Social Affairs Commissioner Vladimir Spidla and Regional Policy Commissioner Danuta Hübner highlighted the "importance of supporting workers in transition, helping them with active labour-market policies to get another job, and to keep the period without a job as short as possible". They promised help from the European Social Fund, stating that Belgium already received €1.1 billion over the past six years. Commissioner Hübner intends to meet with the relevant regional authorities to discuss how to use the European structural funds to address the consequences of the Volkswagen decision. She also said that the European Investment Bank might play a part in this process.
The Volkswagen workers will not qualify for payment from the new Globalisation Adjustment Fund, as jobs are not moved to a country outside of the EU (for more on this Fund, see EurActiv 1 March 2006).
Volkswagen’s restructuring is the result of increasing competitiveness challenges for European carmakers. The European market (as well as the American) is struggling with overcapacity and the bigger growth markets are in Russia, India and China. The restructuring process is also controversial in Germany, as legal proceedings are beginning against a number of Volkswagen managers accused of having maintained a system of 'slush funds'. Parts of these funds were used for allegedly bribing shop stewards into accepting earlier restructuring measures, including the working-time cuts that are now being withdrawn.
The restructuring was a model for nationwide labour-market reforms, which were inspired by former Volkswagen HR chief Peter Hartz, later a close aide of former German chancellor Gerhard Schröder. The new German labour market model has therefore become known as the 'Hartz reform'. The indictment, for bribery and breaches of the law on European works councils, concerns Hartz also.
To counter the globalisation challenges for European carmakers, the European Commission established a 'Cars 21' expert group which is supposed to produce a "competitive automotive regulatory system for the 21st century".



