German President cautions Swiss on direct democracy

Bundeshaus (Swiss parliament building) in Bern, Switzerland. November 2013 [Petra B. Fritz/Flickr]
Bundeshaus (Swiss parliament building) in Bern, Switzerland. November 2013 [Petra B. Fritz/Flickr]

In the wake of a successful referendum against "mass immigration" in Switzerland, German President Joachim Gauck crossed swords with his Swiss counterpart, Didier Burkhalter. EurActiv Germany reports.

The EU and Switzerland are standing before "big diplomatic challenges", said German President Joachim Gauck during a state visit. The Swiss referendum on immigration has provoked significant irritation in Germany, Gauck explained on the first day of his trip.

Meanwhile, he said he could not imagine that the country actually wants to distance itself from Europe. "Switzerland carries so much of Europe in itself", Gauck explained in the presence of his Swiss colleague, Didier Burkhalter.

Burkhalter replied, with a reference to Brussels' decision to suspend talks on education and research.  "We do not completely understand why the EU has already stopped negotiations in various dossiers", he said.

On 9 February, a Swiss referendum ended up voting in favour of an initiative "against mass immigration", intending to reintroduce immigration quotas for EU citizens.

Read>>: EU-Swiss relations in turmoil after immigration vote

But this would take effect in three year,s at least, Burkhalter reminded his guest, after the referendum's decision is implemented. For this reason, he called for "a dose of understanding and pragmatism on the part of the European member states".

But in Brussels and Berlin, the vote has been received just as many meant it: a signal of separation. Gauck, for whom freedom – including freedom of movement – plays a central role, opposed Burkhalter's remark.

"In times of globalisation, we should not build walls, but rather exploit opportunities for openness and diversity", said the German president. He not only interprets free movement of persons as a "centrepiece of the common internal market", he said, but also as a central factor for the entire European integration project.

"Dangers" of direct democracy

With its long democratic tradition, Gauck said he could imagine Switzerland as an EU member state. Europe could learn a lot from the Swiss, regarding treatment of minorities, for example.

Doubtless, the German president did not mean introducing direct democracy in the EU with this statement.

A devoted supporter of representative democracy, Gauck warned the Swiss of the dangers of direct democracy "when the citizens vote on highly complex topics"; a statement that could create many red faces within the Swiss People's Party (SVP).

In contrast to Gauck, many SVP supporters consider the will of the people infallible and sacrosanct, even ranking higher than international law.

But even as a member of the FDP, Burkhalter could not agree, and sharply countered his guest from Germany. "Europe could definitely stand more of Switzerland", he retorted.
"Referendums should be respected by the authorities, the Swiss president said," advising regulators to assume more humility; decisions unilaterally settled by the authorities are not automatically right, he warned. Here, Burkhalter's words were in clear reference to various cases in which European Commission has been seen as over-regulating.

Following the results of the Swiss vote, Gauck moved the long-awaited official visit from 2 to 3 April. It was a gesture meant to fortify friendly relations between Switzerland and Germany. On Wednesday (2 April), he was scheduled to visit the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva.



Gerry's picture

Direct democracy would not work Europe because it's population is just too diverse. One country would vote this way, another country would vote that way, and everybody would feel the results to be wrong. Switzerland might get away with it but there is always the risk of narrow minded, shortsighted and bigoted results. Just like regular governments, really. For this to work in Europe it's population needs to become much more homogenous, and that means migration and more migration.

an european's picture

There are people like politicians not knowing what the consequences after voting are ! Not everyone is an experts in policies and therefore have to be informed in a direct democracy !
An example : Recently Swiss made a simply Ys or No immigrant ignoring to mention that it's linked to the EFTA agreements !
No one want to signs a paper after not knowing the outcoming results..unfortunately this happened.

@ Gerry
The United States is just too diverse too !
Half of the 50 Union states vote for Obama but Romney had could win too!
We have now two candidates of the european parlament for the commissioner of the European Union !
If the 500 MIO people would have the choice to elect indirectly comissioner or president then at the end results would be the same : the one or the other !
I would ban all the treaties of the eu- comissioner as well the sx month roundtable of "eu" virtual presidency and then implement an european presidential eligibility legislation act !
And thus for more democracy.