EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU businesses urge leaders to cut 'green tape'

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 15 May 2013

European companies’ competitiveness is hampered by unnecessary burdensome legislative instruments in climate, energy and environment and policymakers must rebalance industrial strategies towards manufacturing, BusinessEurope president Jürgen Thumann said in an interview with EurActiv. The European Business Summit (EBS) begins today (15 May).

With Europe’s manufacturing output now 10% lower than before the crisis, the prosperity of the continent is at risk and “has been left unaddressed by policy-makers for a too long time,” Thumann said.

If the Commission is to fulfil its aim of returning European industry to 20% of total GDP – it now stands at 16% – then improving access to finance and better translating skills into employment are priorities for politicians, Thumann said.

The clear priority to boost productivity that BusinessEurope is highlighting is the need for the EU to reassess its approach to energy policy however, said the former head of the German employers’ organization BDI.

"European companies are suffering from the negative effects of green tape," said Thumann, slamming the Commission for its inclination to develop 'unnecessary burdensome legislative instruments in climate, energy and environment policies.'

European business is carrying the burden for the world

“We need to learn from the high cost lessons of the current EU policy while taking “game changers” - like the shale gas revolution and the very limited progress in global climate talks - into account,” the business chief said, without directly endorsing shale exploration.

He said that unless energy policy is “cost-competitive, reliable and climate-friendly”, Europe will not achieve its 20% industrial GDP target nor its 2020 climate targets.

European companies are carrying the burden of global regulation, when Europe’s share of total global greenhouse gas emissions is just 10% to 11%, Thumann said.

“The costly EU climate policies and our unilateral approach have not led to the success of the ‘leadership by example’ role that the European Commission had promised,” he added.

Thumann insisted that European companies remain committed to the fight against climate change, but added: “In the light of the lacklustre results from UN climate negotiations, the EU must rethink its own energy and climate policies."

Technology is the solution

Technology should be the driving force to deliver on energy cost-competitiveness, security of supply and climate action with the ambition of maintaining a strong industrial base in Europe.

Thumann’s message is likely to be repeated by other business figures at the business summit (15-16 May) which will see businessmen mix with Europe’s leading policymakers, including Commission President José Manuel Barroso and Council President Herman Van Rompuy.

Two of the summit’s key sessions will directly address the energy policy issue, one addressing energy as a “driver for growth”, and another “shale gas and the future of energy in Europe”.

The summit will give business leaders the chance to add their voices to a growing political chorus demanding rebalancing of Europe’s climate policies.

EU leaders will grapple with controversial issues including shale gas development and climate change mitigation at an energy summit on 22 May, when they meet to discuss how to lower energy prices and improve the Union’s industrial competitiveness.  

The Draft Conclusions say that the EU's goal is to ensure “a level playing field for business and industry”, so they can compete in the global marketplace, having regard inter alia to the impact of carbon leakage.”

Trade and materials also on the agenda

“Carbon leakage" is jargon for the relocation of European businesses abroad because of the comparative advantage they may gain from looser climate regimes.

Leaders are also expected to task the Commission to assess a “more systematic recourse to indigenous sources of energy, both conventional and unconventional”.

Unconventional sources usually refer to shale gas, which many believe has triggered an industrial revival in the USA, but is viewed with suspicion by several EU countries.

Other key issues on the agenda of today’s business summit are trade policy and Europe’s supply of raw materials and resources.

“Europe is import dependent on almost all industrial raw materials so we need to ensure free trade and open markets globally,” Thumann said in the interview.

To read the full interview, please click here.

Next steps: 
  • 15-16 May: European Business Summit
Daniela Vincenti and Jeremy Fleming

COMMENTS

  • With this kind of outrageously self serving and ultimately suicidal stated position, how can anyone still take Jürgen Thumann and the other spoilt brats at Business Europe Seriously? He is obviously not very bright but at minimum he should be able to grasp the meaning of this headline:
    UN's climate chief: World has entered new CO2 'danger zone'

    (AFP) – 2 days ago

    PARIS — The world has entered a "new danger zone" with levels of Earth-warming carbon dioxide in the atmosphere never experienced by humankind, the UN's climate chief warned Monday.

    By :
    courant didees
    - Posted on :
    16/05/2013
  • Mr Didees, it is usually better to go for what Mr Thumann says rather than attacking his intellectual capabilities (or indeed lack thereof).

    "European companies are suffering from the negative effects of green tape," Ok Mr Thurmann, I was waiting for examples – to substantiate your assertion. Sadly although I searched the article there were none.

    Another assertion: "We need to learn from the high cost lessons of the current EU policy" perhaps Mr Thumann would care to substantiate? – hmmm thought not.

    Or this: "unless energy policy is “cost-competitive, reliable and climate-friendly" well, taking one example, on-shore wind LCOEs are identical to those of a CCGTs. Companies are perfectly at liberty to erect their own, for example, wind turbines – one of BE's members – Michelin did so in Northern Ireland and others are doing so all over Europe – what's not to like with that?. Capital cost of a wind turbine and its connection works out at something under 2 euro cents/kWhr – bolt in IRR of say 4% (for example) and you are at around 3 euro cents which is one third the price of industrial power in Germany, the UK etc. Perhaps Mr Thumann is unfamiliar with these numbers?

    "European companies are carrying the burden of global regulation" come on Mr Thumann, first it was Euro regulation now its global – do make your mind up.

    With respect to "carbon leakage" the solution is staring you in the face Mr Thumann – border carbon taxes, or would taking this approach leave BE with no wiggle room for the unsubstantiated synchronised whining that it has honed in to an art form.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    16/05/2013
  • Mike
    You are entirely correct. I guess I was simply exasperated that I should be expected to swallow this self serving drivel from someone who is there merely by inheritance(not unlike his predecessors at that post). I am glad that someone makes the effort to point out the contradictions and lack of evidence though.. thanks for that..
    That said.. given how bad things are.. People like J Thurmann are no longer just an annoyance..

    By :
    courant didees
    - Posted on :
    17/05/2013
  • Of course Mike without EU green energy regs you would be out of a job, a declaration of interest would have been nice. Notwithstanding, reading the comments I would say it was you doing the most whining.

    CO2 increases crop yields; as the earth hasn't warmed for 16 years (IPCC statement) and is starting to enter a cooling phase we need as much of it as we can get!

    By :
    Heatoreatuk
    - Posted on :
    17/05/2013
  • Heatoreat - as an engineer I have zero problem finding a job - indeed I have been offered several this year some of them unconnected with renewables. I notice you did not address the points I made (generate your own energy - cheap and for the most part easy).

    Instead you come out with an unreferenced comment from the IPCC. Since it is clear that you are a climate warming denier there is little point in getting into a debate. 400ppm and rising none so blind as those who cann't & won't see etc.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    17/05/2013

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 2

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising