EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Risk of EU contemplation regarding Ukraine

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 20 July 2012, updated 23 July 2012

In the present agenda of cooperation between the EU and Ukraine, it makes no sense to discuss visa liberalisation, argues Viktor Tkachuk.

Viktor Tkachuk is director-general of the Ukrainian Foundation for Democracy - 'People First'.

"The EU has found itself in a situation where it does not have a model for development. The proof of this is the current deterioration of the economic recession and the ineffective work of the all-European political institutes. The economy in the European Union countries has ceased to provide financing for integration-related processes.

The EU also lacks models to support economic integration. Instead, we see attempts of centralising management through financial assistance. This causes the political crisis.

Management centralisation destroys the consideration of the national, political, economic and mental culture in the EU. In such a situation, the vision of further integration both inside the European Union and outside on the borders of its member states is absent. The vision is determined but also hidden behind democratic monitoring. The EU has chosen passive observation, instead of active actions.

The lack of an internal model for development is also causing problems in the relationship with Ukraine.  

In the present agenda of cooperation between the EU and Ukraine, it makes no sense to discuss the topic of visa liberalisation. Ukraine’s citizens have to play by the existing rules.

What is a key moment in this situation? Today, only the understanding of human needs among citizens of Europe and Ukraine is determinative. Europe and Ukraine are united today by the identical matrix of human aspirations; this being health and family, medicine and education, work and safety, transparency of state budget and the authorities' accountability. The basic needs for both Europeans and Ukrainians are identical.  

Therefore, it's necessary that the European politicians start to develop a new platform for dialogue with Ukraine. It is very acute. If these intentions aren't declared at least by September of this year, then Russian and American energy corporations will sign a contract on 'product' distribution in November, where Ukraine will be playing the role of product.

China also wants its share of the Ukrainian market and it has already started to make considerable investments in Ukrainian agriculture and in the energy sector (consisting of coal and gas).  

Who is the most interested opponent in the development of a new platform for EU-Ukraine relations? Most probably Sweden, Poland, Lithuania, Germany and the Czech Republic – the countries that have historic connections to Ukraine. These states have a great interest in a democratic and highly developed Ukrainian state in their neighbourhood.  

European contemplation can develop into two scenarios:

  • The pessimistic scenario: Parliamentary elections in Ukraine on 28 October this year will become the last political act of post-Soviet reflection. The corrupt authorities will receive an absolute victory and Ukraine will be back in the year of 1933.
  • An 'optimistic scenario' will bring Russian style political culture to EU's borders this year, as those would become dominant in Ukraine's politics.

The choice of the EU's strategy of contemplation when it comes to Ukraine remains open."

COMMENTS

  • The EU does not have a strategy of 'contemplation' this is merely a residual effect of the EU's existential crisis. The Paralysis and spasmodic movements within its political structures will continue for the next decade. Either a federal state will emerge at the EU's centre or the EU will implode leaving only a free trade zone behind(if that). As for the Ukraine its leaders would be well advised to wait until it is clearer where the EU is actually headed. Buying a pig in a poke hasn't been the fashion since the Middle Ages.

    By :
    Babeouf
    - Posted on :
    23/07/2012
  • The year !! 2020 and Ukraine is under the soviet union again....led by a puppet of Russia,,,Yanko.
    this is not a bad thing as Ukraine people want notjing different, they are living in the past and remain in the past....good luck to them as the E U can not survive another 10 years.

    By :
    gary
    - Posted on :
    26/07/2012
  • The EU has enough on its plate with the present 27 members. Too fast expansion without the NECESSARY constitution to replace an inadequate "treaty" has led to a situation where ONLY one (of 27) members can thwart by veto, necessary arrangements amongst members.

    Does anyone think that expanding the VETO to 28, 29, 30, ...&c is the way forward?

    Opting in and/or opting out is the second problem that needs urgent attention.

    The Schengen visa-border control is an example: it EXcludes some EU members but INcludes outsiders also makes a mockery of "union".

    Dittto the Euro; while individual countries might be wise to have their own INTERNAL currency, The EURO ought to be Mandatory for ALL dealings BETWEEN member states. I.e Poland-Czech, Britain-Hungary.

    Ukraine is wise not to be in any hurry for EU membership. As Viktor Trachuk points out, while their are many common ideals and objectives the same route to Shangri-la for all is not necessarily available.

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    27/07/2012

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Europe's East News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Europe's East Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising