EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

The Greek crisis: An opportunity for Europe?

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 25 July 2011, updated 18 August 2011

Despite outbreaks of nationalism in many corners of the Old Continent, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have no other choice but to push for a political union and a federalist re-modelling of Europe, writes Georgi Gotev, senior editor of EurActiv.

Georgi Gotev is EurActiv's senior editor. He has many years of experience working in journalism and diplomacy.

This commentary was first published by global intelligence company Stratfor.

"The eurozone summit which took place yesterday (21 July) ended up mounting a fresh rescue package for Greece totalling €109 billion until 2014. Lower interest rates and debt buybacks by a special fund will hopefully make the country's debt burden manageable, avoid contagion in the euro zone and ultimately saving the euro and the European Union itself.

Bowing to pressure from Germany, the private sector agreed to voluntarily contribute to the new package to the tune of €37 billion.

Leaders also agreed to extend the powers of the EU's €440 billion rescue fund, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), to stem a tide of further bailouts spreading to countries with the highest debt burdens – Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy and Belgium.

The EFSF will now be able to provide support to countries which are not yet recipients of a bailout. The facility will be able to provide loans as a precautionary measure, intervene on bond markets and even recapitalise banks.

But the summit was not only about fire fighting. Probably the most important news was announced by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who said that by the end of the summer, he would make jointly with German Chancellor Angela Merkel 'proposals on economic government in the euro zone'.

'Our ambition is to seize the Greek crisis to make a quantum leap in eurozone government,' Sarkozy said, calling for 'bold and ambitious' plans to create an embryonic EU finance ministry in the form of a European Monetary Fund.

In the memory of Brussels Eurocrats, France and Germany have never been more alienated from one another than they now are under Sarkozy and Merkel.

Having tried half-measures for too long, adversity has now cornered them into becoming once more 'the engine of Europe'. In spite of nationalistic outbreaks in many corners of the Old Continent, the two leaders have no other choice but to push for a political union and a federalist re-modelling of Europe.

In this perspective, the launch of a Eurobond market appears to an unavoidable step for strengthening the euro zone against any further speculative attacks, but also in order to finance much-needed major European projects, which could be compared to those of the New Deal in the USA of the 1930s.

Without a doubt such projects, which entail unpopular losses of sovereignty, would meet fierce resistance from Eurosceptics. Another problem is that such development would definitely seal a two-speed European Union, with a eurozone core and an alienated periphery.

Upcoming elections in both France and Germany make decision-making in no way easier. But who knows? Being perceived by voters as visionaries is a luxury few leaders have afforded since World War II."

COMMENTS

  • That supranational economic governance is necessary and would greatly benefit all the residents of the EU goes without saying. Yet we can fear that launching into a system of supranational economic governance prematurely would be as short-sighted as was the premature launching the euro. The missing element is a supranational and inclusive government regulated by simple majority. This is to say that the EU really ought to strip the European Council of some of its power, i.e., remove the unanimous vote requirement and replace it with simple majority. At the same time, the EU ought to recreate the EU Parliament by having all MPs elected on a EU-wide basis. In this way, local representation would be through the ministers sent to the Council and EU representation would be through the generally elected Members of Parliament. In short, the EU, structurally, is in desperate need of better feedback from the public.
    By :
    OldStone50
    - Posted on :
    01/08/2011
  • What a load of nonsense by the last commentator. The nations of Europe are 1500 years old. They will not be replaced artificially in a few generations. Artificial multi-ethnic federations (Yugoslavia, the USSR, Belgium) fall away, or, worse, implode violently and bloodily. Even the culturally, linguistically and ethnically homogenous Kalmar Union reverted back to its constituent nations, and nationalism even in old polities (Spain, the United Kingdom) has never been stronger. The only successful multi-ethnic federations (Switzerland, notably) developed organically over centuries, and this in a bottom-up manner arising from the self-interest of the private and political actors involved. Have a Grand Design for the EU and see it collapse as surely as the French Revolution or the lingering death of Belgium. Take a pragmatic to European integration, achieving conrcete wins and solving the everyday difficulties of citizens' lives and see, in time, the EU appreciated. Perhaps, in a few centuries, even loved.
    By :
    M Naughton
    - Posted on :
    03/08/2011

Advertising

Videos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising