EXCLUSIVE: The Juncker team revealed

  
Commission V 0.5 lead picture

Although president-elect Jean-Claude Juncker is still interviewing candidates for Commissioners, EurActiv has seen a draft organigram prepared by his services and dated 2 September, in which every single commissioner is assigned a portfolio.

The document is clearly not a final version and subject to change.

Juncker is currently wrapping up a series of face-to face interviews with the 27 Commissioners-designate and is expected to announce his line up early next week.

But the document speaks for itself and is full of surprises:

  • the internal market portfolio, currently held by Michel Barnier, has disappeared;
  • the Digital Agenda portfolio, currently held by Neelie Kroes, is replaced by a Vice President position for digital and innovation and a Commissioner for 'internet and culture';
  • there is no commissioner for enlargement;
  • a new post of Vice President for 'better regulation' has appeared;
  • a new post for Vice President for Energy Union has appeared (in addition to the commissioner for energy/climate);
  • a Vice President for Growth, Economic and Monetary Union, European Semester & Social Dialogue has appeared;

There are six Vice Presidents in the proposed Commission:

  • Poland’s Elżbieta Bieńkowska (EPP), with Budget and Financial Control as assignment,
  • Estonia’s Andrus Ansip (ALDE) for Growth, EMU, European Semester and  Social Dialogue,
  • Latvia’s Valdis Dombrovkis (EPP) for Energy Union,
  • Slovenia’s Alenka Bratusek for Digital and Innovation,
  • the Netherlands Frans Timmermans for Better Regulation and as already decided by EU leaders,
  • Italy’s Federica Mogherini (S&D) as High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

In terms of political balance, the liberal ALDE family is not underrepresented as initially thought. To the contrary, it has five portfolios, including two Vice Presidents.

Overall, the new Commission appears quite balanced politically. The centre-right EPP group has twelve portfolios, including two Vice Presidents. The Socialists and Democrats (S&D) have eight portfolios, including two Vice Presidents.

[Update:This link has been updated on 10/09/2014, following Juncker's announcement of the full commission and distribution of portfolios.]

Bad news for UK, France

The new post of Vice President for 'Better Regulation', assigned to the Netherlands, should please UK Prime Minister David Cameron, who has led a campaign for less red tape and regulation in EU policy-making.

It is less likely however that the British Premier will like the portfolio assigned to the UK commissioner Jonathan Hill (ECR), on Energy and Climate Change. Cameron had asked for a super-commissioner, but in fact Hill is likely to be under the umbrella of Valdis Dombrovskis, the Vice President for Energy Union.

The same could be said regarding France’s Pierre Moscovici, who gets the Competition portfolio. Paris has sought the economic affairs portfolio, which according to the draft, will go to Finland’s Jyrki Katainen who already holds this portfolio he inherited from Olli Rehn.

Financial services

There is no post for internal market commissioner on the leaked document.

Michel Barnier’s DG was one of the most powerful, as it had joint responsibility for regulating financial services and the EU's single market.

But there was a growing feeling after the financial crisis that both jobs were too big for one DG. It was rumoured that, following the financial crisis, a new post only dealing with financial regulation would be created – "a financial services tsar".

This role of economic and monetary affairs commissioner appears to be this new position. Indeed, the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee has oversight of financial regulation.

The nominee for this post will be Finland’s Jyrki Katainen, if the document is to be believed. France’s Pierre Moscovici was tipped for the job and the UK lobbied hard for its Commissioner Jonathan Hill to get it.

But the document does not have any details of an internal market commissioner, which could mean the post will be abolished or combined with another portfolio.

There is some confusion in the document about audit, customs and anti-fraud, currently held by commissioner Algirdas Šemeta.

There is a vice-presidency for budget and financial control, a separate customs commissioner and a commissioner for justice and anti-fraud.

Anti-fraud has risen up the executive’s agenda since the financial crisis made it vital member states access the revenue they are due.

Belgium gets punished

But the country that has got the worst deal is Belgium, which is assigned the portfolio for “Skills, Youth and Multilingualism”. The name of the Belgian commissioner is not indicated in the organigram, as the country, which is struggling to form a government, will probably make its choice today (4  September).

The Belgian press reports that Marianne Thyssen, a Flemish centre-right MEP, will get the job, contradicting earlier rumours saying Belguim would nominate outgoing Deputy Prime Minister Didier Reynders as its next Commissioner.

Thyssen's nomination would bring the number of women in the new EU executive to nine, avoiding a political battle in the European Parliament.

>> Read: Lack of women no longer a problem for new Commission

Mixed fortunes for Eastern Europe

Romania, which lobbied to retain the agriculture portfolio currently held by Dacian Cioloş, is likely to obtain Humanitarian Aid for its candidate Corina Creţu (S&D). Surprisingly, the coveted agriculture portfolio is attributed to Ireland’s Phil Hogan.

Bulgaria may consider itself a victim of the late arrival to the race of Poland’s Bieńkowska. Kristalina Georgieva, the current Bulgarian commissioner responsible for humanitarian aid who was a strong candidate to replace Catherine Ashton as EU chief, was poised to become budget commissioner in the Juncker team.

She has been replaced by the Polish candidate, who was seen in her country as a possible Prime Minister when Donald Tusk will leave for Brussels to take his European Council President job. So Georgieva gets the portfolio of Taxation and Fight against Fraud, and misses the Vice President title.

However it appears strange that a Pole would get the budget job in two successive commissions, as the current budget commissioner Janusz Lewandowski is also Polish.

Heavyweights get promoted

Some candidates who have held important positions in their countries have obtained “extras” in the Juncker organigram. Bratušek who still serves as Prime Minister of Slovenia gets a Vice President job, and so is Valdis Dombrovkis, a former Prime Minister of Latvia, and Estonia’s Andrus Ansip, who was the longest-serving head of government in the EU (2005-2014).

No surprise for Germany

Günther Oettinger, the incumbent energy commissioner, will get the trade portfolio in the next EU executive, according to the organigram, as Germany wanted. This means that Oettinger would also become chief negotiator for the controversial Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).

The lucky ones

Croatia’s Neven Mimica (S&D), the current commissioner for consumer protection, will get the coveted job of Regional Policy commissioner. Austria’s Johannes Hahn (EPP) will get the neighbourhood portfolio, which has assumed geostrategic importance in the light of the Ukraine crisis. It is unclear if Hahn will also deal with EU enlargement, as this portfolio has disappeared from the organigram.

The logical choices

Malta’s Karmenu Vella (S&D) will get the fisheries portfolio. Denmark’s Margrethe Vestager (ALDE) will get Environment. Lithuania’s Vytenis Andruikaitis, a physician by training, will be responsible for Health and Food Safety.

Downgrade, disappointment

Slovakia’s current Commission Vice President and commissioner for inter-institutional relations and administration Maroš Šefčovič (S&D) is clearly downgraded to holder of the Development portfolio. Spain, who hoped to get an important portfolio for its candidate Miguel Arias Cañete (EPP), is likely to be disappointed by his attribution according to the organigram: Research and Innovation.

The Czech Republic’s Věra Jourová (ALDE), a Regional Development Minister who was presented as a candidate for the portfolio of regional funds, is in fact assigned Transport ad Space. Space hasn’t appeared so far as a Commission attribution.

And the rest

The remaining attributions are Customs for Hungary’s Tibor Navraczics (EPP), Employment and Social Affairs for Portugal’s Carlos Moedas (EPP) and Internet and Culture for Cyprus’ Christos Stylianides (EPP). Greece’s Dimitris Avramopoulos (EPP) gets Migration, Fundamental Rights and Home Affairs, rather surprisingly, given the fact that his country is frequently criticised for the bad treatment of asylum seekers.

How about clusters?

In theory, groupings of commissioners could be organised ad-hoc, and some degree of subordination could be established under the Vice Presidents and some of the commissioners. But nothing in the organigram indicates possible ‘clusters’ of commissioners.

>> Give us your reactions by using the #NewCommission hashtag or send them by email to editorinchief@euractiv.com

Timeline: 
  • 9 or 10 Sept. (expected): Junker to announce members and portfolios of the next Commission 
  • 1 Nov.: Mogherini to take on the role as the EU's High Representative.
  • 1 Dec.: Tusk to take on the role as Council President.
External links: 
Advertising

Comments

Cajuncy's picture

Oh my loordy...I knew this was just a wee bit of an end to a misery in Finland, him leaving. Now? What? The guy took the bloody economy in Finland from A++ rating to geesh...let's see what the years will result in. Are the guys in Brussels that negligent/ignorant on issues that this may have no effect? The guy ran the country to a freaking point of having to pay itself out of debt for years and years to come...just so he can resign out of office when the polls for the party show a decline? God...if this isn't a perversion of the entire EU thingy, "need a representative from all nations". I have a "good swift kick in the ass"- method for the EU, don't ever take a "former-primeminister", he ain't out to boost but 'is ego. What are the criterias? For the post? A marginal membership to the EU/Politbyro with friends in right places.
Katainen ought to be tried in Finland for bloody treason.....not that he ever will, now the misfit is going for something waaay bigger.

Joe Thorpe's picture

I think he would be a perfect fit for the job, coming from the UK I cant think of a better selection, who would you suggest? There aren't any economies that are flying in the EU it isn't just Finland that are feeling a bit of a pinch right now

Eurochild's picture

This organigram is a bit unbelievable, considering some of the posts overlap with each other. What is the point of having a Commissioner for Digital and a Commissioner for Internet? (What exactly would a Commissioner for Internet do and why is that bundled up with Culture?).

There is a Commissioner for Anti-Fraud and another Commissioner for Fight Against Fraud?

Really, the EU is going to have a Commissioner for Customs? And what would that post entail, exactly?

Would Poland really secure a Vice Presidency of the Commission, after just having been given the presidency of the Council?

A Commissioner for Energy and another Commissioner for Energy Union?

One Commissioner for Growth AND Economic and Monetary Union AND European Semester AND Social Dialogue?

Better Regulation?

Even the titles of the alleged posts, as offered to us by Euractiv, sound completely different from everything else that's known about how the new Commission will be arranged.

Iwantout's picture

As we know, EU maths works differently from everyone else’s.

“In terms of political balance, the liberal ALDE family is not underrepresented as initially thought.” Absolutely correct, despite dropping from 11.4% of MEPs to 8.9%, they have 5 commissioners rather than the 7 they had previously. So they go from 25% of all commissioners to 17.8%. Massively over represented is a more accurate assessment.

“Overall, the new Commission appears quite balanced politically”, absolutely if you are a federalist from the big two parties, the EPP and the S&D with 54.8% of MEPs between them, magically have 78.5% of the commissioners.

Meanwhile the ECR with an increase in the number of MEPs from 54 to 70 (7.3% to 9.3% of all MEPs) have finally been given a single commissioner, ie 3.5% of the total.

Is this listening to the message the electorate sent on polling day or is it better described as a stitch up ?

Eurochild's picture

The governments of the EU member-states appoint the Commissioners, not "Brussels". The appointments are therefore more of a reflection of the results of national parliamentary elections, not the elections to the European parliament.

Aren't you anti-EU whingers the ones who always bang on about national governments having a bigger say?

Iwantout's picture

Sorry I thought the commissioners were nominated by the nations, then considered by the Commission President (who decides what portfolio to grant them) and finally put before the EP for approval and subsequent appointment. As such the nations do not appoint the commissioners at all, the Parliament does. Apart from the fact that the EP illegally nominated the President themselves this is the process that was followed for Mr Juncker and we were told was the democratic way as it reflected the electoral results.

Given this I am sure you will join me in urging the EP to reject the proposed commissioners outright and demand that the make up more accurately reflects the will of the electorate as demonstrated in the recent polls. This was the underlying thrust of my musings.

Aren’t you pro EU fanatics the ones who always bang on about how the EU is working for the people and saying how you want to get closer and listen to what we are saying? Of course now a clear majority of people no longer bother speaking and have totally disengaged from the entire process because the way we vote is irrelevant, the juggernaut grinds on regardless in a single direction.

The UK was the only country to take the up swell of public demand for reform seriously and nominate a commissioner accordingly, amazingly the immediate response of the head of the EP was to publicly state that he may be rejected for his views. (http://www.euractiv.com/sections/eu-elections-2014/schulz-says-parliamen... )How many other prospective commissioners faced that sort of attack ? Certainly none of the pro federalists.

Southron's picture

You describe the process correctly. However, Eurochild did not describe it incorrectly, just sparcely.
Also, the EP did not "illegaly" nominate anyone - this is a fiction at best.

But going on to the original article.
- The EC process needs to be fixed. It makes no sense that Juncker isn't allowed to choose the team that he will lead for the next years, I would understand if there were some legal formalities regarding balance of countries and populations, but this method needs to change. Also, being forced to have one comissioner per country.. its just creating a bit of clutter, in my opinion

Lululajoie's picture

Let's wait and see ! very strange organigram.
No reference to internal market, enterprise and industry for instance...
Marianne Thyssen shoud be given a more visible portefolio ! Reynders may be laughing !!

Lululajoie's picture

Let's wait and see ! very strange organigram.
No reference to internal market, enterprise and industry for instance...
Marianne Thyssen shoud be given a more visible portefolio ! Reynders may be laughing !!

Andreja's picture

SLOVENIA IS AGAINST ALENKA BRATUŠEK AS A CANDIDATE FOR THE COMMISSIONER! Alenka Bratušek is an outgoing Slovenian Prime Minister, who was ‘’very successful’’ in dismantling the economic and development potential of Slovenia in just one year. She as a Prime Minister has indebted Slovenia by € 12 billion in just one year!! Gross public debt per capita amounts to 14.000 € nowadays!! The unemployment is on a rise which pushes especially young highly educated people to search for job abroad. The economic growth is deteriorating and international competitiveness of Slovenia experienced a huge slump from the last year. In WEF (World Economic Forum) report (out today) competitiveness ranking (2014) Slovenia is on 70th position (out of 144 countries), which represents a fall by 8 positions in comparison to 2013. In short, economic, employment and well-being situation is Slovenia has deteriorated tremendously during the period of Alenka Bratušek as a Prime Minister of Slovenia.

And as a person Alenka Bratušek has no manners and no moral in climbing up the career and political ladder. Her English language is far from the proficiency level that is demanded for such a high post as a Commissioner’s. Her education is also not appropriate for any of posts she is interested in as a potential Commissioner (i.e. budget, regional, transport), namely her BA was in textile and her MSc in social science. Even more her Master thesis was prepared as a ‘’copy-paste’’, with no required citations; it was marked as ‘’ negligence’’. She represents a very bad role model for young people, especially young women how to succeed in a career: ruthlessness and backstabbing the opponents, using femininity instead of knowledge, arrogance and shamelessness (Alenka Bratušek put herself on a list of three candidates for Commissioner coming from Slovenia) instead of grace and respect.

In Slovenia there is a strong opposition to Alenka Bratušek as a candidate for the Commissioner coming from Slovenia. The petition against her you can find here (is in Slovenian language): http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/ustavimo-imenovanje-alenke-bratusek-z...

All honest, just, fair, hard working people of Slovenia don’t want ALENKA BRATUŠEK to be nominated as a Commissioner coming from Slovenia. STOP THAT WOMAN FOR THE GOOD OF THE WHOLE EU!

Pages

Content Partners