EurActiv.com

EU news and policy debates across languages

04/12/2016

East Europeans wary of Russia diplomatic thaw after Paris attacks

Europe's East

East Europeans wary of Russia diplomatic thaw after Paris attacks

Russia's 2014 invasion of Crimea continues to instill fear in its former Soviet satellites.

[ Democracy Chronicles]

With signs growing of a thaw between Moscow and Western capitals after the Paris attacks, some of Russia’s neighbours fear that European resolve to keep up economic sanctions and military pressure over the Ukraine crisis may be waning.

Alarmed by Russia’s seizure of Crimea last year and support for pro-Kremlin rebels in eastern Ukraine, the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania along with Poland are some of Europe’s most hawkish countries on relations with Moscow.

They are wary of Russian backsliding on implementing a Ukrainian ceasefire deal agreed in February, and that the thorny issue may have become secondary for some European powers more eager to unify against Islamic State after last Friday’s carnage (13 November) in France.

“There cannot be bargaining over compliance of the (ceasefire) conditions,” Estonian Prime Minister Taavi Roivas said, insisting the deal must be fulfilled to the last letter. “Cooperation elsewhere does not mean for Europe concessions in its neighbourhood,” he told parliament on Tuesday (17 November).

But the Paris attacks and last month’s downing of a Russian airliner over Egypt, both claimed by Islamic State, have created a sense that Western capitals and Moscow have a common interest in battling the militants.

>>Read: France and Russia fight as allies in Syria

This has increased pressure for greater cooperation, effectively easing Moscow’s international isolation.

President Vladimir Putin has ordered Russia’s military to coordinate with France over air strikes on Islamic State in Syria and President Francois Hollande is due next week to make the first visit to Moscow by a Western leader in six months.

European Union leaders say the sanctions, which are due for review at the end of January, can be removed only when all signatories to the ceasefire deal, including Russia, comply with its terms fully.

But Konrad Szymanski, Poland’s Deputy Foreign Minister in charge of European Affairs, expressed the region’s suspicions. “There has been – and not since today, I’m afraid – a short-term instinct to seek any good excuse to back down on the appropriate and proportional response to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine,” he told reporters.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=1D4yPDCvFMA

Last Saturday (14 November), the Ukrainian military reported five of its soldiers had been killed in the past 24 hours, its highest death toll since the fragile ceasefire began two months ago.

The guns have been mostly silent since early September, but there has been an increase in violations over the past few weeks, with both sides blaming the other.

Right to Intervene

Worries in the region – where memories of Soviet rule just over two decades ago remain fresh among politicians and voters alike – long predate the Paris attacks.

Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia have ethnic Russian minorities and were unnerved when Putin declared last year that Moscow had the right to intervene with military force if necessary to protect Russian speakers abroad. Frequent Russian air incursions near Baltic airspace have added to jitters.

Leaders of nine central and eastern European and Baltic states declared earlier this month that they were gravely concerned by Russia’s “continuing aggressive posturing” and backed a sustainable NATO military presence in the region.

>>Read: Lithuanian FM: EU should put more pressure on Russia

“The Russian-made crisis in Ukraine cannot disappear from the agenda,” Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius said in an interview with BNS news agency, published on Monday after a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.

Any signal that EU resolve was weakening would not be the first time East European countries have been frustrated at what they see as European powers being sidetracked from standing up to Russian assertiveness.

For years after the attacks on the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, the Baltic states warned that NATO was ignoring its European borders due its focus on Iraq and Afghanistan. There was an “I told you so” attitude after fighting between Russian and Georgian forces in 2008, followed by the 2014 Crimean annexation and conflict in eastern Ukraine.

Since 2014, United States has kept about 150 troops in each Baltic state, in overlapping rotations. Britain, Germany, Portugal deployed similar sized detachments. But Baltic calls for permanent NATO troops have fallen on deaf ears.

“Geopolitically, Russia has a great opportunity to play a geopolitics game and come out of isolation,” said Laurynas Kasciunas, head of Eastern Europe Studies Centre in Vilnius. “A great challenge to European unity is ahead of us.”

Still, Ukraine will not go away as an issue. East Europeans will continue their campaign to remind the rest of Europe that it can be risky to ignore the region.

“The Ukrainian crisis is like a suitcase without a handle – neither Europe nor the United States can walk away from it,” said Volodymyr Fesenko, an analyst at Kiev’s Penta political research centre.