EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU, Indignados lost in communication

Published 20 October 2011 - Updated 21 October 2011
Comments5
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

Members of the Indignados and a senior EU official held a rare debate yesterday (19 October) in Brussels which highlighted the chasm between the European elite and the international protest movement.

While the four Indignados and Koos Richelle, director-general of the European Commission's DG for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion,  found some common ground on the scale of the social challenge facing Europe, there was little agreement on either the economic solutions to the crisis or the means of changing policy.

Rejection of formal democratic institutions

The two sides disagreed over the representativeness of public institutions.

"Our first message from the movement is that the politicians don't represent us," said Olivier Bourgeois, a member of the Indignados' International Commission, which considers itself an administrative and not a leadership body. 

The Indignados members rejected as inadequate existing means of democratic representation. One said he had made a point of never voting in his life because no parties adequately represented him. Another rejected the planned European Citizens' Initiative because it is to be non-binding.

Bourgeois said that though "we have received a lot of invitations from parliamentarians" while in Brussels, they refused because talks had to be open to participation by all members of the public. Having merely a delegation of Indignados, they said, could not adequately represent the movement.

"We always say we are not going to the [European] Parliament because we have a methodology which comes from 'the squares'. We have to be in the squares, open to the people … and we say to these politicians please come to our assemblies if you want to know us," said Bourgeois.

The Indignados favoured instead direct democracy through what they called the 'agora', a public square open to all. 

Director-General Richelle urged the Indignados to push for change through existing institutions, saying "If you want to change the system you have to liaise with the system."

"The signal cannot only come through electronic means and indirect means. At a certain stage apart from indignation you need a strategy, or a plan or a definition of what to do," he added.

When asked by EurActiv why a civil servant, not a politician, had been sent to debate, the office of social affairs Commissioner László Andor said they had received no formal request to do so from the Indignados. The office added that the commissioner would be open to meeting with them if asked.

Economic demands: regulated banks and wealth redistribution

The concrete economic demands of the Indignados largely focused on the EU's management of the euro zone crisis, the role of banks, and broader questions of equity in Europe.

These included calls for greater regulation of banks (notably a ban on derivatives trading), the separation of investment and retail banking, a redistribution of wealth towards the poorer in society, debt relief for peripheral euro zone economies, and the trying of politicians and bankers responsible for the financial crisis.

The Indignados cited Iceland as a model, where former Prime Minister Geir Haarde has been indicted and will stand trial for alleged negligence and misconduct. They also praised the Nordic country's proposed new constitution, which was partly drafted through citizens' suggestions via Facebook and Twitter.

Speaking about their own divisions, one Indignado, decribing himself as a European federalist, said there were also many eurosceptics in the movement.

"A lot of people in the Indignado movement come from a background where criticism of the EU is done on an anti-capitalist basis and the conclusion of this is the EU as instrument is unfit," he said.

Target audience: people not politicians

The Indignados present were modest as to their immediate ability to influence politics. One, Héctor Huerga, conceded they would have little effect on European institutions.  "Our work is base work. It is work with the people. We know we are not going to change the European Commission. This is not our objective," he said.

Instead, they hope to affect public opinion and create a new mode of democratic participation, which they argue is made possible through the internet and social media.

"In order to create an informed society people have to talk to one another, to read a lot, to write a lot, and not to create a society that is isolated by institutions and by all these machines of this system," Huerga said.

COMMENTS

  • Very interesting and quite understandable - one of the first articles I have read on this website that seems reasonable and balanced. I agree about making the bankers pay but re-distribution of wealth? Don't make me laugh! We've had enough of that from 1917 onwards and that system was a total failure - people need aspirations and "re-distribution" i.e. communism stamps on the individual (except the apparatchik and nomenklatura or, as we call them today, The European parliament and EU Commission).
    We need a brand new system and to get there, we need to totally exorcise the current situation either by means of economic warfare (partly being waged by Germany, unwittingly) or militarily. My son's generation believes in an economic purging whereas my generation only has experience of warfare. I don't mind, whichever works!

    By :
    Don
    - Posted on :
    20/10/2011
  • I find it a bit curious that a group of Indignados were willing to meet with an unelected Commission official, but not with elected MEPs. In a democracy, anyone who really believes that "the politicians don't represent us" should consider standing for election. Then they would find out how many of their fellow citizens actually agree with them!

    By :
    Ben
    - Posted on :
    20/10/2011
  • There were journalists and cameras from Euractiv in the demonstration on 15-O, and you saw the 15.000 people marching in Brussels (and in other 950 cities in 80 countries), why are you not informing about it?

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    21/10/2011
  • There were journalists and cameras from Euractiv in the demonstration on 15-O, and you saw the 15.000 people marching in Brussels (and in other 950 cities in 80 countries), why are you not informing about it?

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    21/10/2011
  • Interesting messages from indignados... Just one single question is not clear in my mind: how to create a new mode of democratic participation combining social media and the agora? IN other words, how to create a society which is NOT isolated by institutions and by all these machines?

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    29/10/2011
Director-General Richelle (right) debates the Indignados ©MCFBrussels
Background: 

A campaign born on May 15th with a rally in Madrid's central Puerta del Sol square by a group calling itself the "Indignados" ("Indignant Ones") has had a tremendous international success recently, against the background of a deepening economic crisis and uncertainty.

In the US, a similar movement called 'Occupy Wall Street' began on 17 September 2011 as thousands of protesters descended on lower Manhattan's financial district. Indignados and Occupy protests have since spread to hundreds of cities across the world.

The movement has spread across Europe.  On 15 October, clashes erupted in Rome, where demonstrations turned violent. In Brussels, over 5,000 protestors attempted to march from the Gare du Nord to the European institutions, but were held 500 yards from the European Commission by police.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising