EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU budget summit aftermath: ‘Everyone’s a winner’

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 15 February 2013

National leaders were quick to portray last week's budget summit agreement as a victory for their country. But one week after the dust has settled, the picture looks more nuanced. The EurActiv network brings you an overview from Britain, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Spain.

For the first time in the EU's history, the next budget (2014-2020) will be smaller than during the previous one (2007-2013).

Following the 26-hour negotiations, €18 billion of additional cuts were made compared with the earlier proposals tabled at the last summit in November.

>> Read: The EU's 2014-2020 budget in figures

In Britain, Cameron wins cross-party support

Prime Minister David Cameron was widely portrayed as the main summit victor.

His Conservative party hailed the outcome as a "historic victory" for Cameron, who had threatened a veto if the cuts were not significantly bigger than those proposed by European Council President Herman Van Rompuy in November.

>> Read: Eurosceptics give Cameron 'three cheers' for EU budget win

Speaking in the House of Commons on Monday, Cameron said the deal was good for Britain, good for Europe and "above all a good deal for all our taxpayers".

He was congratulated by his party, as well as Labour and Liberal-Democrat MPs. The deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, Simon Hughes, said the party's MEPs would back the deal in the European Parliament.

Bulgaria ‘biggest net beneficiary’

Prime Minister Boyko Borissov said his country would get €15.2 billion in total under the deal, the net balance (minus the country’s contribution to the EU budget) being €12 billion.

Brissov said his country was among the four that saw an increase in their cohesion funds, from €6.85 billion in the past budget to €7 billion in the new one.

“This is the first [EU] budget which cuts funding to the members, and cutting money is very painful,” Borissov said, adding: “But for Bulgaria the result is good”. He added that Bulgaria was the biggest net beneficiary in terms of EU funds measured against the country’s gross national income, with a net balance of 4%.

Czechs happy with extra €900 million

Prime Minister Petr Nečas presented the EU summit result as a success for his country as he managed to win an extra €900 million in comparison with the last budget proposal in November.

Nečas attributed the results to his “veto threat”.

As a result, the Czech allocation, coming mainly from cohesion policy, now stands at €20.5 billion, up from €19.6 billion he said.

This didn’t prevent the opposition from slamming the agreement, on the grounds that in the 2007-2014 period, Prague was allocated €26.7 billion, and that the prime minister had therefore failed in the negotiations.

France of two minds

President François Hollande was among the rare national leaders who did not hide his disappointment.

"Is this your dream budget? I would say if I were alone, no, it would have been different," Hollande told a news conference, adding that it was his "responsibility" to agree on the best possible deal given Europe's difficult fiscal situation.

"What had to be done was that all countries could be winners," Hollande told journalists. He said, however, that "Europe has not necessarily won as much as she could" and that deep cuts had to be made to the European Commission's original proposal.

"But in the envelope, each country could find something they wanted," Hollande claimed, citing the cohesion funding for poorer Central European states and France's own wish to maintain direct payments to its farmers.

Though divided, Hollande's Socialists officially supported the compromise.

The opposition UMP and the Greens, which are part of the governing coalition, both regretted that Hollande had failed to convince its partners to preserve the budget. 

But perhaps more significantly, French farmers expressed their satisfaction with the deal reached on agriculture, where cuts to direct payments are to be compensated by rural development funding. France "has succeeded in protecting its interests", said the main farmers union FNSEA.

Germany hails discipline

Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, from the liberal FDP party, said he "welcomed" the deal, saying it demonstrated the EU's ability to take decisions in difficult times.

“The agreement sends a Europe-wide signal of consolidation. Fiscal discipline, structural reforms and solidarity are the key to permanently overcome the debt crisis,” Westerwelle said.

Ilse Aigner (CSU), Germany’s minister for Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, also welcomed the deal, especially regarding the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Against the background of a necessity of cost reduction in general, the danger of solely putting pressure on the agricultural budget was averted, she said.

“Public money for public services - it is good that all EU countries have clearly avowed themselves to this important principle,” said Aigner.

But the opposition was less enthusiastic.

“The programme to combat youth unemployment is to be welcomed but should not hide the fact that the overall settlement is bad,” said Manuel Sarrazin, spokesman on EU affairs for the Greens.

“For the first time we are witnessing a reduction of the EU budget - €34 billion compared to the budget for 2007-2013. Merkel's disastrous strategy has prevailed: Cut as much as possible, give as little as necessary.

“The gaping breach between commitments and payments illustrates the result is not a sustainable solution in Europe's interest and is threatening to block up the EU financially every year,” Sarrazin said.

‘Extra funds’ for Italy

The government focused its communication on the extra money that the country got during the final talks.

Rome remains a net contributor to the EU budget despite its own fiscal woes, but its "negative balance" has been reduced by €3.5 billion, a figure that made headlines in the national media.

The main criticism came from Pier Luigi Bersani, the leader of the centre-left Democratic party, who said that Prime Minister Mario Monti had won a “Pyrrhic victory".

“If Cameron is happy from the outcome of the summit, we shouldn’t have reasons to call it a good deal,” Bersani said.

Italy goes to the polls on 24-25 February in one of its most important elections in decades. Polls show Bersani’s centre-left may win majority in the lower house but in need of allies to hold the Senate.

Poland sees ‘unique, huge success’

Finance Minister Jacek Rostowski called the budget deal “a unique, huge success”.

Bartlomiej Nowak from the Centre for International Relations (CSM) told EurActiv Poland that the summit “was very good for Poland, but bad for the entire European Union”.

In his view, the negotiations were too much subordinated to the demands of Britain. As for the budget, negotiated by the Polish team led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk and EU Affairs Minister Piotr Serafin, the result should be called “a miracle”, he said. The agreement was also the result of “a great deal of luck,” he said.

Jacek Sasin from the opposition Law and Justice party (PiS) was more critical, advising the government to focus now on the good use of the agreed sums. He said that to the difference of cohesion funding, the obtained results for farmers weren’t that good.

MEP Rafal Trzaskowski (EPP/Civic Platform), meanwhile, said that the parliament had not been consulted in the spirit of the Lisbon Treaty.

In Romania, PM and president bicker over summit result

President Traian Băsescu, who attended the summit, and Prime Minister Victor Ponta clashed over the assessment of the budget summit results.

Băsescu said his country had won an 18% increase compared to the last long-term budget, citing a total allocation of €39.8 billion, €6 billion more than in the previous period.

But the prime minister said the results of the summit had been disappointing for Romania, hitting at Băsescu for not having been able to improve the country’s allocation from the November proposal.

Ponta measured the summit result against the Commission’s initial proposal, saying that the country had “lost €9 billion” during the talks attended by his political rival.

Ponta also said that for €2 Portugal, Hungary and Slovakia were receiving per capita, Romania got €1. 

Slovakia claims it won the ‘competition for money’

Prime Minister Robert Fico praised the summit outcome, calling his country the “second most successful after Estonia” in terms of cohesion funding per capita.  

Slovakia was one of the biggest winners of this “competition for money from the EU,” Fico said. He said EU resources constitute 76% of the public investment planned in Slovakia in 2013.

Fico said Slovakia will get more than €13 billion from the EU budget, more than the previous allocation. Slovakia is also satisfied with the agreed 15% co-financing of the EU funded project, instead of earlier proposed 25%, he said.

Spain remains net beneficiary

Conservative Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy called the budget deal positive for Spain, as his country will remain a net beneficiary of EU funds.

Rajoy stressed that his country would get more than 30% of the money from a newly created €6-billion Youth Guarantee fund, aimed at ensuring that everyone under 25 get a quality job, internship or educational offer within four months of finishing school or becoming unemployed.

Nearly 60% of young Spaniards are unemployed, the highest figure in Europe.

Positions: 

EU candidate Serbia, which receives pre-accession funding, monitored the budget talks.

Ognjen Miric, deputy chief of the Serbian government's Office for European Integration and coordinator for EU funds, said the EU was unlikely to downsize its pre-accession, or IPA, assistance in the next budget and the specific proposed amount should be made public quickly.

"Over the past six months, our embassies have worked closely with member states on IPA allocations, and the information coming to us from the key members suggested there should be no reductions to the IPA budget," he said.

He said €11.4 billion was allocated for the West Balkans under the 2007-2013 EU budget, of which Serbia received €400 million.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Everyone a winner? What is this, a football match? Everyone a winner - except European citizens. And what about the loss of 90% of the proposed budget for rolling out high speed internet to all citizens in Europe? Forget that now; everyone of the "winners" have got their little (or big) pieces of the action, who cares about the good of the whole community?

    Am I disappointed?

    By :
    Mary Ann DeVlieg
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2013
  • And last but not least: the (native) citizens of Brussels.

    Thanks to savings in Administration, Brussels natives will be (a bit) less pushed out by overpaid Eurocrats, enjoying Caiman Islands-like tax rates, hefty tax-free fees and a series of rebates (mortgages e.g.).

    Thank you Mr. Cameron.

    By :
    mike
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2013
  • 1. "David Cameron was widely portrayed as the main summit victor"

    2. " Eurosceptics give Cameron 'three cheers' for EU budget win"

    And i say the first greatest shame for Europe when talking about tinyiest still non-federal Budget in history of the Union!
    Where has european idea gone?

    Finally who cares! It seems that only national Gov's Victory are essential but finally an defeat for European Union and the european mind....and european economy...

    Believe one : This is proof that the economy will continue to shrink down below the limit the next coming mmonth .. when talking about such "national victories" ..until the european Spirit wakup again!

    Standby!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2013
  • @an european
    This morning I watched a UK Parliamentary Committee questioning senior policemen. They were insistent that EU cooperation on fighting crime via Europol etc has made their work much easier. An excellent example of European countries working together.

    Instead of European rhetoric you need to identify tasks which need to be undertaken and can only be done at the European level. I see very few such project. The proposed broadband network can be done at national level – the European element is establishing common standards. The element of telecommunications which cannot be done by national governments is the development and launching of satellites. But that is already being done by the European Space Agency.

    For the Euro federalists identifying cost-effective solutions is of secondary importance. Advancing the European Project is what matters irrespective of the cost.

    By :
    Martin
    - Posted on :
    15/02/2013
  • @Mary Ann DeVlieg,

    Hear,Hear. My POV exactly.

    By :
    Tony Ball
    - Posted on :
    16/02/2013
  • @ mike
    Yes, poor Brussels natives, who rent out flats inherited from their parents to "overpaid eurocrats" for at least 2500€ per month. Poor Brussels natives selling goods, food, providing services and selling houses to "eurocrats" and armies of expats and lobbyists working for, with and against EU, which all live in Brussels...
    On the other hand, instead of being poor Brussels native, you coul be a fat cat in Charleroi. Why not?

    By :
    Overpaid eurocrat
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • @mike
    And just to finish - we do pay an income tax from our salaries, and the rate is from 50% to 70%. As far as I know, it is more than the Belgian rate.

    If you are unhappy with your national system of taxation, vote for change!

    By :
    Overpaid eurocrat
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • @overpaid eurocrat

    The natives who rent out and own business are but a very small minority.

    They probably are the only natives you get in touch with.

    In Charleroi, even a "fat car" -I reckon you refer to someone claiming welfare benefits- pays more taxes than you do.

    A Eurocrat earning € 7,600 per MONTH pays an overall tax rate of 11%.
    Any Belgian earning € 23,900 per YEAR (thus 3 month’s wage of abovementioned Eurocrat) pays an overall tax rate of 28% !

    Only Eurocrats earning more than € 6,938 per MONTH reach a 45% tax rate.
    Any Belgian earning more than 18,730 per YEAR reaches this point.

    By :
    mike
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • Our national tax rate is about fine.

    Your Caiman Islands-like is not.

    I don't have to vote for changing the latter: people like Cameron seem to set this straight (for which I thank him immensely).

    By :
    mike
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • @mike
    At first, the "overall tax rate" includes not only income tax, but also other taxes, levies, contributions, etc.

    Somehow I do not understand your preoccupations with the tax rate. Whatever is the rate of the tax for EU agents, it goes back to the EU budget.

    Therefore, may I suggest some other topics for ranting - too much of them, too little work, they are old and ugly, etc.? Such arguments would be harder to refute, although, looking at the Belgian administration...

    By :
    Overpaid eurocrat
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • Oh dear how did we get to a rant about 'overpaid and over here'? Sort of proves the point I was bemoaning- where's European solidarity if every country is just looking out for itself? Well, some of us can still dream.

    By :
    Mary Ann DeVlieg
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • This article is about the winners of the budget summit.
    I hope that the savings in Administration will turn the citizens of Brussels into winners.

    You wonder why the Brussels natives are preoccupied with Eurocrat tax rates?
    Simple: every day they have to compete with people who, beside a series of tax-free fees (children etc.) get 21% of their (already more than average) salary tax-free AND enjoy ultra-low income tax rates on their basic salary.

    Brussels natives are being pushed out of the city by their own (tax) money.
    55,000 freewheeling and joyriding bureaucrats in a city the size of London or Paris wouldn't have been an issue; in a small city like Brussels, however, they are.

    Without taxpayer's money you would not have a budget, leave alone a salary. Hence the fuzz about the savings in Administration.

    There really is no need for going (or ranting, as you call it) into other topics. Refuting that your tax rate is far below the local one is hard enough.

    Eurocrats are tax money junkies who should detox.

    I hope that next time, in 2020, there will be again someone like Cameron. There is still room for improvement (expat fee, for example).

    By :
    mike
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • @mike
    Dear Mike, can I suggest you to contact Commission's Staff service to get the numbers correct - what are the taxes and what are their rates? Then you could compare it with taxes and rates of Belgian officials. If afterwards you still consider that eurocrats are tax money junkies, so be it.

    As to "competing" with eurocrats, where and how are you competing? The only one example I can imagine, is buying of real estate.

    This is a problem for everybody, that's true. The transport network in Brussels is so bad that living outside the center of the city without a metro station nearby result in many hours spent in traffic jams per week. And there are too few beautiful and green areas, either. So the property in these areas is very expensive.

    And one personal remark before leaving the discussion - I consider my actual salary unadequately low for my experience and responsibilities. With future salary cuts it seems that choosing to work for EU and leaving my country was a very stupid idea...

    By :
    Overpaid eurocrat
    - Posted on :
    17/02/2013
  • The numbers I use come from a book published by an MEP.

    In what way the lives of ordinary Brussels citizens are ruined by Eurocrats? Let me give you a couple of eexamples.

    In first instance real estate, definitely. A flood of 55,000 Eurocrats plus 1,000s of lobbyists have caused a tremendous equilibrium in a city of 1,000,000 inhabitants.

    Although the city of Brussels proposed an adequate site near Anderlecht, the EU insisted their new offices would be located in the South of the city.
    Neighbourhood committees resisted. Alas. Only, I repeat, only because the sheer size of the site –200,000 m2– would generate too much traffic, the city of Brussels did not give in.
    Now, the Eurocrats want 6 buildings of exclusive flats and a kindergarten on the location they have been denied. It is a park, the last one in the commune. It will disappear.

    On top of this, the EU megalomaniacs insist on extending the motorway up to Schuman. Can you imagine how many people will be dislodged? Irony: many a former Schuman resident has been dislodged because of the EU Institutions!

    I hope that further Staff Regulation reforms (plural) and persistent politicians like Cameron will end these tyrannical caprices.

    By :
    mike
    - Posted on :
    18/02/2013
  • @Overpaid eurocrat

    "I consider my actual salary unadequately low for my experience and responsibilities."

    Please, spare us from Eurocrat pretension.

    In Spain, PhD's in Maritime Biology now work in supermarkets because the university ran out of funds -this happened even before the Eurocrats tried to cut EU budget's Research section in order to preserve their own featherbeaded lifestyle.

    By :
    mike
    - Posted on :
    18/02/2013
  • It it right that British taxpayers money is used for a European budget in the first place, And with what benefit to British taxpayers.
    And it also disgusts me their countries like Spain Greece Poland treat it like a benefit system!?

    By :
    R.McGrail
    - Posted on :
    20/02/2013
  • Yawn. same old dull question. heres something the Guardian has posted twice, for starters.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/12/europe-nobel-peace-prize-10-things

    And to add a bit: benefit system? Why do you think the other EU countries' leaders (Uk included) wet their knickers to bump up those banks? To get as much interest back on their own investors' loans, of course. Some people might use the words usury scalpers rather than benefit cheats...

    But let's not decend into trollism...

    By :
    Mary Ann DeVlieg
    - Posted on :
    20/02/2013
  • Here's a preliminary assessment of the potential Cohesion policy allocations to Member States: http://www.eprc.strath.ac.uk/eprc/news.php?id=465

    By :
    EPRC Strathclyde University
    - Posted on :
    26/02/2013
  • Thanks for "http://hipowerwebseo.com/cms.php?page=internet-marketing"> sharing this with us.

    By :
    hipower
    - Posted on :
    09/03/2013
  • Thanks for sharing this with us.

    By :
    hipower
    - Posted on :
    09/03/2013
  • Thanks for sharing this "http://hipowerwebseo.com/cms.php?page=internet-marketing"> ideas with us.

    By :
    hipower
    - Posted on :
    09/03/2013
German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the February summit: All smiles? (Photo: Council of the European Union)
Background: 

After 26 hours of talks, EU leaders struck a deal last week (8 February) on the 7-year budget, but set themselves on a collision course with Parliament, which is preparing to fight off the decision to cut spending.

The EU budget for 2014-2020 is smaller than its predecessor. It goes down to 1% from 1.12% of EU gross national income. It is the first net reduction to the EU budget in history.

>>Read: EU leaders agree budget cuts, MEPs brace for strife and The EU’s 2014-2020 budget in figures

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Communication Partners

Sponsors

Videos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising