EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Gender equality requires tackling stereotypes

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 March 2013

Gender stereotypes are crude simplifications about the character and behaviour of individuals based on their traditional roles and sexual characteristics. It's time the European Parliament brought more pressure to bear on the other EU institutions with a view to tackling this often veiled but highly damaging phenomenon, writes Kartika Liotard.

Kartika Liotard is a Dutch MEP with the European United Left / Nordic Green Left group.

"When I was still a law student in the Netherlands and had just received my driver's licence but didn't have even a quarter of the cash to buy myself a new car, I purchased a scrap Volkswagen Beetle. Proudly, I started it up one day only to watch it fleetingly sputter, and then die. Clearly not ready to say goodbye to my first car, I gathered my courage and screw drivers and fixed my Beetle all by myself.

I repeat, all by myself. I was so impressed with my newly acquired talent, that I immediately knew I had found myself a new hobby. Once, on a sunny Saturday afternoon, I was down on a creeper under my boyfriend's car, when I heard footsteps approaching.

A male voice yelled at me: "hey man, could you give me a hand?" I rolled back from under the car and said: "First of all: it's 'hey misses' to you and secondly: "sure, when it comes to fixing cars, I'm your woman!"

Girls as pink glittery dolls; young women as sexual objects; working women as men's assistants; older women as useless and dependent… Stereotypes do not give us accurate information about others and can have extremely damaging effects on girls and women throughout their entire life, leading to discrimination and to socio-economic disadvantages in old age.

They suffocate personal expression, and thwart individual and professional development. The evidence indicates that children learn this kind of typecasting at home, at school, and through the media. In this way, they are passed on from one generation to the next.

Children meet gender stereotypes head-on at a very young age in particular via television and the internet, advertising, and education, shaping their awareness of how girls, boys, men and women should behave. Marketing that targets children clearly show the systematic gender messaging of companies such as toy manufacturers. Principally, this entails a representation of girlhood as requiring an attractive appearance, good manners, and passive behaviour.

Such labelling of girls and women, as well as its steady repetition have been shown to be a key factor in restricting young women’s aspirations solely to those lifestyles and jobs considered "female-appropriate".

Despite the EU’s commitment to equality between men and women, there are significant policy deficiencies on gender-related issues. One of these issues is gender stereotyping.

Next week, I will present a report to the European Parliament's plenary session in Strasbourg, emphasising the need for new action in this area.

Ongoing debate about gender equality issues, and especially the gender pay gap and job precariousness, must take this kind of early-life pigeonholing into account. European women still earn 17% less than men for the same jobs with elderly women particularly affected by the pay gap, as it increases the risk of extreme and persistent poverty once women have reached retirement age. On top of facing pay and pension discrimination, women face much higher rates of precariousness in employment, meaning bad conditions and little or no job security for millions.

As my report (adopted in Parliament's Women's Rights and Gender Equality Committee) points out, stereotyping should be seen within the context of the continued under-representation of women in decision-making. Economic and political management is typically dominated by men, with women vastly outnumbered in parliaments, government cabinets, and company boardrooms.

As long as men dominate the top jobs, the sordid, yet persistent, perception of these roles as "naturally male" will continue to haunt us to everybody's loss – men and women. This problem needs to be decisively tackled.

That's why I'm calling on the Commission to promote quotas in politics and business to help alter perceptions, confront discrimination, and challenge stereotypes to bring better-adjusted, more balanced policymaking.

Women have fought long and hard to question and redefine traditional gender roles. We in the European Parliament must play our role to support this struggle. I am calling on the Commission and member states to use the European Social Fund (ESF) to combat gender stereotypes in different professions through positive action, life-long learning and encouragement for girls to undertake studies in fields which are not traditionally seen as ‘feminine’. Combined with this, we need special career guidance courses at all levels of education and programmes that inform young people about the negative consequences of gender stereotypes.

While gender stereotypes are both the underlying basis as well as the symptom of deeply engrained prejudice against women, all of us, no matter what our gender identity might be, are affected by the stereotypes surrounding us. It's high time the EU provided leadership in embracing a genuine conception of equality that can adequately address the destructive weight of stereotypes.

Education initiatives and legislation would go a long way towards helping to identify and dispute stereotypes. When all's said and done, people are just too complex to have crude tags slapped upon them."

COMMENTS

  • And tell me-when you rant about female stereotypes...do you notice how many MALE stereotypes you appear to support?
    You portray (as is usual) men in a superficial fashion, only negatively, and then move on.

    Are you aware that 90 percent of MALE children in the UK not only believe girls are better than boys, but ALSO believe adults think the same thing?

    How many times have YOU written the phrase "men" as a GENERALIZATION to ALL MEN.

    Two wrongs NEVER make a right. And ONLY focusing on ONE gender and excluding the other-or only fighting stereotypoing of ONE gender is, in and of itself, sexist. Sadly, too many like you fail to recognize their OWN sexism and in fact will FIGHT to DEFEND it...."oh, no there is NO such thing as that...well, with men it isn't institutionalized...welll...." You offer NOT ONE example of ANYTHING other than caricatures of men and yet claim you support equality. HAH.

    Grow up. If you aren't fighting it for BOTH women AND men-you ARE a sexist...and a hypocrite. Oh-you give LIP service otherwise-but your portrayal of "men" and "sordid" tells the TRUE story-you are one more person who is a sexist and won't admit it.

    By :
    Tired of ALL Sexists
    - Posted on :
    10/03/2013
  • the following is a letter i wrote to starbucks after realizing, through a seldom-seen all-man staff, that the vast majority of their coffee-shops are sexist to have starbucks represented by all-female staffs

    today, march 3rd, i was driving north from pittsburgh and i got off of the highway to stop at the gas station right off of the wexford exit of i-79. after i got gas, i realized that there was a starbucks coffee shop not 200 feet away from me. i was returning from the pittsburgh rivers casino, where i had taken out $100 and was betting small bets on various slot machines - i had gotten up to $190 early-on...but eventually went down to $0. i hate to admit that i would've taken another $100 from the atm...i am happy that i got a "non-sufficient funds" message when i tried to withdraw from my spending account at bank of america. tlc said "don't go chasing waterfalls," and djt says "don't go chasing losses". though djt always chases losses. it's so much easier than chasing the perfect specimen of manhood who has no interest in being associated with me (though it's much more costly).

    anyway, i must say that i had thought of coffee shops (especially starbucks) as being full of politically-correct (liberal) bs - how surprised i was to see that the three coffee-clerks working at starbucks were all men. i, for one, am getting sick and tired of all of the overcompensations that society gives to the lesser gender in an effort to make them appear as man's equal - overcompensations ranging from lesser military requirements to gender-based sports teams to high-heeled shoes to shoulderpads. wherever i go, i see females wanting to be seen as man's equal...when these very overcompensations just label them as a bunch of masculine wannabees.

    again, it has made my day that this starbucks is the first business i have seen in a while with a staff of all men. i'm not saying that i haven't seen a staff made up entirely of the lesser gender at starbucks stores, but it was definitely a mark of diversity to see an all-man staff in a society where all-female staffs are commonplace.

    i was actually wearing a t-shirt that i had designed online, which highlighted the "lesser" aspect of the lesser gender (two stick figures, one blue and one red, with arrows to signify broadening shoulders versus widening hips...with a bigger barbell next to the blue stick- figure...with the words "bodyheight, bodyweight, bodystrength" above and "all this AND a superior sex drive" below. it was a t-shirt advertising one of my websites (www.thelessergender.com), and it was kind of ironic that members of the lesser gender were nowhere to be found working at starbucks today. i must admit that if staffs consisting entirely of females were nowhere to be found (including at starbucks stores) then i don't think i'd have reason to mock females with my shirts and my websites. however, all-wombn staffs are seen a lot more than all-man staffs, and it is for this reason that i must commend the starbucks corporation for not always contributing to the attitudes of female chauvinism which are omnipresent in today's society. we are a society of chauvinists wanting to placate the lesser gender with over-representations in the workforce and even in the military (which actually compromises our national security like competitors in the "special olympics" would compromise the u..s. olympic team if a quota existed for "equal representation" of the lesser olympians). i remember as a little boy, hearing dolly parton or jane fonda or lily tomlin call dabney coleman a "male chauvinist pig," and though the words "female chauvinist pig" may be unheard of...this is what members of society have become as a result of the placation given to the lesser gender (ie, gender-based quotas in everything from college admissions to a town's police force).

    i must commend starbucks for not contributing to the over-representation of the lesser gender, which seems to exist as a means to further the politically-correct notion of gender-equality...even as competitions are gender-based and therefore prevent the little gender from competing against the strong gender. from military requirements to college sports teams to poker nights at casinos...heck, even to the olympics...it's an accepted fact that one gender would serve as a "handicap" while competing alongside of another gender, and yet society is buying into the "anything a man can do" propaganda of feminism.

    completely unrelated to my experience at starbucks today, i must mention the fact that i just want to crash into any car in front of me if there doesn't appear to be anyone sitting in the driver's seat (while there is someone clearly visible in the passenger's seat because the passenger is big enough to tower over the top of the seat). i don't want to know the kind of values which are going to be instilled in a child who has grown up regarding a member of the milk-spouting, egg-bleeding, shorter, weaker, insufficient, lesser gender as "leader" or "head of the family". this propaganda of "female superiority" is a placebo given to members of the lesser gender as a means to provide them with some unwarranted sense of esteem as a method of psychologically overcoming their inferior states of physical being though means of mental delusion. this propaganda, however, will not provide an adequate level of defense against a slanty-eyed nation which harbors aspirations of world-domination and (therefore) practices infanticide of the gender which can do nothing more than fight like a girl.

    i feel that if more stores (and coffee-shops) would take a cue from starbucks and quit having their professional identities represented by a bunch of milk-spouters and egg-bleeders, then the u.s.a would be properly equipped to regain their #1 status. i say this because society would not be exposed to politically-correct preservations of weakness-masking "pride," as they'd be exposed to reality and truths suggesting that 1) a woman simply cannot do anything a man can do (and has no business thinking that she can) - and 2) any male who is dumbfoundedly curious of masculinity has no sense of masculine gender-identity and therefore cannot be considered a man. the problem with america is compassion. there are too many people who feel it is noble to overlook someone's dysfunctional state of mind through praise and encouragement of it. this is wrong and this is why the u.s.a. is going downhill. everyone is too afraid of being labeled a bigot, so nobody dares to say that gender-changing surgeons should be replaced by mind-changing psychologists. nobody dares to take issue with mexicans in america, nobody dares to take issue with labeling as "strong" anyone who can't budge a 100-pound barbell. nobody dares to take issue with "men" who stare open-mouthed and wide-eyed at naked members of their own gender (and who therefore deny a realization of masculine esteem).

    wrapping up, i will compliment starbucks for being the corporation responsible for the first all-man staff i have seen in a society filled with all-female staffs. there is nothing "greater" about a gender that's largely responsible for shorter people, lighter people, weaker people, and defenseless people who have been given a "violence against us" act as a means of protection. there should be nothing and nobody trying to justify the lesser gender as "greater," either through over-representation in the workplace or in the military or in positions of authority. sometimes even gay "men" want to start to Risk Affirming Patriarchal Endeavors, just to teach these wannabees a lesson.

    dylan terreri, i
    sheldon cooper, ii
    --------------------------
    "When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
    www.jaggedlittledyl.com/essays

    By :
    dylan terreri, i
    - Posted on :
    17/03/2013

Advertising

Videos

Social Europe News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Social Europe Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising