EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Ukrainian corruption overcomes European bureaucracy

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 23 November 2012, updated 26 November 2012

The simple expectation from the Ukrainian authorities that the EU won't let Ukraine transformation into a new Belarus allows the current Ukrainian administration to manipulate the position of official Brussels in favour of itself, says Viktor Tkachuk.

Viktor Tkachuk is general director of the Ukrainian Foundation for Democracy "People First".

"The management of leading countries and heads of the central bodies of the EU have no development strategy for the relations with Ukraine.

This has led to the situation that despite the expected non-democratic parliamentary elections in Ukraine, the European Union has nothing else left, but to continue an ineffective dialogue with official Kyiv.

It bears serious risks for the EU countries. First of all, this means confrontation between the Ukrainian "grey capital" and European clean capital. The area of influence of the Ukrainian "grey" assets moves to the west on the territory of the EU countries more tangibly.

The expansion has positive moments - taxes and workplaces in the EU. But there are negative factors as well - for example more corruption in the EU, which already has a higher degree now due to the active phase of the financial and economic crisis. According to official figures, over 1 billion dollars "escape" from Ukraine every month - mainly under the jurisdiction of the EU countries.

The myth that Ukraine will develop too close relations with Russia, in case of a tough line coming from the EU, has a considerable destructive effect.

In reality everything is the other way around. The current Ukrainian authorities which have close connections to big Ukrainian businesses, especially in the heavy industry, metallurgy and chemical manufacturing sectors, will always act extremely carefully concerning Russia.

This especially has to do with political and economic integration projects - the Customs Union and Common Economic Space.

Ukrainian big businesses and politicians clearly understand that in case of free access for  Russian capital to Ukrainian territory, they will get new competitors which will absorb them for sure. And it will only take half a year or a whole year at the most.

It will mean a loss of influence for the big Ukrainian businesses and a gradual loss of assets and possibilities. Will they go for it? Doubtfully. Exactly this is the reason why there are no really close relations between the presidents of Ukraine and Russia.

The present imbalance in the Russian political sphere makes the Ukrainian politicians confident that the Russian Federation isn’t able to essentially affect the situation in Ukraine. The Ukrainian authorities have definitively lost illusions in terms of the cheap Russian gas and perceive the present price as a constant, playing on pushing Russia out of the Ukrainian gas market.

What should we think of closer ties with Moscow under such circumstances? The EU should not cherish this illusion anymore. Maybe officials from Brussels simply use this myth, so that they don't have to do anything.

Now a general scheme of actions of the European Union towards Ukraine in the present post-electoral situation become clear. The next step is the Ukraine-EU Summit. They will predictably show "a yellow card" to the Ukrainian leadership there, but will offer a way for the further development of relations.

The Eastern Partnership Summit in November in 2013 which will take place in Vilnius under the Lithuanian presidency will become the second step. Proceeding from the last statements of the Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, this summit can become the event where the Association Agreement with Ukraine may be signed.

It will mean transferring the Ukraine-EU relations into the format of bilateral agreements with each of the 27 member countries and they will put forward their own demands of Ukraine, different from those coming from Brussels.

To successfully go through this phase of relations with the EU, the current Ukrainian authorities will need an experienced and effective team of diplomats on the European direction which meanwhile is absent. A real start of the process of economic reforms and democracy development in Ukraine will be necessary.

Only in such conditions, it will be possible to speak about the minimum chances of signing and ratifying the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU and the further euro integrational prospects for Kyiv. At least after 2020.

Deaf “authoritative” defense of the current Ukrainian administration with the latent isolation from the West, irritation of Moscow, and what’s the main thing, the growing protest coming from its own population can be the alternative to this.

Only the course towards democracy development in Ukraine can rescue the current Ukrainian administration from the failure of its policy and personal prospects.

It can be a win-win game. But, unfortunately, neither Kyiv, nor Brussels are able to play it today. Motives are different - the essence is single. Private interests."   

COMMENTS

  • It is striking to see the number of articles on Euractiv recently criticising Ukraine and EU-Ukraine relations. I guess the opposition pays well to disseminate its propaganda. No wonder no-one no longer considers Euractiv as a trustworthy source these days..

    By :
    Pravda
    - Posted on :
    23/11/2012
  • I am not surprised that Mr Tkachuk's one sided opinions are published by Euractiv without any critical analysis or objective commentary. This is because his Foundation pays a sponsorship fee to Euractiv, and this gives him the privilege to publish his opinionated comments as advertorials. The truth is different. The Ukrainian authorities are trying to stimulate a stronger business dialogue and to encourage businesses of all sizes to promote a more positive business environment in the country that will attract foreign direct investment. Instead of shooting derogatory opinionated and ill-informed missiles from his NGO ivory tower, Mr Tkachuk would be better advised to speak to business and reconsider what his organisation can do to support those agencies that are trying hard to develop a positive business climate and image for Ukraine.

    By :
    James Wilson
    - Posted on :
    23/11/2012
  • Dear Mr (or Mrs?) Anonymous… oh, pardon, «Pravda»!
    First of all, it is mauvais ton to accuse somebody of being bribed when hiding under pseudonym.
    Secondly, it is also a bad manner to blame others in propaganda dissemination while giving no arguments of your own.
    Thirdly, criticizing Ukrainian authorities and criticizing Ukraine are not the same things. It is a core principle of the People First Foundation (pls, check http://www.euractiv.com/europes-east/tymoshenko-case-dont-confuse-peo-analysis-508495).
    Fourthly, don’t you think that EurActiv would be rather considered as untrustworthy media writing that it is everything OK in EU-Ukraine relations while 2012 elapses without yearly bilateral summit?
    Fifthly, these days perhaps only the European Center for Modern Ukraine co-founded by Leonid Kozhara, deputy head of President Viktor Yanukovych's Party of Regions, can write about Ukrainian authorities well on EurActiv and only in guest blog. The Ukrainian ambassador in Brussels Kostiantyn Yelisieiev in his turn just does his job pleading to the Europeans to accept Ukraine “as is”.

    PS
    “Pravda” in Ukrainian means “truth”. Pure Truth has nothing to hide by the closed visor.

    Regards
    Volodymyr Mishchenko
    peoplefirst.org.ua

    By :
    Ukrainian Foundation for Democracy "People First"
    - Posted on :
    23/11/2012
  • Dear Mr Wilson!
    Thank you for your comment. It prompts me to make some remarks.
    Firstly, the cooperation between People First Foundation (PFF) and EurActiv is a “secret de Polichinelle”. Everyone can find our logo on the main page as well as on the “Europe’s East” section page.
    Our authors submit their materials to EurActiv in form of opinion or analysis which you can agree or disagree with. But you should take into account that our analysis is fact-driven. If you want to dispute on it, please, give your arguments first.
    You argue that Ukrainian authorities are making considerable efforts to support national businesses irrespectively of their size. Then how can you comment that about 250 thousand Ukrainian SMEs disappeared within just a year (2011) due to repressive tax policy? (http://bit.ly/TiyZC1) More facts about Ukrainian Government “performance” in 2011 you can find in our weekly “Democracy Watch” (www.peoplefirst.org.ua/en/articles/issue-02-2012)
    To avoid any doubts that People First Foundation criticizes Ukrainian authorities due to great respect to their rivals we recommend you to track or publications carefully. We consider both power (www.peoplefirst.org.ua/ru/articles/issue-29-2012) and opposition (www.peoplefirst.org.ua/ru/articles/issue-27-2012) responsible for current critical situation in Ukraine.
    We warmly welcome you and your colleagues from EU-Ukraine Business Council etc. to submit your opinion and comment our articles on PFF’s web-site and Facebook page and here on EurActiv.

    Volodymyr Mishchenko
    peoplefirst.org.ua

    By :
    Ukrainian Foundation for Democracy "People First"
    - Posted on :
    27/11/2012
  • I confirm that EurActiv journalists a) distinguish between articles they write, and the Opinions from external authors that they (or BlogActiv) publishes b) always aim to be fact based and balanced. If not in a given article, then over time c) welcome other views.

    This reaction is written by EurActiv's founder: not a journalist myself, but having followed EU-Ukraine relations for several years, and met a number of relevant actors, from NGOs, media, opposition and government. A search on Ukraine's coverage will show that EurActiv has also published many interviews and other views from government, as it should.

    This is a lively and healthy debate. Not entirely different from the one triggered by coverage of 'domestic EU topics' (see today comments on UK trying to curt eurocrats' salaries). Indeed, it's a feature of democracy to have such discussions.

    By :
    Christophe Leclercq
    - Posted on :
    27/11/2012

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising