EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Ukraine: Not Iceland?

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 11 March 2012, updated 13 March 2012

Iceland and Ukraine, two countries that aim at joining the EU and that both had their former leaders prosecuted for abuse of authority, seem to be treated in a completely different way, writes Kost Bondarenko of the Institute of Ukrainian Politics.

Kost Bondarenko is a historian and political scientist. He is also the head of the Institute of Ukrainian Politics in Kyiv.

"In Iceland the former prime minister is facing trial, not for corruption, but for negligence in connection with the handling of the country's financial crisis in 2008. Geir Haarde risks being put behind bars for two years. Ironically, Iceland, like Ukraine, has set the goal to join the European Union.

I wonder whether Brussels protects Haarde as well as Ukraine's Yulia Tymoshenko, since the former was the leader of the opposition - the Independence party - and the charges against him are politically motivated?

However, the Independence party is not an observer in the European People's Party. Haarde does not wear braid, he is not a fan of expensive clothing brands, and he is not a woman. He did not deliver speeches at Maidan. He did not trade natural gas and was not involved in the process of primary accumulation of capital. This is where he is different from Tymoshenko, the former Ukrainian prime minister jailed for abusing her powers.

But there are certain principles, right?

I think if European politicians are not hypocrites, we now have to see the statements of Martens, Brok, Heller, Tannock, Roitova and others to protect Haarde. Several resolutions of the European Parliament should appear to express concerns regarding the level of democracy in Iceland.

Opposition tents should appear at the court building in Reykjavik with Haarde portraits and slogans: “He did not give up!”, "He works! He is Iceland!", "Justice is worth fighting for!". President Ólafur Ragnar Grimsson should be declared dictator and ignored in European countries (Of course! He has led the country for four terms!).

Ambassadors of European states should sit in the hall of some district court and listen as the judge presides over the court. Then there should be a statement that the European future of Iceland directly depends on charges being dropped against Haarde and his inclusion into the political process. There also should be an article in The New York Times signed by the five foreign ministers under the header "Iceland's Slide".

Similarly, Russia should express concern - President-elect Vladimir Putin should protest concerning the trial of former Prime Minister Haarde.

And Hillary Clinton should protest against political oppression. And Haarde will become a candidate for the Nobel Prize.

After all, if we were to be consistent, we should be consistent to the end.

But for some reason now I want to paraphrase well-known Ukrainian poet Pavlo Tychyna:

"To whom we talk?

Havel is in grave, Barroso is silent".

COMMENTS

  • In Ukraine we have a problem with prostitution. No, I am not talking about the hiring of women by men for sexual pleasure, though this problem is also serious and exists. I am talking about the hiring of political commentators by politicians to write and say whatever garbage they are paid to say. Mr. Kost Bondarenko is a good example of such a prostitute.
    Only a lackey and prostitute of the Ukrainian government could possibly compare Iceland and Ukraine and say that the situations are identical.
    Iceland is a strong democracy. Ukraine is a strong authoritarian regime. Iceland has a free press. Ukraine's press is under attack and not free. Iceland practices the rule of law and has an independent judiciary. Ukraine practices the rule of criminal gangs who happen to be the government and fully control the judiciary. This is not an exaggeration. President Yanukovich twice went to jail for his past criminal actions. If there were a truly independent judiciary and prosecutor in Ukraine, he would be sitting in jail right now. We can start with how he tried to steal the presidential elections which led to the Orange Revolution. We can continue with the land grabs and illegal and corrupt privatizations which he has allowed and himself carried out. His greatest financier and Ukraine's leading oligarch, Rinat Akhmetov, is known to have become the richest man in Ukraine by brutally eliminating (i.e. killing) his business partners and opponents. The Italian mafia are daycare kids in comparison.
    The trial of Yulia Tymoshenko, was a complete judicial sham which does not correspond to judicial norms of any civilized country. In fact, even Ukrainian laws and norms were broken during the trial. Although, it is somewhat odd that Mr. Geir Haarde is being prosecuted for his part in the economic collapse of Iceland, the trial will most certainly be fair and the outcome is not predetermined. Yulia Tymoshenko had no chance to win her trial from the very beginning.
    However, there is one positive aspect of Yulia Tymoshenko being sent to jail. There was an unwritten rule among Ukrainian politicians that regardless of their crimes, they would not be prosecuted. Although one of the slogans of the Orange Revolution was: "Bandits will go to jail!", none actually did. Hopefully, the jailing of Yulia Tymoshenko will convince the Ukrainian opposition that the time has come to put this slogan into practice once they form the next government. Of course, given Ukraine’s present authoritarian course and quashing of democracy, this may take a while.

    By :
    Bob
    - Posted on :
    13/03/2012
  • Just compare the punishment. The iceland's former PM is threatened with a 2-yr jail sentence. Tymoshenko IS serving 7 years, plus 3 years denial of participation of election, plus $187+/- million in damages.

    Then you need to compare actual imprisonment conditions between the two countries. Tymoshenko is currently suffering from back pains that require hospitalization that he Ukrainian authorities deny.

    Then you need to look into respective cabinet ministers, the Ukrainian counterparts that are now imprisoned or exiled.

    Two totally different situations here:
    One is the charge of incompetence, the other... politically motivated, with charges stemming back more than a decade that had already been dismissed.

    By :
    Frederick C. Lee
    - Posted on :
    13/03/2012
  • Bob got it exactly right.

    Paid propagandists like Kost Bondarenko repeat the same old thing over and over and over again, including the falsehoods that "Ukraine is just like Iceland, Norway, Sweden, England, Germany, France" and on and on and on.

    The one crucial thing that Kost Bondarenko left out of his paid sovok mafia thug propaganda - and it is precisely that - is that Iceland does not have a stalinist criminal code, and a stalinist show trial kangaroo court system.

    But Ukraine does.

    Party of Regions adherents went to extraordinatry lengths to try to convince people that Article 365 of the Criminal Code in Ukraine, which stems from stalinist times, is "just like" statutes in Iceland and France and elsewhere.

    Article 365 says that a person can be convicted for "exceeding the government" - перевищення влади.

    The vagueness, of course, was intentional. That way, stalin and his political henchmen in a stalinist show trial system could get it to mean whatever they wanted it to mean - and eliminate political enemies.

    To use Kost Bondarenko's own twisted, perverted "logic," if Kost Bondarenko wore a braid, I might believe him.

    But I don't - and even the sovok mafia thugs for whom he works don't believe him.

    They're throwing "spaghetti" against the wall to see if any of it sticks, to see if they can fool anyone.

    Kost Bondarenko is not fooling anyone, except himself.

    By :
    elmer
    - Posted on :
    13/03/2012
  • This is unbelivable. One can not compare Iceland, which is democratic western country and Ukraine, which is non-democratic (crimminalized) soviet style country. If politician in Iceland would behave like the one in Ukraine; they would all be in jail. Criminality is exception in Iceland while it is THE NORM in Ukraine and other soviet states.

    By :
    ED
    - Posted on :
    14/03/2012
  • The former prime minister of Iceland is standing trial before the Landsdómur, a special tribunal assembled to hear cases alleging misconduct in government office. It will be the first time Landsdómur has convened since it was established in the 1905 Constitution.

    Landsdómur has 15 members — five supreme court justices, a district court president, a constitutional law professor and eight people chosen by parliament every six years.
    Whatever the final result, the trial will certainly be fair and unbiassed.

    In contrast, Yulia Tymoshenko was tried before a lone novice judge in a shoebox of a courtroom where conditions were described as 'inhuman'. In a western trial she would have been allowed to call defence witnesses and the prosecutor's evidence subjected to absolute scrutiny. By European standards the trial was a farce.

    This is why European politicians consider it to be a parody of justice - it is Kost Bondarenko who is the hypocrite here..

    By :
    LEvko
    - Posted on :
    14/03/2012
  • "Only a lackey and prostitute of the Ukrainian government could possibly compare Iceland and Ukraine and say that the situations are identical".

    He didn't say this. He said there's a huge difference in the reaction to the trial of a former Prime Minister. One of the criticisms of the trial of Tymoshenko was that a poltician should not be tried for harmful policy or negligence but only for criminality and here the Icelandic PM is being tried for negligence. Other Ukranian journalists (inclulding those opposed to the current regime) are writing against the elevation of Tymoschenko to some kind of martyr, (albeit with the odd qualification that she's not saint either) because, it seems she's charasmatic, a friend of some European parliamentarians, and she's supposed to be pro-western. Europeans kept silent about all the other abuses leading to the feeling, at best, that engagement with Ukraine is window-dressing, unsustained, indifferent to whether there is democracy or not so long as there is "stability" and secondary to their more pressing interests which is their relations with Moscow.

    By :
    \"Jם
    - Posted on :
    14/03/2012
  • "The former prime minister of Iceland is standing trial before the Landsdómur, a special tribunal assembled to hear cases alleging misconduct in government office. It will be the first time Landsdómur has convened since it was established in the 1905 Constitution."

    Interesting. Imagine the Ukraine government convening a body that was established in 1905 and had never sat once in its history of more than a hundred years to try their former PM. What a deluge of critisism would have followed.

    By :
    \"Jם
    - Posted on :
    14/03/2012
  • Can an article also be "flagged as abusive"?

    By :
    Charles
    - Posted on :
    16/03/2012

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising