being corrected," he said. "But it is a painful, difficult, effort. Citizens are frustrated. They are anxious. They feel their way of life is at risk."

Message to Greece and to the sceptics

Without naming individual countries, the Commission president blasted the national leaders who took collective decisions during EU summit meetings only to undermine them later, throwing doubt on the Union's resolve to tackle the crisis. Finland and the Netherlands were the first to cast doubt on the decisions made at the last EU summit in June.

Alluding to Greece, Barroso stressed that the most vulnerable countries must leave no doubt about their readiness to reform. But the stronger countries should leave no doubt either about their readiness to show solidarity, he added, apparently referring to remarks on a possible Greek exit from the eurozone made recently by senior politicians in Germany, Finland and the Netherlands.

A federal Europe

Barroso stressed that in order to survive, the Union should evolve and agree on “a decisive deal for Europe” that would establish a “contract of confidence” between member countries, EU institutions, social partners, and the Union’s citizens.

“Let’s not be afraid of the words: we will need to move towards a federation of nation states. This is what we need. This is our political horizon,” he said.

He made it clear that his vision for a federation of member states was by no means a superstate, similar to the USA. He called it a “democratic federation of nation states that can tackle our common problems, through the sharing of sovereignty in a way that each country and each citizen are better equipped to control their own destiny”.

Treaty change

Barroso did not shy away from stating that the creation of such a federation would require a change of the EU treaties. Alluding to the Lisbon Treaty negotiations, which took three years to conclude after French and Dutch voters rejected a proposed EU constitution in 2005, he said the Commission didn’t take it “lightly” and realised how difficult it was to change the treaty.

Barroso said that a broad debate should start in Europe on treaty change, before a convention or an intergovernmental conference is called, and pleaded for a new kind of debate.

“I would like to see the development of a European public space, where European issues are discussed and debated from a European standpoint. We cannot continue trying to solve European problems just with national solutions,” he said.

Barroso appealed to the European Parliament to contribute, but also to “European thinkers”, to “men and women of culture, to join this debate on the future of Europe”.

His call for a public debate on Europe's future echoes a German campaign called ‘Ich will Europa' ("I want Europe"), launched in August by Chancellor Angela Merkel to persuade Germans of the benefits of European unity.

A first attempt to spark such a debate was launched a few days ago when Barroso's website started gathering questions ahead of his State of the Union speech.

Eurozone vs. EU

But Barroso made it clear that he rejected ideas which would cast divisions between member states, such as the idea of creating a ‘eurozone parliament’. Barroso slammed such proposals, saying: “Let's be clear – there is only one European Union. One Commission. One European Parliament.”

He, however, admitted that the 17 eurozone countries couldn’t avoid deeper integration, while the project should remain open for the remaining EU members as well.

Wooing the Socialists

Barroso also made noises aimed at wooing the Socialists in Parliament. “Some say that, because of the crisis, the European Social model is dead. I do not agree,” he said, indicating that the Commission would launch a 'Youth Package' before the end of the year to combat joblessness and facilitate vocational training.

His statements in favour of putting in place a financial transactions tax through enhanced cooperation is also likely to please the Socialists, who have long campaigned in favour of the idea.

Some MEPs attempted to provoke Barroso, telling him that the statements he had made should be repeated in front of the EU government leaders. But the Parliament's President Martin Schulz, a Socialist, took the floor in his defence, saying that Barroso was even more decisive when speaking at EU summits.

It is less clear whether his proposals for new ECB powers on banking supervision, tabled today, will please such a major player in the EU as Germany. In what appears as a message to Berlin, he said: “All actors, and I really mean all actors, should respect the ECB's independence”.

Eye on the 2014 European elections

Regarding the 2014 European elections, Barroso tabled proposals to boost the European political parties’ abilities to form “a truly European public sphere”. He said it was unfortunate that the political debate is cast all too often as if it were just between national parties.

“Even in the European elections we do not see the name of the European political parties on the ballot box, we see a national debate between national political parties. This is why we need a reinforced statute for European political parties,” he said, adding “We must not allow the populists and the nationalists to set a negative agenda”.

Barroso also said that the European political parties should present their candidate for the post of Commission president at the European Parliament elections in 2014.

Schulz is known to be eyeing the position. Recently, Commission Vice President Viviane Reding said in an interview with EurActiv Italy that she would be happy to work for Barroso if he was re-appointed for a third term.

Positions: 

Commenting on Barroso's proposals, Hannes Swoboda, president of the Socialists and Democrats group, said:

"Barroso is committed to a European social model. That is good news, but now we want to see the specific measures to implement this. The Commission must live up to its social commitment when debating the so-called Van Rompuy paper and should support our demand for a pact for social cohesion and fairness. The Commission must also have a greater social focus and ensure fairness in the work of the Troikas. Only then we will be able to have a real partnership between the S&D Group and the Commission. We would welcome such a partnership with President Barroso."

Swoboda called for a relaunch for Europe and further European integration: "The current neo-liberal direction of Europe is driving countries deeper into recession and people into poverty. This must stop and a new, fair and just Europe must be created."

The chairman of the EPP group Joseph Daul welcomed the announcements by Barroso that European solutions are the answer to the crisis, underlining the importance of the future banking union. 

"We mustn't confuse European solidarity with charity. This is why I support the proposal by the European Central Bank to purchase bonds. Because any Member State which benefits from this solidarity must therefore act responsibly. Member States cannot receive this aid without a realistic reform programme. This is the right approach. It is a European approach."

Daul also insisted on having the negotiations on the future EU budget concluded by the end of this year: "We have to build a Europe which can face the challenges of the 21st Century. This is why we want the 2014-2020 budget of the Union to be in a plausible, solid and ambitious financial framework. The European budget is not a budget of expenditure, but an investment budget. It is a budget for the future. Let us be serious and ambitious. I call on all those responsible to find a solution before the end of the year."

While welcoming the proposal by Barroso as one of the indispensable building blocks of the structural solution to tackle the eurozone crisis, ALDE Group President Guy Verhofstadt said:

"It is hard to understand why the banking union proposal is based on the intergovernmental method. This is a recipe to create a pan-European supervision system with one arm tied behind its back". The Commission's proposal leaves it entirely up to the Council to decide by unanimity amongst the 27 Member States, denying Parliament its role as co-legislator as was the case for the previous legislation on supervision.

On the contents of the proposal Verhofstadt said: "We need a European banking supervisor if we are to get agreement from Member States to allow recapitalisation of banks via the ESM. However, this proposal raises several doubts. For instance, it opens a possible conflict of interest between the ECB's role as guardian of price stability and its new supervisory tasks, between the ECB and the European Banking Authority, between the supervision of Eurozone and non Eurozone banks".

Verhofstadt also criticized Barroso's "federation of nation states". "This federation already exists, it is the European Council.  We need a union based on citizens", he said. 

Co-chairman of the Green/EFA group Daniel Cohn-Bendit concurred with Verhofstadt regarding the need to build a federation based on citizens. "A European public space must be the aim", he said.

Cohn-Bendit also pleaded for the EU budget to represent not 1% of the combined GDP of the member countries, but 5%. The Green/EFA co-chairman said that in Greece, the fascist party was distributing amounts of €20-30 to the impoverished population, a practice similar of those of the Islamists in other continents.

European Conservatives and Reformists Chairman Martin Callanan said that Barroso has failed to shape a positive agenda of reform for the EU, instead opting for the 'same, old tired approach.' Callanan called for economic solutions to the immediate crisis, not another long drawn-out debate about institutions and treaty change. He also said that the EU should take a new direction of small government, free markets and giving people control over their governments.  “Bailouts and ECB Ponzi schemes have enabled you to kick the infamous can further down the road. Last week's ECB decision to buy up bonds may be a useful stopgap but it was in no sense a solution. Risks have simply been transferred from one balance sheet to another,” Callanan said.

Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, made ironic remarks on Barroso not being elected.  Barroso replied that it was Farage who was never able to get elected in the UK, and “that’s why he came to the European Parliament”. Barroso said that for his part, he has always been elected when running for elections, since he was 29.

Verhofstadt paid tribute to the Commission’s President’s pugnacity, saying that “up to now Barroso was the punching ball of Farage, but now Farage is the punching ball of Barroso”.

On behalf of the Union of European Federalists (UEF), MEP Andrew Duff (UK, ALDE) welcomed Barroso’s commitment to a federal path for Europe.

"The President of the European Commission has done well to drop his former inhibitions about the 'F-word'. His call in the state of the Union speech for Europe to follow a federal path is absolutely right,” Duff stated.

President of the Party of European Socialists Sergei Stanishev said:

"For three years now the conservative dominated EU institutions and governments were assuring citizens that austerity only policies and social sacrifice was the route out of the crisis. The realities have proven those policies bankrupt. They have caused stagnation for the real economy, suffering and insecurity for the people and growing euroscepticism across the board. Mr. Barroso’s proposal is just more straw on the fragile European house when what we need is steel.”

"What was inevitable has now been said: for the future of the EU, we must not be afraid to speak of a federation of nation-states and we must continue to deepen cooperation. Let us build it together and have the courage to turn a challenge into an opportunity. Europe needs vision and strong leadership. Mr Barroso has shown vision and leadership today in his State of the Union speech", states the President of the European Economic and Social Committee Staffan Nilsson in response to the European Commission's State of the Union address in the European Parliament.

Next steps: 
  • 18-19 Oct. 2012: Interim report on finalising the economic and monetary union to be presented at EU Summit in Brussels
  • 13-14 Dec. 2012: Final report and roadmap for further economic and monetary union to be adopted by EU leaders at Brussels summit
  • June 2014, European parliamentary elections
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • We don't need a federal Europe, but a free trade zone and if needed, a CONFEDERAL Europe. Democracy works bottom-up, not top-down. Responsibility must be taken at the local level first. Centralised levels are to coordinate only what can't be coordinated locally.
    We had one USSR that showed how wrong centralisation can be. No need for a EUSSR.

    By :
    Eric Verhulst
    - Posted on :
    12/09/2012
  • Eric Verhulst

    I endorse your comment completely .

    While the can is being kicked farther dowm the road , keep talking lest anyone notice .
    The EU has left the people out of it from the start .
    Would they ever risk having an EU wide referendum on closer , federal integration ?
    The likes of Schulz need to shut up , airing the social aspect , when the EU is already seen as the EUSSR .
    As I understand the Eurozone countries have borrowed so much , that they will never be able to pay off their debts . If the Euro collaped and banks called on CDS , the US banks would be crippled and the whole world economy .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    13/09/2012
  • Old Hitler would be proud.

    Those short sighted fools on the Continent will never learn.

    They'll be sorry for generations to come, but, like the last, will forget the steps they took which brought them to ruin.

    They deserve what's coming to them.

    By :
    Leon
    - Posted on :
    13/09/2012
  • Yes, Mr. Barroso, look at the ‘state of the Union’!

    We fully agree with you that new thinking is needed. We cannot go on with business as usual.

    Thank you for your words today on how successful Europe’s engineering industry is in a globalised world. Indeed, our industry which employs over 10 million people in Europe is a world leader. Why? Because our companies are dynamic and focused: they thrive on innovation developed with capable staff who invest their knowledge into developing the new products which give their companies their fine competitive edge. This is the fruit of hard work and in the past has been much helped by a supportive framework – the internal market – which allowed our companies to grow in Europe.

    The British Olympians had 17 days of sporting triumph at the recent London 2012 game; however that triumph was a decade in the making. Success was instilled through foresight and through hard work together across the board to make the Olympics a success for each and every athlete.

    We should be approaching the European economy in the same light: we need to have a policy framework which again makes Europe a place which attracts investment and thereby creates jobs, not, as we have been seeing in the last years, a string of disjointed policies which just add to the complexity, the uncertainty and the cost of “made in Europe”. And it is the Commission which can and should be the driver behind this framework.

    So, please go beyond the rhetoric and get down to having the Commission as a whole work together to remove the barriers that are currently deterring companies from investing in Europe and stopping them what has been at the root of their global success and Europe’s economic development – making in Europe products and technologies which our customers need and want both in Europe & worldwide.

    We agree with you Mr. Barroso that not everything can be a priority at the same time: surely today, getting people back to work must be the priority for Europe. And our industry has proven that we do deliver jobs and growth under the right conditions. The opportunity is there: the Commission’s industrial policy review must change the course of policy and steer the European ship as a whole in the right direction. It must seek to deliver for Europe’s manufacturing base.

    What do we need fundamentally? An attractive investment framework in the EU: staff with the skills our companies need, better access to finance both on the capital markets and with banks, input costs which are globally competitive, modern infrastructures, an internal market which is fully operational, better trading conditions and also regulatory and policy stability and predictability.

    In his 2011 State of the Union speech, President Barroso asked if Europe was really capable of achieving growth and creating jobs. As an industry we know that our companies can make it and we believe we can do it in Europe, but not with the policies and regulation that Europe is delivering today. Let’s hope that in 2013, the final year of this Commission we will have seen some real change for the better.

    By :
    Orgalime
    - Posted on :
    13/09/2012
  • Orgalime

    Your post reads like a Barosso EU Ass licking speech .
    Basically the conditions for inviting industrial investment in Europe simply are not there and smooth talking Barosso and the commission is not going to change anything . Without questioning or writing such comment you know perfectly well that the problem in Europe is bankruptcy and failing economies . Only those countries with substantial external export markets will succeed or see any growth at all . The state of indebtedness in the EU is such that it will stagnate or pull down even the most enterprising and industrious .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    13/09/2012
  • Barroso and the EC are little better than Nazis with the racism taken out when it comes to democracy. Imposition of a federal europe is their answer to the fear, uncertainy and doubt created by the ill conceived Euro debacle, irrespective of the wishes of EU citizens.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    13/09/2012
  • What of a paranoid mind saying the in comparing the EU the USSR or Nazis !!???
    Never heared of an U.S. Communism??

    We need a federal Plan in Europe with a low EU governement!!
    Barosso has right! We need an United Countries of Europe! So we have our Euro, as Draghi said, which is Irreversible! So the missing plan to maintain the economie stable in Europe should be dual federalism as in the U.S. to rerise the economie and fight the jobless!
    It's logical!

    We have the Euro! we have no borders! we are free!!
    We need more Integration and Solidarity wich is a spiritual distinctive mark for everybody and has nothing undemocratially!

    And for You Mr Charles :
    I am a proud pro European and i am sorry that we didn't began the federal policy at the Reunification of Europe directly!
    As i mentionned and explained on posts before why we need the federel plan!

    When I see what happen with Arcelor-Mittal / some aviation companies I regrett that it hadn't be called "European Steel" or "European Airlines". So now many people will become jobless!

    So continuing copy/paste the US/EU

    God bless Europe!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    02/10/2012
  • Federation of Nation States sounds good!

    So Mr. Barroso Do it! and skip the Uckip!

    --- Europe Forever ---

    By :
    Le Pen
    - Posted on :
    02/10/2012
  • an european
    " And for You Mr Charles :
    I am a proud pro European and i am sorry that we didn't began the federal policy at the Reunification of Europe directly!"

    Are you making this statement to Charles as a Nazi point of view , had things gone differently in WWII .
    Incidentally the EU is nearer in form to the USSR than the US .

    I dare say Draghi is right that the Euro is irreversible , but in due course will die with the EU .

    I believe the EU can never recover its economy while the Euro is in place . The Euro was introduced as an idealogical symbol of European unity , but it has been a failure in causing an imbalance of the economies of member states , that can never be corrected under a one size fits all economy .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    02/10/2012
  • I can not understand how the EU is working. While the EU parliment does it's best to pass laws and reforms, when these come to be discussed in other EU countries, they end up ''tailor made'' to that member. Thus, if any one have a dispute with another EU member, which law will apply, the EU law, country A or country B law.
    The same EU is breaking her same laws, after so much hard work, by letting these member states alter, trim or amend, call it what you like, we don't have the same in each 27 countries.These amandements are made on purpose for the sole reason to fit the partyin power and thus each citizen who one day need to abide with.

    By :
    H Galea
    - Posted on :
    13/10/2012
  • Mr Barroso, I do agree, but how will all this happen, if the EU does not have her ''Stock Exchange'', you are letting our future in the hands of others, where they can manipulate our dreams if these will come through or not.

    The last sentence in your speech, not sure of the ''one defence'', is someone suggesting, we will be a superpower, we will be the bullies of europe, hope we will not loose the prize what we have wone.

    By :
    H Galea
    - Posted on :
    13/10/2012
  • A little of the bottle it good for you Sir, What we do in the EU is all wrong, better join USA, better inforn us which side Brition wants to go.

    By :
    H Galea
    - Posted on :
    13/10/2012
  • If Barroso wants federal it is ok! but with no more EU institutions but instead a little Governement with an real European Präsident elected by europeans !
    I am tired with the entire EU lobby with elect themselves "their" Präsident!

    By :
    the Idea
    - Posted on :
    13/10/2012
  • @ David Barneby- Posted on : 02/10/2012reply

    If that is what you said, well , then the United States of America was down long ago with the dollar !!

    That's whay Barroso propose the Fedderating of Nation States !

    Finally that's logic that we cannot continue with 1 moonetary union and without 1 economie & political union !
    We need a such modern political system !
    And the federal US has this modern political system one!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    13/10/2012
  • an-european
    I think it may be true to say , that the US is in a worse financial state than the EU and it seems that more than one state is bankrupt .
    Unless opposed by Congress or the Senate they are able to print money indefinitely .
    The US government does not look after states that are insolvent as the EU is seeking to do .
    Declaring the EU a single federal state , will not make a USE as in the same sense as the USA .
    Friends are better enjoying their separate freedom , I say " When friends become bedfellows , the often fall apart " .

    The EU is governed by ignorant unthing people , who make simple decisions based on unproven facts .
    To quote from an old book " Love Among The Chickens "
    If a chicken lays an egg a day and an egg costs 3pence ", we'll soon be rich . Of course a chicken doesn't lay an egg a day . In the same way you see creating the USE the same as the USA will make the EU a success . You shouldn't believe a word EU leaders or politicians say . The EU is a squidgey ball , you press it one way to fit , but it fills out in another direction , try as you might you cannot make it fit .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    14/10/2012
Background: 

The 'State of the Union' speech, largely modelled on the US president's annual address to Congress, is a recent initiative by Commission President José Manuel Barroso. The first such speech was delivered in 2010 in a chaotic atmosphere, after suggestions that MEPs be forced to attend.

The main focus of last year's State of the Union's speech was the need to raise new sources of finance, including "project bonds", to fund EU infrastructure.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Communication Partners

Sponsors

Videos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising