Organic farmers have raised the alarm over the potential “severe” economic and environmental consequences of new plant breeding techniques for Europe’s farming sector, calling for GMO legislation to apply when approving new seed traits.
In a policy paper due to be published later today (14 January), the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements EU (IFOAM EU) urges the European Commission to classify NPBTs as falling “within the scope of the GMO legislation”.
These new techniques should “be subject to a risk assessment”, and “mandatory traceability and labelling requirements that apply to other GMOs”, according to the policy paper, seen by EurActiv.
The EU executive is expected to rule in the coming monthgs whether they fall withing the scope of GMO legislation or not.
New plant breeding techniques focus on developing new seed traits within a given species through genetic engineering. Backers of the technology say they should not be considered as GMOs because no foreign DNA is present in the resulting plants, which might have developed naturally.
“Unpredictable” side effects
But according to the organic movement, NPBTs use technology that interferes at the sub-cellular and genomic level.
“Therefore, IFOAM EU considers that they are not compatible with the principles of organic farming and must not be used in it.”
The paper continues, saying that GM techniques can lead to “unpredictable side effects”.
“Living genetically modified organisms cannot be recalled once a problem is identified, and their release can lead to negative and irreversible environmental impacts”, organic farmers contend, adding that their use in agriculture could lead to genetic contamination of the gene pool and indirectly to reduced agro-biodiversity.
For IFOAM, organic seed companies and breeders will be most severely affected if these techniques are authorized for release without traceability requirements.
“This would hamper innovation in the organic plant breeding sector.”
Labelling and traceability
Since GMOs and products produced from or by GMOs shall not be used in organic production, “traceability and labelling is indispensable to avoid unintentional use of cultivars derived from NPBTs listed above by the organic sector”.
Organic farmers call for “transparency” as well as a “legally binding obligation” for breeding companies to disclose the applied breeding methods.
“Otherwise, seed producers and farmers cannot make an informed choice and this might cause unwanted contamination of organic seeds and fields,” the paper concludes.
New breeding techniques (NBTs) focus on developing new seed traits within a given species through genetic engineering.
They are seen as a promising new field for the agri-food sector and "are even necessary to meet the challenges of global changes such as population growth and climate change", according to a report by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC), the EU executive's in-house scientific body meant to inform policymaking.
Backers of the technology say NBTs should not be considered as GMOs because no foreign DNA is present in the resulting plants, which might have developped naturally. To opponents, they are just another attempt at selling GMOs to Europeans through the back door.
- By the end of March 2016: Commission to launch its legal analysis on new breeding techniques
- Press release : The organic sector urges the Commission to classify new genetic engineering techniques as GMOs (14th January 2016)
Official Journal of the European Union
- Regulation on genetically modified food and feed
- Regulation on traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms