EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Obama calls on allies to rally on Afghanistan

Published 02 December 2009
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

US President Barack Obama's national security team heads to Congress on 1 December to address concerns from sceptical lawmakers on expanding the war in Afghanistan by sending another 30,000 troops.

Rising combat deaths and military costs have sapped public support for the eight-year-old war and Obama's troop increase has prompted protests from left-leaning leaders of his Democratic Party ahead of next year's congressional elections. 

In his televised speech on Tuesday, Obama said the goal of raising US troop levels to nearly 100,000 was to step up the battle against the Taliban, secure key centres and train Afghan forces so they can take over, allowing for a US exit. 

Allies were also expected to send more soldiers, with Obama saying "the common security of the world" was at stake. 

Obama's pledge to start bringing US troops home after 18 months, provided conditions on the ground allow it, may help him to contain rebellion among Democrats. 

But the July 2011 drawdown date drew swift condemnation from Republicans who, while critical of Obama's three-month strategy review, were nonetheless behind his final decision to bolster the 68,000 US troops now in the war zone. 

"All Americans want to see our troops leave Afghanistan as soon as possible after successfully completing their mission," said Representative Howard McKeon, the senior Republican on the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee. 

"But we want that redeployment to be based on the events and conditions on the ground - not the Washington political clock." 

Republicans argue that setting withdrawal timelines only emboldens the Taliban and undermines support for US-backed governments in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

Key congressional committees scheduled back-to-back hearings on Wednesday and Thursday to review Obama's revised war strategy, estimated to cost $30 billion this fiscal year. 

As commander-in-chief, Obama has the authority to send the soldiers but Congress must approve the cost. 

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, will appear first before the Senate Armed Services Committee at 9 a.m. ET, followed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee at 1:30 p.m. ET. 

Army General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan who had recommended sending 40,000 more troops, will testify next week. 

Gates will describe "the symbiotic relationship between al Qaeda and the Taliban and the urgent need to reverse their momentum in both Afghanistan and Pakistan," said Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell. 

"He will candidly discuss the mistakes we have made in that region over the last few decades and the imperative that we not repeat them," Morrell said. 

Shorter timeline 

Major US troop movements are likely to begin in January and all 30,000 troops should be in place by the end of August, a far shorter timeline than war planners had expected. 

Other NATO members are expected to commit between 5,000 and 7,000 additional troops, although some of them are already deployed as part of the alliance's 42,000-strong contingent. 

(EurActiv with Reuters.

Positions: 

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he expects allies to provide at least 5,000 troops for Afghanistan and possibly a few thousand more after President Barack Obama announced a big increase in US forces for the country. 

"There are 43 countries on the ground under NATO command and I am confident that other allies and partners will also make a substantial increase in their contributions," Rasmussen said in a statement after Obama's announcement. 

"I expect at least 5,000 more forces from other countries in our alliance and possibly a few thousand more," the NATO secretary-general said in the televised statement, released on Wednesday. 

Britain was the only Euroepan country to pledge more forces in support of the US efforst in Afghanistan. "Britain will continue to play its full part in persuading other countries to offer troops to the Afghanistan campaign," said UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The day before, London confirmed it was sending 500 more troops, taking the UK's total deployment to 10,000.

France has ruled out sending more troops to Afghanistan for now but siad it was considering increasing its presence, possibly to train local security forces, in response to a request from US President Barack Obama, the newspaper Le Monde said on Tuesday. France currently has 3,120 troops in Afghanistan.

senior French diplomat with NATO in Brussels later said France was still working out its precise contribution but could help with paramilitary police or supplies. "We are not saying no to Obama," Le Monde quoted a source close to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as saying. It said Obama would ask France for 1,500 more soldiers, although the senior diplomat later dismissed that figure as unrealistic. The diplomat said France was still looking at its options in view of a planned international conference on Afghanistan to be held in London on 28 January. 

Germany said it will wait until the January conference in London before deciding on any troop increases, the BBC reported. Italy has also said it will increase its force, but did not specify by how much.

Key Democrats welcomed Obama's decision to set a date to begin a drawdown but reserved judgment on the troop increase. 

"President Obama asked for time to make his decision on a new policy in Afghanistan. I am going to take some time to think through the proposal he presented," said Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, from Obama's home state of Illinois. 

"The cost of [the Afghanistan surge] is astronomical," said Republican Representative Walter Jones

Representative Dave Obey, who chairs the House committee in charge of approving government spending, said a long-term commitment to the Afghan war could cost $500 billion to $900 billion over the next decade, which could "devour our ability to pay for the actions necessary to rebuild our own economy". Obey, a Democrat, has proposed a war surtax to pay for the conflict. But a tax increase is unlikely, especially with midterm congressional elections next year, Reuters writes.

Next steps: 
  • 28 Jan. 2010: International conference on Afghanistan in London.
Background: 

Since US President Barack Obama took office, the European Union has decided to engage more in Afghanistan, especially in the field of nation-building (EurActiv 23/02/09). 

The EU launched EUPOL Afghanistan in June 2007. For the Afghan presidential election, the EU largely funded efforts estimated to cost over $200 million. 

More than 40 countries have sent troops to Afghanistan under NATO's banner, with the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Poland providing the most European soldiers. 

Last September, European defence ministers expressed reluctance to send more troops to the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan, anticipating their response to a possible US call for reinforcements (EurActiv 29/09/09). 

More in this section

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising