EU climate ambitions clouded by calendar issues


EXCLUSIVE / EU heads of states preparing for a summit opening in Brussels tomorrow (20 March) are divided about when to adopt a new climate change target, as the European Commission’s preferred 40% greenhouse gas reductions goal hoves into the distance.

Draft summit conclusions, seen by EurActiv, highlight the scale of the divisions, with two dates offered for signing off on an agreed European position on the proposed greenhouse gas reduction goal.  

A common position to be submitted to the December 2015 UN climate summit in Paris should be ready “by the first quarter of 2015,” one passage reads. The next page flags a decision on a 2030 package to reduce greenhouse gas output “before the end of the year”.

This raises the prospect of the EU relinquishing its global leadership role in the UNFCCC process as “a solid agreement has to be built a long time before,” according to French negotiators.

The EU leaders' discussion on climate and energy targets is shelved behind the two main topics - growth, competitiveness and jobs, and industrial competitiveness.

The first sentence of the climate and energy conclusions begins with the stated objective that policy must “ensure affordable energy prices, industrial competitiveness, security of supply and achievement of our climate and environmental objectives,” in a display of how far global warming has fallen down the EU’s political agenda.

Poland, with some support from eastern European countries appears to have won a push for no decision to be taken on 2030 climate and energy targets until 2015, despite nominal opposition from powerful bloc players such as the UK, France and Germany.

The Commission issued a proposal last January for a 40% emissions reductions scenario with 27% of the EU’s total energy mix coming from renewables, although member states could choose their own clean energy ratio.

France had expected to convince emerging countries and the US to make a strong commitment to a global deal by adopting a strong European position at this week's EU summit meeting.

That now seems unlikely to happen. The two timeframes underlined in the draft conclusions reveal the gap between countries on the climate issue. Other energy topics quoted in the draft conclusions do not show great ambition either.

The document repeats an EU commitment from 2002 for member states to achieve interconnection of at least 10% of installed electricity production capacity in a “speedy” fashion. The target should have been reached in 2005.

External links: 


Mike Parr's picture

Readers may wish to do a "compare & contrast" in terms of the current EU "non-ambition" and the article on this web site:

You will then start to realise the paucity of ambition by MS as well as their (understatement) "lack of awareness" in terms of the climate change "problems" that face not just the EU but the world.

Barry Davies's picture

You have to hope that the eussr political pygmies, the failed politicians who make up the commission of the corruption ridden democratically deficient eussr, see that their stupidity in the way they have dealt with the Ukraine has left the region with a massive headache in the power supply arena, which the "Green" taxation will only enhance.

This means accepting the idea of man made climate change is a fallacy that they have been duped into acting on, hard for even a strong politician to admit a mistake, which doesn't bode well given the dregs currently running things. Cutting emissions is a good thing, no one would argue with that, but taxing the life out of everybody in a make believe manner is not in anyones benefit.