Cameron attacked over Juncker 'humilation'

  
Prime Minister David Cameron defends his failure to prevent Juncker's nomination. Andrew Lansley, tipped to be the UK's next commissioner, sits on his left. [House of Commons]

British Prime Minister David Cameron yesterday (30 June) defended in Parliament his failure to prevent Jean-Claude Juncker’s nomination by EU leaders as European Commission President.

Labour leader Ed Miliband branded his efforts to block Juncker an “utter humiliation” that risked pushing Britain towards exiting the EU. The criticism comes after similar speculation in the British press over the weekend.

>> Read: British press speculates about EU exit after Juncker blow

Cameron told an uproarious House of Commons that he was unable to prevent Juncker’s appointment at an EU summit last week. He blamed the opposition Labour Party for signing away a veto in the Nice Treaty and for backing the Lisbon Treaty when it was in government.

The British Prime Minister said he wanted the UK to reform the EU and remain in it. He added that Britain would be “the voice” of all those “crying out for change” in the recent European elections, which saw gains for Eurosceptic parties.

“We will fight with all we have to reform the EU,” he said.

But Miliband said, “The truth is the prime minister returned to Britain having failed, not some small failure, but an appalling failure. His combination of threats, insults and disengagement turned out how to be a masterclass in how to alienate your allies.

“The problem for the anti-Juncker cause was it had a toxic supporter; him. The rest of Europe lost patience with his act […] the strategy of threatening exit from the EU was put to the test and failed.”

Cameron had said that Juncker’s appointment could lead to Britain’s EU exit after a referendum penciled in for 2017.

The prime minister said that he forced the vote by EU leaders on Juncker, which he lost by 26 votes to two, because he wanted Britain’s opposition to him “firmly on the record.” Only Hungary stood with the UK in the vote.

“It doesn’t matter how many countries were ranged against me, I thought he was the wrong candidate,” Cameron said.

“I firmly believe it should be for the EU Council to propose the President of the European Commission […] it should not be for the European Parliament to try and dictate that choice – this was a point of principle on which I was not prepared to budge.”

“This was a bad day for Europe because the position of the Council risks undermining national governments,” he added.

Working with the wrong person

Cameron was drowned out by catcalls from MPs when he said he would work with Juncker, who he said was the wrong person to head the EU executive. He has already telephoned the former Luxembourg PM to congratulate him.

Cameron, who said he disagreed with the Spitzenkandidaten process and that the idea there "was this great big mandate" for Juncker was false, pointed out that EU leaders had offered some concessions in the conclusions to the Council.

Their final statement said London's concerns about the future direction of the EU will need to be addressed and that the principle of an ever closer union in the treaties allowed for different paths of integration for different countries. They also agreed to review the process for appointing the president of the European Commission once the new executive was in place.

"While the EU has taken a big step backwards in the nomination of the Commission president, we did secure some small steps forward,” Cameron said.

Former Liberal Democrat leaders Menzies Campbell and Charles Kennedy attended the hearing but appeared to be the only Lib Dems present. When asked about the absence of his coalition partners, including pro-European Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, Cameron said it was up to the Lib Dems to explain it.

He also rejected Kennedy’s argument that he could have better influenced the appointment process if the Conservatives had remained within the European People’s Party, instead of forming its own parliamentary group, the European Conservatives and Reformists, in 2009.

Juncker must be approved by the European Parliament before becoming Commission president.

BBC's recording of the debate in the UK Parliament's house of commons.

Timeline: 
  • May 2015: UK General Elections
  • 2017: Mooted UK referendum on EU membership
External links: 
Advertising

Comments

ge041075's picture

Sad. Why so much violence, false narrative and humiliation around the Brexit debate?

Mike Parr's picture

I think you need to add "emptiness".

“We will fight with all we have to reform the EU,” he said.

Moron-con & the rest talk about "reform" but only ever that word - not specifics - & the problem when they get down to specifics is that Moron-con would find that much of the "reform" the dolt wants would affect the single market - & who pushed the single market - his heroine Thatcher-cow.

Joe Thorpe's picture

Did the Author watch the debate in the Houses of Parliament? He (Cameron) was read a diatribe that had been written before the vote in Brussels had even taken place & bore no resemblance of the mood of the country. Milliband had his elves read his whip imposed questions out one by one as though he was in favour of Junker yet he & his party were violently as opposed to Junker as the Conservatives & LibDems. They were as two faced as many of those who voted for Junker.

Simlabim's picture

What is Nigel Farage actually saying about the fact that it is in first line the British establishment that wants an EU Commission President with the"charisma of a damp rag and the appearance of a low-grade bank clerk" who is not known and not voted by the people?

Remember his speech from 2010: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bypLwI5AQvY

ge041075's picture

Really good point. Sceptics don't like Juncker because he was electected by the EP although they blamed the Council president because he was not democratically elected. What a nonsense.

Gerry's picture

It's so much fun commenting on these articles 'cause they're such an easy target. No need to think too much like all those other difficult subjects. But seriously , it's just full on damage control for Cameron right now. Personally I still think that had he gone along with Juncker's nomination, and then tried to renegotiate and reform, his humiliation would have been much, much greater, because;, he would not have gotten his reforms; he would have created a great deal of hostility with the push for them; he would have been blamed for accepting Juncker and then not enough results; the UK would have stormed to the exit in principle out of hurt pride, no excuses.
But look, you stick your head out and you get smacked around. Cameron certainly is. When in politics you need to have a thick, thick skin. The reforms will still happen anyway, just not by Cameron's initiative.

A Londoner's picture

British political attitudes towards the EU are bizarre! The Conservatives cheer a clear failure of British diplomacy, the Liberal Democrats are federalist in Brussels and inter-governmental in Westminster, the Labour Party avoids mentioning Europe during the whole EP election! And of course Mr Farage promises all the things we like about European co-operation but none of the nasty things.

Bizarre!

Alberto_Rodrigues.'s picture

I am Alberto Rodrigues an economical and digital science researcher Different companies use more than 10% of their incomes in advertising Europe Union use just 1% of PIB for propaganda and this is done using funds Because of this EU use to spread useles funds in different areas which do not bring incomes and create enough jobs but it help in propaganda issues Europe Union must stop this and invest all the 1% in the economic engine The situation is similar with a train which must run in competition with some others but instead to put all the fuel gas in the engines they spread useles it in different parts of the train just to provoke a smell for propaganda isues and because of this the train run slowly just 10 km and then it stop in middle of the road

During this time Eu competitors as they use to put all the fuel gas in the economic engine they arrive fast in the destination and they leave EU so much behind EU must stop all those mistakes must stop all those useless money spending and finance with priority just project which can bring profit in very short time without consuming resourses and making pollution and in the same time can offer possibilities for employes to work from home and like this they can take care with their child give them good education

Apart of this it reduce pollution and help in a better demografic distribuition of the population because like this a big parte of people who are leaving in so crowed cities can move back to the countrysite Because of the strategy importance of those projects all the 1 % funds must be canalised just for those kinds of projects Apart of all those advantages money must be invested with priority in know how transfer which can be combined with tourists products because like this money invested monday will create jobs in tourism ,transport ,agriculture , construction ,real estate, commerce ,service ,artesanat ,food industries ,entertainment ,ecological industries ,advertising ,new media ,digital economy and dozens of some other domains linked with them

an european's picture

Camoron says :
"...added that Britain would be “the voice” of all those “crying out for change” in the recent European elections, which saw gains for Eurosceptic parties.

...We will fight with all we have to reform the EU,”

Senseless words of "reform" speeches but nothing behind!

The labour Party is correct attacking that moron behavior of Con !

today i love the Brexit more than ever !

Content Partners