EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Europe 2020 plan ‘too long-termist', critics say

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 04 March 2010, updated 06 April 2010

A Brussels gathering of EU politicians and policy experts yesterday (3 March) argued that the long-term ambitions of the European Commission's 'Europe 2020' strategy for economic renewal will prove ineffective if they are not rooted in the 'now', with concrete proposals for immediate action to solve Europe's economic crisis.

The conference, hosted by pro-integration lobby European Movement International, took place as Commission President José Manuel Barroso launched his strategy, which the Portuguese has made the cornerstone of his second term at the EU executive's helm.

Participants, however, cautioned that a long-term strategy working towards a bright new tomorrow would hold no value if it failed to address the many problems facing Europe's economy and citizens today.

Maria Joao Rodrigues, a key force behind Europe 2020's predecessor, the Lisbon Strategy, argued that the latter did not succeed because there was a lack of suitable political instruments, a lack of financial means, and – most importantly – a lack of political will from EU member states to achieve its goals.

For the new plan to succeed where Lisbon failed, the one thing it must have above other things is credibility, she argued, particularly at a time of mass unemployment and economic uncertainty.

Other experts felt this credibility would prove unachievable, because new strategy outlines a series of lofty ambitions but fails to address the social, economic, financial and jobs crises currently crippling European growth.

John Monks, secretary-general of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), declared himself an 'EU 2020 sceptic' and argued that the new strategy risked being "Lisbon as usual" – a repeat of its poorly-performing predecessor.

He feared that the long-termism of this new vision ignores the need for concrete, speedy solutions to the current problems facing Europe. "I think it's a rush to judgement by a new Commission that feels naked without a 10-year strategy," he argued.

Philippe De Buck, director-general of BusinessEurope, the EU employers' lobby, called for the Commission to be held accountable for the success or failure of the new strategy. Governance was the key to making it work, he said, adding that the Commission should not be focusing beyond the terms of its own five-year mandate, which ends in 2014.

Instead of waiting until 2020, he called for a rigorous mid-term assessment in 2014 which would judge whether the current Commission had done enough.

“The Lisbon Strategy failed because the first five-year Commission mandate during that 10-year period did nothing," he claimed.

Pat Cox, president of European Movement International, argued that the EU needs to "raise its game" by adopting bold measures to address both current and long-term problems. If this does not happen, Europe faces a "zombie decade" of economic stagnation similar to that of Japan in the 1990s, he claimed.

Positions: 

Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, President of the Party of European Socialists, suggested that a time had come to establish “a mutual guarantee system” to insure deficit states against the risk of sovereign default, which could be managed by the European Investment Bank. Referring to what he called “the lack of concrete proposals”, he wondered “if the European Commission is living in another world”. 

European Liberal Democrats President Annemie Neyts described the Lisbon Agenda as “a dismal failure” and criticised the ineffectiveness of the “non-compulsory Open Method of Coordination”, adding that any new strategy needs “carrots and sticks”.  

Gunnar Hökmark, Co-Chairman of the European People’s Party Working Group on Economic and Social Policy, said that a time had come to move away from tired declaratory strategies like “best in the world” and recommended instead focusing on the best reforms available. He concluded by sharing his concerns that if it doesn’t get the economy right, “Europe risks losing influence in the World”.

Next steps: 
  •  25-26 March 2010: EU summit to discuss the strategy's overall approach and the Commission's proposed headline objectives.
  • 17-18 June 2010: EU summit to adopt further details of the strategy, including country-specific targets.
  • Autumn 2010: Member states to submit stability and convergence programmes, as well as national reform programmes.
Under fire: Barroso
Background: 

The EU's new strategy for sustainable growth and jobs, called 'Europe 2020', comes in the midst of the worst economic crisis in decades.

The new strategy replaces the Lisbon Agenda, adopted in 2000, which largely failed to turn the EU into "the world's most dynamic knowledge-based economy by 2010".

The new agenda puts innovation and green growth at the heart of its blueprint for competitiveness and proposes tighter monitoring of national reform programmes, one of the greatest weaknesses of the Lisbon Strategy.

During a summit on 11 February, EU leaders broadly endorsed a paper by European Council President Herman Van Rompuy, which called for more rigorous implementation and monitoring procedures for the new strategy (EurActiv 11/02/10).

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Communication Partners

Sponsors

Videos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising