EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Special Report: France wins first round of CAP budget battle

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 06 July 2011, updated 08 July 2011

France scored a provisional victory in the battle for the EU's long-term budget last week when the European Commission proposed to leave support for farmers broadly unchanged until 2020. A deal with Germany on regional funds appears to be the key to France's success.

The future of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is a major source of tension between supporters like France and critics such as the UK and the Netherlands.

But a strong lobbying campaign led by Paris – the CAP's single biggest beneficiary – seems to have paid off.

Last week, the European Commission tabled proposals for the EU's 2014-2020 budget which largely leave current farm funding untouched.

"In the current context of economic and budgetary pressure, the European Commission is proposing to maintain CAP spending at 2013 levels," said EU Farm Commissioner Dacian Cioloş.

With member states jostling for different priorities in the EU's long-term spending, it appears that one of the key to the negotiation was the creation of an intermediate category in the regional budget – the second biggest beneficiary of EU spending.

Jean-Paul Denanot, president of the Limousin Regional Council, told EurActiv that according to his understanding, Germany agreed to keep the current CAP budget unchanged in exchange for the introduction of 'transition regions' in the bloc's cohesion policy.

The creation of this intermediate category allows support to continue for Germany's Eastern Länder, which would have otherwise ceased to fulfil the criteria for receiving EU money.

To be eligible for funding as an intermediate region, the GDP of beneficiaries should represent no more than 90% of the EU average - whereas the current 75% threshold would have easily been exceeded by the German Länder since poorer eastern countries joined the EU in 2004 and 2007.

Under the proposed new budget for 2014-2020, German regions will continue to receive financial aid equal to two thirds of the amount they receive currently. Overall, the Commission is proposing to increase the share of regional spending in the 2014-2020 budget from 35% currently to 36.7% (€376 billion).

Smaller share of budget for farmers

Regarding the EU's farm budget as such, things look broadly unchanged although adjustments will be introduced gradually.

While the Commission proposal maintains CAP spending at its 2013 level, overall, farm policy should have a slightly smaller share of the total EU budget.

The Commission proposes to allocate 36.2% (€371.72 billion) of the proposed EU budget to the CAP, compared with 39.4% in the current budget.

Of the €371.72 billion allocated to the CAP, €281.8 billion is earmarked for direct payments and market measures in support of farmers (Pillar 1) – down from €289 billion in the current budget. Over the years, these will gradually decrease – by €42.2 billion in 2014 and by €38 billion in 2020.

The rest of the CAP budget (€89.9 billion) is earmarked for rural development (Pillar 2) – a decrease from the current €96 billion. It is also proposed that annual Pillar 2 budget will fall in stages from €13.6 billion in 2014 to €12 billion in 2020.

30% of CAP payments linked to 'greening' measures

The publication of the Commission's long-term budget proposals last week also sheds some light on the EU's reformed farm policy after 2013.

The Commission proposes to make 30% of direct payments to farmers conditional on "greening" measures such as improving water efficiency and reducing pesticides use. Farmers will also be expected to deliver "public goods" such as biodiversity protection in order to receive their full payment.

"The compulsory greening of direct payments is a fundamental pillar of the reform," the Commission noted, adding that 30% direct payments for environmental measures went beyond mere "cross-compliance".

Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik stressed that the 30% subsidy "needs to be justified by environmental measures".

More money for Eastern farmers, small holdings

The reformed CAP also includes a system of "convergence" to reduce income disparities between farmers in the "old" Western European countries and the newer ones from Central and Eastern Europe.

"All member states with direct payments below 90% of the EU-27 average will, over the period, close one third of the gap between their current level and 90% of the EU average direct payments," according to the EU executive.

The Commission also intends to cap direct income support for the largest agricultural holdings, which it said "receive a disproportionate share of direct income support from the CAP".

Outi Alapekkala

Positions: 

Italian MEP Paolo De Castro (Socialists & Democrats), chairman of the European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, said that the Commission's budget proposal "does not meet the expectations of the Parliament on the new CAP budget at all" and can only be considered as "a starting point" for negotiations between the institutions.

De Castro called the budget proposal "a disguised cut" of the CAP resources. "The so-called freezing based on constant price means a cut of the funds in real terms, in particular for the Single Payment Scheme, for an amount of circa €3 billion a year compared to the current MFF," he added.

EU farmer and agri-cooperatives' lobby Copa-Cogeca welcomed the budget proposal as "a reasonable starting point".

"This is nevertheless a tight budget, especially given the huge challenges facing EU farmers. They are already coping with much more extremes in climatic conditions and market volatility," Copa President Gerd Sonnleiter insisted.

Cogeca President Paolo Bruni stressed that "we are very keen to help farmers to get better returns from the market. For this we need effective measures in the new CAP which will reinforce farmers' position in the food chain. The best way of doing this is by concentrating supply via the development of producer organisations, such as cooperatives. In view of the extreme market volatility, measures to manage agriculture markets are also vital".

Joris Baecke, president of the European Council of Young Farmers (CEJA), welcomed the proposal not to cut the budget of agriculture in the upcoming decade. But the group is urging the EU "to ensure that the proposed budget is allocated in a more equitable fashion".

"The future of European farming will be determined by the decisions being made today, as currently only 6% of European farmers are under the age of 35, and given the high percentage of farmers nearing retirement age, it is imperative that we begin the process of improving these numbers immediately," said Baecke.

The European Landowners' Organisation (ELO) welcomed the Commission’s proposal to reform the CAP by enhancing its sustainability, "although it felt it was short on details".

However, the ELO regrets that the Commission's proposal "cuts annual CAP commitments in constant prices from €59bn in 2013 to €51.3bn in 2020, affecting both Pillars negatively. This implies a fall in the CAP share of the Multiannual Financial Framework from 39% in 2013 to 34% in 2020".

While the ELO shares the objectives of more equitable distribution of direct farm support and fairer treatment of farmers performing the same activities, it does not agree with "capping" direct farm payments, in particular those that relate to the provision of public goods, such as food and environmental security, because it says that will encourage farms to split and hence weaken farm consolidation and competitiveness.

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB), an NGO, regretted that "the budget for rural development - which includes the most advanced environmental schemes under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) - will continue to remain disproportionately small compared to the amount of money handed out directly to farmers".

The EEB fears that the suggested 30% share of the CAP direct payments in support of sustainable agricultural practice "will not be enough to ensure more farmers follow these good practices in order to receive EU taxpayers' money".

Matthias Meissner, coordinator of the WWF's CAP team, said that "the Commission's proposal on CAP is still risky. Devoting 30% of direct payments (Pillar 1) to the environment is a positive step although the devil will be in the details to avoid mere window dressing. Failing to clearly state that rural development (Pillar 2) will not be sacrificed to maintain direct payments for farmers (Pillar 1), still puts environmental protection at risk. The Commission needs to propose strong targeted agri-environmental measures in the second pillar to restore the environment".

The European confederation of relief and development NGOs (CONCORD) noted that "the 'reduction' (in real terms) of the CAP budget to 36.2% in the 2014-2020 EU Multiannual Financial Framework does not necessarily induce a reduction of the CAP's external impacts, particularly for developing countries".

"The EU has a global responsibility to promote a sustainable model of agriculture in Europe, while minimising the harmful impacts for smallholder farmers, who represent 85% of the agricultural sector in developing countries," the confederation added.

Next steps: 
  • Autumn/Nov. 2011: Presentation of legislative proposals for reform of CAP.
Background: 

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is a system of EU agricultural subsidies and programmes, which according to the European Commission costs each EU citizen around 30 eurocents a day.

At around €53 billion a year, the CAP currently represents some 40% of the EU's long-term budget for 2007-2013, compared to nearly 71% in 1984. The EU executive expects the figure to fall to 33% in 2013.

The majority (over 70%) of CAP spending goes to direct payments for farmers, while some 20% of the CAP budget is spent on rural development measures. The rest is handed out as export subsidies to food companies.

France is the biggest beneficiary of the policy by around 20%, followed by Germany and Spain (~13% each), Italy (~11%) and the UK (~9%).

The CAP budget is set every year by member states and the European Parliament in the framework of the EU's long-term budget.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 2

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising