“Current EU policy does not sufficiently support the cultivation of GMO-free soy products, despite a clear demand for GMO-free food by the consumer,” Deryckere told EurActiv in an interview.
“66% of the EU citizens are worried about GM in food and drinks, and thirdly European labelling rules are not yet fully harmonised across EU member states, which may result in consumer confusion,” he said, referring to a 2010 Eurobarometer survey on food-related risks.
Another Eurobarometer, from the same year, showed that 61% of Europeans did not think that the development of GMOs should be promoted.
The European Union currently has a system requiring companies to label their products if they contain more than 0.9% GMOs. But Deryckere believes that it is unfair that the scheme does not take into account feed for animal-based products.
Bart Staes, a Belgian Green MEP, said at a conference organised by ENSA on Wednesday (4 November): “85% of imported soy feed for animals contains GMOs”.
Green MEPs have pushed for specific “GMO-free” labels to apply across the European Union.
A number of companies have introduced voluntary GMO-free labels, including Belgian soy manufacturer Alpro, a member company of ENSA.
In February this year, ENSA sent a position paper to the European Commission calling for "harmonised rules on the use of GMO-free labels on foodstuffs at EU level".
At the moment, some European countries have decided to introduce their own national labelling regimes, but they are considerably different.
In Finland, a product must be 100% GMO-free to qualify for the label, whereas Germany permits under 0.1%. In France, vegetable-based products with under 0.1% GMO can qualify for the label.
However, to the European Commission, that the harmonisation of labels was not so simple. “There is a split majority on the issue,” said Werner Bosmans, an official in the Commission’s environment directorate.
Deryckere also supports the harmonisation of other food labels, including a product's impact on people's health and the environment.